An
edited extract from Francis’s Legacy, by E. Michael Jones.
(Talmudic quotes
supplied by Lasha Darkmoon).
If what is
left of the WASP establishment wants to do something effective in the culture
wars, they will have to understand just who the enemy is.
In order to
understand this, they will have to go back well beyond the 1960s. In fact, they
will have to go back beyond the 18th century: to be precise, 1800 years before
that, right back to the opening shot in the culture wars.
This war
began 2000 years ago at the foot of the cross, when the Jewish high priests,
Annas and Caiphas, said to Jesus Christ, “If you come down from the cross,
we will accept you as our Messiah.”
Needless to
say, Jesus did not come down from the cross. And because he didn’t, the Jews
rejected Him. Instead, they chose Barabbas,
a bandit who had been condemned to death for his revolutionary activities.
At once, by
doing this—by preferring a notorious criminal to a man of spotless innocence
who had come to redeem them—the Jews became revolutionaries themselves:
condemned to seek heaven on earth by following one false Messiah after another
from Simon bar Kokhbar to Shabbetai Zevi, from Alex Portnoy to Paul Wolfowitz.
As my
friend Sam Francis used to say, Who is the real enemy?
To answer
that question, we need to turn first to Professor Kevin MacDonald’s
analysis of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored Peoples
(NAACP), the premier organization of the Jewish-Black alliance.
Kevin
MacDonald, America’s premier racial theorist, says pretty much the same thing
as Benjamin Ginsberg in an article on the Jewish-Black alliance which appeared
in Race and the American Prospect, the
book my friend Sam Francis was editing before he died:
The record
[MacDonald writes] shows quite clearly that Jewish organizations as well as a
great number of individual Jews contributed enormously to the success of the
movement to increase the power of blacks and alter the racial hierarchy of the
United States. (p. 221).
Jews have
played a prominent role in organizing blacks beginning with the founding of the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909. The
NAACP was founded by wealthy German Jews, non-Jewish whites and blacks led by
W.E.B. Dubois. The Jewish role was predominant.
By
mid-decade, the NAACP had something of the aspect of an adjunct of B’nai B’rith
and the American Jewish Committee. . . . By 1920, Herbert Seligman was director
of public relations and Martha Greuning served as his assistant. . . .
Small wonder that a bewildered [Black Nationalist leader] Marcus Garvey stormed out of NAACP
headquarters in 1917 muttering that it was a white organization.
The NAACP,
in other words, purportedly a black organization for the advancement of
black civil rights, was in fact a Jewish organization.
It was a
Jewish organization that mobilized America’s blacks to fight racial
discrimination insofar as this was congruent with Jewish goals. Benjamin
Ginsberg is remarkably frank in discussing the terms of the Jewish-Black
alliance:
By speaking
on behalf of blacks as well as Jews . . . Jewish groups were able to present
themselves as fighting for the abstract and quintessential American principles
of fair play and equal justice rather than the selfish interests of Jews alone.
This would not be the last time that Jewish organizations found that helping
blacks could serve their own interests as well.
[LASHA
DARKMOON SAYS: A valued correspondent, Dick Chardet, has this morning sent me
the following extremely apt 1912 quotation by ISRAEL COHEN which reinforces all
the points made above. At his request, I add the quote here:
We
must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. We will
aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions
and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro
will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will
deliver America to our cause.
—
Israel Cohen, ”A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century”, 1912.
Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957]
Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957]
It turns
out, then, that there is much more to this Black/Jewish alliance than that of
simply fighting discrimination.
By allying
themselves with the blacks, the Jews found that they could covertly attack the
people they perceived as their main political enemies and weaken if not destroy
their political influence, i.e., the power and cultural values of the WASPs—an
ethos based on 2000 years of Christianity.
And so the
real enemy, it turns out, was the old enemy who has dogged our footsteps for
the last 2000 years: The Revolutionary Jew
*
* *
The
Revolutionary Jew, it must be emphasized, is not our enemy because of some
occult racial inheritance. The Revolutionary Jew is our enemy because he has
rejected Logos. This means that Jews, to the extent that they honor and revere
Logos, are not our enemies.
Note.
“Logos” may be defined as the Christ Principle, or the rule of law in a
divinely ordered universe. Thus the Logos would seem to be an intrinsic feature
of all the great world religions with the notable exception of
Judaism—especially in its bizarre Talmudic manifestation. (LD)
There are
Jews who accept Logos fully by sincerely accepting baptism, and there are Jews
who accept it in some lesser capacity by their docility to the truth. We all
know Jews like this, and they should not be excluded from our fellowship,
especially since many of them have suffered at the hands of “the Jews”
themselves.
