Recently European Comr. for Agriculture, Dacion Ciolos, has said, "any business that relies upon subsidies (grants, tax breaks) is NOT A REAL BUSINESS." (Oh dear, that's practically every Third Sector set up!)
How evil is the Hegelian Dialectic deceit of Communitarianism?
A friend recently emailed me this:
“…an email I wrote - "I may be barking but have you noticed all the incinerators going up - makes you wonder"
but I erased it as you might think I was/am loony…”
My reply was, “No, I would never think you are a loony. Are you kind? Do you care? Yes of course you do, – you are not nuts! Otherwise you would be selfishly indulging yourself watching football or playing silly computer games, etc. in other words “Fiddling while Rome burns”, that’s nuts!
But no – instead, like me you are scaring yourself half to death studying the weirdest, maddest info. Why? So you can try and do something to stop it. So you can inform and warn others. We do live in a mad world, but we are not the mad ones.
If you are mad, then so are we all. The thing is, our government is doing, and the main opposition parties are allowing, such insane stuff – we look bonkers when we discover it and bring it up, and talk or write about it.
Who would believe in their wildest dreams this mad Fabian, Communitarian, Common Purpose plot? Who would believe anyone could plan and carry out such wicked things? Acts so evil they are unimaginable to the normal person? That is the problem…”
And then I sent these links about just who isliterally insane,
It can be incredibly difficult and very disturbing dealing with the reality of the facts we are uncovering, even the brightest truthers struggle at times.It ranges anything from being made to feel foolish through ridicule because of people’s disbelief, through very real fear for one’s own safety - Alex Jones admits to frequently lying awake in bed sweating and worrying. Alan Watt has admitted fear and feels watched and persecuted on occasions. Brian Gerrish has spoken, in one of his talks, of the possibility of his being murdered by the establishment. Ultimately, there is fear for one’s country and what the future holds for all the ordinary people if the Communitarian looney's are not stopped by honest, rational people like us.
Here, Niki Raapana opens up her heart and recalls:
“..Everytime I thought about the gertee tour I cracked up laughing at the idea of me actually leaving my sanctuary and going into the most depressed places in the US. No wonder I stopped writing the book last year. This book is going to change my life in ways I can't imagine... and it's not fear that blocks me.. it's contentment in my current situation. I have so little in the way of food, drink and convienences, but I love my rustic little space in CampRedington and I have healed myself here. Learning all the terrible things about globalism and the planned wrecking of the US economy knocked the wind right out of me. I've come 6 long years away from reading, studying and writing letters all night, going to meetings, posting flyers on my fence, and walking back and forth to the Seattle Dawson attorneys with copies of my hard won FOIAs. I never want to go back to being that flipped out and driven... but I have to find some drive to get this going.
I'm really looking forward to face meeting the friends I have made through the ACL and seeing my old friends who knew me before, as Nordica used to say, I took on the whole US government.I was so depressed winter 2002 when I went camping at John's pond in Hannsville, working like mad on the timelines for the lawyers, almost starving to death before my friend Patty made me come stay at her house in Kent. Wyoming was a grand interlude, but by the time we returned to Anchorage in 2005, I was lost. It wasn't until I came to the Basin in 2006 that I was able to actually finish 2020: Our Common Destiny. I camped here for that winter in a freezing wall tent dreaming about making gertees, and somehow my spirit for life returned. I found happiness again. Gertee, like my Nordica, saved my life. Maybe it can save others' too. I'll never know unless I take it to them…” takenfrom:
This is a war! We are in a war! We are at war! The Fabian Communitarians started it.
It is a war against people!
There is a lot at stake, in fact - everything is at stake!
Things are going to get a whole lot nastier, probably quite soon.
Do you know that the Muslim religion, not only permits but also, actually encourages its followers to lie, cheat and steal in relation to non-muslims. This is called Dhimmitude!
This is a fact! Research and look it up for yourself if you find this hard to believe and,
[By the way, where does this leave our courts in relation to Muslims in the dock who take an oath - whether on the Koran, Bible or just affirming?Our Judeo-Christian courts are a joke to muslims who laugh up their sleeves because our main legal principle of truth does not apply to them. How utterly hilarious! All they are ever actually promising to do is tell the truth to fellow Muslims, as Mohamed instructed.They can still happily lie to Christians, Jews and everybody else in court and not be damned one bit in the eyes of their religion!]
