Cicero, Roman statesman and lawyer
""The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. " Thomas Jefferson.
from Moriarty’s Police Law. 17th edition, page 202.
Treason means treachery, a betraying or breach of faith and in law denotes the grave crime of treachery towards the Sovereign as head of the State and any betraying of the State itself. Blackstone terms it the highest civil crime which any man can commit…
Question Your Reality
“..How is it possible that so many brilliant minds cannot see past the antithesis to the ultimate synthesis? Obama IS the synthesis, he said all kinds of things during the campaign that were easy to see were communitarian. Left... right... why even use these terms anymore to describe anything that has current political relevancy? Why can't the left or the right see the PERFECT middle? Why is communitarianism still a taboo topic to scholars who so easily break every other taboo?..” Niki Raapana, F.A.Qs on Communitarianism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGU8FOuLdSY “…I read until I couldn’t see..” “.. The Global Marshall Plan..” “..Agenda 21..” the reason for all the recent wars
The new politics:- neither left nor right but centre https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWnYGTIC7lw
The Angry Cheese's Philosophy:
New or unusual viewpoints which you have never heard of or come across before need to be considered, thought about and the evidence for them studied, if only briefly. If you are scathingly labelling everything new to you a conspiracy theory and thoughtlessly dismissing it out of hand because of this trendy expression you have recently picked up then you are an IDIOT - a FOOL! And you are behaving very dangerously! You are closing your mind and literally shrinking your brain. You are lazy and you are wasting your God-given intelligence by not stretching it. The human brain needs to be exercised just like the human body. You will stay a stupid, ignorant, immature child your whole life until you die of old age if you do not regularly use your powers of thought, imagination and reasoning. Please,
Open your mind, and try to learn something new every day.
Follow the White Rabbit:
short film: Slavery and the 8 Veils that Blind Us.
The Admitted Trick of the EU
This can be accomplished by successive steps, each diguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversably lead to federation."
Jean Monnet, founding father of the EU. 1943
The french bureaucrat became Societe Generale of The League of Nations - the forerunner of today's EU.
The EU, “A Slow-Motion Coup D’état,” Christopher Booker.
The U.K. is now a POST industrial society, which is just a clever way of saying we're being totally ASSET STRIPPED! Our industrial heart is being ripped out and given to the greedy elite so they can exploit third world people (often children) who will work for a crust, for pennies, for peanuts!
From America. Sound familiar?
A Nation Adrift,
Stop Common Purpose and the EU,
On the surface, Common Purpose is an educational charity which provides leadership and networking development training.
In reality, C P is a corrupt, subversive and sinister organisation which seeks to destroy the national identity of
..Most people have never heard of C P which is strange because C P has corruptly abused millions of pounds of taxpayers' money...
..All Common Purpose "graduates" have been corrupted and are totally untrustworthy…
..It makes me sick that while service men and women are risking their lives in
..I cannot express in words how appalled I am at the actions of Common Purpose and the New Lab government. C P has also infected the Conservatives and the Lib Dems. They cannot be trusted either…
…British governments are elected to govern - not to rule, dictate to and betray their own citizens… NOW READ ON :-www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865
AND SO IT SPREADS :-
Common Purpose - a secretive charity whose training creates a charity to encourage youngsters to set up charities?!
Supported by Deutsche Bank? But paid for with your tax money!
Brian Gerrish meets Alex Jones:
And on Red Ice Radio, Brian Gerrrish:
Common Pupose - Meddling Beyond Ability?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDBHgq9UTIo Stepford Wives or Wot? Spooky, and so fashionably diverse!
Leading beyond authority can mean acting ultra vires.
Ultra vires is a legal concept. It is Latin for "beyond the powers". It can apply to any body which has rules, such as a charity or a local authority. An ultra vires act is one that is outside the specified and/or implied constitutional objects and powers of the body in question. It is "beyond the powers" and therefore illegal.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQqp5PAsF5s Meddling Beyond Ability?
It's Really MARXISM
A Russian / Chinese sort of thing......being imposed here in UK
George Orwell's legacy insulted by Plato-esque "Guardian" class
Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."
A more appropriate George Orwell Prize:
Socialism's Charm + Communism's Charm =
“Lenin” was a wicked tyrant, worse than Ivan the Terrible. “Lenin” was not even his real name! "Trotsky" was not his real name either!
