The Angry Cheese.

Keryn Jalli, Swansea University

2012-01-30T11:25:00.000-08:00

Re: http://studentactivistdiary.co.uk/index.php/author/keryn-jalli/

Author Archives: Keryn.Jalli

EXCLUSIVE! Student Activist Diary exposes fascist meeting in Swansea

Dear Miss Jalli,

Please be aware of the law when publishing articles, and pay attention to the following:

Libel. from http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1153

1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander, which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie. Publication need only be to one person, but it must be a statement which claims to be fact and is not clearly identified as an opinion………….. 2) v. to broadcast or publish a written defamatory statement.

May I suggest that the next time you publish an article; it would be wise to stop and do a little research first to check whether the facts being put before you are actually correct. It is ‘not rocket science’ in these days of the Worldwide Web. Failure to do such research is not only lazy, sloppy journalism; it could be catastrophic.

Sadly, Zahid Raja, NUS Wales Black Students Officer and on the United Against Fascism Wales steering committee has allowed himself to be seriously mislead. Let’s hope he soon sees sense.

In your article, you directly state that Brian Gerrish, Editor of the UK Column newspaper, is “a known fascist sympathiser.”

I, and many others, would very much like to know from exactly where you obtained the false information that Brian Gerrish is, “a known fascist sympathiser.” Did you just print this falsehood because Zahid Raja told you to? Or did you check elsewhere first? If so, where?

Anyone taking the trouble to research properly, which you and Zahid Raja clearly have yet to do, will very quickly find out that Brian Gerrish is, in fact, quite the reverse! Brian Gerrish is a brave and dedicated fighter against fascism, in all its forms!

You have also quoted Zahid Raja elsewhere in your article, where he describes, “ …..Choosing Brian, a well-known proponent of fascism, to speak on faux-issues that underpin Islamaphobic propaganda suggests to me that this is a political attempt to inject divisive politics into the local community.”

Raja is entirely wrong in this statement.

Raja also implies that Brian Gerrish’s talk was intended to whip up racism in the local community and promote racial division in the area. These accusations are also false,

here “this attempt to mainstream racism”

and here “this kind of baseless politics that fuels racism.”

May I suggest you take a quick visit to the UK Column online www.ukcolumn.org

Go to the top and click on the British Constitution Group,

then go to video, click and scroll down to see:-

http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/video/dele-ogun-democracy-gone-wrong Dele Ogun, author of “The Law, the Lawyers and the Lawless. “

As you can see, not only are all races welcome to join the British Constitution Group and attend their conferences, they address the conferences too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Hk1VZR4p1U Here is Brian Gerrish in conversation with Anthony Hilder, the well-known American author and commentator. He also addressed the British Constitution Group conference in London a couple of years ago. Listen to them, for heaven’s sake!

There are a variety of very interesting videos online where you can see for yourself exactly what Brian Gerrish believes and is working towards. Please do so, you will be pleasantly surprised.

Important! Please also be aware that Brian Gerrish, his fellow workers on the UK Column, people in Lawful Rebellion, and the membership of the British Constitution Group are greatly upsetting and disturbing the British Establishment. We are exposing Common Purpose and wide scale corruption in the highest places. This is a very real fight against evil, and we are committed to it.

However, by writing and spreading around blatantly false, Government–sourced propaganda such as the incorrect nonsense you have been duped into printing recently in this article, you and your misguided colleague are not being rebels. You are being used as “useful idiots” by the governing Elite, you are allowing yourselves to be New World Order pawns.

Yes, the British Constitution Group is political, but it is not party political. It does not represent any particular group, race, religion, age group, etc. Anyone living here permanently or temporarily as a visitor, from any background may join, and are doing so. And need to, believe me!

Another interesting fact you may not know.

Joining The British Constitution Group requires taking a pledge not to vote for any of the BIG 3 Political Parties – the LIB LAB CON.

The false left-right paradigm? Have you ever heard of this expression? All young people need to.

And if, like most British people, you are still relying on the BBC, Channel 4, ITV, CNN, Sky, Fox – even Russia Today and Al Jazeera, with mainstream media (MSM) newspapers, to be informed, you are being seriously mislead. You must look further and wider for truthful information on what is really happening to this country, and the wider world.

