Recently European Comr. for Agriculture, Dacion Ciolos, has said, "any business that relies upon subsidies (grants, tax breaks) is NOT A REAL BUSINESS." (Oh dear, that's practically every Third Sector set up!)
Cicero, Roman statesman and lawyer
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
""The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. "Thomas Jefferson.
from Moriarty’s Police Law. 17th edition, page 202.
Treason means treachery, a betraying or breach of faith and in law denotes the grave crime of treachery towards the Sovereign as head of the State and any betraying of the State itself. Blackstone terms it the highest civil crime which any man can commit…
“..How is it possible that so many brilliant minds cannot see past the antithesis to the ultimate synthesis? Obama IS the synthesis, he said all kinds of things during the campaign that were easy to see were communitarian. Left... right... why even use these terms anymore to describe anything that has current political relevancy? Why can't the left or the right see the PERFECT middle? Why is communitarianism still a taboo topic to scholars who so easily break every other taboo?..” Niki Raapana,F.A.Qs on Communitarianism:
New or unusual viewpoints which you have never heard of or come across before need to be considered, thought about and the evidence for them studied, if only briefly. If you are scathingly labelling everything new to you a conspiracy theoryandthoughtlessly dismissing it out of hand because of this trendy expression you have recently picked up then you are an IDIOT - a FOOL! And you are behaving very dangerously! You are closing your mind and literally shrinking your brain. You are lazy and you are wasting your God-given intelligence by not stretching it. The human brain needs to be exercised just like the human body. You will stay a stupid, ignorant, immature child your whole life until you die of old age if you do not regularly use your powers of thought, imagination and reasoning. Please,
Open your mind, and try to learn something new every day.
"Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each diguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversably lead to federation." Jean Monnet, founding father of the EU. 1943 The french bureaucrat became Societe Generale of The League of Nations - the forerunner of today's EU.
The U.K. is now a POST industrial society, which is just a clever way of saying we're being totally ASSET STRIPPED! Our industrial heart is being ripped out and given to the greedy elite so they can exploit third world people (often children) who will work for a crust, for pennies, for peanuts!
On the surface, Common Purpose is an educational charity which provides leadership and networking development training. In reality, C P is a corrupt, subversive andsinister organisation which seeks to destroy the national identity of Britain, to destroy democracy in Britain and introduce the EU Police State into Britain… ..Most people have never heard of C P which is strange because C P has corruptly abused millions of pounds of taxpayers' money...
..All Common Purpose "graduates" have been corrupted and are totally untrustworthy…
..It makes me sick that while service men and women are risking their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, thousands of C P "graduates", many of them in the police and other government departments, are actively working to destabilise Britain... ..I cannot express in words how appalled I am at the actions of Common Purpose and the New Lab government.C P has also infected the Conservatives and the Lib Dems. They cannot be trusted either…
…British governments are elected to govern - not to rule, dictate to and betray their own citizens… NOW READ ON :-
Leading beyond authority can mean acting ultra vires.
Ultra vires is a legal concept. It is Latin for "beyond the powers". It can apply to any body which has rules, such as a charity or a local authority. An ultra vires act is one that is outside the specified and/or implied constitutional objects and powers of the body in question. It is "beyond the powers" and therefore illegal.
Keen Communitarian and Etzioni pupil living in the Ivory Tower of Academia is, university lecturer and civil servant Dr. Henry Tam who has been active in influencing for many years, not only the British Government under New Labour but also, Conservative, Liberal and Green policy. See Tam in action:
Listen to this arrogant, over-educated, sanctimonious person, “Another natural disaster, another prompt to donate money to help those in need. That’s absolutely right. And decent people – i.e., most of the human race minus hate-warped evangelists – respond…” Tuesday, 2 February 2010.
What rubbish! Tam is an arrogant, vicious deceiver who frequently makes scathing judgements and false statements. Who the hell is he to state what is right or wrong in relation to what people choose to donate? And would he care to define what a “hate-warped evangelist” is? Perhaps it is a Christian who objects and questions the warped filth of Communitarianism? Is Tam flakey? He is a liar. “Most of the human race,”didnot send money to Haiti relief charities – for a start, only those with access to western technology even heard about it, and only those in “the west” could afford to! And, thanks to Etzioni, Tam and Middleton, etc. a growing number of people in “the west” now do not support or trust ANY CHARITY AT ALL, due to their new found understanding of the total non-accountability, the laissez faire irresponsibility andtheftthat now exists in the Third (Charity) Sector!
Communitarianism - will take everything from you - even your life!