How It Works, Niki Raapana Explains:
'Big Society' Invented by Chinese Communists
Charity - Community - Communitarianism
‘The E.U. is based entirely in supremacy of Communitarian Law.’
‘Amitai Etzioni calls the European Union “a beautiful idea.”’
‘Etzioni defines his belief in peaceful disarmament as Fabian.’
‘Amitai Etzioni means “tree of life from
Keen Communitarian and Etzioni pupil living in the Ivory Tower of Academia is, university lecturer and civil servant Dr. Henry Tam who has been active in influencing for many years, not only the British Government under New Labour but also, Conservative, Liberal and Green policy. See Tam in action:
introduction by Fung 32.34, Tam boasts 33.40. – 44.10.
Henry Tam's "Together We Can" morphed into Obama's
"Yes We Can" = "Thank You Satan"
Facism in the UK being developed NOW:
Tam also pontificates on his blog http://henry-tam.blogspot.com
Listen to this arrogant, over-educated, sanctimonious person, “Another natural disaster, another prompt to donate money to help those in need. That’s absolutely right. And decent people – i.e., most of the human race minus hate-warped evangelists – respond…” Tuesday, 2 February 2010.
What rubbish! Tam is an arrogant, vicious deceiver who frequently makes scathing judgements and false statements. Who the hell is he to state what is right or wrong in relation to what people choose to donate? And would he care to define what a “hate-warped evangelist” is? Perhaps it is a Christian who objects and questions the warped filth of Communitarianism? Is Tam flakey? He is a liar. “Most of the human race,” did not send money to Haiti relief charities – for a start, only those with access to western technology even heard about it, and only those in “the west” could afford to! And, thanks to Etzioni, Tam and Middleton, etc. a growing number of people in “the west” now do not support or trust ANY CHARITY AT ALL, due to their new found understanding of the total non-accountability, the laissez faire irresponsibility and theft that now exists in the Third (Charity) Sector!
Communitarianism - will take everything from you - even your life!
Nobel Prize Winner Joseph Stiglitz
Ms V and rccoones films (removed from YouTube)
http://vimeo.com/185581 Ms V. and rccoones films removed from YouTube may be viewed here.
Sheffield. Common Purpose is riddled through the running of this city, as it is in many others across Britain. Sheffield features very prominently in the latest edition of Brian Gerrish’s paper the UK Column. Here is a local man speaking out in relation to Common Purpose and Sheffield City Council, www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdsYHri7ovI
WARNING! Qui tacet consentire videtur
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
U.S.Tea Parties Anti Communitarian But Don't Know It!
from the co-founder of the Anti Communitarian League
Every policy the Tea Party has protested is based entirely in communitarian ideology. From National Health Care to the Bank Bailout to the Stimulus Package to Stop the IRS and End the Fed, it's all communitarian. Yet the actual word, communitarianism, is missing from your protests and debates. Our entire country is being led down a communitarian path without any idea of how it's happening. So, I'd like to present it to you as a topic for discussion.
This is not an attempt to take-over or co-opt your party. I have zero aspirations for political or leadership positions. Simply bringing the topic of communitarian development before American voters has been the driving force behind everything I've written about it for the past ten years. My primary goal is to make the changeover to communitarian government open to public debates in every affected country.
Communitarianism is the belief that individual and national sovereignty must be balanced against the needs of the global collective. Their entire foundation for forced social evolution rests on their Big Idea that all the world's people will be "free" after everyone gives up any claims to their personal freedom. Defined as the new "spirit" of community, Communitarians believe they are leading mankind into an advanced moral and spiritual state of being. Across the globe, communitarian gurus promote a global program designed to create one big, planned, gated community. They call it sustainable community development.
Anti communitarianism is the antithesis to communitarianism. That means we think the opposite of communitarians. We disagree with their Big Idea. We oppose forced social evolution. We disrespect their organizations. We object to communitarian programs, policies, and laws being enforced upon nations that have not legally adopted supremacy of communitarian law. We hate what they've done to America.
The Anti Communitarian League began in Seattle, Washington in the spring of 1999. We were renters who became targets in a huge land war between the community planners and our wealthy landlord. I spent three years volunteering my time to help "slumlord" Hugh Sisley resist hostile, "innovative" government land use actions against him and his tenants. (Sisely and the City won; We the Tenants lost.)