Slimey Ed loads-a-money Balls, the Schools Secretary,
has misleadingly compared the head mistress of an Muslim independent school in Slough, who admits to having been until recently, an active and contributing member of Muslim extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT), to teachers in Britain who may have BNP membership.
Now let’s be grown-up here!
Let’s be mature, Christian and honest here!
Love them or loathe them, the fact remains that the BNP do not support or encourage violence, and/or psychopathic, maniacal bombing campaigns and suicide bombers.They never have.In fact the BNP is totally opposed to the current wars in the Middle East.Sorry, but it is absolutely true,so get used to it!
Ball’s comparison is sly, dishonest and totally false!
It demonstrates what we all suspect - that Balls is a deceiver, a liar!
It would have actually been much more accurate for him to compare loathsome head teacher, Farah Ahmed, to an ex IRA member or supporter.Just as we would not wish to see a person connected to the violent and extremist IRA as a school teacher, head or school governor, the fact that we have people associated, or previously associated with, the organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir teaching and influencing young people, and/or heading up“charities” to fund schools and education, is equally disturbing.It is a potentially dangerous situation in need of investigation and should be sorted out - right now!
Did this school’s governors know of her former affiliation to Hizb ut-Tahrir when they agreed to her appointment?Is the Charities Commission aware of it?And what exactly are they going to do about it?
Weasel words from the dishonourable head teacher of the Islamic school in Slough, Farah Ahmed: "Our school is being used as part of a wider political agenda and this type of vilification of the Muslim community needs to stop," should not necessarily be given credence for reasons stated at the start of this article. After all, if Muslims are allowed, encouraged and taught to lie to us we would be total fools, in turn, to believe anything without looking into it much more carefully.
Shadow communities minister Paul Goodman did an excellent job standing his ground, shouting his head off and facing up to Ed Balls and Jeremy Paxton on BBC2’s Newsnight last night.He was impressive.
Mr Balls, citing Ofsted reports etc. told the same programme there was no evidence extremism had been promoted at either of the schools - based in Slough and the London borough of Haringey.Very hard to measure though, and unlikely to be picked up by just an inspection or two, here and there; and now, of course, everyone knows.Is it right that Muslim extremists who support the enemy our troops are currently fighting, are working in education, in a position of trust over British youngsters? Surely not!
So attractive! Rupert Murdoch is evolving. Every day he looks more like the pinky-grey, wrinkly lump of sludgey crap you would find inside a Dalek, if you pulled the top off.
"You bloggers should be exterminated."
And now he and his arrogant, avaricious pals are starting to sound a bit like bossy Daleks too!
They REALLY hate the Internet, and the effect it's having on their news-rag sales - and their bank vaults! For example:
"Then there are the bloggers.
In return for their free content, we pretty much get what we’ve paid for - something of such limited intellectual value as to be barely discernible from massive ignorance."
And they quote someone called Andrew Keen from his clever, condescending book The Cult of the Amateur,
"Citizen journalists, he says, simply don’t have the resources to bring us reliable news. They lack not only expertise and training but access to decision makers and reliable sources.
The difference, he says, between professionals and amateurs is that bloggers don’t go to jail for their work – they simply aren’t held accountable like real reporters." from:
What is a Professional though?
A Professional is often considered to be an "expert" and has usually been a student who has passed his exams to the satifaction of a bunch of academic scrutineers, and perhaps gone on to do the same post grad. and then landed himself a position where he is paid to please - who?
Well, he has to follow his profession's code of conduct, please his employers, his partners, his investers the shareholders, the authorities, his peer group, the Goverment.......blah, blah, blah..
And what is an Amateur?
The Enthusiastic Amateur, however, pleases himself! Nobody has bought him off. Nobody tells him what to study, or how to approach his studies, or what to say or not say. He has to stay within the law but the enthusiastic amateur works from his own pure passion for the subject, driven by a personal experience perhaps, or a dream of achievement. Often a lonely figure, shunned and sneered at by clever, successful students who dismiss his work as unprofessional. This is a real scholar!
There is a huge difference between a clever student who's done well, and a real scholar. Students often don't achieve much really, sometimes if they are lucky they make some money for themselves and their employers but a scholar - they are the ones who really can move mankind forward. They shake the world! Perhaps not in their own lifetime, but they are more likely to be remembered long after the armies of bright students have been forgotten. The scholar seeks the truth alone - nothing more.
