The World’s Never Seen
Anything Like This
by Robert
Hunziker / September 30th, 2015
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear
Power Plant No. 2 nuclear reactor fuel is missing from
the core containment vessel.1
Where did it go? Nobody knows.
Not only
that but the “learning curve” for a nuclear meltdown is as fresh as the event
itself because “the world has never seen anything like this,” Never.
Utilizing
cosmic ray muon radiography with nuclear emulsion, researchers from Nagoya
University peered inside the reactors at Fukushima. The nuclear fuel in reactor
core No. 5 was clearly visible via the muon process. However, at No. 2 reactor,
which released a very large amount of radioactive substances coincident with
the 2011 explosion, little, if any, signs of nuclear fuel appear in the
containment vessel. A serious meltdown is underway.
“The
researchers say further analyses are needed to determine whether molten fuel
penetrated the reactor and fell down.”2 In short, researchers
do not yet know if the molten hot stuff has penetrated the steel/concrete base
beyond the containment vessel, thus entering Mother Earth.
The
Nagoya University research team, in coordination with Toshiba Corporation,
reported their findings at a meeting of the Physical Society of Japan on
September 26th.
Thus,
therefore, and furthermore, it is advisable to review what’s at stake:
“High-level
nuclear waste is almost unimaginably poisonous. Take for example cesium-137,
with a half-life of 30 years, which makes up the largest fraction of long-lived
radionuclides residing in spent nuclear fuel. One gram of radioactive
cesium-137 (about half the size of a dime) contains 88 Curies of radioactivity.
104 Curies of radioactive cesium-137, spread evenly over one square mile of
land, will make it uninhabitable for more than a century.”3
As, for
example, there are 1,090 square miles of land surrounding the destroyed
Chernobyl reactor that Ukraine classifies as an uninhabitable radioactive
exclusion zone because radioactive fallout left more than 104 Curies of cesium-
137 per square mile on the land that makes up the zone. Scientists believe it
will be 180 to 320 years before Cesium-137 around Chernobyl disappears from the
environment.
Here’s
the big, or rather biggest, problem: Cesium is water-soluble and makes its way
into soils and waters as it quickly becomes ubiquitous in a contaminated
ecosystem.
Chernobyl,
on the other hand, is a different animal than Fukushima because its explosion
was much more widespread and more dense than Fukushima, where 80% of initial radiation
was blown out to the Pacific Ocean. Hmm.
Whereas,
during the Three Mile Island incident, a partial core meltdown occurred but the
reactor vessel was not breached, so there was no major radiation release.
Categorically,
“Long-lived radionuclides such as Cesium-137 are something new to us as a
species. They did not exist on Earth in any appreciable quantities during the
entire evolution of complex life. Although they are invisible to our senses
they are millions of times more poisonous than most of the common poisons we
are familiar with. They cause cancer, leukemia, genetic mutations, birth
defects, malformations, and abortions at concentrations almost below human
recognition and comprehension. They are lethal at the atomic or molecular
level.”4
Still, a
true understanding of the dangers of the Fukushima disaster may never be fully
known by the general public because of difficulties accessing solid
information. Indeed, the Japanese government has made it nearly
impossible to obtain information which is not indiscriminately labeled
“secret,” and a journalist may face up to 10 years in prison based upon which
side of the bed a government employee gets up on any given morning; it’s
absolutely true!
The
independent organization Reporters without Borders has downgraded Japan in its
World Press Freedom Index from 22nd place in 2012, to 53rd in 2013 and to 59th
in 2014, following the enactment of the state secrets bill. Reporters without
Borders says that “Japan has been affected by a lack of transparency and almost
zero respect for access to information on subjects directly or indirectly
related to Fukushima.”5
Meanwhile,
there is another angle to the nuclear issue. On the opposite side of the
anti-nuke crowd it is instructive to note that a sizeable pro-nuke coterie
claim nuclear power is safe and also claim that few, if any, serious human
health problems have arisen, or will arise, from radiation exposure. In fact,
some nuke addicts even claim a “little radiation exposure” is good.