The City of Seattle and King County government had established new agencies with new agency rules. These offices were granted expanded power to write and enforce new judicial administrative regulations. Their new laws supposedly completely overruled our 4th and 5th Amendment Rights. When we complained and insisted on a Redress of Grievances, City officials told us our rights had already been balanced against the "rights of the community at large." When they could not provide evidence for this drastic change to U.S. Rule of Law, I began reading everything about it that I could find .
I learned very quickly that this wasn't just an ordinary local land dispute. It was apparent to me that we were on the front lines of a massive multi-front war against our individual, state and national freedom.
It took me a full year of reading before I identified the replacement system driving the new actions. American officials rarely tell American voters the name of the new system. The Reinvention of America into a Sustainable Communitarian Paradise was never supposed to be debated or voted upon by the American people. By the time we found out about it, it was, according to our officials, already a "done deal."
In the beginning I was still naive enough to think lots of other Americans would join in our fight. I asked everyone I saw if they knew the Bill of Rights had been replaced with communitarian values. Most of them laughed right in my face. I wrote hundreds of snail mail letters and spent thousands of hours studying, reading, and hoping someone more qualified would take over the resistance. I was shocked to learn we were the only anti communitarians in the United States. I remain horrified by the fact that every university in the country teaches communitarianism yet our original thesis against it is the only one ever written.
A lengthy study of the recently available online documents about your party shows me that your loosely affiliated organizations have not taken an official position on the philosophy that drives the Reinvention of American Government. I've found a few local groups that have posted information about UN Local Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. I haven't found any local Tea Party groups (besides affiliates of Gigi Bowman in NY) who are being asked to discuss or vote on communitarian changes to the U.S. system.
Since my above definition of anti communitarian thinking is based entirely in my own personal research, experience and understanding, it's only fair to provide you with a short synopsis of who I am and how I came to be an anti communitarian thinker.
In the early 80s while I was attending college in Anchorage, Alaska (and bartending nights at Whitekey's Fly By Night Club) I became a registered Libertarian voter. My friend Kenzo and I even attended a fund raiser for Dick Randolf and won a lunch "date" with Ed Clark. Having read Atlas Shrugged in the sixth grade, I thought I knew what the Libertarians stood for.
When I transferred to UMAss, Amherst in 1984, I did deep background research on U.S. policies toward the Sandinistas and found myself opening up to socialism. After writing two extra credit documentaries on U.S. Economic Policy in Central America, I began identifying my politics as Libertarian, Socialist & Feminist, and later added Green to my list. (I never identified with either the Democrats or the Republicans.)
I think I clicked with the Libertarians because I was convinced they represented individual liberty. My freedom to move whenever I want to move on means everything to me. But I also come from German Wisconsin farm stock and have a deep respect for people who work the land. I admired the socialists because I thought they represented land starved Nicaraguans against the arable land gluttony of the ruling Somoza family. I grew up on Steinem and Bella and had always considered myself a feminist. I love camping and being in the woods, so I naturally assumed that's what being a Green was all about.
It was only after I began fighting the new community development policies in 1999 that I did a thorough vetting of all my political beliefs. What I learned was most difficult to swallow.
My first realization was that the Libertarian Party was unwilling to step up and debate the communitarians, even after Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne wrote that the "last great debate" in American politics was between the Libertarians and the Communitarians. I later realized the party's founders were internationalists promoting free market/free trade communitarianism in the United States.
My second realization was that Bella signed the Communitarian Platform. Feminism, as it turns out, is just another dialectical branch of communitarianism.
My third big realization was the role socialism plays in the phony dialectical evolution into communitarianism. Socialism, like capitalism, exists only to further the communitarian synthesis.
The Green Party ended up being number two on my enemy list, the first place reserved forever for their ideological affiliate Dr. Amitai Etzioni, founder of the Communitarian Network.
By 2002 I decided I would only vote for candidates who defend the U.S. Bill of Rights by openly attacking communitarian policies in the U.S.. Obviously I've never voted since then.
