Behind
the Green Mask of Rosa Koire
"Leading
the latest wave of American opposition to UN Agenda 21 and Sustainable
Development is a California Democrat named Rosa Koire. Rosa promotes herself as
an expert. Expert in what? UN Agenda 21? Sustainability? Most certainly. She
knows as much about the UN Agenda 21 plan as her expert teachers at the John
Birch Society do. There's no doubt newcomers learn a lot from her. Rosa knows
exactly how the plan works to take American's private property.
.jpg)
Rosa
Koire read our original works on Communitarianism in 2010 and emailed me to
tell me it was “excellent.” She re-named her 501(c)(4) (a dodgy unaccountable Third Sector tax-exempt nonprofit
organization, IMHO Angry Cheese) the Post Sustainability Institute and defined
Post-sustainability as “the condition of environmental, political, social, and
economic systems after the imposition of Communitarianism.” (Notice it does not
say “law”.)
The PSI
mission declares the PSI is a “non-partisan, non-governmental think tank
established to study the impacts UN Agenda 21/ Sustainable Development and
Communitarianism have on liberty, by tracking the progression of the
Sustainability movement and forecasting likely outcomes.” The PSI mission says
Communitarianism is the “dominant form of world governance.”
At a
glance it all sounds great, and even I was kind of okay with the PSI mission,
at first. But the truth is, the ACL is the only place in the world that
published any scientific, theoretical research about LA21 being part of global
Communitarian governance. Besides our long research topic page on Agenda 21 and
Communitarianism, first published at the ACL website in 2003, the ACL published
the original and only existing reasoned antithesis to Philosophical
Communitarianism. Where are the papers produced by Rosa Koire's PSI think tank?
They don't exist. The PSI “think tank” has never published one original
scientific study on Communitarianism showing it as the foundation for LA21.
Rosa
published her book about the plan, Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, in
2011. The first two lines of her book are “The arm of UN Agenda 21 is long and
reaches into every area of the world. The Philosophy of Communitarianism
pervades this plan.”
Again,
there is no direct citation for Rosa's opening statement about Communitarianism
pervading the plan. She states it without ANY attribution or showing how she
arrived at this original conclusion. She shows no valid scientific path she
took or where she even got her idea. She cannot defend it. She simply announces
the Philosophy of Communitarianism is behind Agenda 21 like she decided that
was what it is with magic. Rosa cunningly states our copyrighted
antithesis to Communitarianism over and over, as if it requires no direct
attribution and no clear citation of her source.
I called it robbery when I finally read her book
earlier this year. Rosa defended her stealing it on my blog by saying our
copyrighted, original antithesis belongs to the “public domain.” As she is a
“forensic commercial real estate appraiser specializing in eminent domain
valuation,” Rosa made her personal fortune off the government's “right” to TAKE
private property for the public good. Now she is making money off our
intellectual property, our copyrighted, private property, protected by law
under the U.S. Constitution, because she decided it was necessary to TAKE it
from us for the public good. Rosa seems to think her “twenty-eight year career
as an expert witness on land use and property values” gives her some extra
special legal insight into what constitutes the value of our intellectual
property.
At first
I was honored to be recognized by someone of her caliber for all the published
work we have put out. After Rosa emailed me it quickly moved to voice, with us
chatting it up, sharing stories and gossip. I had the impression we were going
to become friends. I told her I was exhausted, sick, losing teeth and steam
after our decade of intense research and writing on Anti Communitarianism. I was
camping year round in Alaska (still am) and barely scraping by. Sales of our
books were slow, not enough to even keep simple food on our table, so I was
ready to do whatever she asked of me in hopes it would increase ACL Book sales.
When she linked to the ACL and said I was a member of PSI Board of Directors, I
really thought the ACL finally had a strong ally. Except... I did notice how
she used our original thesis in her PSI mission without attributing it to us
anywhere in her mission statement.
So, it
shouldn't have been such a shock to finally learn in 2013 that for the first
107 pages of her book she used the term Communitarianism repeatedly to back up
her Anti UN Agenda 21 position, without once citing the ACL as her source for
the connection between the two. When she finally does mention me, just me and
NOT my co-author Nordica Friedrich, it's as if I'm just someone who taught her
about the Hegelian dialectic, because I'm the world's “foremost critic” of
Communitarianism.