This is not a moaning letter, Keryn. We are genuinely concerned for you and your friend Zahid. Please do not allow yourselves to be used by hopelessly lost New World Order slaves like UAF. You are young and we can assure you that you do not know everything, we are older and still learning much about wholesale corruption in British and world politics. Believe us, nothings is what it seems!

And this applies to the fringe organisations and pressure groups too.

This is a video of the talk which Raja and Jalli objected to, with Swansea University students and the UAF outside, demonstrating. Against what?

Brian and the British Constitution Group's concern for local children's safety, and the safety of children generally across Britain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl3hT0ghdRs

Is the British government really involved in making money from the protection and care of children and families? The answer is, you bet, and what’s more they don’t like talking about it.

Sarah Teather was recently sent a simple email by the UK Column:

http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/children%E2%80%99s-services-commissioning-and-market-development

http://www.ukcolumn.org/blogs/labour-mp-sian-james-and-her-thugs-try-hide-causes-south-wales-suicides

Brian Gerrish in Swansea, Are Our Children Safe? An Investigation Of Politics & Suicide Risks

2012-01-30T06:58:00.000-08:00

http://www.ukcolumn.org/blogs/labour-mp-sian-james-and-her-thugs-try-hide-causes-south-wales-suicides

Brantwood School, R.B.S Bonuses 2012,

2012-01-28T11:08:00.001-08:00

Royal Bank of Scotland bonuses!? For what??!!

A 1 million pound bonus for RBS Chief Executive Stephen Hester!? In his bloody dreams!

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-24029865-pressure-grows-over-rbs-bonuses.do

DON’T CARE WHO THIS BLOKE IS, OR WHAT HE’S DONE!

DON’T CARE!

NO BONUS FOR HIM OR ANYONE IN THIS SCUMBAG BANK!

CLOSE DOWN THIS VILE BANK – NOW!

To hell with it, and Grant Thornton.

The Royal Bank of Scotland is the low down, rotten, no good, pig sty of a bank that foreclosed on a girls’ school in Sheffield – BRANTWOOD SCHOOL, NETHER EDGE, SHEFFIELD.

RBS is a greedy disgrace to banking!

http://theangrycheese.blogspot.com/2010/12/rbs-natwest-hypocrite-bank-scumbags_8773.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7165419/School-to-close-with-9-days-notice-after-RBS-withdraws-support.html

Sheffield University History Dept. Book Trashing 2011-12.

2012-01-28T09:07:00.000-08:00

This book now needs a new chapter, called "Sheffield University"

Sheffield University's History Dept. has recently moved to trendy new buildings. Since before Christmas 2011, I believe, workmen have been in the old history building to gut it and refurbish it. Just before Xmas, I have been reliably informed, a demolition team filled 2 LARGE SKIPS WITH THOUSANDS OF OLD HISTORY BOOKS. THESE BOOKS TOOK THE FULL FORCE OF THE HOWLING WINDS AND TORRENTIAL WINTER RAINSTORMS with which the UK was battered. Can you believe this? I am finding this very hard to deal with. As we were getting ready for Christmas, dodging the storms and enjoying the holiday, these precious books were soaking and rotting in the open air! UNBELIEVABLE!

I cannot express my utter contempt for this disgusting business, it's like something out of 'Fahrenheit 451' and comparable to the Nazis.

A friend who was sent to work on site just after the New Year salvaged 2 carrier bags of historical journals for me which never made it to the skips and stayed dry. If only he had been there the week before,he was informed, there were 2 skips full! How can a "respectable" university, a centre of higher knowledge and learning, behave in such an appalling, wasteful and disrespectful way? I am still reeling from the shock. I also have the old door signs, "Library" and "Old Library."

Everyone I have told about this is utterly horrified. It's kept me awake at night!

Why has this happened? Stupidity? Laziness, selfishness, or a deliberate act to supress knowledge? When I go to bookshops, charity shops, car boot sales, etc. I have noticed over the last 15 years or so that non-fiction books are just not around much anymore, apart from dozy biographies, gardening, cookery, the odd attractive coffee table book, and sport. And it's nearly all junk novels now, have you noticed this?

Why couldn't these books be sold to second hand book dealers, why not auction them off, or give them away to a charity? I know people who would have filled up a van for £100.00 or £500.00 and the money could have been put to good use.