The New Paradigm
“..We are supposed to be children who leave important decisions to them. We are being infantilized. For eg. Hollywood movies were based on novels; now, they're based on comic books……
…We have a faux society. The central bankers (Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Warburgs and the rich) control the media, politicians, professors, journalists. Those who deviate from the script are quickly marginalized. Our social, political and cultural life is a charade, a fraud. The latest example: "Family Secrets," a new book exposing the Bushes' role in this conspiracy can't get reviewed in the mainstream media. In a healthy society, this book would be in the headlines.
There are hundreds of universities offering thousands of courses but the conspiracy paradigm is not among them. The true consciousness of humanity is kept alive by a few score private scholars who are like monks in the Dark Age..."
EU history will be all the history taught in schools
As Ed Balls proposes to abolish the remains of old-school history, the EU proposes to make the teaching of its own history compulsory, says Christopher Booker
By Christopher Booker Published: 4:14PM GMT 21 Nov 2009
"The latest initiative by our "Children's Secretary",Ed Balls, is to abolish what remains of fact-based teaching of history and geography in our schools. He plans to "roll them together into themed lessons on social issues such as global warming" (funny how that seems to seep into everything nowadays).
The ruthless drive of educational progressives to eliminate history-teaching from schools has been under way since the 1960s. The aim is to ensure that children know nothing about their country's past or how the world came to be as it is, leaving their minds blankly open to whatever vacuous progressive claptrap is fed to them.
In his desire to chuck history onto what Lenin called "the scrapheap of history", Mr Balls may have to make an exception, however. A campaign is now being mounted in the European Parliament to make it compulsory for children to be taught the history of the EU. According to Mário David, the PortugueseMEP leading the campaign and a former chief of staff to the Commission President Jose-Manuel Barroso, it Is vital to counter all the "lying, cheating and mistrust" that surrounds the EU in the minds of the peoples of Europe. Our children must therefore be indoctrinated accordingly.
A year or two back, when Richard North and I were writing a comprehensive history of "the European project", The Great Deception, we were astonished to find just how horrendously misleading is the account of that history peddled by the EU itself on its Europa website. From laying claim to Churchill as father of the EU to consistently obscuring the nature of the key role played by Jean Monnet, they have come up with an official version of the origins of their "project" which bears virtually no relation to the facts. Doubtless this is just the sort of history which Mr Balls will be happy to allow in our schools – because "fact-based" it isn't."
Author John Perkins (Confessions of an Economic Hit Man) recently talked to Alex Jones on his radio show of -
the mutant, viral, predatory capitalism that has developed in the West over last 30-40 odd years, how it lacks compassion, and its sole goal is to create profits irrespective of the cost to the environment or anything else, and its proponents believe there should be no restrictions or regulations on business, it is for profit only, maximising profits with no care, with no compassion or responsibility. Business should, they believe, own everything police, utilities, the military, privatise everything, etc.(oh dear!)
However, Perkins now says it cannot go on, and even some of the Elite are apparently now having second thoughts about their approach to sustainable resources (oh dear!) poor countries and communities (oh dear!) and business ethics.
Perkins has noticed social responsibility is now being talked of by younger people coming into business from uni. etc. Perkin’s book "Hoodwinked," covers this. In his visits to Business Schools Perkins talks about, in recent years, a change in attitude of students and teachers – towards social responsibility and "change" (oh dear!) How can the USA have homeland security - the whole planet is our homeland (oh dear!)? The Globalist clouds across the planet, the “Corporate Persons” that operate without being answerable to law, regulation, or paying redress to people harmed.This must stop for the sake of our future.
Well, surprise, surprise Mr Perkins!The young people are being taught this Communitarian, Third Way approach in school, college and universities. The teachers are being forced / brainwashed to teach this in diversity / leadership training sessions. This is not spontaneous and hopeful at all, it is cynical, controlled and planned – by the Elite, to suit them and them only!
Jones replied to him that we have to be careful that the Elite don’t set up phoney pressure groups, or steer genuine pressure groups and interest groups into a false, controlled community / environmental sector (oh dear!)Do you mean the Fabians, Communitarians, and Common Purpose? Involving Sustainability and Agenda 21, Alex? Perhaps? By any chance?
