Recently European Comr. for Agriculture, Dacion Ciolos, has said, "any business that relies upon subsidies (grants, tax breaks) is NOT A REAL BUSINESS." (Oh dear, that's practically every Third Sector set up!)
It is now crystal clear that our society, country, nationality, values and history are being destroyed from within - planned, orchestrated and financed by members of our own Parliament and House of Lords, together with their supranational financial backers.
Everything we have, built on the knowledge, values, toil and sacrifice of our forebears is being dismantled piece by piece, step by step, by a conspiracy within the establishment in order to create a new 'Post Democratic State' (dictatorship) in Great Britain.
As adults we now find ourselves in a perilous position where freewill and fundamental freedoms are being taken from us. The emerging future is a vicious police state under the control of a wealthy pro-European Union elite - a key part of an emerging World Government.
For our children, their future is of a lifetime of enslavement in this new post democratic world system. A state which, left unchallenged and unchecked by their parents, will deny our children the opportunity to know and enjoy life in a moral, honest and happy country.
Our charge against Westminster is simple. Treason has been committed, and is being committed by the unlawful collective actions of Parliament, the House of Lords and their supranational financial co-conspirators. The fact that Blair, Brown, Mandelson and others from the LibLabCon have led the drive to remove Treason and its penalties from the Statute Book is circumstantial evidence of their crimes and intent. Wider documentary and other evidence proves that Treason has in fact been committed.
In our 3rd Conference we will put our Government on trial in our BCG Conference Court. The charge will be Treason with the ultimate intent of perpetrating genocide against the British people. We will bring forward key witnesses with the evidence to prove our case to you, the audience. The audience and our Jury will decide if the case is proven and, if so, what the appropriate punishments must be, and how such crime(s) are prevented in the future. In considering the evidence brought forward and the appropriate punishments, the safety and future happiness and welfare of our children is paramount. Our decisions must be made in the interests of spiritual and brotherly love for our fellow men, and we continue to renounce the use of violence.
This will be a very different event. Don't miss it!
It is with great regret and disappointment I submit my resignation from my appointment as a Political Officer in the Foreign Service and my post as the Senior Civilian Representative for the U.S. Government in Zabul Province. I have served six of the previous ten years in service to our country overseas, to include deployment as a U.S. Marine officer and Department of Defense civilian in the Euphrates and Tigris River Valleys of Iraq in 2004-2005 and 2006-2007. I did not enter into this position lightly or with any undue expectations nor did I believe my assignment would be without sacrifice hardship or difficulty. However, in the course of my five months of service in Afghanistan, in both Regional Commands East and South, I have lost understanding of and confidence in the strategic purposes of the United States’ presence in Afghanistan. I have doubts and reservations about our current strategy and planned future strategy, but my resignation is based not upon how we are pursuing this war, but why and to what end. To put simply: I fail to see the value or the worth in continued U.S. casualties or expenditures or resources in support of the Afghan government in what is, truly, a 35-year old civil war.
This fall will mark the eighth year of U.S. combat, governance and development operations within Afghanistan. Next fall, the United States’ occupation will equal in length the Soviet Union’s own physical involvement in Afghanistan. Like the Soviets, we continue to secure and bolster a failing state, while encouraging an ideology and system of government unknown and unwanted by its people.
If the history of Afghanistan is one great stage play, the United States is no more than a supporting actor, among several previously, in a tragedy that not only pits tribes, valleys, clans, villages and families against one another, but, from at least the end of King Zahir Shah’s reign, has violently and savagely pitted the urban, secular, educated and modem of Afghanistan against the rural, religious, illiterate and traditional. It is this latter group that composes and supports the Pashtun insurgency. The Pashtun insurgency, which is composed of multiple, seemingly infinite, local groups, is fed by what is perceived by the Pashtun people as a continued and sustained assault, going back centuries, on Pashtun land, culture, traditions and religion by internal and external enemies. The U.S. and NATO presence and operations in Pashtun valleys and villages, as well as Afghan army and police units that are led and composed of non-Pashtun soldiers and police, provide an occupation force against which the insurgency is justified. In both RC East and South, I have observed that the bulk of the insurgency fights not for the white banner of the Taliban, but rather against the presence of foreign soldiers and taxes imposed by an unrepresentative government in Kabul.
