Baby P Injustice.

As public fury over Baby P grows, questions are being asked like -

Why did Judge Stephen Kramer downgrade the charges against Baby P's killers from "murder" to ‘causing or allowing death’ when there have been many other recent cases where it was hard to establish exactly who caused the fatal blow ie. Gerry Tobin or Mary-Ann Leneghan but all accused received murder sentences?



Is there some Common Purpose behind the sick joke that English Law has become? Or a "Diversity" problem among some legal practitioners at odds with its Judeo/Christian basis? Perhaps the modern British judiciary just have the hots for E.U. law? The Angry Cheese is unimpressed!

DEUTERONOMY 19:21 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

What Is Our Law?

www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/41/messages/135.html

Lord Hewart, quotation,

"...justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done."

Why? Because law cannot just be made up. Apparently!

If a one-legged tyrant believes everyone in his kingdom should wear pink, silk pyjamas and hop about on one leg like he does, and passes a law as such – that law is invalid. It is not related to natural justice, it is just a foolish whim. Or so they teach in law school.

Of course in real life it did happen, relatively recently too, in China. Mao - a tyrant, ordered everyone to wear blue trouser suits and, out of fear or brainwashing and hypnosis, the population were convinced and complied. They didn’t have to hop on one leg though, they just had to run around on their two skinny legs until they died from starvation and overwork!

Today, because current leaders (tyrants) across the world are pretending to believe in “global warming”, or “climate change,” many new “laws” will be passed on their whims that will infringe on our right to drive cars, heat our homes and basically live normally. The “laws” on climate change that these leaders (charlatans) are introducing are made up! They will mean colossal taxes for us all – even for those who drop out and are not employed for whatever reason! Is this however, natural justice? Is this real law?

Most people do not know that the much quoted Deuteronomy section of The Bible, where the basis of our law was laid out, was not to ensure that guilty people were not let off too lightly but quite the reverse - to prevent overenthusiastic revenge,

Vendettas often developed where our ancestors would wreak their own revenge (or justice as they saw it) on enemies and extended families of enemies, usually in quite horrible ways, often over generations. So the law of “an eye for an eye, etc” considered the balance of punishment severe enough to satisfy the wronged party so they would not be tempted to take the law into their own hands, without the law itself going too far and being overly cruel and restrictive. Thus law was considered fair, and accepted by society. Note, “the wronged party” could be loosely defined as being not only the immediately affected person or their family, but also as the wider community who might be outraged by the said criminal act. Therefore the Deuteronomy guidelines would also prevent mob justice – lynch mobs, etc.

Where are we now in relation to this? We have almost come full circle. The population of Great Britain has been feeling for quite a while that, as in pre-Deuteronomy times, there is no law to give us satisfaction. Law often no longer seems fair, and is becoming unacceptable. Why is the law becoming so stupid, weak and peculiar, and who is behind this? We now have pathetic law where bad people “get away with it” too often, using smart lawyers and legal loopholes. Judges often appear to have their own peculiar agenda which does not include any common sense. The population as a whole is becoming deeply dissatisfied with current law, and sentencing. Is it just a matter for the immediately affected parties? Most think not. Law can never be a private, personal affair. A large part of Law used to be, and should be, about sending out the message, “We, the Police and Judiciary, are handling the situation properly, have trust, the experts will come to the right and fair result.” If draconian laws in relation to restrictions and tax concerning "climate change" and the "credit crunch," another dubious phenomenon, are introduced, the British people could rebel. Public anger over the "soft" treatment of Baby P's secret killers, and other vile crimes, are reflecting this mood.

Who could blame the British People if they start to wreak their own revenge as our ancestors used to? Not the gelded police. Not our Government who have let us down. And certainly not lawyers!

"...justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.”