an agenda to enforce minority values

"..The obsession in government with 'equal opportunities' -which radiates outwards to other establishment institutions like the police or judiciary - is in reality an agenda to enforce minority values over those of the majority and pillory anyone who dissents.

And dissent is stamped upon - not least because, when deviant behaviour becomes viewed as normal, normal behaviour inevitably becomes treated as deviant. So, for example, sexual encounters where a woman may have second thoughts afterwards is suddenly defined as 'date rape'. And the traditional family, that bastion of security and safety, becomes stigmatised instead as a fetid stew of child abuse, marital rape and violence against women.

As a result of decades of propaganda, intimidation and spinelessness, the 'long march through the institutions' urged by revolutionary thinkers has been achieved. The evidence is on display all around us: academics producing crooked research projects, zealot feminist civil servants in the Home Office, or judges whose hearts bleed for burglars rather than their victims and permit the demands of gypsies to ride roughshod over the planning laws that bind the rest of us.

Wittingly or unwittingly, such people are helping promote an agenda for legislating against virtue and in favour of vice; against self-restraint and for irregularity; against domestic order and for disorder. It is a corruption of our traditional values. The demonising of men as potential rapists, child abusers and woman-beaters is a crucial part of that agenda, and the lamentable questioning of pregnant women but its latest manifestation.

There is no doubt in this writer's mind that the UK Government is actively participating in a calamitous and treacherous game of `Hegelian Dialectics` with the lives of it's own citizens and the security and wellbeing of the whole nation. More simply put, create the problem, incite the reaction, impose the solution, and their solution always seems to include elements which erode more of our ancient rights and personal freedoms, and increases government control over our lives. The unfathomable chaos, injustice and the rapid retreat from reason we see everywhere, and which has resulted in the bewilderment and demoralisation of a whole nation has been planned and orchestrated during top secret meetings held under `Chatham House` rules and in the Masonic Lodges from whence came the motto `Order Out Of Chaos`."

www.rense.com/general85/species.htm

Alex Jones and Nigel Farage discuss,

Democracy (Sovereignty) versus Bureaucracy in the UK & EU.

CLICK TO LISTEN:

http://rss.nfowars.net/20091216_Wed_Alex.mp3

Global Warming; BELIEVE, or be SHOT.

If Climategate Is No Big Deal, Why Are Questions About It Met With An Armed Response?

Dissenting opinions against the world government will not be tolerated

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, December 14, 2009

The boilerplate response on behalf of the guardians of the global warming scam is to claim that the climategate scandal holds no significance whatsoever. If warmists really are that laid back over the whole controversy then why are questions about it by accredited journalists met with an armed response from UN thugs?

The latest effort to whitewash climategate comes in the form of an Associated Press “investigation” which involved a handful of AP writers looking through the leaked emails. Unsurprisingly for an organization that has vehemently thrown its full weight behind the climate change fraud, the AP concludes that “the messages don’t support claims that the science of global warming was faked,” despite emails which openly discuss using “tricks” to “hide the decline” in global warming.

However, even if we are to accept the ludicrous premise that climategate is a distraction or a non-issue, the question remains – if it’s such a side-issue and not severely damaging to the UN’s global carbon tax agenda, then why does mere mention of it by reporters cause United Nations officials to send in armed goons to silence them during press conferences?

Hundreds of thousands of people have now seen the video that emerged over the weekend of journalist Phelim McAleer being harassed and kicked out of a press conference by armed UN security for putting a question about climategate to Professor Stephen Schneider from Stanford University.

As soon as McAleer begins his question, UN officials swoop in and try to wrestle the microphone away from him. When this fails, an armed thug is sent in to threaten McAleer and his cameraman before eventually making them leave the press conference. The goon is insistent that his free speech crushing antics are not caught on film.

“I have met Mr Christopher Ankerson the UN’s head of security for the conference and he has confirmed it was Professor Schneider’s staff who asked the security guards to come corral us at the press conference,” said McAleer. “Mr Ankerson could not say what grounds the security guard had for ordering us to stop filming.”

“This is a blatant attempt to stop journalists doing journalism and asking hard questions. It is not the job of armed UN security officers to stop legitimate journalists asking legitimate questions of senior members of the UN’s IPCC.”

This is not the first time McAleer has been the victim of the climate cult thought police. During a question and answer session with Al Gore earlier this year, McAleer had his microphone cut off after asking Gore about the multitude of errors in his Inconvenient Truth movie.

It seems like the UN is so insistent on claiming that “the debate is over” that they will metaphorically (or not so metaphorically in this case) put a gun to the head of anyone who suggests otherwise.