On page
108, Rosa says, “I learned about the Hegelian Dialectic from Niki Raapana, the
world's foremost critic of Communitarianism. Her book, 2020: Our Common
Destiny, is an excellent analysis of the supranational movement of
Sustainable Development. The Hegelian Dialectic is the philosophical basis for
Communitarianism. The idea is that true freedom only comes through slavery to
the state because then all free will is relinquished to a higher order
(government).”
Is it
clear to Rosa's readers at this point that, “The Hegelian Dialectic is the
philosophical basis for Communitarianism” is our original thesis, or that
everything they read about Communitarianism for the last 107 pages of her book
was just an unattributed rip off of our original works? I seriously doubt it.
There are
two co-founders of the ACL, two authors of What is the Hegelian dialectic?, two
contributors to 2020: Our Common Destiny, and, 2020: Our Common
Destiny is NOT about the Hegelian dialectic.
Rosa
Koire knows how to speak up at meetings and flyer neighborhoods, but she is not
capable of writing a whole new philosophical school of thought, as we did with
our Anti Communitarian Manifesto. Her misleading and absolutely wrong
explanation of communitarianism, using watered down milk, is so
unbelievably stupid, I wonder why she bothered to try to “explain” it at all.
Why did
Rosa start out in her opening paragraph denying the existence of Communitarian
Law, EU Communitarian Case Law and the acquis communitaire, Communitarian Harmonization
and Norms, the Earth Charter, the Declaration of Human Rights, the
Communitarian Constitution of Bolivia, the International Court's Communitarian
case against Pinochet, and other existing legal documents with:
“Communitarianism 'balances' the rights of the individual. Because the rights
of the community are not defined in a constitution they can change without
warning or notice; one's individual rights are balanced against a continuously
amorphous rulebook.” We'll come back to this later.
Why
didn't Rosa cite us as the source for the additional ABCD research she ads to
her personal story of Jim Diers on pages 128 to 132, especially when she says
“This is Communitarianism.” on page 130?
She
refers to Seattle (where we learned about ABCD in 2000), ties it all to
“mapping community assets” (Chapter Three in 2020), and almost verbatim
quotes my 2005 One Nation Under Siege video interview where I describe
the 11 page ABCD questionnaire. She refers her readers to the copy of it posted
at her website and neglects to mention we have an entire chapter devoted to it.
She got most of what she writes about ABCD and mapping from us. We exposed the
Obama's training in ABCD. We devoted Chapter 4 of 2020 to the GIS and
Mandatory Volunteerism. Reading Rosa Koire's book, there is no indication that
she “borrowed” so heavily from two author's copyrighted works.
Exactly
like we did in our book 2020, Rosa begins her book “teaching”
Communitarianism. Then she tells the story of two womens' local resistance to
the plan, and how they found UN Agenda 21. Except for our Big Mother's
Double Tongued Dictionary and international contributors, Rosa ends her
book exactly like we did too! Is it worth noting here that it was Nordica
Friedrich who laid out the entire format for TACM and 2020,
Nordica who made it a “story of how two women followed a paper trail from their
lowly Seattle neighborhood to the elite boardrooms of the United Nations?”
Did
removing Nordica's name and private property ownership from ALL our published
works make it easier for Rosa to steal it because she wasn't stealing food
directly from Nordica's babies' mouths? What WAS the point of her doing that?
It just doesn't make any sense. Did she take Nordica's name off everything we
published because Talmudic Law requires “two witnesses” to report a crime?
According
to Property Rights expert Rosa Koire, Intellectual Property, U.S.
copyright claimed by poor authors like us who can show over a decade of
original, published work, can't be controlled by the minds that actually
created it and copyrighted it. It's simply not ours anymore! Why does Rosa
think our intellectual property belongs to her and the public domain?
Well, our original, hard work is just so important we don't get to own
it. Is that a decision she made based on Talmudic Law?
There is
one major difference between our stories. We gave up everything to do our
research, we went broke to sue the City of Seattle, to build our massive
website with over 10,000 exit links to direct sources, and to write our books.
Rosa boasts of her fund raising skills and tells readers about how her
neighbors jumped out of their seats to write checks so that she could sue her
city. Rosa Koire raised half a million dollars for her lawsuit (and she's doing
it again now). We never raised a dime.