Is there an agenda in Britain to destroy knowledge? Many believe there is. A quick study of the Fabian Society, the Tavistock Institute and the Frankfurt School would pay most people dividends however, theory is one thing, you can know about it in your head but, when evil physically touches you and your circle, it still shocks your heart. I know, but I don't want to finally accept, that there are such wicked, disgusting people in the world. I have to though.

Burning or destroying a library is destroying peoples' study, theories, dreams, ideas, plans. People who are no longer with us have very kindly left their hard work behind for us to learn from. Other people, who have also now passed on, saw fit to appreciate these works and purchase them for the library with public money, or paid for and donated them. Where has respect gone? Common decency? Appreciation, high standards and civilised behaviour?

The remaining part of one set of books from the trash, that we salvaged, were donated as a gift to the university and have the lady's name inside. They are illustrated and have gold leaf on the cover, and are beautifully bound in leather. Very expensive in their day.

I could not go to university when I was young. I would have loved to go but it was unaffordable and much harder to do, back then. I did my degree, years later, as a mature student at Sheffield University! It was a big achievement that I had waited a long time for. Sadly, university nowadays is for students - not for scholars! I have a rare document in my possession which I have been considering getting properly bound to donate to Sheffield University for posterity but I am far too scared to now! I just might burn my degree certificate on the campus near the Dean's office because I am so angry and disappointed over this!

Just when you think you have heard enough, some other bastard kicks you in the guts! Thanks, Sheffield University!

A scene from François Truffaut's film 'Farenheit 451.' (1966)

Commemorative plaque to Nazi book-burning in 1933 on Römerberg Square, Frankfurt City Hall, Hesse, Germany.

Insomnia http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1hzXKcQrg0

Scotland, Paedophile Capital of The World

2012-01-28T06:34:00.000-08:00

Robert Green Convicted In Court With No Jury

On Tuesday, 24th January in Stonehaven Court, Scotland, Robert Green was found guilty of Breach of the Peace, and breaking some of his bail conditions. Three other charges were dropped.

Barely reported in the mainstream press, this man has been found guilty of ‘crimes’ for daring to expose the facts concerning the rape and abuse of Hollie Greig at the hands of senior members of the Scottish establishment. Even before the latest 6 day hearing, the Scottish ‘justice’ system had spent over £500,000 trying to shut Robert up.

Far from helping him to investigate the abuses and bring forward evidence already existing, Robert was subjected to a clear collaborative campaign by the Scottish State system. The criminal conspiracy reaches to the very top of Scotland’s government and following the case it now makes Scotland the paedophile capital of the world. Do as you like and the state will protect you.

Reports from the public who were present state:

Robert Green did not receive a fair trial. There was no jury and he was denied key witnesses for the defence. Dame Elish Angiolini was clearly too important in the elite system to appear despite the fact that the failure to bring abusers to account occurred under her hand. Presiding Sheriff Principal Bowen simply accepted an objection by the Prosecution that she was irrelevant to the case. Robert had already been denied the Procurator Fiscal Stephen McGowan as a witness for the defence, despite unanimous support for his citation by all his legal representatives, past and present.

On taking the witness stand, therefore, Robert asked if he could make a statement on the record, but was refused by the Sheriff. Answering his Counsel’s questions with his customary eloquence and clarity, Robert stressed that his main object throughout the activity which had offended a few people in Scotland was to secure an investigation of Hollie’s allegations. He was able to quote from Dr Eva Harding’s letter in which Sylvia Major is named as an abuser and stated that this individual was sitting in the court.

Throughout Mr Lamb’s cross-examination Robert reiterated his belief that he was acting in the public interest in attempting to protect vulnerable citizens. He explained that he had tried every possible avenue prior to taking the action which had given rise to his being prosecuted, and that Anne Greig had also been directing her concerns through the normal legal channels since 2000. By the time of his arrest therefore, 10 years had passed during which time the authorities had obstructed every attempt to secure justice.

Robert also continued to stress that his efforts were designed to instigate an OPEN, INDEPENDENT INQUIRY into all aspects of Hollie’s case, including the abduction of Anne and the highly suspicious death of Robert Greig.

In the final afternoon session both sides summed up and Mr Lamb skilfully had Robert acquitted of 3 of the 5 charges against him. However the Sheriff ruled that in his opinion Robert was guilty of Breach of the Peace and of breaking some of his bail conditions.

