Monday, August 29, 2016
Sunday, August 28, 2016
What Happened to James Wesley Howell?
The CIA Can't Let
James Wesley Howell Live
“If James Wesley Howell were a genuine terrorist, you'd think
there'd be one news item about his case in the two-and-a-half-months
since he was arrested June 12.
There is a virtual news blackout and law enforcement refuses to
answer inquiries. The mass media are too afraid to ask about
Howell. Why?
James Wesley Howell was a CIA-sponsored "terrorist" who realized
he was being double-crossed. He backed out and surrendered to local
police before he could be murdered. Of course the MSM spun
it that he was arrested.”
"Where is Gordon Duffy, Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson,
Michael Rivero and the hundreds of other websites that pretend to present the
truth? Have all these people been warned? (Where are Russia Today and Iran's
Press TV?)"
This is a valid and
very profound question. Considering some of the volatile subject matters
covered by these Alternative News sources, I think we can remove any
possibility of them being threatened (warned). However, it poses a bigger and
darker question: Are Gordon Duffy, Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson,
Michael Rivero and hundreds of other websites just pretending to present ALL of
the truth? Are these alternative news sources merely
Government-controlled opposition to give the illusion of high-profile, internet
Patriots seeking the truth?
I remember when
this story broke shortly after the Gay Night Club incident in Florida. The
unanswered questions in Florida seemed to mimic the ruse of another false flag
-- the same stratagem was reflected with James Wesley Howell. It shows that the
War on Terror is totally bogus, and that many of the "alleged"
terrorists are Government-trained/financed patsies.
Thursday, August 25, 2016
Tuesday, August 23, 2016
Sunday, August 21, 2016
NAMED PERSON SCHEME. The Docherty Case:..Still Work To Do
On Friday's UK Column News, Alex Thomson announced publication of the
transcript of David Scott's extended interview with Brian and Janice
Docherty. At over 250 pages, this was a huge amount of work by Alex and
his team of UK Column members, all of whom are owed a huge thanks.
The transcription of the interview is available here.
Please distribute it as far and wide as you can. We appreciate it is a
big read, but even reading the table of contents gives a great overview
of the case.
Alex's team formed following our announcement that the Docherty case
should be treated as an open source investigation. So far, the response
has been superb, with information coming in thick and fast. That
information is already being used to motivate MPs, MEPs, the police, the
judiciary and other public authorities, and we must also thank everyone
who has contributed to that effort.
But they need more help. They have identified ten main questions they
need answers to. If you have any information which can help, please
contact the team by email at dochertyinvestigation@ukcolumn.org
1. Is Bridgeen Smith/Smyth, the TUSLA manager at Letterkenny who was
apparently drafted in to deal with the Dochertys (as she is not on the
CORU register in Letterkenny), in fact the wife of Northern Regional
Director John Smith/Smyth?
The Dochertys have seen both use two surname variants, oddly enough.
2. Who in the Irish Government is trying to urge the Dochertys to place
all the blame on Mary Malee in Mayo in order to deflect from Dublin?
3. What is the relationship between Sergeant John Forkan and Maria
Houston (alias Heuston), the unqualified woman whom the Dochertys
believe to have been “caring” for their son Christian? Has
Houston/Heusten a military background?
4. What is the background and motivation of Donegal lawyer Liza Finegan?
5. What is the current professional practice status and practice location of psychiatrist Ciarán Smyth?
6. What is the current official and the current actual practice
location of Donegal/Derry social worker Gabrielle McDaid? Was she
registered to practice social work in the Republic of Ireland before
June 2016? Has she ever had regular social work employment in Donegal
(or elsewhere in the Republic), or only in Northern Ireland?
7. What is Judge Paul Kelly’s background with the Roman Catholic church?
8. Since Irish court-appointed guardian ad litem Patricia Molony does
not drive, which police or other persons took her and the Docherty
children from the Republic of Ireland, via Northern Ireland, to Scotland
and back for the Docherty children’s attendance of the funeral of their
maternal grandmother (McLaren) in Blairgowrie, Perthshire, in January
2016? Who authorised this at Police Scotland and PSNI?