The United States military presence in Afghanistan greatly contributes to the legitimacy and strategic message of the Pashtun insurgency. In a like manner our backing of the Afghan government in its current form continues to distance the government from the people. The Afghan government’s failings, particularly when weighed against the sacrifice of American lives and dollars, appear legion and metastatic:
• Glaring corruption and unabashed graft;
• A President whose confidants and chief advisers comprise drug lords and war crimes villains, who mock our own rule of law and counternarcotics efforts;
• A system of provincial and district leaders constituted of local power brokers, opportunists and strongmen allied to the United States solely for, and limited by, the value of our USAID and CERP contracts and whose own political and economic interests stand nothing to gain from any positive or genuine attempts at reconciliation; and
• The recent election process dominated by fraud and discredited by low voter turnout, which has created an enormous victory for our enemy who now claims a popular boycott and will call into question worldwide our government’s military, economic and diplomatic support for an invalid and illegitimate Afghan government.
Our support for this kind of government, coupled with a misunderstanding of the insurgency’s true nature, reminds me horribly of our involvement with South Vietnam; an unpopular and corrupt government we backed at the expense of our Nation’s own internal peace, against an insurgency whose nationalism we arrogantly and ignorantly mistook as a rival to our own Cold War ideology.
I find specious the reasons we ask for bloodshed and sacrifice from our young men and women in Afghanistan. If honest, our stated strategy of securing Afghanistan to prevent al-Qaeda resurgence or regrouping would require us to additionally invade and occupy western Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, etc. Our presence in Afghanistan has only increased destabilization and insurgency in Pakistan where we rightly fear a toppled or weakened Pakistani government may lose control of nuclear weapons. However, again, to follow the logic of our stated goals we should garrison Pakistan, not Afghanistan. More so, the September 11th attacks, as well as the Madrid and London bombings, were primarily planned and organized in Western Europe; a point that highlights the threat is not one tied to traditional geographic or political boundaries. Finally, if our concern is for a failed state crippled by corruption and poverty and under assault from criminal and drug lords, then if we bear our military and financial contributions to Afghanistan, we must reevaluate our commitment to and involvement in Mexico.
Eight years into war, no nation has ever known a more dedicated, well trained, experienced and disciplined military as the U.S. Armed Forces. I do not believe any military force has ever been tasked with such a complex, opaque and Sisyphean mission as the U.S. military has received in Afghanistan. The tactical proficiency and performance of our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines is unmatched and unquestioned. However, this is not the European or Pacific theaters of World War II, but rather is a war for which our leaders, uniformed, civilian and elected, have inadequately prepared and resourced our men and women. Our forces, devoted and faithful, have committed to conflict in an indefinite and unplanned manner that has become a cavalier, politically expedient and Pollyannaish misadventure. Similarly, the United States has a dedicated and talented cadre of civilians, both U.S. government employees and contractors, who believe in and sacrifice for their mission, but have been ineffectually trained and led with guidance and intent shaped more by the political climate in Washington, D.C. than in Afghan cities, villages, mountains and valleys.
“We are spending ourselves into oblivion” a very talented and intelligent commander, one of America’s best, briefs every visitor, staff delegation and senior officer. We are mortgaging our Nation’s economy on a war, which, even with increased commitment, will remain a draw for years to come. Success and victory, whatever they may be, will be realized not in years, after billions more spent, but in decades and generations. The United States does not enjoy a national treasury for such success and victory.