Focusing mainly on The Communitarian Reinvention of American Government under Presidents Clinton and Bush II, some of my ACL research was devoted to minor communitarian Third Way politicans like Senator Evan Bayh. I did make note of Senator Barack Obama's introduction as the Third Way Wonder Boy in 2004. All I needed to know about Obama when he ran for president was the fact that Communitarian Platform signer Professor John McNight also signed Obama's Harvard Law School application.
It was during the 2008 elections that I became acquainted with some people who supported Ron Paul. When I was unable to find Congressman Paul using the word communitarianism once in all his years of published speeches against the U.N. Agenda, and his office never responded to my inquiries, I refused to endorse him on my websites. The ACL has endorsed only a couple of candidates in our entire time online, and one's a Canadian. When the Ron Paul Revolution became the Tea Party protests, I didn't join, but I was happy to see the turnouts. I was relieved that our people were finally showing some gumption.
I am now convinced your smallest local groups are in the position of taking any political direction the members choose to take. Maybe once your members are introduced to their enemies as communitarian thinkers, you can stop everyone else and their brother from defining what it is you stand against.
"Vast forests have already been sacrificed to the public debate about the Tea Party: what it is, what it means, where it's going. But after lengthy study of the phenomenon, I've concluded that the whole miserable narrative boils down to one stark fact: They're full of shit. All of them." http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/210904According to the Communitarians, the U.S. Constitution (and all national government) is "outdated" and poses a barrier to achieving world peace and justice. This appears to be in direct opposition to your principles:
“There already is a universally accepted national tea party statement and a national tea party platform. We've had them for a long time. The national tea party statement is called the Declaration of Independence, and the national tea party platform is the Constitution of the United States. And come to think of it, I can name six or seven national tea party leaders—revered figures who command the movement's loyalties. Their names are among those signed at the bottom of our national tea party statement and our national tea party platform. They are John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, James Madison." Tea Party Declaration of Independence from Political Party Loyalties By Paul Beaird March 23, 2010There are several indications your party is being misled and co-opted by communitarians.
1. Some people are already calling you communitarians:
"They're what I call "molecular," or communitarian, individualists -- that is, individuals cooperating with others to achieve what the politicians promise but can't deliver." http://www.thenews.com.pk/03-10-2010/opinion/7993.htm2. Branches of your movement are tricking you into supporting Right Wing Conservative Communitarians like Palin and Beck:
3. Communitarianism is a social science that infiltrates national and state governments via social development programs. It's called Socio-Economics. Why would Tea Party members discount it as an issue?
"This is not a movement based on social issues," Melanie Morgan, a former talk show host who has been active in Tea Party Express, told USA TODAY earlier this year. "Many conservatives are involved only because of the fiscal aspect of smaller government, of lower taxation, of an accountability as far as the debt is concerned, the runaway spending by the liberal Congress." http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2010-09-20-values20_ST_N.htm4. The Left Wing Communitarian President of the United States is using Right Wing Communitarian Shills and Rolling Stone Magazine to slander you as corporate backed phonies:
RS: What do you think of the Tea Party and the people behind it?5. Obama's and the RS writer's opinion seems to be completely at odds with average people's opinion within the movement:
Obama: I think the Tea Party is an amalgam, a mixed bag of a lot of different strains in American politics that have been there for a long time. There are some strong and sincere libertarians who are in the Tea Party who generally don't believe in government intervention in the market or socially. There are some social conservatives in the Tea Party who are rejecting me the same way they rejected Bill Clinton, the same way they would reject any Democratic president as being too liberal or too progressive. There are strains in the Tea Party that are troubled by what they saw as a series of instances in which the middle-class and working-class people have been abused or hurt by special interests and Washington, but their anger is misdirected.
And then there are probably some aspects of the Tea Party that are a little darker, that have to do with anti-immigrant sentiment or are troubled by what I represent as the president. So I think it's hard to characterize the Tea Party as a whole, and I think it's still defining itself.
RS: Do you think that it's being manipulated?
Obama; There's no doubt that the infrastructure and the financing of the Tea Party come from some very traditional, very powerful, special-interest lobbies. I don't think this is a secret. Dick Armey and FreedomWorks, which was one of the first organizational mechanisms to bring Tea Party folks together, are financed by very conservative industries and forces that are opposed to enforcement of environmental laws, that are opposed to an energy policy that would be different than the fossil-fuel-based approach we've been taking, that don't believe in regulations that protect workers from safety violations in the workplace, that want to make sure that we are not regulating the financial industries in ways that we have.