Sentencing has been deferred until Friday 17th February, until which time the bail conditions on Robert remain in force.

www.ukcolumn.org

Roger Hayes, Lawful Bank

2012-01-20T01:22:00.001-08:00

The Kings Head Hotel,

http://kingsheadlouth.co.uk/

10, Mercer Row,

Louth,

Lincolnshire.

LN11 9JQ

Thursday, January 26th, 2012, 7:00pm until 10:00pm

Roger Hayes, chairman of the British Constitution Group, will talk on our monetary system and what's so very wrong with it, and present the plan for a new form of saving and banking - The Lawful Bank.

You are all welcome to attend, to learn of this new initiative and ask questions.

Guaranteed to be a very interesting evening.

http://lawfulbank.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9HivlOAMqs

ROBERT GREEN TRIAL - DAY 3. 18 JAN 2012

2012-01-19T06:43:00.000-08:00

HOLLIE GREIG CASE - ROBERT GREEN TRIAL - DAY 3 - 18 JAN 2012

18 January 2012 23:32:22

Elish Angilioni
http://holliedemandsjustice.org/
= Trial Day 3 – Grampian Police on the back foot
Posted on January 18, 2012 by Belinda 3

Crown Office in attempt to block defence questioning of Grampian police “weak link” DC Lisa Evans. Towards the end of a very interesting day, the Trial came to a dramatic halt after Procurator Fiscal Stephen McGowan attempted to prevent DC Lisa Evans being cross-examined by Robert’s defence QC, Andy Lamb. Even Sheriff Bowen admitted being “mystified” but agreed to an adjournment, as Robert’s Counsel and the PF could not reach an agreement. It has not yet become clear why the Prosecution seem so desperate to obstruct the cross-examination of a particularly weak witness.
We should point out that Evans was the officer who interviewed Hollie about her allegations on 8th September 2009 at Shrewsbury, witnessed by Robert. From the current cross-examining of alleged abusers and victims, it has been confirmed that none of those named were ever interviewed as a result of Hollie’s detailed and precise evidence and, in line with what appears to be normal police procedure over such allegations these days, no computers were seized or examined.
DC Evans had been brought in as a prosecution witness because she was one of the officers involved in the raid on Robert’s home on 13th February 2010 whilst he was being held in Aberdeen and his computer, unlike those of the alleged sex abusers, was seized. The computer and papers taken from his living room (with no inventory supplied) were part of today’s court productions.
It would seem that Grampian police have a confusing sense of priorities when computers of alleged sex-abusers are not seized or examined, but the computer of someone who trying to expose the abusers is confiscated! There may well be some rational explanation for this anomaly but so far after two years, no one has been able to provide one.
Although the Evans issue seems to present a problem for the prosecution, it was not the only set-back for the Crown. Today’s witnesses packed less of a punch than yesterday’s, in particular Win Dragon, who seemed to be overwhelmed and incoherent. Dragon repeatedly claimed that Hollie had never been raped. However, she admitted to being a friend of Denis Charles Mackie, which could have affected her judgement. She was also cross-examined by Mr Lamb about her relationship with Dame Anne Begg, MP for Aberdeen South.
There seems to be an increasing mood of dissatisfaction about Grampian police’s repeated failure to investigate Hollie’s allegations, or to try to ascertain the true facts about the death of Robert Greig. As we said yesterday and as we believe is rapidly becoming apparent to even the most sceptical observer in the court, the witnesses who claim to be angry and/or distressed about Robert’s allegations should instead direct their feelings towards Grampian police whose negligence, and possibly worse, has brought things to this pass. Most consicuously absent from today’s court productions are the 2 notebooks seized from Robert’s house in which details of DC Evans’ interview with Hollie were recorded.

Once again, Robert wishes to thank all those who turn up every day to support him and for all the kind messages of encouragement he has been receiving. Please note there is no hearing on Friday, so after Thursday’s session the trial will resume again on Monday.

Following the updates from Stonehaven court for the past three days, on Hollie’s website, the hits have increased expotencially as they have for other supporting sites with a phenomenal amount of interest. On Hollie’s site alone, downloads of the Buchanan V Robert Green pdf file are now heading close to 1,000. The dam is fit to burst. Mainstream media are at long last NOW showing an interest as are councils and police in both England and Scotland. Across the world people are visiting the site. Due to the wonderful support of the many thousands of people who support truth and justice, it finally feels that justice may in the end prevail for all three victims of authoritarian abuse – in many departments.