We were
just defending principles in Dawson v Seattle, not principal,
so we had no great outpouring of support. We were not defending our own land,
so we had zero interest from other concerned land owners. We were just poor
tenants. No business leaders were on our side. We didn't have homeowners on our
side. (What about the ACLU? That's another joke on Americans.) Nobody
cared then, or cares now, if renters have privacy rights or not. There wasn't
one group in the nation willing to help us fight the Israeli Community Policing
innovative new home invasion strategies. There still isn't one.
Rosa
writes on page 31: “Familiarize yourself with Communitarianism. It's the
political philosophy behind all of this. It states the individual's
rights are a threat to the global community.” {emphasis added} “It”
doesn't state that! Who is “it”? Are we an “it”? We, Nordica
Friedrich and Niki Raapana, are human beings. We stated it, yes we did, that is
part of our Anti Communitarian legal analysis.
Rosa Koire's rise to the front of the Anti Agenda
21 “movement” was accomplished by promotions of her by Property Rights groups
like the Eagle Forum, Tea Party, John Birch Society, Michael Shaw of Freedom
Advocates, and somebody she calls “Mr. X.” We were never promoted by any of
these groups, except for a short time in 2008 when Michael Shaw began citing
our work and his wife sent us a few sweet donations. This ended abruptly when
Shaw changed his mind and began promoting the “Permanent Revolution” work of
Terry Hayfield (JBS), an online wacko who had been stalking Nordica and I in
internet forums and emails with a crew that all had names from the Wizard of
Oz. Patrick Woods, editor of the August Review, and his son Jason can
testify to that bizarre scene.
Michael
Shaw dropped the word Communitarianism from his Anti Agenda 21 lectures in
2009. He began calling it “tyranny.” We never got any explanation of why he did
that. Tyranny? Rosa told me Michael Shaw's father is the one who designed her
vaguely familiar book cover, but who is the real author of the outrageous claim
in Rosa's book that Zionism has nothing to do with UN Agenda 21 because Israel
is a just a nationalist, tiny country! Not even Rosa Koire is that brazen, is
she?
Why would
Rosa Koire lie so boldly as if nobody would notice her big lies? The path to
answers starts by looking at the missions of leading Right Wing “free
enterprise” capitalists. We see they almost all promote a “return” to Biblical
Law and Christian values. They don't just mean the Ten Commandments, they mean
Talmudic Law. Even U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Bush II insisted the oral,
mystical Talmud is the actual basis for the entire American justice system in
2002. The big lie goes unchecked.
The truth
is, the deadly, silent global Communitarian coup is almost complete, and the
last thing the
Communitarians
need is for anyone to understand what Communitarian Law is before it's a done
deal.
Why does Zionist Glenn Beck promote Koire's plagiarized,
milky version of our work, and not ACL Books? Why does the Tea Party patriot
movement promote Rosa Koire's milk and lies alongside the John Birch Society,
and not ACL Books? Why do the Libertarians, the Ron/Rand Paul Right, Rockwell,
von Mises, Tom Woods etc. continue to ignore or barely name the most important
economic topic of the twenty-first century? Ever heard of a Conservative Communitarian?
Libertarian Communitarian?
Why, it's
such an amazingly perfect synthesis there's even Anarcho Communitarians
now. The Third Way synthesis merges all political ideologies and religions
under Communitarianism. It's not a murky combination of milk and water as Rosa
teaches. It's a murky combination of politics and mysticism. All sides play a
role. Rosa has obviously learned her far right Christian Zionist pals play
theirs expertly.
Our 2003 ACL mission statement is very clear that
we do not endorse any race, religion or culture that claims to be superior to
everyone else. Nordica often describes 2020 as “our treatise against
racism.”
2020: Our Common Destiny shares our conscript experience alongside evidence of U.S. Community
Police training in Israel, called “the Harvard of Anti Terrorism.” The ACL provides
an abundance of evidence of Etzioni's commitment to Militant Zionism, and it's
all taken from his own published works.
Rosa calls identification of the role of Zionism
part of “the dialectic.” This is an utter twisting of our original thesis that
the Hegelian dialectical formula leads to Communitarianism. How is it possible
to remove the Zionist father of Communitarianism from any expose of dialectical
Communitarianism?
The Zionist father of Communitarianism has not only
written over 30 books about the need to rebuild America into a Communitarian
society, his plan for a More Muscular U.S. Foreign Policy is cited in Daily
Pentagon Briefings. In the world of Communitarian deceptions, any
outrageous lie is possible.