Contrast what happened to McAleer to the events witnessed during Lord Monckton’s speech at a not too dissimilar conference last week.

Agitators with pro-UN, pro-man made global warming politics are allowed to gatecrash events, take over the stage and shut down the conference with no response whatsoever, but God forbid an accredited journalist ask a skeptical question of a scientist, otherwise he’ll be thrown out by armed goons.

This is the face of tyranny being imposed – no dissenting opinions against the world government will be tolerated.

The fact that these globalists and their scientist cronies will not even allow their religion to be questioned is proof itself that global warming is a contrived fraud protected not by solid science but by thuggery, intimidation and a stenchful loathing of free speech.

In continually silencing dissent against the global warming mantra, its disciples are borrowing a slogan from the Kafkaesque dictatorship portrayed in Patrick McGoohan’s 1960’s television series The Prisoner – “Questions are a burden to others, answers a prison for oneself.”

www.prisonplanet.com/if-climategate-is-no-big-deal-why-are-questions-about-it-met-with-an-armed-response.htm

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235629/Is-Blair-trying-cash-climate-change--Ex-PM-arrives-summit-urge-greenhouse-gas-deal.html

Chinese Premier turns Green

Chinese Premier turns Green, and Gets the Vapors.

Develop Green Economy, Promote Sustained Growth

"We claimed in our ACL Manifesto that Etzioni suggested Americans must learn to follow the Chinese neighborhood model. The earliest case law I found using the words communitarian law came from China. That was before I found all the EU's environmental communitarian case law at Luxembourg going back to 1957.

All of Europe and many Americans have already totally adapted to China's ideology. We have been tricked into becoming more like the Chinese! This speech by the premier of the largest communitarian country in the world shows how easily the white westerners were duped. While our country listened to right, left and unsourced Russian propagandists, too many neglected to listen to the world leaders who tell it like it really is.

Here is the Chinese Premier talking about UN Local Agenda 21. He explains it in no uncertain terms. The purpose and intent of that document is "an effort to create a better home for the human race." In the USA, LA21 is still sneered at as if it's a joke. Our websites get hits everyday from Americans searching for "Local Agenda 21 conspiracy". But the hits for LA21 coming from the rest of the world never say that... wonder why.

So, what is the connection between the governments of China, the EU, Russia, the UK, Israel, Bolivia, Colombia, the United States (and now Iraq and Afghanistan)? There's only one thing they all share, it's a common belief in global communitarianism. And it's not a theory anymore.

Global government means it's global. If we never look at the global structure , the law, or where the ideas and practices are coming from, or where the law is already in place, then we haven't got a clue how to survive in it. Not everyone can "go off the grid" and you still need a lot of stuff and stable land. The survivers in the wild will have to be light on their feet and able to travel without leaving footprints. That knowledge barely exists anymore.

Truthfully, I see very few making it "hiding out in the mtns" because the globalists control too much of our wilderness and forests. I've been camping up here for years and don't think I'd last more than a month in the winter without assistance from civilization. But I do agree the biggest nightmares will be the cities, American cities, so if at all possible, get the hell out of those. Put your seatbelts on" :

Speech by H.E. Wen Jiabao

Premier of the State Council of the People's Republic of China

At the Fifth China-EU Business Summit

Nanjing, 30 November 2009

Your Excellency Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt,

Your Excellency President José Manuel Barroso,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Dear Friends,

It gives me great pleasure to attend the Fifth China-EU Business Summit. I wish to take this opportunity to express deep respect and heartfelt thanks to people from all sectors who have over the years made significant contribution to the growth of China-EU economic and trade relations and friendship between the people of China and Europe. At this crucial moment in tackling the international financial crisis, it is important to further enhance economic and trade cooperation between China and Europe. This will contribute not only to the growth of our own economies but also to the steady recovery and enduring prosperity of the world economy. I sincerely wish this Business Summit a complete success.

The theme of the Summit, "The Green Agenda: Sustaining Growth Beyond the Recovery", addresses an important area where we can enhance China-EU cooperation. A review of world industrialization over the last 200 years or more shows that the modernization of developed countries, with a population of no more than one billion, was achieved at a great cost to the resources and ecology of the whole world. A famous line from the World Conservation Strategy reads, "We have not inherited the earth from our parents; we have borrowed it from our children." To leave to future generations a planet where they can survive and thrive, we need to put in place a circular and sustainable system of national economy that generates high output with low input, low consumption and low emissions. We need to transform the existing patterns of development and consumption and move the world to a development path characterized by high productivity, prosperous lives and sound ecology.

