Claiming ownership of our original thesis on Agenda 21 & Communitarianism
by Niki Raapana and Nordica Friedrich.
Keep finding new places that are citing our antithesis as if it's just
"common knowledge" now. This is a major breakthough and we're very
pleased to see how far and wide it's gone. After ten years of being the
only people pushing an original Anti Communitarian thesis into the
mainstream arena, it's a very good feeling to witness how many people
have finally learned to pronounce it!
The downside for us is, the world is so communitarian now that our
copyright on our published thesis and our original idea has been
violated on a scale we never imagined. We are seeing our names removed,
portions reproduced as if the author was someone else, or flat out
plagiarization of everything. Worst of all, some writers are twisting it
around and adding their own conclusion to our thesis without bothering
to show where in the hell they came up with their idea! Academia has
always been plagued with robbers who steal papers from fellow students. I
wonder how often it's happened outside academia. We may not only have
one of the most widely read original theses in modern times, but we may
also own the most plagiarized thesis by non-academics in modern times.
Our original research, thoughts, lines, articles, and thesis is in other people's books
Sustainable Development Handbook
It's in videos of other people
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PHBHsxIG-zg
http://shiftfrequency.com/tag/communitarianism/
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/10/un-agenda-21-exposed-with-rosa-koire-video-2482896.html
http://shiftfrequency.com/tag/communitarianism/
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/10/un-agenda-21-exposed-with-rosa-koire-video-2482896.html
It's in articles "written" by other people
Community by Coercion Communitarianism New American May 31, 2004
COOLECTIVIST MINDSET: RECIPE FOR REVOLUTION
It's in letters written by other people
Our original idea has been reproduced so
many times many people may assume Rosa Koire, the John Birch Society or
Debra Rae are the ones who showed conclusively the role of
Communitarianism in Agenda 21. They did not. The JBS barely mentioned it
in the past 20 years, and only lately began using the term in their
Anti Agenda 21 meetings. Debra Rae went so far as to take entire
sections out of 2020: Our Common Destiny as well as TACM,
and while she mentions she took most of her article from us at her
website, she apparently forgot where she got it when she gained a larger
audience at News With Views. Rosa Koire did not do any original
research that led her to a Communitarian conclusion either. Rosa read
both our books before she put her final argument together. But she never
cites us in her public speaking engagments anymore (not since her Tea
Party video in 2011), and she actually removed Nordica's name from TACM.
The upside is that Rosa never removed the reference and link to the
Anti Communitarian League at DemocratsAgainstUNAgenda21. We're still in
her book somewhere (haven't seen it yet).
I have no problem saying Rosa Koire has
done a tremendous amount of research on her own. She has been a major
force in bringing Agenda 21 in front of the Tea Party and the Religious
Right. We do not disparage the valuable contributions she's made to
exposing the plan in her traveling book promotions. But Rosa did not
make the connections between Communitarianism and Agenda 21, she knows
she didn't, and it's dishonest of her to make it appear like she did.
Now I'm fully aware that communitarian America doesn't care what we
sacrificed to provide this thesis to them. I've heard the Christian
collectivists whining more than the leftists about how it doesn't matter
where the information comes from, it's so important the rules do not
even apply. I've been told I'm jealous of Rosa's success. I've been told
I need to "share more." Total BS. I defend property rights for everyone
else, why wouldn't I give myself and my co-author the same
consideration? I do know zero value is placed on intellectual property
on the internet, but it's just hilarious that other people so worried about their property rights
think it's okay to steal ours! We haven't gone around asking everyone
who reposts our website/works to take it down. As long as there is
proper attribution, it's educational and not for profit, it's allowed.
Remove the attribution, pretend it's your original thoughts and words,
or make money off it, and it's not allowed.
There is only one antithesis that shows Communitarianism is the
synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic. There is only one antithesis that
shows Agenda 21 is Communitarianism. There is only one book in the world
that shows evidence for the connection between Agenda 21 and
Communitariansim, Communitarian Law, Asset Based Community Development
and Community Oriented Policing. Those are chapter titles in 2020: Our Common Destiny & The Anti Communitarian Manifesto.