9. Which (Irish, British or foreign) entities and persons purchased the
(State tax-relieved) stately home of Lawton House in Moneygall, County
Offaly for the previous Minister for Children and Youth Affairs in the
Republic of Ireland, James Reilly, since he is a known bad debtor?
And which entities and persons previously purchased for Reilly, in a
“non-recourse” investment arrangement, the care home which he previously
owned, Greenhill Nursing Home in Carrick-on-Suir, Co. Tipperary? (See
here, here, here and here.)
10. Can the public notify the team of any people connected with any of
the characters in this transcript who are known or reasonably suspected:
• to be police, military or intelligence informants;
• to have an allegiance to Freemasonry, to any criminal group or
political gangsters, or to (a Scottish or Irish diocese of) the Roman
Catholic church that is much stronger than they publicly intimate;
• or to be living a lie about his or her denominational affiliation,
(sources of) wealth, political loyalty or attitude, sexuality or
nationality?
In addition, the team would like ot know the Roman Catholic church
intelligence role of Robert CASSIDY (Scot close to IRA), Neil McKAY
(Edinburgh), John and Neil DOHERTY (Antrim, no relation to the
Dochertys), Enda SHERLOCK (brother of Seán the TD), Carmel McGILLOWAY
(Derry), Cormac KEONE (Derry), or John and Yvonne HARTNETT (Derry)?
Is Glen CRAWFORD working for PSNI?
Is social work team leader Eilish CRAWFORD-QUAILE from Scotland or a psychiatrist?
The email address again, if you think you can help, is dochertyinvestigation@ukcolumn.org
Saturday, August 20, 2016
Julian Assange's LAWYER, DEAD after being Struck by Train. Coincidence?
This, in London earlier this week,
has a very unpleasant smell about it.
http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/julian-assange-s-lawyer-found-dead-after-being-struck-by-train-27812
It very much looks as though the Big Boys are still in the game and
haven't gone away!
Indeed, one does ask - why is this not on the mainstream news? You
guess!
I was informed today, that the CIA run the English military - if this is
true, then Assange with something on Hillary, will present no problems. This
will all be very well hidden.
James Bond is alive and well, after all!
The short video explains, as does the article, why he allegedly
"committed suicide"!
Jolly crafty - but it still happens!
Harry Lime, 1949....etc....(just after the war, remember?....Mein Gott -
fresh memories!)
==============================================
why is this
not main stream news?
The
news is particularly disturbing, as Democratic Strategist and CNN host,
Bob Beckel appeared in a FOXTV interview
and called for the
assassination of Julian Assange (or more accurately, "Just kill the
sonofabitch!")
Assange
is believed to be planning a strategic "October Surprise" leak of a Hillary Clinton email,
just prior the US Presidential Election. It purportedly contains information
that will definitively put her behind bars.
Tuesday, August 16, 2016
Koran Burnt, Ashes Mixed With Pig's Blood.....
Black Mass and The Consumption of Mary set for Aug. 15
By Ben Luschen
| June 29, 2016
Adam Daniels and followers
burn a Koran and defile its ashes with human menstrual blood and pigs entrails
in a sick public satanic ceremony designed to upset and enrage Christians!
The entire sick 'ceremony' revolves around
the desecration of the Eucharist, which requires that a Host be stolen from a
Catholic church.
Sad 'satanist' and handler of stolen property Adam Daniels with weird, attention-seeking 'friend.'
Monday, August 15, 2016
Saturday, August 13, 2016
Monday, August 8, 2016
Saturday, August 6, 2016
The Radical Gender Bender Agenda - Children Being Ruined For Life
Bill
Muehlenberg posted: "I have penned dozens of articles now seeking to
expose the madness and harmfulness of the radical gender bender agenda.
Children are especially being targeted by these activists, and are being
greatly harmed as a result. The insanity gets worse by the day"
I have penned dozens of articles now seeking to expose the madness and
harmfulness of the radical gender bender agenda. Children are especially being
targeted by these activists, and are being greatly harmed as a result. The
insanity gets worse by the day.