In an effort to create a better home for the human race, the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development adopted two guiding documents, the Rio Declaration and Agenda 21, as well as a statement of principles on forests. It also opened for signature the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Since then, the concept of a "green culture" has drawn intense attention from countries around the world, and sustainable development has become a consensus of the international community. The Kyoto Protocol adopted in 1997 and the Bali Road Map established in 2007 defined the responsibilities of countries at different stages of development in addressing climate change, giving rise to a global "green wave" emphasizing harmony between economic development and the environment. The upcoming Copenhagen Conference represents another important moment in international action on climate change. The willingness and commitments expressed by countries at Copenhagen will promote a historic shift towards green economy and sustainable development. The Chinese government will take an active and constructive part in the Conference and looks forward to a positive outcome at Copenhagen......

Rest of speech here:

http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/2009/12/develop-green-economy-promote-sustained.html

No, I think it's "Turning Chinese" actually!

You see, unfortunately, the Japanese are gradually turning Chinese (Communitarian) too!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEmJ-VWPDM4

ClimateGate Nazis Silence Free Speech

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b-vrBKMxy4

www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXDE9nEfAq8

www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjuVxYjm5Ss

www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8WawButqIc

Rockerfeller/ Soros’ Hitler Youth invade conference room and jack-boot free speech.

Memories of Mao’s Red Guard.

These are also Marxist tactics.

Idiots like these orange "brownshirts" love the environment so much they aerosol/ chemical sprayed it with green slogans – all over Copenhagen.

Who paid for these young people to be there? Who organised this?

To find out, all you have to do is follow the money.

http://rss.nfowars.net/20091210_Thu_Alex.mp3

www.prisonplanet.com/brownshirt-youth-corps-invade-monckton-speech.html

Larcenous Global Government Tax

Monckton: Secretive Copenhagen Treaty Creates Larcenous Global Government Tax

Text of agreement outlines plan for tax on all transactions in addition to 2 percent GDP tax, mandates globalist power grab on an “unimaginable scale,” by a “sinister dictatorship,” warns Monckton

Paul Joseph Watson

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Lord Christopher Monckton warns that the secretive draft version of the Copenhagen climate change treaty represents a global government power grab on an “unimaginable scale,” and mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 percent levies on both GDP and every international financial transaction.

Speaking with The Alex Jones Show, Monckton, who is in Copenhagen attending the UN climate summit, said that when he attempted to obtain a copy of the current draft of the negotiating text agreement, he was initially rebuffed before he threatened an international diplomatic incident unless the document was forthcoming.

“I insisted and it took about 10 minutes and they consulted each other with three or four of them arguing over it – none of them would produce the document….I said I know this treaty exists because this is what the conference is all about,” said Monckton.

Only after Monckton threatened repercussions was he handed the the current draft of the treaty, and the details it contained are perhaps a clue as to why the UN officials were so keen to keep it under wraps.

“Once again they are desperately trying to conceal from everybody here the magnitude of what they’re attempting to do – they really are attempting to set up a world government,” said Monckton, adding that the word “government” was no longer used but the process of further centralization of power into global hands was clearly spelled out in the treaty.

Monckton said that the new world government outlined in the treaty would be handed powers to, “Tax the American economy to the extent of 2 percent GDP, to impose a further tax of 2 percent on every financial transaction….and to close down effectively the economies of the west, transfer your jobs to third world countries – all of that is still in the treaty draft.”

As the leaked document out of Copenhagen reported on by the London Guardian revealed yesterday, this massive new system of global taxation will be paid not to the UN, but directly into the coffers of the World Bank.

“The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions,” Guardian.

Monckton illustrated the size of the new taxes being proposed by noting they amounted to at least half of the entire US defense budget.

“This is how they are going to fund this vast new government they’re setting up,” said Monckton, adding that he counted around 700 new bureaucracies that would be created as a result of the treaty, which would be bankrolled by taxpayers even outside of the raft of new taxes the treaty would create.

Monckton outlined how the new taxes would be enforced, stating, “They’re going to auction allowances to emit greenhouse gases and if you don’t buy an allowance to emit greenhouse gases, you won’t be allowed to emit them,” adding that the text contained a provision for a “uniform global levy of $2 dollars per ton of CO2 for all fossil fuel emissions,” as well as an additional tax on every commercial plane journey, except ones that go in or out of poorer countries.

There would also be a “global levy on international monetary transactions – that means every transfer of money across borders will be taxed,” said Monckton, adding that this would be on top of the GDP tax.

The treaty outlines, “Penalties or fines for non-compliance,” in developed countries and the creation of an international police force to “enforce its will by imposing unlimited financial penalties on any countries whose performance under this treaty they don’t like,” added Monckton, saying that it amounted to a total global government takeover on an “unimaginable scale”.

“We’re looking at a grab for absolute power and absolute financial control worldwide by the UN and its associated bureaucracies and 700 new bureaucratic bodies,” said Monckton.

Speaking about how such draconian measures were being forced through despite the recent scandal surrounding how key IPCC-affiliated scientists conspired to “hide the decline” in global warming, Monckton emphasized how the climate change establishment were still ludicrously attempting to downplay the significance of the climategate emails by merely repeating their already discredited propaganda about global warming.

“What has happened is that the mainstream media has done themselves terrible damage by signing up to this climate nonsense and then by servilely refusing to admit that climategate was happening, admit how serious it was and simply inform their readers of what was actually in these emails,” said Monckton, “Admissions that while they’re telling us, as the Met Office did just today, that today is the warmest decade since records began 150 years ago, privately what they’re saying in the climategate emails is ‘hey look we’ve got a temperature which has been falling and we can’t explain why and it’s a travesty that we can’t explain why’ – so they’re saying one thing to us publicly to maintain the scare that’s making them rich, and that’s what’s called fraud, it’s criminal fraud, and on the other hand they’re saying privately ‘oh dear oh dear we can’t account for the fact that there’s been no warming for the last 15 years’”.

Monckton said that the Copenhagen treaty meant America was in “immediate peril” of losing its freedom to a “sinister dictatorship” being formed under the contrived pretext of global warming.

www.scienceandpublicpolicy.com

www.prisonplanet.com/monckton-secretive-copenhagen-treaty-creates-larcenous-global-government-tax.html

Common Purpose take down Brian Gerrish

• Home
• Forums
• Video
• Columnists
  • Brian Gerrish
  • Mike Robinson
  • John Morton
  • Martin Edwards
• Backissues
• Newsfeeds

CP Exposed Takedown

Please spread the word as fast as possible:

cpexposed.com has been taken down by the web hosting company, Hostgator, as the result of a complaint by Common Purpose alleging copyright infringement.

The notice from Common Purpose can be downloaded from here: http://dmca.hgfix.net/cpexposed.com/cpexposed.com.pdf

Duckworth.

We are puzzled since all the documentation is in the public domain, and has been for some considerable time.

Maybe this has happened because we recently posted information from Common Purpose’s own website showing the links between the Scottish paedophile James Rennie and the Common Purpose organisation. Are we getting too close to the truth? How many other paedophiles are protected by Common Purpose networks and their secretive Chatham House confidentiality rules?

Spread the word.

Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible.

Please submit to Digg and Reddit!

Tell us about the money, Honey!

We all need to know much more about Common Purpose, and its head Julia Middleton (above pic.)

This "charity" is a secretive organisation that hides behind the Chatham House rule.

How can a multi-million pound charity, soaking up tax payer’s money, be a secret? What is this woman and her “charity” hiding?
Why is this allowed?

Britain's Charity Sector urgently needs investigating, doesn't it?

Why doesn’t the modern ethos of openness and transparency apply to Britain’s Charity/ Voluntary Sector – our new bloated Third Sector, as well?

Why does the Third Way stink so much?

And who is Amitai Etzioni fan Henry Tam?
And what has he been up to with New Labour in the UK?

www.thebcgroup.org.uk

www.ukcolumn.org

The view from your - Common Purpose window looks all weird and wonky to me...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1jy_DIZ4fs

Communitarianism is big news

"..Americans (and the British) are proving to be some of the most self deceptive people in the history of the world. I'm wondering if they even WANT to know what the hell is going on in this country. Looks to me like they don't.. not at all. The truth could fall on them like a tree blown out of the earth in a big windstorm and they'll spend the rest of their lives looking for the dead leaves it sent flying into the distance, and ignore the tree.." Niki Raapana, 1/12/09.
************************************

"Just in from George Butler of the Secret Truth radio show. Communitarianism is big news today, but little to nothing about the actual Communitarian Network or it's Israeli founder, Dr. Amitai Etzioni, Obama'a guru. Apparently Howard Dean said exactly what it is so Alex Jones and Rush Limbaugh can ignore the facts. It's just socialism people, so don't bother looking ANY further. It has nothing to do with Community Policing, nothing to do with Community Development, and God forbid you should point out it has a LOT to do with Israel, the Vatican, Bush and Sarah Palin too... it's has to revert back to dialectical debates.. okay? The synthesis between capitalism and communism must always be less important than the pieces that created it. Besides, communitarian agents know it's much easier if people don't have to think about the possibilty they've been lied to by BOTH "sides".

http://www.infowars.com/howard-dean-were-all-communitarians-now/
(Whoopee, America is becoming more like the EU!)

Here's infowars' commentary:

In the video here from earlier this year, Dean declares the debate between capitalism and socialism is over. Dean says what we have is a merging of the two and it is called Communitarianism.

In other words communalism otherwise known as communism. Communalism is not about a tribe of hippies living in the woods. It is about the needs of the community overshadowing the needs of the individual. The excuse here is the principle that the community exists for the benefit of the individuals who participate in it, so the best way to serve the interests of the individual is through the interests of the community.

In other words, it is a majoritarian philosophy. Sort of like two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner.

I couldn't see any video on infowars so I did a quick internet search for "Howard Dean communitarianism." Found Rush Linmbaugh doing a show on the same video. But Rush won't let you download or watch it without being a member.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_120109/content/01125113.guest.html

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Howard Dean, April the 5th, 2009, this just surfaced. He was in Paris and said this.

DEAN: Capitalism is always going to be with us because capitalism represents part of human nature. But the other part of human nature is communitarianism. The debate for the new generation is instead of capitalism or socialism, is we're going to have both and then which proportion of each should we have in order to make this all work.

RUSH: So he's essentially saying here that the argument between capitalism and socialism is over. This is what the Democrats really believe, and they're content with saying this across the pond. Can you imagine if the Democrats had said this at all during the 2008 presidential campaign? "Capitalism has seen its last days, socialism is where we're headed, communitarianism." The Universe of Lies. But when they think they are with friends, like Western socialist democracies like Paris or France, then they firmly believe they're with friends and they can utter what they truly believe. (interruption) What's the angst in there, Snerdley? Communitarianism? Well, you know what a commune is? Okay, think of the original story of Thanksgiving. It's just like communism, commune, communitarianism. It is a word. Communitarian is somebody who believes in a commune, and so communitarianism is the belief in a commune, or communism. It means organizers! A communitarian is what Obama is. Organizers, community organizers. Community, commune, communism. Mao, Marx. It's all in there.

Here's where Rush got the video:

http://www.breitbart.tv/howard-dean-declares-debate-between-capitalism-and-socialism-to-be-over/ The tag line at breibarttv reads: "We are going to have both." I skimmed through the comments for a minute, there's 686 since this am. Love reading people say: There was a debate? What debate?

When I was told by Seattle City officials in 1999 that my rights had been balanced, I was confused. Then I found Etzioni and learned there was a debate between the US Bill of Rights and Communitarian Values and my privacy lost in the debate. So I asked Etzioni fand his cronies for the next four years, Where's the debate? Etzioni finally responded the debate had taken place in academia, the media and somewhere else I forget just now, meetings?

This infowars video is spreading across the internet as if it's the FIRST time these people ever heard of communitarianism. Good thing Alex and Rush are leading the big "expose" and telling people it's still just communism... but NOT that it's BOTH. Oh no, we have to protect the serious hard truth and disuade people from ever actually SEEING The Ultimate Third Way. The right wing prophets are so obvious sometimes.

http://campustweet.com/Story/107683

and here's the discussion on a Ron Paul forum where a couple of the commentors think communitarianism is a GOOD thing! They don't like socialism, that's all. :) Notice how deftly the original poster changed it from communitarian to socialism in their title? That's not accidental.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?s=8087fcdc612b1b76638354a904a250b6&t=221099&page=2

And here's more of the same... it's ALL the left's fault... this has nothing to do with the Right. How can it, they're not socialists, right? http://www.wral.com/golo/blogpost/6526263/

But in the final analysis this is just disguised authoritarianism with a Socialist economic bent, packaged as 'community organizing' and couched in language that individualist Americans won't find so off putting. It's the same approach the Left uses when they call themselves "Progressives", which is just the fuzzy, feel good term for Leftist authoritarianism.

Howard Dean also talks about The Permanent Campaign in this video. It is a political strategy designed to control the media cycle and hence public perception. If you've ever wondered why Obama appears to endlessly campaign now you know why.

THIS is what the core and the leadership of the Democratic Party has become.

THIS is what the REPUBLICAN PARTY has become too. It sure looks to me as if the Right is playing hardcore damage control with this whole Dean speech. No heightened activity at the ACL today from people looking for "communitarianism." Americans are proving to be some of the most self deceptive people in the history of the world. I'm wondering if they even WANT to know what the hell is going on in this country. Looks to me like they don't.. not at all. The truth could fall on them like a tree blown out of the earth in a big windstorm and they'll spend the rest of their lives looking for the dead leaves it sent flying into the distance, and ignore the tree.

Posted by the tent lady:

http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/2009/12/alex-jones-and-rush-linbaugh-discussing.html