Please continue to visit, support, comment and spread the word about the documents, which reveal so much.
-------------------------------------------------------------

THE FACTS OF THE CASE == Description: HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF FILE:
http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/kyv3fd
ROBERT GREEN EXPOSES SATANIC RITUAL CHILD ABUSE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaRI-h9jVxM&feature=uploademail
HOLLIE GREIG - ROBERT GREENS BLOG
http://holliedemandsjustice-robertgreensblog.blogspot.com/2011_10_01_archive.html
ROBERT GREEN INTERVIEW- EDGE MEDIA 25 8 11 =
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF35AAC01128C697D
Autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned online...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mhfju-nNlgY
HOLLIE GREIG 15 MIN SPECIAL - TONY LEGEND MANCHESTER RADIO ONLINE 10 4 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqN1-3CIqQw
ROBERT GREEN ON HOLLIE GREIG - P DROCKTON RADIO 5 3 2010
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBA1F5B143DC56468

HOLLIE GREIG OFFICIAL SITE =
http://www.holliedemandsjustice.org

...namaste...b.

www.facebook.com/butlincat

www.myspace.com/butlincat/blog

www.youtube.com/butlincat6

www.butlincat.blogspot.com

Trial Day 2, Robert Green, Aberdeen

2012-01-18T04:04:00.000-08:00

http://holliedemandsjustice.org/content/trial-day-2-the-witnesses-for-the-prosecution/#comment-239

Trial Day 2 – The Witnesses for the ProsecutionTrial Day 2 – The Witnesses for the Prosecution

"All the prosecution witnesses had to demonstrate was the degree to which he had caused them ‘alarm and distress’. Every single witness confirmed that they had never been questioned about Hollie’s allegations, whether in 2000 or 2009, which is precisely the point Robert has always made about Grampian police’s failure to investigate."

This confirms what Anne and Robert have always maintained, Grampian police never interviewed the alleged abusers furthermore, Shropshire Council accepted false information of a "full investigation" and have brought false charges against Anne and Robert taking them to the High Court in an attempt to silence them. It begs the question: on whose instructions are they acting?? Look at the documents on the site

http://holliedemandsjustice.org/content/who-really-issued-the-interdict-on-robert-green/

India - a Cashless Society?

2012-01-17T09:26:00.000-08:00

http://www.infowars.com/cashless-society-india-implements-first-biometric-id-program-for-all-of-its-1-2-billion-residents/

Cashless Society: India Implements First Biometric ID Program for all of its 1.2 Billion Residents

Brandon Turbeville
Infowars.com January 12, 2012

Over the past few months, I have written several articles dealing with the coming cashless society and the developing technological control grid. I also have written about the surge of government attempts to gain access to and force the use of biometric data for the purposes of identification, tracking, tracing, and surveillance.

Unfortunately, the reactions I receive from the general public are almost always the same. While some recognize the danger, most simply deny that governments have the capability or even the desire to create a system in which the population is constantly monitored by virtue of their most private and even biological information. Others, either gripped by apathy or ignorance, cannot believe that the gadgets given to them from the massive tech corporations are designed for anything other than their entertainment and enjoyment.

However, current events in India should serve not just as a warning, but also as a foreshadowing of the events to come in the Western world, specifically the United States.

Recently, India has launched a nationwide program involving the allocation of a Unique Identification Number (UID) to every single one of its 1.2 billion residents. Each of the numbers will be tied to the biometric data of the recipient using three different forms of information – fingerprints, iris scans, and pictures of the face. All ten digits of the hand will be recorded, and both eyes will be scanned.

The project will be directed by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) under the premise of preventing identity theft and social welfare fraud. India has rather extensive social welfare and safety net programs, ranging from medical support and heating assistance to others aimed at helping the poor. Fraud is a rampant problem in India, especially in relation to these programs due to a preponderance of corrupt politicians and bureaucrats who often stuff welfare rolls with fake names and take the money for themselves.

Yet, although the justification for the billion person database is the increased ability to accurately disperse social welfare benefits, it will not be just the Indian government’s social welfare programs that have access to and utilize the UIDAI. Indeed, even before the program has been completed, major banks, state/local governments, and other institutions are planning to use the UIDAI for identification verification purposes and, of course, payment and accessibility.