Consider a brief item out of Seattle, Washington: the city council has
declared a ban of any attempts to change unwanted homosexual attractions. It is
now illegal to try to help someone in this area, even if you are a pastor. But
the city of course fully supports the idea of gender bending.
Contradiction much?
Joseph Backholm, head the Family Policy Institute of Washington, points out the
absurdity and contradictions of all this: “So we have the situation where the
city of Seattle has declared that same-sex attraction is always unchangeable –
but your gender is changeable whenever you want to." Yep, makes perfect
sense.
Thankfully some professional bodies have not fallen for this con job,
and have stood strong, exposing the bogus nature of this whole enterprise. A
while back I wrote about how the American College of Pediatricians released a
very important statement called, “Gender Ideology Harms Children”. I offered
the full text of this here:
They have since come out with another, longer statement which everyone
needs to be aware of. The document, “Gender Dysphoria in Children,” is a
7000-word statement fully documented and referenced with careful medical and
scientific research. The abstract of the statement says this:
Gender dysphoria (GD) of childhood
describes a psychological condition in which children experience a marked
incongruence between their experienced gender and the gender associated with
their biological sex. When this occurs in the pre-pubertal child, GD resolves
in the vast majority of patients by late adolescence. Currently there is a
vigorous, albeit suppressed, debate among physicians, therapists, and academics
regarding what is fast becoming the new treatment standard for GD in children.
This new paradigm is rooted in the assumption that GD is innate, and involves
pubertal suppression with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists
followed by the use of cross-sex hormones—a combination that results in the
sterility of minors. A review of the current literature suggests that this
protocol is founded upon an unscientific gender ideology, lacks an evidence
base, and violates the long-standing ethical principle of “First do no harm.”
Here is its conclusion:
Gender dysphoria (GD) in children is
a term used to describe a psychological condition in which a child experiences
marked incongruence between his or her experienced gender and the gender
associated with the child’s biological sex. Twin studies demonstrate that GD is
not an innate trait. Moreover, barring pre-pubertal affirmation and hormone
intervention for GD, 80 percent to 95 percent of children with GD will accept
the reality of their biological sex by late adolescence.
The treatment of GD in childhood with hormones effectively amounts to mass experimentation on, and sterilization of, youth who are cognitively incapable of providing informed consent. There is a serious ethical problem with allowing irreversible, life-changing procedures to be performed on minors who are too young to give valid consent themselves; adolescents cannot understand the magnitude of such decisions.
Ethics alone demands an end to the use of pubertal suppression with GnRH agonists, cross-sex hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries in children and adolescents. The College recommends an immediate cessation of these interventions, as well as an end to promoting gender ideology via school curricula and legislative policies. Healthcare, school curricula and legislation must remain anchored to physical reality. Scientific research should focus upon better understanding the psychological underpinnings of this disorder, optimal family and individual therapies, as well as delineating the differences among children who resolve with watchful waiting versus those who resolve with therapy and those who persist despite therapy.
The treatment of GD in childhood with hormones effectively amounts to mass experimentation on, and sterilization of, youth who are cognitively incapable of providing informed consent. There is a serious ethical problem with allowing irreversible, life-changing procedures to be performed on minors who are too young to give valid consent themselves; adolescents cannot understand the magnitude of such decisions.
Ethics alone demands an end to the use of pubertal suppression with GnRH agonists, cross-sex hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries in children and adolescents. The College recommends an immediate cessation of these interventions, as well as an end to promoting gender ideology via school curricula and legislative policies. Healthcare, school curricula and legislation must remain anchored to physical reality. Scientific research should focus upon better understanding the psychological underpinnings of this disorder, optimal family and individual therapies, as well as delineating the differences among children who resolve with watchful waiting versus those who resolve with therapy and those who persist despite therapy.
For those who might prefer a shorter summation of this important
document, there thankfully is one provided by the ACP featuring 17 summary
points. Here it is in its entirety:
1. Gender dysphoria (GD) of childhood
describes a psychological condition in which children experience a marked
incongruence between their experienced gender and the gender associated with
their biological sex. They often state that they are the opposite sex.