Sheffield. Common Purpose is riddled through the running of this city, as it is in many others across Britain. Sheffield features very prominently in the latest edition of Brian Gerrish’s paper the UK Column. Here is a local man speaking out in relation to Common Purpose and Sheffield City Council,www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdsYHri7ovI
WARNING! Qui tacet consentire videtur
BE WARNED.Do NOT assume someone else will sort out problems or bad situations for you.If you do not object, it is assumed by the government that you agree! You acquiesce! This is a fact!By saying and doing nothing, it is presumed that you agree to their actions and decisions!So, by staying away from rallies, meetings, lectures, talks, protests, etc. and by not writing letters of objection to your M.P. you are deemed to agree with your local council, district council, the government, big business, the armed forces, the EU, etc! Look what being naive and trusting has lead to: Pro EU propaganda to dupe the British: Important Radio interview with the devious Norman Reddaway Here
In the early hours of the 24th June 2016 the town of Sunderland at the mouth
of the River Wear in the North East of England, famed for shipbuilding and
glass manufacture, announced that in the UK’s Referendum the
Leave vote had
exceeded the Remain vote by 22% – when the expected margin had been only 6 or 7%.
Sunderland had spoken, the anti-fascists had spoken. The result was that
freedom and democratic sovereignty were restored to the British people.
The voters of Sunderland had defied the once socialist but now corporatist
Labour Party who regarded them as their personal fiefdom, they had defied the
great local employer NISSAN who had always threatened them with job losses if
they voted to leave the European Union and they defied the catastrophically
incompetent and manipulating “opinion polls” and the placing of heavy money
against a Leave vote by the schoolboy spivs who gamble on currencies for profit
in the (also catastrophically incompetent) City of London.
In other words in Sunderland – as in many Conservative areas of the country
– the voters had attacked and defeated that unholy alliance between the
authoritarian pseudo intellectual left and the corporatist right who combined
in their mutual hatred of communities, nations, cultures, sovereign
democracies, free trade and the rule of law in their conspiracy to create a
world of supranational corporate fascist power.
Big business and big government, together with the self declared
“progressive left”, despised individuals and their votes, traditional family
structures, entrepreneurs and small businesses serving communities like
Sunderland.
As in the 1930s and 1940s, there are today in ALL the “major” political
parties both corporatist fascists and their opponents – the democratic
sovereigntists and anti fascists. In the 1930s the Tory Party had many appeasers
and sympathisers with Nazi Germany and fascist Italy. Sir Samuel Hoare was
thrown out of Government and went to live in Spain where he conspired with
fascists and local representatives of Hitler to make peace with Germany by
removing Winston Churchill.
The Labour Party repeatedly voted against re-armament against Hitler in the
1930s and called Churchill a “warmonger” and the socialist Lord Allen of
Hurtwood said that Britain should help Hitler get Germany’s fair share of
colonies!
The former Liberal Prime Minister David Lloyd George was such an admirer of
Hitler that he said he was “the greatest living German and it is a pity there
are not more like him in Britain”.
The left wing BBC kept Churchill off the air for much of the 1930s and their
General Manager Lord Reith was an admirer of Hitler while the Federation of
British industry (now the CBI) was making agreements with Nazi industry in mid
1939 – after Hitler’s march into the Rheinland, after the attack on
Czechoslovakia, after the Krystallnacht attacks on Jewish businesses and after
the Nuremberg Race laws. (For more evidence of fascism then and now see my
books And into the Fire, Europe’s Full Circle and Fascist Europe Rising.)
So there is nothing new about these corporatist fascist bodies supporting the
end of democracy and the promotion of supranational corporate power. They are,
as they were then, backed by many of our “intellectual” classes whose
experience of life is confined to a State or corporate funded desk and lecture
hall, divorced from those impoverished by their academic “solutions”. They
periodically produce lists of hundreds of signatures to demands or
condemnations of Government policy – and they are virtually always wrong.
They were wrong about the Gold Standard in the 1930s.
They were wrong about the Common Market in 1972 (they just lied about its
destruction of democratic parliamentary Government)
They were wrong about Margaret Thatcher’s monetarism in the early 1990s (a
long period of growth resulted)
They were wrong about the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (causing 3m
unemployed)
They were wrong about the Euro (25m unemployed in the EU)
And of course they will be proved wrong about Brexit.
BLOOMBERG WILL FLOURISH
Already within 48 hours of the decision to leave the EU a major international
employer, Bloomberg, continues active recruitment in London. ”We employ nearly
4,000 staff in the U.K., which is home to many of our major clients. And our
new London headquarters will open next year. We will be in London for the long
haul.”
