Woodland Trust v Tories - here they go again, no tree in the UK is safe!

Just been sent an appeal from the Woodland Trust. This Gov. want to tear up ancient woodland AGAIN - for their stupid new train set!

After what Heseltine presided over in the 1990s, Twyford Down and the Newbury ring road, the chances of greedy Tories building any kind of tunnel, for their stupid new train set, in order to save nature and endangered habitat is virtually non-existant. Twyford Down was a site of special scientific interest, and the terrain was chalk, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD! If they couldn't be bothered to pay engineeers to drill through soft chalk, what chance does any woodland or natural habitat have now- under this lot? Look at the Somerset Levels, Cameron could NOT CARE LESS and has turned away expert help from the Dutch - he could not give a damn about the countyside, his swine of a wife is a property developer and is having acres of trees felled around Scunthorpe to create her lucrative concrete monstrosities. Filthy lucre, that's all they care about! The Tories won't be happy until all the trees are cut down and all wildlife in the UK is dead!    
See this:-

http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/campaigning/campaigns/protect-ancient-woodland/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=wt_newsletter_feb2014

Tory Michael Heseltine's barbaric legacy :-

http://www.nce.co.uk/features/nce-40-years/no23-newbury-bypass/8638603.article

"Construction of the Newbury bypass will forever be recalled as the scheme that changed the way engineers think about the environment.

What ignited the treetop and tunnel protests was a road scheme with the goal of improving traffic flow on the A34, the main route between the Midlands and the south coast ports of Portsmouth and Southampton.

And it did - with the opening of the bypass in November 1998 - the entire route, from the M40 to the M3, became dual carriageway.

But controversy dogged the road both before and after its opening. Environmental campaigners set up 29 camps and built treehouses and tunnels in an effort to halt the felling of over 49ha of mature woodland along the route.

The protest made a celebrity out of eco-warrior Swampy and added millions to the project’s costs.

It became the UK’s largest anti-road protest in which more than 1,000 people were arrested. Campaigners were pulled out of trees and starved out of tunnels. Policing and security costs meant the bypass overran its budget by 50% and took 34 months to complete. The 12.8km long bypass cost of £100M.

Swampy emerged as something of a national hero, even appearing on the BBC’s Have I Got News for You. Not everyone was enamoured, however. A magistrate in Reading told Swampy to stop “living off the back of society”.

Former transport minister John Watts said he would like to see him buried in concrete and T-shirts appeared with the slogan “Sod off, Swampy”.

But the change in attitudes to road building since is clear. Anti-road campaigners have changed the way in which they themselves operate." 

Remembering Twyford Down (M3) road protest

 ".....Surely, they said, the law will not permit the beast to chew a path 400 foot wide and 100 foot deep through all this, blocking up rivers, uprooting oaks and chestnuts, smearing tarmac over the camomile and poppies. They were wrong.
They fought with tactics which the beast has seen a hundred times. They signed petitions, wrote letters, showed slides, wrote pamphlets, held rallies, wrote appeals, hired lawyers, wrote cheques. They raised £100,000 and took on the Department of Transport fact by fact, point by point. The department said local people wanted the road; they paid for a Harris opinion poll, which proved the opposite. The department said that 27 species of butterflies and 9 varieties of wild orchid could be transplanted from Twyford Down to another location; they went to English Nature (formerly the Nature Conservancy Council) who said this was nonsense. The department said that their alternative route, through a tunnel, could not be built; they proved it could be.
Radicals warned them it was pointless, but they decided to co-operate with the public inquiry, in 1985. As witnesses, they felt they were treated like criminals, but they persisted. The inspector closed the inquiry without hearing from crucial groups, the Countryside Commission and English Heritage, but they forced him to re-open the hearing in 1987. They believed they fought and won on every point – traffic flows, economic forecasts, geological surveys, cost benefit analysis – but when the report was finally published in 1990, they had lost all the same. They appealed to the European Commissioner, who was appalled to discover that the department had conducted no Environmental Impact Assessment, and last autumn he ordered a halt to the plan. The Department of Transport ignored the order. The protestors went to the High Court and begged for help, but Mr Justice McCullough took the department’s side....."

