It got off to a good start with a box of ‘After Eight Mints,’ someone loves me!
However, I spent most of the day alone and, at one quiet point I read my latest copy of the “UK Column” newspaper from cover to cover, followed by a quick flick through our local free paper, the “Mablethorpe Target” (Wolds Edition) Feb.13 2008.
I gave up regularly watching the British TV News 18 months ago and have not bought a British mainstream newspaper since either, deciding I was too grown-up for fairy tales! Anyway, on Thursday I thought I would give the early evening mainstream news one more try. ( I haven’t bothered since!)
Several news items registered. Later I found myself putting them together in my head, and dwelling on them. Individually, they are all serious enough but together these 5 reports demonstrate perfectly the downward spiral of reckless stupidity, waste and incompetence that we are being wickedly deceived, duped into believing that Great Britain is being helplessly sucked.
I believe, in fact I know, that there is actually nothing helpless about this. It is all by design, it has all been planned, it is all quite deliberate!
We are now in the change-over period. Britain's institutions are being gutted and replaced by EU ones. When the vortex of chaos finally stops, the British political and public landscape will have changed completely into the EU facist dictatorship.
The Five Reports:
a) The Target, page 3, “Fears for Future of Beauty Spot.”
“New worries have been sounded on the future maintenance of Louth’s cherished Hubbards Hills.
To save £34,000 a year, East Lindsey District Council intends offloading responsibility for the beauty spot to
A “fractious debate” ensued at a meeting of Louth Town Council weighing the pros. and cons., the proposal being eventually deferred in favour of a wait-and-see position pending a future meeting.
“Quizzed after the meeting,
b) The Target, page 16, “ Policing Minister says ‘no’ to force’s plea for extra funding.”
Lincolnshire Police Authority and
They expect their budget deficit to exceed £14 million by 2010……
Authority chairman Angela Crowe said the cap limit would have to be broken and she was adamant that there would be no job cuts…..
“ The minister was impressed by our case and that we had the support of our MPs.
He listened attentively and seemed to understand our unique position but……
At that point he simply reminded us that it was Government policy to not to go above the guidance figure of five per cent.”
This horrifying case of neglect was reported on my local tv news around 6.15. How many more of these cases do we have to read about before decent changes are made to our systems of care in the
d) www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3369587.ece
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/feb/14/lawrence.race
Poor Steven Lawrence. Will his memory ever be allowed to rest in peace? How much longer will this young man be associated with hate and violence?
e) http://itn.co.uk/news/e2669ecf4132647b70c2f1dbaef979bf.html
“Lotfi Raissi, 33-year-old-pilot, was held following the September 11 attacks after being arrested at his home under the Terrorism Act, ten days after the atrocity which killed almost 3,000 people.”
................................................
So what do we have here? Well I see examples of, what I and some others believe to be, a very serious situation – the marginalisation of elected local government, the misuse of public money and the manipulation of fact. Theft, mismanagement and deceit, the rubbishing of
For a start, the Hubbards Hills situation is absurd. East Lindsey District Council is so poor that it cannot afford to maintain this beauty spot, its meagre funds will not stretch to it. This Council is being so screwed that it has to shave and save costs all over the place and Hubbards Hills is perceived as expendable.
But if it becomes the responsibility of the Louth Town Council then the funds will be found? From it becoming a charity! How will that work? Does this mean that the town councillors will come rattling around the households of Louth with collecting tins to save Hubbard Hills? - No!
A charity will be legally set up and an appointed board of trustees will then have the job of raising the money. A grant from the public purse will be applied for and may well be forthcoming, and the rest may have to be raised from the private sector - local businesses may be prepared to donate money but in return they will want to be seen as the “Saviour of Hubbard Hills,” or they may wish to use the area in some new corporate way, or put “discreet” promotional signs up in flower beds and on rubbish bins, etc. In other words it will be rented or leased out. Some kind of “event” like charity jogging may also have to be set up to raise some money.
Aside,- are trustees paid? Should trustees be paid?
This ridiculous situation is echoed a million times across the country.
Whatever is decided for the future of Hubbard Hills, you and I will still pay for it! The grant will come from your taxes. The money from the local businessman will come from a tax allowance that his firm might otherwise pay into the public pot. Why not just let town, district and county councils have the money they need from taxation and allowances to do the job they have been elected to do, and have often done perfectly well for ages?
What we are seeing here is one small piece in the vast and complex mosaic of EU stealth. A deliberate policy of the rapid marginalisation and eventual (quite soon) deconstruction our traditional councils. Our councils are soon going to be completely replaced by the Regional Development Agencies that are being put into place now, directly applying European laws, directives and regulations straight from
Who runs these Regional Agencies? In the future, who will be the equivalent of the current councillors and the civil servants we have now in our councils? Are they already being trained and prepared? Is this what Common Purpose is all about? Does Common Purpose mean Cadre Project?
Nevermind, don’t worry. All you will have to do is shut up, be very good or else, and make sure you pay, and pay, and pay, and pay………Have a laugh if you like and call me alarmist, but remember - You have been warned!
See: www.ukcolumn.org February 2008 Issue.
