'Let Them Eat Cake'-scoffer, multi-millionaire, champagne socialist Emma Thomson, loves Europe and all the
freebies that the Chosen Elite pay themselves (with our tax money)!
‘We should be taking
down borders, not putting them up,’ she explained, before adding that she
would ‘of course’ vote to remain in the EU in the upcoming referendum. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/emma-thompson-backs-the-in-campaign-britain-is-a-cake-filled-misery-laden-grey-old-island/
By The Way, from October 2016 Turkey will be granted Visa Free Travel to the EU, meaning Europe's Borders will now end at Syria! (75 Million Muslim Turks) which dwarfs the entire UK population able to come to Europe overnight no questions asked (Schengen Area's)! This is why Cameron has rushed the date of June before the British Public realize this buried subject!
Vote Out not just for independence, but security!...don't take my word for it, Google "Turkey EU Visa October 2016"...
The EU – A Well Disguised Dictatorship
Posted
By: Rodney Atkinsonon: February 18, 2016
How many
people realise that the European Union isn’t so much a democracy as a group
dictatorship?
There are
a total of 766 MEPs sitting in the EU Parliament, elected by various forms of
proportional representation from the 28 current member states, but once elected
they do not sit in national blocks but in seven Europe-wide like-minded
political groups which, as stated in the EU’s guide to its institutions (2005)
‘between them, represent all views on European integration, from the strongly
pro-federalist to the openly eurosceptic’.
So far,
so democratic.
However,
it is important to realise that, unlike the British Parliament at Westminster,
the European Parliament does not have a proposing chamber (the House of
Commons) and a revising chamber (the House of Lords); it’s directives and
regulations — let’s call them ‘laws’ for simplicity —
are arrived at by various European institutions, the most important of which
are:
The
Commission (unelected),
The
Council of Ministers (not elected for that role), and
The
Parliament.
A new EU
Commission is set up within six months of every five-year election.
But according to the Guide, the Commission is ‘independent of national
governments and its job is solely to represent and uphold the interests of the
EU as a whole, including the ‘ever closer [political] union described in
Article 1 of the original Treaty of Rome’.
And it is
here that democracy begins to falter.
To begin
with, it is the member states’ governments which, between them, will
agree — in secret — who is to be the new President of
the Commission who will then, in discussions with the member states
governments, choose the new Commissioners , one from each state.
Next, none of these Commissioners, including the President, will be an MEP and
none need ever have been elected to any organisation at all. Nor
will the MEPs vote for them but will simply be expected to ‘approve’ them en
bloc and once again, in secret.
It is the
European Commissioners’ responsibility to put forward new directives or
regulations (let’s call them ‘laws’ for simplicity). Before doing
so they will consult up to 3,000 bodies and working groups and will be expected
to consider the views of the European Parliament — yet they are
also entitled to ignore them completely.
The next
step is to have them ‘considered’ by the European Council of Ministers, and
each proposed law will be reviewed by the appropriate Minister from each of the
28 member states. For instance, should the proposal involve
finance, it will be each government’s Minister for Finance who will do so, and
if it concerns agriculture, then it will be the ministers for Agriculture.
Once
agreed, the proposed new law it will be sent to the European Parliament.
And it is
in the European Parliament that democracy completely breaks down.
On
reaching the Parliament, these laws are sent on for further study to the particular
Committee of MEPs dealing with the subject involved, but only for 24 hours.
In an
attempt to speed up the legislative process, the Commission will then
‘facilitate’ private discussions between the leading MEPs on the Committee,
civil servants and Ministers representing the European council in a process
known as the ‘Trialouge’. But this, too, will go on behind
closed doors and therefore compromises emerge which may have no resemblance to
amendments suggested by the elected MEPs in Committee.
When the
Commission is satisfied that the proposed laws will be passed, they are sent on
to the full Chamber of MEPs, known as the ‘Plenary’, which will usually have
been given only a few hours’ notice of the final voting list. Each
political group will then be allowed a short time to put forward their views in
Parliament but the speaking time is allocated on the basis of the size of the
group, with even their leaders being restricted in the time they can
speak. So these cannot be termed ‘debates’ as we would see them in
Westminster, but are mainly ‘sound bites designed for the media.
Then
comes the actual votes. But although a proposal can be won or lost
on a simple majority of those voting in the Plenary, given the scores of
proposals and their amendments that can be brought forward for voting in one
day, it is not surprising that there can be some spectacular
mistakes. Especially as the voting is merely on a show of
hands! In spite of this, should any vote be lost, this is not
the end of the matter. It then goes to ‘Conciliation’ during which
the Commission has another chance to broker a deal between the Parliament and
the Council. Once again, in secret.
For it is
the EU Council of Ministers which makes the final decision on
legislation. Most, but not all, EU laws are passed jointly with the
European Parliament although in some fields the Council alone legislates but
has to consult the Parliament. Once proposals are passed, the
Commission is asked to publish the resulting laws — directives or
regulations — in the ‘Official Journal’ and sent to individual
member states.
In
Britain, these laws then go through Parliament in the sense that they are laid
before Committees which will ‘take note’ of them. But there is no
option to reject any unless Britain has a national veto on the subject under
discussion, because
the UK Courts are required to accept EU laws regardless of what any Westminster
Statute may say.
Even the
EU Commissioners admit that a large percentage of our laws come from the
European Union.
This, in
effect, means that whatever the unelected European Commission puts forward and
the Council of Ministers agrees with, will become law in Britain.
And that
they, their children and their grandchildren will continue to be ruled by what
is officially called an ‘Oligarchy’ or more simply a group dictatorship, unless
the UK votes to leave the European Union in the coming Referendum.