http://www.nickdavies.net/1992/07/01/the-battle-for-twyford-down/

The battle for Twyford Down,  Published July 1992 

http://www.urban75.org/blog/remembering-twyford-down-m3-road-protest/

State-sponsored vandalism under the Tories in the early 1990s.  Twyford Down, was a "site of special scientific interest", covered in rare plants and the habitat of even more rare butterflies and other insects!  All now dead and gone forever! SO WHAT!  It was trashed by John Major's government!  Michael Heseltine was Minister For The Environment - sick joke or what?! It was his job to RUIN IT! And boy did he .....today this montrously ugly legacy is still a thoroughly sickening perverted sight, and a bloody disgrace to Hampshire and the total bunch of fluoride drinking, brain dead twats who live there and let this happen! SHAME ON YOU! The opening up of south Hampshire to Londoners and Northerners has facilitated acre upon acre upon acre UPON ACRE of the ugliest urban sprawl.  Miles of endless ugly "Barratt Homes" across what were once the strawberry fields, paddocks, grazing areas and ancient woodland all around the New Forest, Southampton, Portsmouth, Bournemouth, Winchester etc.  I hope the Chilterns area knows what it is in for once this train link is built through it!  "Barratt Homes AND BARBARITY- all the way!

Somerset Levels - Money Talks

DO YOU KNOW?

I RENT MY HOME OUT AT £3,000 a MONTH

I CLAIM £21,000 FOR MY SECOND HOME’S MORTGAGE

I LIVE FOR FREE AT 10 DOWNING STREET

Yet I have turned down Dutch offers of help, expertise and equipment to help quickly drain and sort out the flooded Somerset Levels.   After all, what’s in it for me?  Nothing, right?

I have also turned down grants of hundreds of thousands of pounds from the EU to pay for the building of sea defences, river banks, dredging, etc, etc. all around the UK to help the farmers and householders whose lives have been ruined by the floods.  After all, what’ in it for me? Nothing, right?

Not just in Somerset, but Yorkshire, Lincolnshire and other areas!  After all, what’ in it for me? Nothing, right?

SOME PEOPLE CALL ME A CROOK!   

Because I am stuffing the people who voted for me, and are mug enough to trust me and believe I care!   

I do not care! 

I MEAN, show me the money – AND I MIGHT!

SHAPESHIFTING REPTILIAN POLICE OFFICER CAUGHT ON CAMERA LIVERPOOL UK MUS...

Floods, Somerset Levels, Why?

Is the UK Environment Agency being deliberately attacked, from within?

Are the right people currently being employed to run it? 

Or is it being run by totally inadequate people?

Why would inadequate people, who are out-of-their-depth, be put into positions of influence in Britain?

Is the E.A. being deliberately rendered incompetent and hopeless, in the eyes of the British general public, so that it can then be declared ineffective and unfit for its purpose by the Gov. who will then declare that this whole area (and it is a hugely important area) needs to be replaced by an assortment of third sector (unaccountable under the Freedom Of Information Act 2000) organisations to take charge - in order to "save money" ?

DOES THIS ALSO APPLY TO ALL THE OTHER AREAS OF PUBLIC LIFE IN THE U.K?

Why else would Cameron be continually dismissing Holland's ongoing and considerable offers of help, expertise and equipment?

Is he also hoping for a mini "Katrina" effect, where the people experiencing flooding in the Somerset levels and Thames Valley become demoralised and ruined, and abandon their properties, never to return? 

Then he and his hooray Henry, "city" mates can clean up?  