As the
Gospel of St. John makes clear, the Jews became “the Jews” the minute they
rejected Christ. As such, their only identity is negative. The minute they
rejected Logos, which means reason, order, speech, and word, they became
revolutionaries, determined enemies not only of Christ and the Christian social
order, but any order in any society not of their own revolutionary making.
Thirty
years after rejecting Christ, the Revolutionary Jew rose in rebellion against
Rome. Seventy years later they united under Simon bar Kokhbar, one of their
many messiahs, and tried the same thing again. Having failed to destroy Rome,
they attempted to destroy the Europe which St. Benedict created out of the
ruins of the Roman Empire and to replace it with one of their many deadly
Utopias.
What does
Jerusalem under Simon bar Kokhbar—what does the Soviet Union under Trotsky,
Zinoviev, Kamanev, and Radek—what does the short lived Soviet Republic of
Bavaria under Kurt Eisner and Eugene Levine—what does Hungary under Bela
Kun—what does the racial apartheid state known as Israel under terrorists like
Menachem Begin or Itzhak Shamir—what does the neocon Never-Never Land known as
the “free and democratic Iraq”—what do all these miserable abortions have in
common?
Death is
what they have in common!
Lots of
people have to die to bring about the Revolutionary Jew’s version of heaven on
earth.
Key
figures in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917), and the subsequent Soviet Union of
the Stalinist era, which claimed the lives (according to Solzhenitsyn) of 66
million Russian Christians between 1917-1953.
“With
the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.
Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish
leaders.” — WINSTON CHURCHILL.
(Note.
Churchill was unaware that even Lenin was partly Jewish).
*
* *
The West
which we seek to preserve is based on docility to Logos, the order of the
universe which makes discourse possible. The essence of Jewish Messianic
politics which seeks to create heaven on earth, is rejection of Logos. It has
nothing to do with DNA.
The essence
of this Jewish rejection of Logos is found and known in the Talmud, which is
anti-Logos in every sense of the word, from hatred of Christ all the way down
to rejection of the practical logos known as morality.
We saw a
good example of Talmudic thought in action during the Israeli invasion of
Lebanon (2006) when Charles Krauthammer and the Jewish rabbinic council
attacked the Just War theory—in particular its ban on killing non-combatants
and the principle of proportionality. This was apparently a “Christian” ideal
and therefore non-applicable to Jews.
Christians,
if they choose, may spare the lives of civilians and kill their enemies in a
restrained manner—“proportionality”—but there is no obligation on Jews to copy
the compassionate Christians.
Charles
Krauthammer, torture advocate, argues in the Weekly
Standard (December 5, 2005) that it is not only permissible to hang a
suspect up by his thumbs to extract information from him, but that it is a “moral duty” to do so, provided Israel’s security
and the lives of a million imaginary people are at stake. Alan Dershowitz, Harvard
law professor and torture expert, would have approved. He suggests
it might be a good idea to torture suspects, even the innocent ones, by
sticking needles under their fingernails.
The
principles of the Just War theory are of course the basic principles of
civilized conduct, the bedrock of human decency. Those who refuse to abide by
these basic rules are barbarians and deserved to be treated as such. No country
can implement Talmudic thought—as America has—and not suffer the catastrophic
consequences of Logos rejection: that is to say, the rejection of reason, human
rights, and the fundamental ethical principles that are inseparable from
civilized behavior.
In France,
in 1890, in the wake of the one hundredth anniversary of the French Revolution,
the Jesuits who wrote for Civilta Cattolica explained how widespread
rejection of Logos, in the form of the French Revolution, led to bondage: in
particular, bondage to Jews.
The same
thing is true of our country in the wake of the Cultural Revolution of the
1960s. We swallowed the bait of sexual liberation and ended up being enslaved
by our enemies.
Lest anyone
misunderstand me, I am saying that the Jews are our enemy insofar as we are
partisans of Logos and they are not. They are the enemies of Logos, because
their religion is based on hatred of Logos. And nothing makes this clearer than
the Jews’ “holiest” book, the Talmud, a compendium of the most diabolical
principles ever conceived by the mind of man.
Opening
the Talmud at random, here are a dozen pearls of wisdom the impressionable
young student is likely to encounter:
(1) “It is permitted for Jews to cheat
Gentiles. All lies are good.”
(2) “If a Jew has stolen something from a Gentile
and the Gentile discovers it and demands it back, the Jew should simply deny it
all. The Jewish court will stand by the Jew.”
(3) “A Jew need not pay a gentile
the wages owed him for work.”
(4) “When a Jew murders a gentile, there
will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.”
(5) “Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth. Gentiles
prefer sex with cows.”
(6) “Adam had sexual intercourse with all the
animals in the Garden of Eden.”
(7) “A Jew may have sex with a child as
long as the child is less than nine years old … When a grown-up man has
intercourse with a litte girl it is nothing.”