I realize the emotion and tone of my letter and ask you excuse any ill temper. I trust you understand the nature of this war and the sacrifices made by so many thousands of families who have been separated from loved ones deployed in defense of our Nation and whose homes bear the fractures, upheavals and scars of multiple and compounded deployments. Thousands of our men and women have returned home with physical and mental wounds, some that will never heal or will only worsen with time. The dead return only in bodily form to be received by families who must be reassured their dead have sacrificed for a purpose worthy of futures lost, love vanished, and promised dreams unkept. I have lost confidence such assurances can anymore be made. As such, l submit my resignation.
Sincerely,
Matthew P. Hoh
Senior Civilian Representative
Zabul Province, Afghanistan
cc:
Mr. Frank Ruggiero
Ms. Dawn Liberi
Ambassador Anthony Wayne
Ambassador Karl Eikenberry
This letter was addressed to:
Ambassador Nancy J. Powell
Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Communitarianism, Amitai Etzioni, and the Kabbalah
"Communitarianism is a “Third Way” compromise between Capitalism and Communism. Communitarianism is not Fascism nor is it Communism, but a synthesis of these opposing ideologies which preceded it. It draws government-business partnerships from Fascism and employs group decision-making from Communism. Communitarianism will resemble a corporate state (Fascism) in which the elite will work under capitalist rules to continue generating wealth while the working class will be controlled by Communist model laws. The Communitarian synthesis incorporates not only elements of Fascism and Communism, but also Globalism.
The impending economic collapse of the United States along with the financial markets of the world will create the conditions necessary for a global Communitarian society....." from
One is by the British Government’s land and sea department DEFRA.It is childishly simplistic, twee and contains very limited information. It is also full of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) devices, which mean it is brain-washing you while you watch it!Its Jackanory style is supposed to lull us into a sense of false security. Big Brother is looking after you (not) so go back to sleep didums, and don't worry.
The other is by an honest American informing us of the warped ethos and the history behind Sustainable Development and Agenda 21, and what we can all expect as its implemented.No lullabies and brain-washing here, he gives it to you straight with references so you can go and do your own research rather than just take his word for it.This is the grown-up’s version. Take the red pill and wake up!
We Are Change UK is a group of idealistic, dedicated and non-violent truth activists based in London. Its members currently stand accused of being “agents” secretly working for the British Government and the Ministry of Defence! The proponent of this theory is the ambitious, self-obsessed and self-published author - Mr. Daniel Obachike.
To Obachike’s credit, he is a quick learner.He rapidly realised that there are big bucks to be made around savage destruction, and the injury and murder of innocent people - and he determined to get some!Horrendous annihilation accompanied by bewildered confusion, wild claims, interesting theories and heated controversy over whom to blame, definitely generates huge amounts of money,
eg: the TwinTowers Tragedy on 9/11.
Some have made small fortunes from this vile outrage and the arguments over its cause.
The London bombings on 7/7 have facilitated similar speculation, and large sums have been made from these atrocities too. London-based, Obachike is one of these people.He has done very well indeed, out of the London Bombings.
And now Obachike has now discovered that he can spin all this up to the next level by attempting to destroy the reputations, rubbish the work, and vandalise the aspirations of the naive, young WAC UK truth activists in their quest to expose the truth about these outrages.As the confused and concerned public struggle to learn about his sinister accusations concerning WAC UK’s alleged motives, ideas and techniques, they can buy Obachike’s book and wear his tee-shirts, and even more money will swell his bank account.
Loverly Jubberley!It seems to be working, too:
“Well done Daniel, you are clearly becoming a rich and well-known man!”
But, “Oh dear, Danielwhat’s this?Perhaps you are not quite so clever after all?”
By offering absolutely no evidence whatsoever, other than mere personal conjecture, as his spiteful ideas about WAC UK fly around cyberspace raising eyebrows, courting controversy and boosting his self-published book sales, conversely, his plan is now spluttering and backfiring, and problems are arising!This is because the continuing unsupported, unsubstantiated nature of Obachike’s ubiquitous accusations, is actually causing some to start asking questions about him, and his motivation,
“If there is no proof, is Daniel being honest here?” people ask.
“Why is he behaving like this, where is the evidence?”