What is global Communitarianism without Etzioni,
Zionism or Talmudic Law? Watered down milk.
Rosa's
real reason for stealing all our ACL research and misleading readers into
thinking it is all hers is stated clearly by her on the top of page 31,
“Calling it a Zionist plot is absurd considering that Zionism is a nationalist
movement that is completely opposed to the dissolution of boundaries.”
This
reference Rosa made to Zionism was her perfect opportunity to show her readers
her commitment to the whole truth, to full disclosure of the global governance
plan, by sharing all known facts with her readers. Doesn't she trust her
readers with all the facts? Why wasn't it important enough for Rosa to mention
at this point, or at any point in her book when she said “Communitarianism,”
that a lifelong Zionist, an Israeli soldier adept in Cabala, whose name means
he's the “tree from Zion,” introduced the world to Communitarianism, and maybe that's
why some people might call it a Zionist plot? But of course Rosa makes sure
we get a geography lesson designed to lessen the reality of Israeli influence
based on its size: “(Israel is about the size of Vancouver Island and slightly
larger than New Jersey.)”
Facts are
just facts. It's impossible to deny Zionism is also a spiritual commitment to
Israel made by millions of Christians, worldwide, mainly as a result of the new
Schofield Reference Bible saying any Christian who doesn't support Israel will
go to Hell. Never mind that millions of American non-Zionist taxpayers are
forced to support Zionism to the tune of trillions. Zionism is a lot more than
a little nationalist movement, and Rosa
Koire is very cunningly deceptive when she tries to bury some facts.
How is it
possible to say such an idiotic thing when she's surrounded and paid very well
to speak by so many middle class American Christian Zionists? Besides the Irgun
family legacy assigned to Obama, Dr. Amitai Etzioni and other notable “dual”
citizens in positions of American power and influence, besides the obvious
American Jewish support for Israel, there are millions of Christian Zionists in
the USA. There are more Zionists in America than there are in Israel. Rosa
Koire doesn't know that?
Rosa
writes on page 31, “Another reason why you may not have heard of UN Agenda 21
before is because opposition is often conflated with anti-Semitism.” The
accusation of racism against Jews is a familiar tactic used whenever anyone
even barely mentions Zionism in a political science paper, but this is the
first time I have ever heard this! Opposition to Agenda 21 was always controlled
by Zionist Christians who refused to link to our research because they said we
were “anti-Semitic.”
We think
this slur is entirely unfounded, considering the factual reality that many Jews
worldwide are ANTI Zionist, just as we are. Zionism is NOT a race of people.
It's not even a religion, it's a political ideology, and there's a lot of
traditional, Biblical Jews in the world who not only disagree with it, they
vehemently oppose it. Jews who oppose political Zionism are sneered at by the
Zionists and called “self-hating Jews.” If we have to be labeled as haters
because we oppose Zionism, it would be more appropriate to call us “self-hating
Americans.”
I suppose Rosa's readers don't need to know their
holy Zionist Communitarian guru Etzioni was financed entirely by another globe
trotting Zionist named George Soros, either. Rosa wants her readers in the dark
forever. She ridicules any of her readers who may ask pertinent questions about
Zionism. Is Rosa Koire a professional Zionist propagandist as well as an expert
in public domain takings?
So much for her PSI claim to be “non-partisan!”
The
extremely partisan Zionist “resistance” to LA21 has been trying to shut us up
for a long time. They tried so many different tactics to get us to stop using
the word Communitarianism, maybe someday I'll write them all down. But wow, I
gotta say now that having someone steal our work and revise it to fit the
politically active Zionist's need for complete impunity... that's a first.
Zionists
are not the least bit interested in exposing any facts that point to their
influential role in furthering Communitarianism, and will shut down any writer
who does. We've been working on the fringe of the Anti Agenda 21 arena for 13
years. I say fringe because our work was outright rejected by the Anti Agenda
21 leaders, because we include the taboo subjects of capitalism, Zionism,
Talmudic Law, and Etzioni in our research. All we had to do to be
“successful” was to shut up about the law.
I was
censored by newswithviews for naming the Judaic Law Institute. We've been
stalked online and personally visited by Zionists for 12 years now. It's not
always the same method but it always ends at the same place; we get told to
back off. Sometimes our visitors are very friendly folks. In 2009, a U.S. Army
Pentagon analyst and his wife came all the way to Kenny Lake, Alaska to tell me
to, “back off on the Mossad.” I told Sgt Brian Bloomquist to go back to DC and
put Etzioni's name in his DoD Known Terrorist database, and then to tell the
Pentagon to send me a check for doing their job.
Ten years
ago, Etzioni's office staff claimed in an online public forum that we said
Communitarianism was a Zionist plot. (One Etzioni assistant, Erin Riska,
confirmed some of our Etzioni research that was speculation at the time we
wrote it.) So, yes, we have heard ACL research is taboo before, but the first
time I heard Agenda 21 called a Zionist plot is when Rosa Koire took her
place on the national stage.
Our
rights to privacy and self-determination were “balanced” because U.S. COPS are
taught in Israel that we have “too many rights in this country.” National
opposition to UN Agenda 21 wouldn't even begin until almost a decade after we
were the pilot test for Etzioni's SWAT home inspections.
Rosa, who
entered the arena almost two decades after UN Agenda 21 was adopted at Rio,
mentions all the programs we wrote about. She knows Community Policing was a
topic page at the ACL since 2003, it's the title of Chapter Two in 2020,
but she never refers to us, our research, or our story, not once when she
continually throws out program terms she took directly from ACL research.
Leaders of the Agenda 21 resistance never include our grassroots experiences
with Zionist Community Policing tactics.
Our current book project, Round Green Virgin,
will be finished after we get the funds to complete it. The hardcopy edition of
2020/TACM was such a financial disaster our enemies will say we should
quit publishing altogether! Certainly Rosa Koire demanded I quit. Rosa insisted
I hand it ALL over, so her and the Shaws could take control of our books.
(Michael Shaw is also the same man who quit citing us, quit using the term
Communitarianism, and then told me the word Communitarianism would NOT be part
of the Anti Agenda 21 “movement” in 2009.) Her reason? People want the books
they pre-paid for and I owe her $1000 for the plane ticket to her 2011 Behind
the Green Mask conference.
The fact that I was really too sick to fly was not
a valid “excuse” for not going. When Nordica was all prepped and set to go in
my place, Rosa refused to allow her to come. Nordica Friedrich was not welcome
to speak at the first national conference focusing on Communitarianism and
Agenda 21! (How's THAT for controlled opposition?) Of course Michael Shaw was
the Featured Speaker, and the rest, as they say, is history. As for Nordica's
copyright on both our books and her 100% ownership of our website and our ACL
Books company... well, let's just pretend she doesn't exist, shall we?
Rosa never once offered to purchase the rights
to reprint our copyrighted research. She showed utter contempt for the decade
of sacrifices we made to create Anti Communitarianism. Our position as poor,
humble, non-affiliated authors always made us look like easy targets. So, why
pay for it?
Rosa spends half a page admonishing her readers to
drop any valid scientific inquiry (as in What is the Hegelian dialectic?)
because identifying religious and political concepts is “not productive, not
realistic.” She says naming all the players, religions and economic theories
that make up the
Communitarian philosophy “feeds right into the
dialectic.” Rosa says we all need “to come together.”
Somebody please explain to Rosa, after she's done
singing her Beatles' tune, that a legitimate study of Communitarianism must
include all known facts about it, or it is not a scientific study.
The
honest scientist is not allowed to remove hard evidence from the table just
because they have a financial attachment to hiding that piece. Our work was not
non-profit, grant funded, or government controlled. We've never been government
employees! We don't censor facts. We include every religion and every political
system that contributes to the final synthesis. We examine communism,
capitalism, fascism, socialism and Zionism, as they all relate to achieving the
final Hegelian dialectical synthesis.
Zionism
is a political system based on dialectical religious law, and there is way too
much evidence of its influence on Communitarianism (and communism and capitalism)
to deny it. Who determined Zionism cannot be exposed along with the theory it
supports? Who decided to drop the most important word “law” from any future
discussion of Communitarianism? And, why would they?
Rosa says
in her acknowledgments at the very end of her book that my books “were
invaluable in making sense of the source.” I find that so vague. “Sense of the
source?” What source? My co-author Nordica who she removed? And, oh my
God, if by I helped her make sense of the source she means Hegel, then that's
just over-the-top, because based on her stupid water and milk demonstration, I
obviously didn't help her understand our antithesis against Hegel and
Communitarianism at all!
Wait! She
must mean Dr. Etzioni! He is the true “source” of all modern Communitarianism,
is he not?
What does Rosa Koire tell her readers about
our Communitarian guru, Amitai Etzioni, Dr. Tree of Life from Zion? What does
Rosa Koire write about our Communitarian guru's 60+ years in Israeli military
intelligence, his religio-political cult, his Fabian Socialist mentors, his
influence on the White House, his KGB global Community Policing network, his
global influence on local sustainability projects, his programs for mandatory
volunteerism, or the Communitarian Network he founded in DC in 1990?
Shhhhhhhh.
Amitai
Etzioni is hidden from her readers; Rosa Koire never even mentions his name.
And...
good grief... she says there is only an “amorphous rulebook.” That's so not
true, not even in the U.S. where it's all very quietly done. Communitarianism
is not all shapeless soft law, Delphi Technique and shaming. It's not only
coming down under UN Agenda 21 or Sustainable Development. It's not only an
attack on American's Property Rights! It's not an uncomfortably vague,
unformed, unstructured plan or program for development. It's a massive, very
structured, organized global justice system.
On her
very first page Rosa writes: “the rights of the community are not defined in a
constitution.”
Why would
she write something so easy to be checked and so easily proven to be untrue?
She knows the Bolivians rewrote a Communitarian Constitution in 2009, two years
before she published her book. How will she explain the newly revised
Communitarian Scottish Constitution? And the next one? Did she miss the
part in our book where we cited the blueprint for Global Communitarian
Citizenship?
Rosa
freely plagiarized our thesis and program research, but she not only avoided
our constitutional law and Etzioni research, she purposefully negated it, as if
somebody told her it was all taboo.
Rosa
knows the 2005 EU Constitution was written with a Communitarian Supremacy of
Law clause. She knows the foundation for trade unions under the WTO establishes
Communitarian Law. She read it in our book, a book full of direct source
citations of laws and constitutional changes, even in the U.S.
Rosa
knows the changes to the law in the USA. She read, “In the state of Oregon, an
evolving law of search and seizure suggests that communitarian precepts can be
translated into workable and coherent State constitutional doctrine.” Taking
Law Seriously: Communitarian Search and Seizure, American Criminal Law
Volume: 27 Issue 4 Dated (1990) pp 583-617. It's cited in 2020: Our Common
Destiny.
What Rosa
surely knows is, if we can't look at Zionism, maybe we won't take Talmudic Law
seriously,
In 2012,
the Communitarian Pachamama cult unveiled their proposal for the Eleven Laws
of Nature, described as “Human Rights for Mother Earth.” The proposal calls
for a new UN international court with authority to try and convict anyone,
anywhere, in any nation, who violates Mother Earth laws.
The Affordable
Health Care Act, taking effect right now in the USA, is a Communitarian
Law. The “right” to mandate purchase of health care insurance is based entirely
in Etzioni's vision for the world. The enforcement arm for this U.S.
Communitarian Law is the Internal Revenue Service, which has been proved, in
U.S. Courts, time and time again, to have no constitutional authority to exist.
The “right” to tax, fine, shoot and jail citizens, to make them to pay for
programs that destroy their “right” to life, liberty and happiness, is a
Communitarian “right.” This is what Dr. Etzioni means by “balance.”
On
January 1, 2013, Pope Benedict declared, “Communitarian Development is God's
Plan.” Should we all be preparing for an Inquisition against anyone or any
nation who defies development?
What
lengths will the Communitarians go to ensure the success of their global coup,
besides misleading basically decent, kindhearted Americans? We need look no
further than the bombed out ancient civilizations in the Middle East, some very
stubborn holdouts against Etzioni's more moral, peaceful Communitarianism.
The
phony, circular, go-nowhere dialectical wars between the Americans and the Arab
world are absolutely necessary to leading the unwashed refugee Arab masses to
accepting sub-nation status under Communitarian Harmonization of Norms. History
shows us the Arab nations were strong American allies all the way up until
1948, before Etzioni and his terrorist buddies took over Palestine. The first
really successful Communitarian project put the Palestinians behind a “Berlin”
wall. The Green Space between national law and Communitarian Supremacy of Law
is not a hidden agenda. The only “green mask” over UN Agenda 21 in the Middle
East is the one the Zionists use to shield it from Americans.
There
have been a few minor glitches to the plan. There are actual human beings
involved as pawns, and they are sometimes unpredictable. But, regardless of how
the war actually began, and why, the demands the Syrian refugees make now come
directly from the old Zionist-communist playbook. Demands for positive Human
Rights, very caring people insisting on fake UN rights that lead to final
destruction of the world's most ancient Muslim strongholds, these are powerful
Communitarian tools.
Communitarian
developers are all over the world now; fellow travelers work their activist
magic to foment the changes. The difference between cons and locals is simple;
real locals fight to win and END the conflicts, whereas destruction of people,
cultures, religions and neighborhoods is the Communitarian's first and primary
goal. The cons feed off the RE-building too.
They love
rivers of local blood and millions of homeless refugees. Their only real job is
to ensure the locals argue dialectically until the cows come home or keep
shooting 'til there's no more bullets, so they can sink their Communitarian
development plan into the veins of the peace talks and settlements, as the only
“moral” solution.
Hollywood
actress turned UN Goodwill Ambassador Angelina Jolie touched the hearts of
millions with her recent plea to help Syrian refugees. The new Communitarian
high priestess (miraculously reborn into Mother Teresa II) didn't explain her
humanitarian interest in Syria coincides with her family's financial
investments in the UN Millennium Development Goals in Cambodia and U.S. Cities.
Pro-Syrian
refugee activists insist her monetary motives do not matter. Any help is good
help, right?
The
authenticity of famous people or experts teaching us “truths” is really not an
issue, is it? So what
if our
heroes support a few “nice” Communitarian programs, like Rosa's story about how
she got involved in fighting UN Agenda 21 because she wanted to volunteer to do
some Community Service.
Supranational
global governance is based upon Communitarian Law. The Law is a perfectly
balanced mystical combination of all the world's philosophies, all the way back
to the beginning of human history. The authors of this new age religion, of
this complex global law religionalized, are busy as little bees incorporating
every religion and legal system on the planet. No religion, no nation is safe.
What
about that peculiar U.S. barrier to an Established State Religion at the
foundation of American religious tolerance? Oh, you mean the ridiculous
American LAW that declares everyone is free to follow their own
conscience? Don't ya know? It's outdated and spiritually unevolved. It doesn't
apply!
As our sweet little old Israeli Communitarian guru
says:
“The
First Amendment's Disestablishment clause is not a foreign policy tool, but a
peculiarly American conception. Just because the American government is banned
from promoting religion within the United States does not mean that the State
Department and the Pentagon cannot promote religion overseas and in societies
that are undergoing profound societal changes.”
Etzioni
continues, “The last point is crucial. Overseas we are participating as
a key architect and builder of new institutions; we are in what social
scientists call 'the design business.'”
The key
U.S. architect rebuilding Arab religious institutions is Etzioni. We're to
believe the Arabs hate the U.S. because they “hate our freedoms,” not because
we're in the “design business.”
Time for
a Happy Holiday drink! Here's a new alcohol free recipe with a punch:
Mix ½ cup
Etzioni's vision with ½ cup Bolivian claims that their 500 year old Goddess
Pachamama is rooted in their ancient Communitarian traditions. Add 4oz shot of
U.S. Senator Mike Lee (UT) and his Mormon Communitarianism. Top it off with the
Vatican calling it all “God's plan.” Spice it up with the Islamic Communitarian
Imperative by the Futhula Gulen in Turkey and Chiara Lubich Communitarian
spirituality. Liberally garnish with American Methodist Communitarian soul.
Slide angelic Lucifer enlightenment down the straw. Stir lightly. Now, take a
drink and see if you can keep from gagging.
This
Christmas season, do something exceptionally meaningful. Please give generously
to our Anti Communitarian League research. We're hanging in there with nothing.
If the ACL disappears, there will never be any scientific opposition to Etzioni
or Communitarianism. Our “last point is crucial” too.
What kind
of new theory of global justice needs absolute freedom from logic? Not the good
kind.
“Conscience? Ah, that stuff will drive ya nuts.”
Marlon Brando as Terry in On the Waterfront
To order your $17 ebook copy of 2020: Our Common
Destiny & the definitive Anti Communitarian Manifesto, go to http://nord.twu.net/acl. We're also starting
our first newsletter. To sign up for our newslist or to contribute anti
communitarian research to our new magazine, please visit the newly updated site
soon! The new roster of ACL contributors is fantastic and shows the
far-reaching range of people in exotic places who've recognized something
“else” was going on that nobody had a name for."