Prevalence rates among children are estimated to be less than 1%.
2. It is false that brain differences observed in some studies between transgender adults and non-transgender adults prove that GD is innate. If differences do exist in brain structures of transgender adults, these differences are more likely to be the result of transgender identification and behavior, not the cause of transgender identification and behavior. This is because thinking and behavior is known to shape brain microstructure through a process called neuroplasticity.
3. When GD occurs in the pre-pubertal child, it resolves in 80-95 percent of patients by late adolescence after they naturally pass through puberty. This is consistent with studies of identical twins that prove no one is born hard-wired to develop GD.
4. All complex behaviors are due to a combination of nature (biology), nurture (environmental factors) and free will choices. Studies of identical twins prove that GD is predominately influenced by non-shared post-natal events. The largest study of twin transsexual adults found that only 20 percent of identical twins were both trans-identified. Since identical twins contain 100 percent of the same DNA from conception, and develop in exactly the same prenatal environment where they are exposed to the same prenatal hormones, if genes and/or prenatal hormones contributed significantly to transgenderism, the concordance rates would be close to 100 percent. Instead, 80 percent of identical twin pairs were discordant for transgenderism. This means that at least 80 percent of what contributes to transgenderism in one adult co-twin consists of one or more non-shared post-natal experiences.
5. There is no single family dynamic, social situation, adverse event, or combination thereof that has been found to destine any child to develop GD. This fact, together with twin studies, suggests that there are many paths that may lead to GD in certain vulnerable children. Clinical case studies suggest that social reinforcement, parental psychopathology, family dynamics, and social contagion facilitated by mainstream and social media, all contribute to the development and/or persistence of GD in some vulnerable children. There may be other as yet unrecognized contributing factors as well.
6. There is a suppressed debate among physicians, therapists, and academics regarding the recent trend to quickly affirm gender dysphoric youth as transgender. Many health professionals are deeply concerned because affirming youth as transgender sends them down the path of medical transition (a sex change) which requires the use of toxic hormones and unnecessary surgeries. Healthcare professionals opposed to affirming a child’s gender dysphoria based upon the medical ethics principle of “First do no harm” are being silenced. This is true among left-leaning youth trans critical professionals as well as those who are traditionally more conservative.
7. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of sex, male and female respectively – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs), including but not limited to androgen insensitivity syndrome and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.
8. Human beings are born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a psychological concept; not an objective biological entity. No one is born with an awareness of being male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like other aspects of one’s self-awareness, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.
9. A person’s belief that one is something one is not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking; at worst it is a delusion.
10. Cross-sex hormones (estrogen for boys and testosterone for girls) are associated with dangerous health risks. Oral estrogen administration to boys may place them at risk for experiencing: thrombosis/thromboembolism; cardiovascular disease; weight gain; hypertrigyceridemia; elevated blood pressure; decreased glucose tolerance; gallbladder disease; prolactinoma; and breast cancer. Similarly, girls who receive testosterone may experience an elevated risk for: low HDL and elevated triglycerides (cardiovascular risk); increased homocysteine levels; hepatotoxicity; polycythemia; increased risk of sleep apnea; insulin resistance; and unknown effects on breast, endometrial and ovarian tissues.
11. Puberty is not a disorder and therefore should not be arrested as though it is a disease. Puberty-blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty. Puberty blocking hormones (gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists or GnRH agonists) arrest bone growth, decrease bone density, prevent the sex-steroid dependent organization and maturation of the adolescent brain, and inhibit fertility by preventing the development of gonadal tissue and mature gametes for the duration of treatment.
12. Pre-pubertal children who receive puberty-blocking hormones (GnRH agonists) followed by cross-sex hormones are permanently sterilized. Pre-pubertal children who bypass pubertal suppression and are placed on cross-sex hormones directly are also permanently sterilized.