“Was Obachike actually, really there?” we ask ourselves.
“Is Obachike,” we now wonder, “just a Walter Mitty fantasist, or a mercenary hack or, possibly, even a government paid, disinformation agent himself. Is he undermining WAC UK for the Establishment? Is he being paid to do their dirty work for them? Who do we believe?”
We Are Change UK are not paid to be activists.They are volunteers and have nothing to gain from discovering and publicising the truth, apart from the satisfaction of doing what’s right, and making a positive difference to people’s lives.They are, in contrast to Obachike, not at all well-off, in fact they are often in financial difficulty, and struggle to continue.
Interestingly, We Are Change UK is not Obachike’s only target!He has “fallen out” with numerous other 9.11 and 7/7 activists and truth groups, has ripped into the BNP, rubbished UKIP, and accused Brian Gerrish’s new British Constitution Group of being “over before it has begun,” and “just a bunchof UKIP supporters” – in spite of the fact that he arrived late at the June ’09 BC Group Conference (his first) in Euston Road mid-afternoon, and only sat in on one talk, (just under an hour) while playing with his mobile phone. He looked bored, clapped half-heartedly and then promptly left, rudely ignoring several decent people who approached him in a friendly manner to introduce themselves.
However, that was enough for Obachike to consider himself to be an expert on the British Constitution Group, and declare it “hopeless.”
Daniel has also, in the past, argued with other 7/7 survivors, 7/7 victim’s family members and witnesses, as well as the police and emergency services, etc.Get the picture?
We all know, or we should, that
“those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.”
But Daniel, unless you are just a historian and not really an activist at all, you must have some ideas on how to improve the future!
So Obachike, perhaps you would like to suggest where exactly concerned and disgruntled British citizens DO GO TO for genuine information and activism?
Whose website Daniel? Come on, who?
Who should they trust?Who should they believe?
Which group should they join, Obachike?
Who should they support? Tell us Daniel, you are “the expert” after all!
Or should they just not bother at all and merely read your book, buy your tee-shirt, and go to your blog – to hear more of your rubbishing and slagging-off of, well -almost everyone in Britain and beyond with an opinion or research that is not yours!
There is NOTHING POSITIVE, nothing OPTIMISTIC about Obachike and his message.
There is NOTHING FORWARD THINKING, there is no HOPE if one listens to this paranoid man-with-few-allies. He continually stares into the dark wickedness of the past, ghoulishly stirring it over to see what else he can find there, but he has no plan or idea to help make the future brighter – except a monetary one, for himself!
Daniel Obachike is a toxic, psychic vampire sucking on the dead bones of the July Bombings, and the energy and spirit of everyone he comes into contact with.
A head teacher once pointed to the pupils in a school assembly and said, "Remember, when you point your finger to accuse someone, always be aware that your other three fingers are actually pointing back towards yourself!"
The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
Follow up:
Come winter, the squirrel is warm and well fed.
A social worker finds the shivering grasshopper, calls a press conference and demands to know why the squirrel should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others less fortunate, like the grasshopper, are cold and starving.
The BBC shows up to provide live coverage of the shivering grasshopper; with cuts to a video of the squirrel in his comfortable warm home with a table laden with food.
The British press inform people that they should be ashamed that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so, while others have plenty.
The Labour Party, Greenpeace, Animal Rights and The Grasshopper Council of GB demonstrate in front of the squirrel's house. The BBC, interrupting a cultural festival special from Notting Hill with breaking news, broadcasts a multi-cultural choir singing 'We shall overcome'.
Ken Livingstone rants in an interview with Trevor McDonald that the squirrel got rich off the backs of grasshoppers, and calls for an immediate tax hike on the squirrel to make him pay his 'fair share' and increases the charge for squirrels to enter inner London .
In response to pressure from the media, the Government drafts the Economic Equity and Grasshopper anti Discrimination Act, retroactive to the beginning of the summer.
