George W. Bush launched a “preemptive” war. Now the Nobel Committee is trying for “preemptive” peace. I had always thought the way these things worked was that you helped bring peace or democracy to some corner of the globe first, and then you won the Nobel Prize. But this year, the Nobel Committee has turned that logic around: It clearly likes what Obama is trying to do: on nuclear disarmament, climate change and Middle East peace—and so, in a “preemptive” strike, it’s giving him the award now, in hopes that doing so will boost his chances of success later. It’s an interesting idea. Perhaps next they’ll start giving Oscars not to the people who have made the best movies of last year, but to the people who have the best chance of making the best movies next year. After all, once you’ve already made the movie, you no longer need the encouragement...."
www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-10-09/obamas-nobel-farce/?cid=bs:archive9
This new, preemptive approach can be applied to any number of situations, for example to people who might be naughty, or are just thinking about possibly being naughty one day, or just wondering what it might be like to be naughty:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2i2xxXv_kO8
www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-on-obama-winning-the-nobel-peace-prize.html
www.prisonplanet.com/war-criminal-obama-deserves-an-oscar-but-not-a-nobel-peace-prize.html
What an insult to the genuine Nobel Peace Prize winners of the past! If Obama had even a tiny a shred of dignity and honesty he would have refused this award but no, he is a shameless psychopath like Tony Blair. He couldn't grab it fast enough!
The Dalai Lama received his in 1989, what an insult to him and his people it is, to award this to a viscious, war-mongering, morally compromised American president. What sick bastards run our planet now:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-2952804905725298165
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6546125124638220966