Oh, and his wife is into large scale property development too, isn't she?

http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-week/leading-article/9131442/floods-of-incompetence/

Forbidden History of Britain

Ourstory of Britain by Wilson & Blackett

http://self-realisation.com/video/ourstory-of-britain-playlist/

Sequence 1
Professor Lee Pennington & Dr Joy Pennington filmed Welsh historian Alan Wilson in their house in 1994.
After they all finished eating dinner, they jokingly surprised Alan by asking him to say a few words on his research. Alan, never at a loss for words, responded with no effort at all, and this wonderful two hour straight off-the-cuff footage, is the result.
Its fairly old footage but the content needs to be heard. This area of research is not being done by anyone else, even though its of vital importance.
Because of YouTube restrictions, there are 16 separate 9 minute parts to this two hour footage.

Sequence 2
This two hour documentary is broken into ten separate parts each around 15 minutes long. Alan Wilson & James Michael present this lecture in a College of Kentucky – one of several that Alan lectured at in his lecture tour of 1992. James Michael sadly passed away in January 2008. Were it not for his dedicated work little of this Arthur research would be known in the USA today.

This full documentary contains not just a presentation lecture but also extra footage which has never been broadcast until now. You will be shown some of the vast amounts of evidence concerning the voyage of Arthur 2 and Prince Madoc sailing from Britain to America during the 6th century – almost a thousand years before Columbus.

Also covered later in the documentary is James Michael explaining the ancient British Coelbren alphabet, and its connection to many inscriptions found in the America.
The establishment crooks have written off this Coelbren alphabet as the creation of a Welsh-British Antiquarian called Iolo Morganwg during the19th century, yet the authors easily show in their books how this accusation is completely false and they give many examples of its use and notice CENTURIES prior to the time of the alleged forgery.

The documentary is not always good quality in parts as it was only converted in 2008 using old VHS tapes originally recorded in 1992. Despite this it is a brilliant and informative documentary of how history — like most things — has been manipulated and forgotten.

As of today (April 2013) Alan Wilson is now 80 years old and still going strong. He and his life-long fellow researcher Baram Blackett have written and published nine books. They also have available several documentaries ( old and new ) documenting their researches and what happens when you discover things the establishment doesn’t want discovered.

Their books published to date (oldest first) are as follows :-

1 – Arthur, King of Glamorgan and Gwent.
2 – Arthur and the Charter of Kings.
3 – Arthur the War King
4 – Artorius Rex Discovered
5 – The Holy Kingdom
6 – The King Arthur Conspiracy
7 – Moses in the Hieroglyphs
8 – The Discovery of the Ark of the Covenant
9 – The Trojan War of 650 BC
More information can be found at:
RichPlanet.Net

Sequence 3

A documentary by Rich Hall about Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, who have researched ancient british history for over 30 years. Their time, effort and dedication needs the recognition it deserves. Please mirror to help spread this information.

Alan Wilson interview http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xedb…
Alan Wilson & Baram Blackett’s official web site http://kingarthurslegacy.com/
Forensic Historians: http://www.richplanet.net/index.php

Scotland, Currency, Independence. A prediction from January 2008...

ONLY JUSY STARTING TO DISCUSS THIS - APPARENTLY!!??

http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/scottish-independence-scotland-would-leave-pound-1-3304826

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/andrewlilico/100026646/an-independent-scotland-would-have-to-join-the-euro-heres-why-and-what-it-means/

Here is my prediction, from back in January 2008!:-

The United Kingdom? Scotland's Vital Role.

The fact is we all get along quite well in the British Isles and we move around much more these days and live in each others' countries, and generally there is no real problem. Traditionally we still have our regional differences which occasionally manifest themselves, usually during sporting events, but these could be ignited into something more confrontational and extreme by those with ulterior wicked or distructive intentions. Generally the British have worked together very well in the recent past, facing the huge historical problems placed before us. In fact it has been rather wonderful, but to some it may seem that we British have done far too well over the last 200 years, and achieved far too much, and that this situation cannot be allowed to continue!

Why exactly did Blair and Co. devolve power to the regions on taking office? I do not remember the subject being discussed much or in any great detail on the run up to that election? Obviously, the people of Northern Ireland badly needed change of some kind but the scale of the plan for an actual Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly came as a total surprise to many ordinary people, after New Labour obtained power ten years ago.