As Aaron Saenz of the Singularity Hub writes:

Yet the UID is going to be used for much more than social welfare programs. The UIDAI is in discussion with many institutions (banks, local/state governments, etc.) to allow them to use the UID as a means of identity verification. These institutions will pay the UIDAI some fee to cover costs and generate revenue. There seems to be little doubt that once it is established, the UID will become a preferred method (if not the preferred method) of identification in India.

Saenz also sees the eventuality of the UIDAI program becoming a means of payment and accessibility. He continues:

Ultimately, I wouldn’t be surprised if the UID, with its biometric data, could be used as a means of payment (when linked to a bank account), or as an access key to homes and cars. Purchase a meal with your fingerprint and unlock your door with the twinkle in your eye. Similar results could be expected in other nations that adopted biometric identification systems.<

Saenz, and other proponents of the UID (UIDAI), have been diligent in pointing out that the program “is just a number, not an ID card.” However, this claim is debatable. Saenz himself admits that State issued driver’s licenses and identification cards will reference the UID information.

The question then becomes how much of that information will be referenced, and how that will be accomplished? Will the information be included on the card? Will only part of the information be included on the card? Or will the card reference back to the digital UID information to be then reconciled with the information that is present on the card? Although the UID is obviously going to be utilized by other institutions outside of the social welfare programs, no answers to these questions have been provided.

But, in the end, does it really matter if the information is collated into an ID card format if the government already has access to that information digitally? More than likely, a national ID card will appear as a supplement to the database already created by UID. Regardless, the private biometric information has still been taken from the individual. The database is still there.

Indeed, government “officials” have already stated that the database will be used by intelligence agencies for the purpose of monitoring “bank transactions, cellphone purchases and the movements of individuals and groups suspected of fomenting terrorism.” This will be very easy to do since the UID number will be entered anytime an individual “accesses services from government departments, driver’s license offices and hospitals, as well as insurance, telecom, and banking companies.”

Nevertheless, proponents have also touted the fact that, at this point, the UID program is optional. But the program will obviously not be optional for very long. As I have discussed in previous articles, the introduction of a program such as a national ID card, biometric data, or cashless payment technologies is always followed by the program becoming mandatory. The ultimate goal of an all-encompassing cashless surveillance program with no opt-out provisions is always introduced by stealth and the Gradualist Technique.

At first, the program is introduced as a way to speed up transactions, increase efficiency, and provide convenience. Soon, however, governments and businesses begin to transition out of the older methods of payment and identification and focus more on the new technology. Identification using the traditional methods remain as an option, but become viewed as cumbersome. Eventually, the alternative methods are phased out completely and mandates replace what was once a personal choice.

As soon as Indian banks, businesses, and government social service offices begin to require identification using the UID, the ability to remain off the system and lead what passes for a normal life will disappear.

This is exactly the intention with India’s new biometric ID program. In fact, the cashless society is a stated goal of the UID program. CEO of MindTree’s IT Services, the company that was awarded the government contract for development and maintenance of the UID, explained in an interview with ComputerWeekly that the “ID scheme will support a cashless society. He said all vendors will have a biometric reader and citizens can pay for things with a fingerprint scan. Even a bag of rice.”

No doubt, even after such an admission by a man who was instrumental in the development of the program, many who read this article will still dismiss it as a “conspiracy theory.”

Nonetheless, this new monumental data mining effort by the Indian government dovetails with recent efforts in the Western world to develop an electronic surveillance grid capable of tracking, tracing, and recording every single movement and communication of every single citizen within a nation’s borders.

New technologies which are being introduced inside the United States, the UK, and Australia such as vein scanners, biometric employee time and attendance systems, voice recognition devices, and behavior analysis systems are all geared toward Total Information Awareness of every human being on the planet.

Only a totalitarian form of government would desire this information; and only a very determined totalitarian government would actively work toward establishing it. India is only the first nation to openly sweep up its entire national population into such a massive biometric database net. We cannot let our nation be the next.

This post first appeared on Activist Post.

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Mullins, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University where he earned the Pee Dee Electric Scholar’s Award as an undergraduate. He has had numerous articles published dealing with a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, and civil liberties. He also the author of Codex Alimentarius – The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies and Five Sense Solutions. Brandon Turbeville is available for podcast, radio, and TV interviews.
Please contact us at activistpost@gmail.com

WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT?

this filmed talk is vital listening -

The Manipulation Of The Human Psyche (Full Version)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x26Q2XUZVwE

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwNju_G9SoI at 16 mins.