13. At least one prospective study demonstrates that all pre-pubertal children placed on puberty blocking drugs eventually choose to begin sex reassignment with cross-sex hormones. This suggests that impersonation of the opposite sex and pubertal suppression, far from being fully reversible and harmless as proponents claim, sets into motion a single inevitable outcome (transgender identification) that requires lifelong use of toxic cross-sex hormones, resulting in infertility and other serious health risks.
14. Adolescent girls with GD who have taken testosterone daily for one year may obtain a double mastectomy as young as age 16. This is not a reversible procedure.
15. A thirty year follow up study found rates of suicide are nearly twenty times greater among adults who undergo sex reassignment in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – affirming countries. This demonstrates that while sex-reassignment eases some of the gender dysphoria in adulthood, it does not result in levels of health on par with that of the general population. It also suggests that the mental health disparities are not primarily due to social prejudice, but to whatever pathology has precipitated the transgender feelings in the first place and/or the transgender lifestyle itself.
16. Conditioning children to believe the absurdity that they or anyone could be “born into the wrong body,” and that a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Affirming gender dysphoria via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of sterility, toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.
17. There is a serious ethical problem with allowing irreversible, life-changing procedures to be performed on minors who are too young to give valid consent themselves. Children and adolescents do not have the cognitive maturity or experiential capacity to understand the magnitude of such decisions. Ethics alone demands an end to the use of pubertal suppression, cross-sex hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries in children and adolescents.
2. It is false that brain differences observed in some studies between transgender adults and non-transgender adults prove that GD is innate. If differences do exist in brain structures of transgender adults, these differences are more likely to be the result of transgender identification and behavior, not the cause of transgender identification and behavior. This is because thinking and behavior is known to shape brain microstructure through a process called neuroplasticity.
3. When GD occurs in the pre-pubertal child, it resolves in 80-95 percent of patients by late adolescence after they naturally pass through puberty. This is consistent with studies of identical twins that prove no one is born hard-wired to develop GD.
4. All complex behaviors are due to a combination of nature (biology), nurture (environmental factors) and free will choices. Studies of identical twins prove that GD is predominately influenced by non-shared post-natal events. The largest study of twin transsexual adults found that only 20 percent of identical twins were both trans-identified. Since identical twins contain 100 percent of the same DNA from conception, and develop in exactly the same prenatal environment where they are exposed to the same prenatal hormones, if genes and/or prenatal hormones contributed significantly to transgenderism, the concordance rates would be close to 100 percent. Instead, 80 percent of identical twin pairs were discordant for transgenderism. This means that at least 80 percent of what contributes to transgenderism in one adult co-twin consists of one or more non-shared post-natal experiences.
5. There is no single family dynamic, social situation, adverse event, or combination thereof that has been found to destine any child to develop GD. This fact, together with twin studies, suggests that there are many paths that may lead to GD in certain vulnerable children. Clinical case studies suggest that social reinforcement, parental psychopathology, family dynamics, and social contagion facilitated by mainstream and social media, all contribute to the development and/or persistence of GD in some vulnerable children. There may be other as yet unrecognized contributing factors as well.
6. There is a suppressed debate among physicians, therapists, and academics regarding the recent trend to quickly affirm gender dysphoric youth as transgender. Many health professionals are deeply concerned because affirming youth as transgender sends them down the path of medical transition (a sex change) which requires the use of toxic hormones and unnecessary surgeries. Healthcare professionals opposed to affirming a child’s gender dysphoria based upon the medical ethics principle of “First do no harm” are being silenced. This is true among left-leaning youth trans critical professionals as well as those who are traditionally more conservative.
7. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of sex, male and female respectively – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs), including but not limited to androgen insensitivity syndrome and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.
8. Human beings are born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a psychological concept; not an objective biological entity. No one is born with an awareness of being male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like other aspects of one’s self-awareness, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.
9. A person’s belief that one is something one is not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking; at worst it is a delusion.