It is a very interesting conversation where Communitarianism is discussed by two very sincere people (we hope) – from within a Hegelian Dialectic but without it being actually recognised or named as such.
Perkins has flip-flopped from 1) working without conscience in big business, to now 2) worrying about the effect all this is having on the environment and third world countries, etc. – and writing books about his concerns,and is now (oh dear!) being encouraged by 3) third way, sustainability / community ideas and programmes.http://rss.nfowars.net/20091119_Thu_Alex.mp3
Nobody would argue that the U.S.A. does not have a Constitution, or that it is not reliable, sensible and fully functional. Americans are rightly proud of their Constitution.It is the best you can get, - and is based entirely on ours!
Because the British Constitution has developed over along period of time, it is contained in several documents.The Americans were able to merge all of its principles together into one document.That is the only difference.If anyone says we have no written constitution in Britain – they are either seriously mistaken, or a liar.
“I only contend that the English constitution is, in theory, the most stupendous fabrick of human invention, both for the adjustment of the balance, and the prevention of its vibrations; and that the Americans ought to be applauded instead of censured, for imitating it, as far as they have.”
President John Adams.
Common Law was established by Alfred the Great, who reigned from 871-899AD. He compiled the laws and customs of the nation into the "LiberJudicialis," based on the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule. Alfred's son, Edward, declared,“To all who are charged with the administration of public affairs I give the express command that they show themselves in all things to be just judges precisely as in the LiberJudicialis it is written; nor shall any of them fear to declare the common law freely and courageously"
The Coronation Oath is the freely taken and mutual covenant between the Monarch and the People of Britain.
MagnaCarta - a Common Law document - was originally signed in 1215, a contract between the knights, barons, clergy, townspeople and the King. MagnaCarta affirmed the right of the People to such things as trial by jury, and protection from excessive fines.
The First Statute of Westminster, passed during the reign of Edward I. According to William Stubbs, the British constitutional historian,
This act is almost a code by itself; it contains fifty-one clauses, and covers the whole ground of legislation. Its language now recalls that of Canute or Alfred, now anticipates that of our own day; on the one hand common right is to be done to all, as well poor as rich, without respect of persons; on the other, elections are to be free, and no man is by force, malice or menace, to disturb them. The spirit of the Great Charter is not less discernible: excessive amercements, abuses of wardship, irregular demands for feudal aids, are forbidden in the same words or by amending enactments.
Clause 15, known as the Freedom of Election Act 1275, and is still in force today.
The Declaration of Right was imposed upon William and Mary as a condition of their assuming the Crown - in other words, they would only be elected by the People if they accepted its terms.
The Declaration of Right, and the Bill of Rights, clearly state that -
noforeign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have, any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm.
So it can clearly be seen that every EU treaty imposed upon us by Parliament, is unconstitutional. Here is the evidence that our present Monarch has indeed broken her Coronation Oath, by giving Royal Assent to these treaties.
Other constitutional rights given by these contracts -
The right to bear arms
The right to petition the Sovereign
Free men cannot be imprisoned without cause
The Government cannot arrest any man because he disagrees with the Government’s policies
Habeas Corpus is not to be denied
No person will be compelled to make loans to the King, and there will be no tax without the approval of Parliament
Soldiers and sailors will not be billeted on civilians
Government will not impose martial law during peacetime
The right to bear arms gives every person the right to self defence using reasonable force, including deadly force if appropriate. Using tragic events as an excuse to remove that right has historically been the work of governments with good reason to fear their people - governments intent on some kind of future totalitarian control of their populations.
Conclusion: Today the British Constitution is in grave danger. Moves are afoot to replace the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement. These are to be replaced by a new "Bill of Rights" and a European constitution.
Britain's constitutional documents are timeless, and were constructed by the People. The new "constitutional" documents will be written by politicians. Which would you trust?Parliament has grabbed executive power from the Crown. The House of Lords has become a body which blindly follows the party whip. And today, our Monarch simply complies with the wishes of the Prime Minister, with no thought or consideration to our sovereignty or the Constitution. Nor, it seems, to the solemn oath she took at her Coronation. “[executive power] will corrupt the legislature as necessarily as rust corrupts iron ... and when the legislature is corrupted, the people are undone.”John Adams.
It is up to us to fix this situation.
Anyone attempting to introduce a European constitution into Britain is a traitor to the British People and deserves the most serious punishment.
