Surprisingly, chief
among Kelly’s concerns (see below) is whether or not his spacecraft can successfully pass
through the perilous Van Allen Radiation Belts. Such is the
prospective danger in fact, that NASA will have to send a dumbie craft first
in order to ‘test out’ what the potential radiation effects will be on future
human crews, as well as on the ship’s delicate sensors and equipment.
Hold on. Why the
guessing game by NASA? Why don’t they just use the same
1969 technology they are said
to have used on the first Apollo moon missions?
SuperPerformance72 explains, “This video released by NASA about the upcoming Orion space exploration craft, shows a NASA scientist admitting that they still haven’t worked out how to properly shield the spacecraft from the radiation emitted from the Van Allen belts.”
SuperPerformance72 explains, “This video released by NASA about the upcoming Orion space exploration craft, shows a NASA scientist admitting that they still haven’t worked out how to properly shield the spacecraft from the radiation emitted from the Van Allen belts.”
Hmmmm!
And aren’t these
astronauts from the 60s/70s doing well, no epidemic of cancer or anything……!
Why Ionospheric Heaters are
Destroying the Van Allen Belts www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyGqevWh-xE
6/22/2015 -- NASA
'accidentally' DRAINS the Van Allen Belts -- STS-75 'Tether Incident' www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WdTWyvBfLs
Published
on 22 Jun 2015
It appears that NASA actually DRAINED one of the protective
Van Allen Radiation belts surrounding Earth.
This experiment was done, and was successful. No doubt, this could easily cause "climate change", since the Van Allen Belts protect us from solar radiation, high electron voltage.
During the experiment, after deploying the tether in space, they say the tether "broke" and floated away into Earth's orbit.
They were never able to retrieve the floating tether, which worked exactly as expected, and became a glowing bright object in space for several weeks (3 months).
They do not say whether the Tether fell back to Earth, however the height of the experiment leans towards the fact that the tether is still up in space, along with the satellite carrying it.
The projected timeframe for REMOVING the inner Van Allen Belt was 2 month’s time. This all occurred in 1996, and for sure was up THREE months.... thus we can begin to see that the same time we started seeing major "climate change" is the same time they removed one of the Van Allen belts.
If you remove a protective layer of the upper ionosphere , which shields us from the Sun, then you should expect the Sun to have a greater impact on the Earth below once the shield is gone.
That is exactly what happened. Global spikes in Temperatures, Earthquakes, and Volcanic eruptions began in earnest after the year 1996.
Now we know the culprit.
This experiment was done, and was successful. No doubt, this could easily cause "climate change", since the Van Allen Belts protect us from solar radiation, high electron voltage.
During the experiment, after deploying the tether in space, they say the tether "broke" and floated away into Earth's orbit.
They were never able to retrieve the floating tether, which worked exactly as expected, and became a glowing bright object in space for several weeks (3 months).
They do not say whether the Tether fell back to Earth, however the height of the experiment leans towards the fact that the tether is still up in space, along with the satellite carrying it.
The projected timeframe for REMOVING the inner Van Allen Belt was 2 month’s time. This all occurred in 1996, and for sure was up THREE months.... thus we can begin to see that the same time we started seeing major "climate change" is the same time they removed one of the Van Allen belts.
If you remove a protective layer of the upper ionosphere , which shields us from the Sun, then you should expect the Sun to have a greater impact on the Earth below once the shield is gone.
That is exactly what happened. Global spikes in Temperatures, Earthquakes, and Volcanic eruptions began in earnest after the year 1996.
Now we know the culprit.