10. Cross-sex hormones (estrogen for boys and testosterone for girls) are associated with dangerous health risks. Oral estrogen administration to boys may place them at risk for experiencing: thrombosis/thromboembolism; cardiovascular disease; weight gain; hypertrigyceridemia; elevated blood pressure; decreased glucose tolerance; gallbladder disease; prolactinoma; and breast cancer. Similarly, girls who receive testosterone may experience an elevated risk for: low HDL and elevated triglycerides (cardiovascular risk); increased homocysteine levels; hepatotoxicity; polycythemia; increased risk of sleep apnea; insulin resistance; and unknown effects on breast, endometrial and ovarian tissues.
11. Puberty is not a disorder and therefore should not be arrested as though it is a disease. Puberty-blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty. Puberty blocking hormones (gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists or GnRH agonists) arrest bone growth, decrease bone density, prevent the sex-steroid dependent organization and maturation of the adolescent brain, and inhibit fertility by preventing the development of gonadal tissue and mature gametes for the duration of treatment.
12. Pre-pubertal children who receive puberty-blocking hormones (GnRH agonists) followed by cross-sex hormones are permanently sterilized. Pre-pubertal children who bypass pubertal suppression and are placed on cross-sex hormones directly are also permanently sterilized.
13. At least one prospective study demonstrates that all pre-pubertal children placed on puberty blocking drugs eventually choose to begin sex reassignment with cross-sex hormones. This suggests that impersonation of the opposite sex and pubertal suppression, far from being fully reversible and harmless as proponents claim, sets into motion a single inevitable outcome (transgender identification) that requires lifelong use of toxic cross-sex hormones, resulting in infertility and other serious health risks.
14. Adolescent girls with GD who have taken testosterone daily for one year may obtain a double mastectomy as young as age 16. This is not a reversible procedure.
15. A thirty year follow up study found rates of suicide are nearly twenty times greater among adults who undergo sex reassignment in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – affirming countries. This demonstrates that while sex-reassignment eases some of the gender dysphoria in adulthood, it does not result in levels of health on par with that of the general population. It also suggests that the mental health disparities are not primarily due to social prejudice, but to whatever pathology has precipitated the transgender feelings in the first place and/or the transgender lifestyle itself.
16. Conditioning children to believe the absurdity that they or anyone could be “born into the wrong body,” and that a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Affirming gender dysphoria via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of sterility, toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.
17. There is a serious ethical problem with allowing irreversible, life-changing procedures to be performed on minors who are too young to give valid consent themselves. Children and adolescents do not have the cognitive maturity or experiential capacity to understand the magnitude of such decisions. Ethics alone demands an end to the use of pubertal suppression, cross-sex hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries in children and adolescents.
I urge everyone to read carefully both documents, and to share them far
and wide. Way too many children are being ruined for life by this radical
political and social engineering ideology. Treating our children as guinea pigs
in adult social games is just unacceptable.
It is time for some truth to be heard on this nefarious agenda. The
American College of Pediatricians deserves the highest praise for doing just
this.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2016/08/05/say-what-gender-changeable-but-attractions-arent#.V6TJkPP1I-c.facebook
https://www.acpeds.org/gender-dysphoria-in-children-summary-points
https://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/gender-dysphoria-in-children
https://www.acpeds.org/gender-dysphoria-in-children-summary-points
https://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/gender-dysphoria-in-children
[1986 words]
Bill
Muehlenberg | August 6, 2016
Friday, August 5, 2016
Clinton Foundation: organized crime at its finest
Typical communitarian con-artists and criminals:
The Clinton Foundation: organized
crime at its finest
Monty McCurry posted on Facebook,
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had
no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server
very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal
and a conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. History.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.
Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clintons set it up in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did –contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clintons, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result – foreign money goes into the Clinton 's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted.
As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering…and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!
Warning: They (Clintons) could be back in the White House in January 2017.
Don't let it happen.
Remember, most people are not well informed. We must inform and educate them.
The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. History.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.
Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clintons set it up in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did –contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clintons, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result – foreign money goes into the Clinton 's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted.
As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering…and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!
Warning: They (Clintons) could be back in the White House in January 2017.
Don't let it happen.
Remember, most people are not well informed. We must inform and educate them.
Come back Norman Dodd, we need you:
SEE THE WORK OF NIKKI RAAPANA.