“ Why Does Nothing Work in
And so to the police. Obviously, it costs money to run a police force. Officers and other staff have to be paid, buildings and vehicles have to be purchased and maintained. Fuel, heating and light, communications, uniforms, equipment, blah, blah, blah! Police funding has to keep up with inflation in order for the force to stay efficient, it is obvious to a ten year old! So,
“ GORDON BROWN, YOU USELESS MORONIC TW*T - PAY THE F**K**G POLICE, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD! ”
Or perhaps Great Britain should just become even more of a huge, pathetic joke than it already is by turning Lincolnshire Police Authority, and others, into charities with boards of trustees so that nice hefty Government grants can be applied for and business sponsorships can be introduced!
What kind of dump of a country has its police force totally demoralised and obliged to go begging to the Government for a few measly quid in order to be able to carry out its duties efficiently? And then tells them, “No!”
Oi! BROWN! YOU TOE-RAG! WHERE IS ALL OUR MONEY GOING?
Well obviously NOT on decent standards of care for many of our unfortunate and tender elderly citizens! Poor Molly Darby, God Bless!
Here we go again, more criminality, more cruelty to innocent people, more horror, more inhumanity, more devilry, more wickedness!
For how many years have we been reading and hearing about this kind of vile and totally unnecessary incident – often involving children or the vulnerable but so very frequently nowadays involving poor, old people?
What annoyed me about the reporting of this incident was that “The Beeches Residential Care Home” in Wath-Upon-Dearne, Rotherham,
How had “The Beeches” killed this lady? Had the building collapsed on her and killed her? The Beeches looks solid enough, sound and substantial. Even if it had, the building’s owners and managers would be liable.
No, “The Beeches” did not cause this lady’s death. Someone in “The Beeches” among the staff, the management or the owners of this care home is responsible, not the home itself. From what has been reported, no particular person seems to have been named so far as being responsible and it was not even stated whether this is a Local Authority run establishment, or if it is privately owned.
So what exactly has this reporter actually told the British public ? Well, not much!
The old lady died horribly and unnecessarily.
She was taken from this building to a hospital where she subsequently died.
Hospital staff raised the alarm because of her dreadful state on admittance.
Investigations concluded that the care home was responsible for her demise. New procedures have been imposed and training will be introduced to improve standards in the future.
News organisations seem to have become very guarded and careful of what they dare to report these days, at times it is hardly worth them bothering!
Also remember that Corporate Liability Law, by classing a company as a “legal person,” tends to conveniently provide a “Stay Out of Jail” card for very bad people within organisations when the “corporate body” is found responsible rather than those working inside, or owning and setting procedures within the organisation who should really be locked up?
It was very upsetting to hear the news report of the vandalism of the Steven Lawrence Centre in Deptford,
Apparently, racists attacked the building and are responsible for the damage. It was a racist attack, a racially provoked attack, a hate crime and a racist incident. This is how it has been reported, look it up for yourself.
How do the authorities and news reporters know that it was racists and not badly behaved people who are not racist but just evil and get their kicks from being vandals? It may seem highly likely that it was a genuine racist attack but is it right to assume? How helpful is it for us all when the mainstream media jump to conclusions like this?
This reporting contradicts the reporting of the previous incident by actually offering too much information of a speculative nature, containing assumption alongside the bare truthful facts. The press and news industry obviously feel free to embroider in this case, where as in the last one they were cautious and measured in their reporting.
Is it useful for the press to keep the racism pot simmering on the stove? Why might this be?
It is very controlling to keep a chosen “hot” issue in the public arena, and refer to it on regular basis. It is a form of “psychic driving” involving both overt and subliminal repetition.
Human beings are very susceptible and easily influenced. Obviously one can change peoples’ behaviour by showing them directly how to do something in a different way but psychologists and the powerful organisations who employ them eg: governments, big businesses, etc. have been aware for a long time that people can be subtly changed, without them being consciously aware of it, by suggestion and repetition of a word, phrase or object. What do you think advertising is?
All of the mainstream media does exactly what the Government wants, always! Even when the poor, subsidised, useful-idiot luvvies think they are being independent and radical. As if !
So does the Government secretly want the racism pot to carry on simmering then? Yes, of course it does! In order to justify the £millions of public money (that could and should be spent on care, education, health etc.) currently being spent on quack psychology like "Diversity Training"?
Perhaps Government Agents smashed the Steven Lawrence Centre, or paid a criminal group to do it, in order to keep the controversy going? If the surveillance equipment miraculously shows nothing, or the cameras were “not working,” I think I will be drawing my own conclusions on this, and I would suggest you do the same.
What does this do for the
The last news item I noticed is about an innocent pilot being given leave to appeal for compensation after being held in prison due to the 911 tragedy. If he is entitled to have compensation then he should get it but it is interesting to note that the British Justice System is the one area of Government which is never, ever financially capped. Lawyers, magistrates and judges never seem to have to moderate their decisions in relation to economy, but everyone else has to.
Why is there no limit to what sums can be awarded in law? It is the one area where anything goes! The sky really seems to be the limit, funny that! There is always loads of endless money in
Law and "Charity", that’s where all the money is these days in NuLabour’s
The Army, Navy, Air Force, Police, hospitals, care homes, education, housing, welfare, pregnancy and birthing services, Council Services, libraries, farming, fishing, transportation, etc. can all go to hell, and clearly are! Who cares? Not your Government. Welcome to the Matrix.
Here is how it is done.. www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaoX_SgNO70