(8) “A Gentile girl who is
three years old can be violated … A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish
girl.”
(9) “A Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer every
day: Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.”
(10) “When the Messiah comes, every Jew will have 2800 slaves.”
(11)
“Jesus is in hell, being boiled in hot excrement.”
(12) “If a Jew is
tempted to do evil, he should go to a city where he is not known and do the
evil there.”
(For
all these quotes and more, see Elizabeth Dilling’s The
Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today.
(Formerly titled “The Plot Against Christianity”). See also Michael Hoffman’s
monumental 1100-page Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of
Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit.)
Lytton
Strachey and his friends once referred to the subversive movement we call
Bloomsbury as the “higher sodomy.” Taking a page from his book, I will refer to
Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular as the “higher Logos.”
Those of us
who follow the higher Logos know, however, that the only proper response we can
make to our enemies is to love them, and the clearest manifestation of that
love is our desire to bring them to the Truth, otherwise known as the Logos.
We should
therefore work for their conversion to the Higher Logos.
*
* *
At this
point, it should be obvious that I am not just talking about Jews as the
enemies of Logos. I am also talking about Christians who want to live and act
like Jews. And lest this statement of mine be distorted and presented as
evidence of my “anti-Semitism”, let me add that I firmly believe that there are
many Jews who are better Christians than quite a few Christians are!
The
Puritans spring immediately to mind as “bad Christians”, thanks to the toxic
Judaizing influence they had on America from the moment of its birth.
I am also
thinking of the many non-Jewish character assassins and apologists for usury,
pornography and other Jewish forms of social control. Their name is
Legion. They earn their money by poisoning the public mind.
I am
thinking of the likes of Alfred Kinsey, a nominal Christian, who to my mind was
a far more evil influence than Sigmund Freud, an atheist Jew. (See “The Case
Against Kinsey”, here).
I repeat:
the revolutionary Jew is our enemy because he is a rejecter of Logos, not
because of his DNA.
We are not
anti-Semites because we oppose the machinations of the Revolutionary Jew. No,
we are true Christians because of that, as the Church from the time of
St. Peter onward has proclaimed.
Like St.
Peter and St. Paul, we are suffering at the hands of the Jews, “the people who
put the Lord Jesus to death, and the prophets too. And now they have been
persecuting us, and acting in a way that cannot please God and makes them the
enemies of the whole human race” (1 Thess 1: 15).
We are now
engaged in a war which has ebbed and flowed over the centuries, but the sides
in this war have not changed. What has changed are the odds. The Jews have
never been stronger. The Christians, specifically the Catholics, have never
been weaker.
The outcome
of this particular war however—and the war for the soul of the West, as Tolkien
knew, is a spiritual war—is rarely predictable, no matter what the odds
are.
If St.
Paul, representing the Christian position, has to say, “When I am weak, I am
strong,” (2 Corinthians 12:10) then the Revolutionary Jew, representing
the opposite polarity, has to say, “When I am strong, I am weak.”
We are
outgunned on every front in the culture wars, but that is no reason for
despair.
If we
follow the Logos that St. Paul followed, who was outgunned by the Jews too,
outgunned but not undone, we can say with St Paul: “We are hard pressed on
every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not
abandoned; struck down but not destroyed.” (2 Corinthians 4:8)
And so, as
Theoden said, “We come to it in the end, the great battle of our time, in which
many things will pass away. But at least there is no longer need for hiding.”
(See Lord of the Rings, here.)
Nor, we
might add, is there any place to hide.
Many of us
are have already had our careers destroyed by the Revolutionary Jew and his goyische
front men. The Jews spy on us through our computers. They suborn fellow
Christians to betray us, get us fired, prevent us from speaking out.
Our backs
are to the wall. We have never been weaker. And our enemies have never been
stronger. But that is no reason for despair, because as Elrond says, “this
quest may be attempted by the weak with as much hope as the strong.” And why is
that? Because “such is the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world:
small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are
elsewhere.” (See Lord of the Rings, here.)
We have no
common past. We have no royal family waiting in the wings. We have no established
religion which can act as a source of order and identity. We have no racial
identity. We have no common DNA. I am almost tempted to say that we have no We.
We are a nation of nations, and that is all we have ever been.
All we have
is various ethnic traditions and communities, united by the frail bonds of
Logos, as perceived by the human soul beset by human passions.
If our
souls are weak, remember that Logos is not. Logos is the glue that binds the
universe together.
And so it
is strong enough to unite us as Americans—whether it be the higher Logos which
acknowledges Christ as Lord of the universe, or the lower Logos which honors
him by detecting order in the works of creation and beauty in the moral law.
We are the
party of Logos, and it is only as such that we can think of surviving.
If we do
not survive, how can we hope to prevail over our enemies?