There's no doubt that there is genuine anger, frustration and anxiety in the public at large about the worst financial crisis we've experienced since the Great Depression. Part of what we have to keep in mind here is this recession is worse than the Ronald Reagan recession of the Eighties, the 1990-91 recession, and the 2001 recession combined. The depths of it have been profound. This body politic took a big hit in the gut, and that always roils up our politics, and can make people angry. But because of the ability of a lot of very well-funded groups to point that anger — I think misdirect that anger — it is translating into a relevant political force in this election. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/209395
"Obama could not be more wrong — in fact, his thinking shows a lot more about his problems than the tea party’s. If the Tea Party is being run by special interest lobbies, then our special interest lobbies are in a lot of trouble. The convention was held at the Mill Valley community center. There were about 500 people there; it was standing room only. They spent the whole day milling about between different tables that represented various groups, ranging from the NRA to the seller of a cookbook of “conservative recipes.” I didn’t look, but I assume it was full of recipes for meatloaf and mashed potatoes with nary a sprig of endive in sight. There were funny T-shirts, cut-outs where you can get your picture taken next to Lincoln, Reagan, or Palin, and lots of sugary foods from Costco.6. Communitarian Radicals think they are the experts on what you really mean:
It was all very unprofessional, by which I mean that it did not seem the least bit stage managed or fake, in the way that the events put on by professional political operatives usually are. It was all quite spontaneous. Here’s an example. The speakers were unorganized, and had to speak in the hall in competition with all of the tables. So if people were not interested in a speaker, they would just go on buying and selling books and T-shirts or signing up for petitions, and eventually the speaker would be drowned out. If they were interested, the chatter would stop and eventually people would stop and listen. It was, in a charming way, the competition of the free market of ideas at work. http://www.libertycentral.org/president-obama-is-wrong-about-the-tea-party-2010-10
JakeSense, 19 September 2010 12:30AM said, Please stop repeating the lie that Tea Party members are "Conservatives". Numerous polls in the US consistently show that almost half of people who identify with the Tea Party -- myself included -- are Liberal Democrats. The Tea Party has one, and only one goal -- Fiscal Responsibility. Just because some fools (Sarah Palin and Glen Beck) are trying to co-opt the Tea Party does not make any the rest of us Conservative. We can disagree vehemently with Palin and Beck, yet still think the government must learn to balance it's budget, stop piling on so much debt and the Federal government spending is out of control.
"When tea party activists say they want to change Washington, what they mean is, they want to get rid of politics." http://perspectives.thirdway.org/?p=874I realize "forests" have already been cut down trying to explain your Tea Party. There appears to be a few solid and agreed upon principles behind it, but every description of what you represent incorporates the writer's personal views and political beliefs into their definition of you. From Obama down to each local group online, the Tea Party is whatever you want it to be. Now that I fully grasp that amazing truth, may I humbly suggest you consider adding anti communitarianism to your local group's discussion list next time you meet up?
Anti Communitarian League
Safety and Infiltration Avoidance
1) Beware of all strangers. Historically resistance to tyrants has taken the form of small autonomous groups whose members know and trust one another from long experience. These groups are then united by common interest, common goals and common literature. But a strict heirarchy will soon be broken by the tyrants' agents.
2) Beware of the man who is "too perfect." He says all the right things, he needs little persuasion and he supplies money. The wealthy are usually in bed with the tyrant and they are the last to oppose despotism.
3) Be doubly aware of a stranger who proposes illegal activities. You will soon find him testifying against you in court.
4) Beware of those who draw cheques from the enemy. They are very likely to have divided loyalties. It is very difficult for a man to destroy the beast from whose teats he sucks.
5) Avoid drunks, drug users and anyone of unstable character. Always chose quality over quantity.
6) Recognize the media’s tactics and do not react to buzz words. Religious groups, tax resistors, so-called ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ and other groups are called cultists, bigots, Nazis and other words which the masses are conditioned to hate. After the media have demonized a target, as in Waco, 911 or 7/7, Governments are free to murder at will. Ask yourself, "Is it wrong for people to preserve their freedom and individual rights, or to resist oppressive taxation?"