That,
however, has been debunked via a recent (July 2015) landmark study concluded by
an international consortium under the umbrella of the International Agency for
Research on Cancer/Lyon, France where a long-term study for low radiation
impact was conducted on 300,000 nuclear-industry workers. The study proves,
beyond a doubt, there is “no threshold dose below which radiation is harmless.”
Any amount is harmful, period.
Nevertheless,
here’s one example of the pro-side:
“The
Fukushima incident will continue to attract media attention for some time to
come, I imagine. It has become such a good story to roll with that it will not
just go away. However, in sober reflection and retrospection one has to come to
the conclusion that far from being a nuclear disaster the Fukushima incident
was actually a wonderful illustration of the safety of nuclear power.”6
Back to
Fukushima, depending upon whom is the source, radiation exposure is (a)
extremely harmful and deadly as levels of radioactivity are widespread
throughout the greater region, including Tokyo, or contrarily, (b)
radioactivity is at such nominal levels that people do not need to worry, or
(c) the worst is yet to come. Thereupon the rubber meets the road, meaning the
credibility issue encountered by outsiders looking inside Fukushima remains
“who to believe.”
Meanwhile,
the “world information system aka: Internet” is crowded with stories about
melting starfish in the Pacific Ocean, dumbfounded whales, and massive animal
deaths, enough so that people start connecting the dots in expectation that
Fukushima radiation is omnipresent; however, to date, most of the evidence is
labelled conjecture by various mainstream parties. Again, the problem is who to
trust.
Regardless
of whom to believe, it is now known for a fact, a hard fact, that Fukushima
Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant No. 2 is missing its fuel within its core
containment vessel. This leads to a world of unknowns, and the biggest question
is: What can be done about a full meltdown should it occur (maybe it’s already
occurred)? Then what?
A full
meltdown would involve all of the fuel in the nuclear plant core melting and a
mass of very hot molten material falling and settling at the bottom of the
reactor vessel. If the vessel is ruptured, the material could flow into the
larger containment building surrounding it, which is shielded by protective
layers of steel and concrete.7
“But if
that containment is ruptured, then potentially a lot of material could go into
the environment.”8
What does
a lot of material going into the environment really mean?
Sources
claim deadly Cesiun-137, which is only one of many dangerous isotopes, is
water-soluble and makes its way into soils and waters, as it quickly becomes
ubiquitous in the ecosystem. The question thus becomes would a full meltdown
turn lose this deadly isotope, as well as others, on the surrounding
environment? Frankly, it kinda seems like it would.
Nobody
knows whether Fukushima morphs full meltdown into Mother Earth, although the
signposts are not good, and not only that but nobody knows what to do about it.
Nobody knows what to do. They really don’t.
The only
thing for certain is that it’s not good. Going forward, it becomes a matter of
how bad things get.
- Up to 100% of No. 2 Reactor Fuel May Have Melted, NHK World News, September 25, 2015. []
- Ibid. []
- Comments on Draft of Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2013, Physicians for Social Responsibility, May 23, 2013. []
- Steven Starr, senior scientist, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Director, Univ. of Missouri, Clinical Laboratory Science Program, The Implications of the Massive Contamination of Japan With Radioactive Cesium, Speech to NY Academy of Medicine, March 11, 2013. []
- Reporters without Borders (2013). Press Freedom Index 2013: “Dashed Hopes After Spring}, August 2014. [
- Dr. Kelvin Kemm, CEO of Nuclear Africa, “Physicist: There was no Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: The Terrible Toll From Japan’s Tsunami Came From the Wave, not Radiation”, Cfact, October 12, 2013. []
- Charles Ferguson, president of the Federation of American Scientists []
- Charles Ferguson, president of the Federation of American Scientists, “Mechanics of a Nuclear Meltdown Explained”, PBS Newshour, Science, March 15, 2011. []
Robert
Hunziker (MA, economic history, DePaul University) is a freelance writer and
environmental journalist whose articles have been translated into foreign
languages and appeared in over 50 journals, magazines, and sites worldwide. He
can be contacted at: rlhunziker@gmail.com. Read other articles by Robert.
This
article was posted on Wednesday, September 30th, 2015 at 2:23am and is filed
under Environment, Japan.