The squirrel's taxes are reassessed. He is taken to court and fined for failing to hire grasshoppers as builders for the work he was doing on his home and an additional fine for contempt when he told the court the grasshopper did not want to work. The grasshopper is provided with a council house, financial aid to furnish it and an account with a local taxi firm to ensure he can be socially mobile. The squirrel's food is seized and re distributed to the more needy members of society, in this case the grasshopper.
Without enough money to buy more food, to pay the fine and his newly imposed retroactive taxes, the squirrel has to downsize and start building a new home. The local authority takes over his old home and utilises it as a temporary home for asylum seeking cats who had hijacked a plane to get to Britain as they had to share their country of origin with mice. On arrival they tried to blow up the airport because of Britain 's apparent love of dogs.
The cats had been arrested for the international offence of hijacking and attempted bombing but were immediately released because the police fed them pilchards instead of salmon whilst in custody. Initial moves to return them to their own country were abandoned, because it was feared they would face death by the mice. The cats devise and start a scam to obtain money from people's credit cards.
A Panorama special shows the grasshopper finishing up the last of the squirrel's food, though spring is still months away, while the council house he is in, crumbles around him because he hasn't bothered to maintain the house. He is shown to be taking drugs. Inadequate government funding is blamed for the grasshoppers' drug 'illness'.
The cats seek recompense in the British courts for their treatment since arrival in UK .
The grasshopper gets arrested for stabbing an old dog during a burglary to get money for his drugs habit. He is imprisoned but released immediately because he has been in custody for a few weeks. He is placed in the care of the probation service to monitor and supervise him.. Within a few weeks he has killed a guinea pig in a botched robbery.
A commission of enquiry, that will eventually cost £10,000,000 and state the obvious, is set up. Additional money is put into funding a drug rehabilitation scheme for grasshoppers and legal aid for lawyers representing asylum seekers is increased. The government praises the asylum-seeking cats for enriching Britain 's multicultural diversity, and dogs are criticised by the government for failing to befriend the cats.
The grasshopper dies of a drug overdose. The usual sections of the press blame it on the obvious failure of government to address the root causes of despair arising from social inequity and his traumatic experience of prison. They call for the resignation of a government minister.
The cats are paid a million pounds each because their rights were infringed when the government failed to inform them there were mice in the United Kingdom .
The squirrel, the dogs and the victims of the hijacking, the bombing, the burglaries and robberies have to pay an additional percentage on their credit cards to cover losses. Their taxes are increased to pay for law and order, and they are told that they will have to work beyond 65 because of a shortfall in government funds.
"President Obama said on Friday morning he was "most surprised and deeply humbled" by being awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. "To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who have been honored by this prize," he added. The Daily Beast's Peter Beinart on why the award only aids the right’s arguments that Obamamania bears no relation to reality.
George W. Bush launched a “preemptive” war. Now the Nobel Committee is trying for “preemptive” peace. I had always thought the way these things worked was that you helped bring peace or democracy to some corner of the globe first, and then you won the Nobel Prize. But this year, the Nobel Committee has turned that logic around: It clearly likes what Obama is trying to do: on nuclear disarmament, climate change and Middle East peace—and so, in a “preemptive” strike, it’s giving him the award now, in hopes that doing so will boost his chances of success later. It’s an interesting idea. Perhaps next they’ll start giving Oscars not to the people who have made the best movies of last year, but to the people who have the best chance of making the best movies next year. After all, once you’ve already made the movie, you no longer need the encouragement...."
This new, preemptive approach can be applied to any number of situations, for example to people who might be naughty, or are just thinking about possibly being naughty one day, or just wondering what it might be like to be naughty:
What an insult to the genuine Nobel Peace Prize winners of the past! If Obama had even a tiny a shred of dignity and honesty he would have refused this award but no, he is a shameless psychopath like Tony Blair. He couldn't grab it fast enough!
The Dalai Lama received his in 1989, what an insult to him and his people it is, to award this to a viscious, war-mongering, morally compromised American president. What sick bastards run our planet now:
