Is
the UK Environment Agency being deliberately attacked, from within?
Are the right people currently being employed to run it?
Or is it being run by totally inadequate people?
Why would inadequate people, who are out-of-their-depth, be put into positions of influence in Britain?
Is the E.A.
being deliberately rendered incompetent and hopeless, in the eyes of
the British general public, so that it can then be declared ineffective
and unfit for its purpose by the Gov. who will then declare that this
whole area (and it is a hugely important area) needs to be replaced by an
assortment of third sector (unaccountable under the Freedom Of
Information Act 2000) organisations to take charge - in order to "save money" ?
DOES THIS ALSO APPLY TO ALL THE OTHER AREAS OF PUBLIC LIFE IN THE U.K?
Why else would Cameron be continually dismissing Holland's ongoing and considerable offers of help, expertise and equipment?
Is he also hoping for a mini "Katrina" effect, where the people experiencing flooding in the Somerset levels and Thames Valley become demoralised and ruined, and abandon their properties, never to return?
Then he and his hooray Henry, "city" mates can clean up?
Oh, and his wife is into large scale property development too, isn't she?