7) Avoid sensitive discussion on the telephone, and use discretion when inviting someone to your home.
8) Beware of someone whose intellect, education and background appear different from those with whom he attempts to associate. Most people inter-relate with others of the same interests or background.
9) Investigate. Do a little investigation. The Elite can create good cover. But they seldom bother because up to now resistance groups have almost never checked their associates’ backgrounds.
10) Recognize the ruthlessness of the tyrants and act accordingly. A government which will mass murder women and children is not going to play "fair" with you!
You must recognize the scope and age of the One World Government conspiracy. It is coded in the Great Seal of The United States which is over 200 years old, and is coded in other devices –currency notes for example, and places much older. They intend to have their One World Government with one universal humanist religion, one worldwide economic system, one heavily monitored and designed ‘culture’ and absolute control over every human being. The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women will submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments.
A Tropical view? No! An English shoreline.
Find Madeleine and Ben, missing in the E.U. Blackhole - along with all our billions!
Beneath the bulls**t- the veneer of villas, cocktails, designer clothes and jet skis, half of Europe- Spain, Portugal, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria etc. still live in the Dark Ages - along with their dodgy police, their various bent judiciaries and institutions. Look at my first entry under 'Shock and Awe,' 'The EU's Starving Children.' Everything is fine visiting or moving to these countries- as long as they're getting your money, but when things go wrong or problems crop up, that is when you will learn just how "modern" these cesspits really are! And when you'll realise just how much they really like British people! I strongly advise parents not to go to dumps like Paedugal, and try Skegness, Blackpool or Bognor Regis instead. Our seasides are safer and much more fun! Our weather? Aren't we worshipping & sacrificing to the Sun just a little too much?
WAR IN IRAQ, SYRIA, AFGANISTAN. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Yes, they are volunteers but they are not tin soldiers in a child's game. They are not disposable, so stop treating them as such! Obama and Cameron are LIARS!
We ordinary British still have not had the full reasons and the real need for these conflicts thousands of miles away fully explained to us.
Am I alone in feeling that this rotten Government and the depraved Elite of this country actually want the brightest, bravest and best of our young people - dead, or disabled?
You are taking our forces for granted, abusing their patriotism, honour and loyalty, Mr Cameron, just like your evil predecessors Blair and Brown. Your whole lives' work amounts to a huge rubbish heap scattered with the bones of the innocent. You are all failures and will all be remembered as bad prime ministers. You and your sick colleagues are all cursed, and far beyond redemption. Are you afraid? I would be. God has a special place for wicked scum like you - empty and eternal! By the way, what sacrifices did you and your colleagues make for
Now let's see how you conducted yourselves as young men....
YOUNG PEOPLE OF BRITAIN - I LOVE YOU ALL. DO NOT DIE FOR LIES AND GREED, PLEASE DON'T TAKE THE RISK. War is not glamorous or an exciting adventure, it is death, destruction and hatred.
DON'T SIGN UP! JUST SAY "NO," LIVE LONG AND BE HAPPY. BE KIND, FORGIVING AND TOLERANT.
YOUR LIVES ARE FAR TOO PRECIOUS TO BE LOST IN POINTLESS, VICIOUS WARS AND CONFLICTS STARTED BY THIS WICKED, MISGUIDED GOVERNMENT. VERY FEW, IF ANY, OF THESE MPs HAVE EVER RISKED THEIR OWN LIVES , OR THOSE OF THEIR OWN FAMILIES, FOR THIS COUNTRY. ARE THEIR SONS IN THESE WARS? NO! NEVER! QUESTION THESE POLITICIANS, THEIR BACKGROUNDS, MOTIVES, AND SCHEMES FOR PERSONAL ENRICHMENT. STOP! AND THINK! WHAT ARE THEY REALLY UP TO? NO DAMN GOOD! THEY HATE US ALL, AND LOVE ONLY MONEY
USE YOUR ENERGY TO FIGHT COMMON PURPOSE & E.U. COMMUNITARIANISM INSTEAD!
If you want a real noble cause to fight for then consider volunteering to aid and protect Middle East Christians and fight against the wicked ISIS plague.