I believe they are a diversion to split opinion across the UK and to awaken ancient, ugly, tribal grievances, enabling Westminster and The City to get up to their self-serving schemes while the distracted general population squabbles in dismay over the fairness of prescription charges, tax and welfare, student fees and the principle of North Sea oil.

See (a) for a recent example of needless mischief-making by a smirking “lord,” stirring up the sediment at the bottom of the pond. Expect much more of this kind of infantile behaviour in the future, from those of privilege and in power. (If he has only just discovered these verses then it does not say much for his education, they were covered in my junior state-school music class! Along with certain verses of Rule Brittania, and in some old sea-shanties that were fun to sing but would now be non-PC. ) Trouble-making is very much part of the new agenda, and there is a lot more at risk than just an old-fashioned patriotic song from a different era!

SCOTLAND’S VITAL ROLE

Why did Blair recently disband the most world-famous Scottish regiments? Could the reason be to encourage the Scots to resent the British Government? 

Has it worked?

I believe that certain people in our government, in banking, business and the establishment, powerful people, secretly desire and relish the regional rivalries that are now developing. In fact they are deliberately causing them. These Europhiles have been very busy for a long time undermining the institution of the United Kingdom. The UK has been a success for about three centuries but is now obsolete and is being replaced by the EU which has been specifically developed to facilitate the national and fiscal absorption of all European and surrounding countries. Some interesting facts:

1) Scotland has always been a very powerful and important country. Many are not aware that, historically, Scotland has often lead in the creation of legislation which is then introduced at a later time in the rest of Great Britain. This is an old, established legal precedent. Not all law in our history has been passed first in London and then imposed on Scotland.

An example involves unpasteurised milk which is banned in Scotland but permitted in England. Blair intended to simply bring English law into line with Scotland, on becoming Prime Minister, and bring in a total ban. However, English dairy farmers and their customers campaigned and Blair was forced to back down. The precedent was there though, for Scotland to lead and for England to follow, and he could have easily done this. It is nothing new, and could have been achieved with little more than the proverbial stroke of a pen.

Traditionally, the UK countries have some differing laws which have developed reflecting local religion or custom. Two examples; you could not buy a drink in parts of Wales on Sunday in the old days because all the pubs were shut. There are no abortion clinics in Northern Ireland.

2) Mary Queen of Scots and Bonnie Prince Charlie, are two famous examples of the many historical, pre-UK, attempts of Scots striving to thwart the English with aid from European countries i.e. France, Rome (the Vatican) and Spain.

3) Scottish banks have printed their own banknotes for centuries.

Now continue thinking along the lines of Scotland leading, and England following and just bear with me here:

If, or when, Scotland goes completely independent it will then deal with the EU in its own right. The pressure to abandon Sterling and join the euro will become intense. Many blinkered fools in Scotland, feeling tribal and possibly believing life is just a game of football, will want to dump Sterling just to cheese off the English, not realising or considering that this

a) may not be in their own peoples’ best long-term interest and
 

b) may be exactly what the British Government and the other major political parties have secretly desired and been planning for.

Joining the euro will be marketed to young Scots as being their future and a fresh start, shaking off stuffy old Britain. Older people will decline, and impressionable younger people will be voting for, and will be elected to, the Scottish Parliament. Nonsense like the oil issue will be argued over, as if the English people or the Scots have ever or will ever own or benefit from it. Don't be so naive!

If they go for it, England, Wales and N. Ireland will then have to change as well. We already have Ireland and France with euros. If Scotland changes to the euro, all our near neighbours will then be using the euro and Sterling really will no longer be practical. Scotland will have achieved a very hollow victory which future generations throughout the whole of the British Isles will deeply regret.

 
The English government of the day will be able to pretend total innocence and appear helpless in the winds of change, and people may never suspect that it was planned all along, over years, by those in power back-stage of the political scene. This is how the Europhile Establishment may be planning to introduce the euro into Great Britain because at the moment the idea is still very unpopular here.
 
It could happen. Why else would Blair have bothered?
 
Is it important? Does it really matter if we change to the euro?

http://www.ukcolumn.org/bring-back-the-bradbury