“Tenderly bury your fair young dead,
Place a wooden cross at their head’
All the words you can say have been said,
It is for you my tears are shed.”www.standpointmag.co.uk/the-mole-june
The Power of Nightmares, The Fantasy of Fear:
Online Sociopaths (psychopaths)
Offenders who are particularly pernicious in their smear campaigns are often narcissists at best or sociopaths at worst, if your case meets this criteria it is important that you understand what makes them tick.
Portofino, Sheffield UK
Portofino, Sheffield's best restaurant by far, has re-opened, Hooray!
Common Purpose "graduates" breach The Seven Principles of Public Life
All Common Purpose "graduates" have been corrupted and are totally untrustworthy. Some of these "graduates" are "useful idiots" who do not realise just how evil Common Purpose is. Those Common Purpose "graduates" who are public servants breach ALL the Seven Principles of Public Life as set out by the Committee on Standards in Public Life.
The Seven Principles of Public Life
The Committee has set out 'Seven Principles of Public Life' which it believes should apply to all in the public service. These are:
Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest. They should not do so in order to gain financial or other benefits for themselves, their family or their friends.
However: People become Common Purpose "graduates" for career advancement and to be part of a secret, Masonic-like society for careerists. This is not the action of a selfless person.
Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.
However: Being part of the Common Purpose network brings those in public service under pressure to do favours for other Common Purpose "graduates". The lack of integrity and probity of Common Purpose police officers is particularly disturbing.
In carrying out public business, including making public appointments, awarding contracts, or recommending individuals for rewards and benefits, holders of public office should make choices on merit.
However: Being part of the Common Purpose network will bring them under pressure to do favours for other Common Purpose "graduates" rather than to act impartially and objectively.
Holders of public office are accountable for their decisions and actions to the public and must submit themselves to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their office.
However: There is a strong resistance amongst Common Purpose "graduates" towards giving out details of their Common Purpose membership and the activities they engage in. Common Purpose itself operates according to the Chatham House rules which effectively means that meetings are held in secret with no agenda, records or accountability. Fish rots from the head.
Holders of public office should be as open as possible about all the decisions and actions that they take. They should give reasons for their decisions and restrict information only when the wider public interest clearly demands.
However: There is a strong resistance amongst Common Purpose "graduates" in public office towards giving out details of their Common Purpose membership and the activities they engage in. Common Purpose itself operates according to the Chatham House rules which effectively mean that meetings are held in secret with no agenda, records or accountability. Hardly a recipe for "Open Government".
Holders of public office have a duty to declare any private interests relating to their public duties and to take steps to resolve any conflicts arising in a way that protects the public interest.
However: Many Common Purpose "graduates" in public service deliberately hide their membership of Common Purpose. This leaves them open to accusations of dishonesty, corruption, favouritism and under-the-counter dealings.
Holders of public office should promote and support these principles by leadership and example.
However: Common Purpose "graduates" are incapable of leading by example because those people who have found out what they are up to do not trust them at all.
Does This Sound Familiar?
Massive sums of public money funnelled through philanthropic charitable foundations and think-tanks to fund huge psy-ops……..sound familiar?
'An unparalleled amount of power is concentrated increasingly in the hands of an interlocking and self-perpetuating group. Unlike the power of corporate management, it is unchecked by stockholders; unlike the power of government, it is unchecked by the people; unlike the power of churches, it is unchecked by any firmly established canons of value.'
(page viii) Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Rene A Wormser 1958.
Who Paid The Piper? by Frances Stonor Saunders, 1999.
In The Last Perilous Times....
This know also, that in the Last Days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, highminded, ever learning, yet never able to come to the knowledge of the Truth. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, made to be taken and destroyed, speaking evil of the things that they understand not; Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated by all nations for My name's sake: And they will not repent from their demonic worship, or their idols, neither are they going to repent of their murders, nor of their Sorceries and magic, or their worship of Satan.
1Timothy 4:1,3; 2Peter 3:3-5; 2Timothy 3:1-7; 2Peter 2:10,12; Matthew 24:9; Revelation 9:20-21
TYRANNY. Plato's Republic 344a-c, H.D.P. Lee translation
But when a man succeeds in robbing the whole body of citizens and reducing them to slavery, they forget these ugly names and call him happy and fortunate, as do all others who hear of his unmitigated wrongdoing. "