J P MORGAN WITHDRAWS THREAT
AS the Referendum approached Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan threatened his UK
employees: “After a Brexit we cannot do it all here and we will have to start
planning for that. I don’t know if it means 1,000 jobs, 2,000 jobs – it could
be many as 4,000, and they will be jobs all around the UK.”
But after the vote this arch corporatist had a different tone. He wrote: “J.
P. Morgan has 16,000 employees in the U.K. We are extremely proud of the work
they do and our long history in the country. Regardless of today’s outcome, we
will maintain a large presence in London, Bournemouth and Scotland, serving
local clients as we have for more than 150 years. In the months ahead, however,
we may need to make changes to our European legal entity structure and the
location of some roles.”
OSBORNE WITHDRAWS THREAT
And George Osborne the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, having predicted
economic disaster and an emergency budget if the British voted Leave, now says
the UK is ready to face the future “from a position of strength” and indicated
there will be no immediate emergency Budget. And these are the kind of people
who have been making critical economic and political decisions about Britain
and the EU for decades! Is it any wonder chaos reigns?
Such is the disgraceful state of affairs in so called “democratic” societies
when the people have to ignore those who have all the power and all the money
in order to find out the truth. And they have to found new parties to stop the
left right and centre’s cartel of power. That cartel had adopted the same basic
philosophy and thus ensured that a vote is powerless to change anything.
Sunderland was right. The British people were right. Even many who voted
“Remain” might now find out what the REAL issues are – although they will have
to fight the censorship of the “mainstream media” and listen instead to the
more respectable parts of the internet and youtube – and their friends, family
and local businesses in their own communities.
The people of Britain are about to become the next victims of the
‘Coloured Revolution’ tactics used by Washington and Brussels against
democratically elected governments from Serbia to Syria, from Ukraine to
Brazil.
Within a few days of the British electorate’s totally unforeseen
(including by this author!) grass-roots decision to defy Establishment bullying
and waves of MSM propaganda to vote for Brexit, the counter move of the
globalists is already becoming clear.
First, a concerted attack on sterling and leading shares to apply
financial pressure and justify the self-fulfilling prophesies of gloom and doom
of the defeated Remain camp.
Second, massive psychological pressure organised by ‘civil society’
organisations, such as Avaaz masquerading as grass-roots social media protests
but in fact funded by Foundations financed by George Soros. The spear-point of
this propaganda campaign is at present the petition for a Second Referendum,
which has already passed the three million mark, even when tens of thousands of
bogus signatures have been identified and removed.
Third, the use of other ‘civil society’ groups, including SumOfUs and 38
Degrees, to conducted rolling polls of ‘progressive’ public opinion so as to
ascertain which themes and attacks on Brexit will be the most effective. This
is a key technique taught in ‘color revolution’ training course modelled on the
proposals of Gene Sharp and now honed by John Carlane, liberal globalist former
British Army officer turned head of the Peace Education and Training
Repository.
Fourth, the mobilisation of crowds of angry and clearly violence-prone
protesters in London and other key cities. Despite the fact that many on the
British far-left campaigned for Brexit, gangs carrying Communist and anarchist
flags are out on the streets. They are supposedly to defend ethnic minorities
(many of whom in fact voted alongside their indigenous working class
counterparts for Brexit) but have already been involved in attacks on known or
suspected Brexiteers.
Fifth, the CIA/liberal elite’s retained propaganda corps of
bought-and-paid-for journalists are lying and twisting flat out to exploit all
the above. The aim is to frighten ‘soft’ Brexit voters into changing their
minds and to build up momentum for a drive to use the autumn’s expected General
Election as a de facto Second Referendum.
The purpose of this hybrid political war on the British majority is to
derail the whole Brexit process and keep Britain in the EU (or at least to turn
leaving into such a shambles that no other country will dare to follow suite).
This explains why Prime Minister Cameron has already broken his promise
during the referendum that, in the event of a Leave vote, he would immediately
trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty in order to set Brexit in motion. It is
now blatantly obvious that the Europhile elite have no intention of allowing
such a minor inconvenience as the democratically expressed will of the British
people to disrupt the process of ‘ever closer Union’ or of the geo-political
‘necessity’ of keeping the EU united for the deepening confrontation with
Russia.
In advance of last Thursday’s vote, the Brussels-rule camp pulled out
all the stops, with multi-levelled frauds and the ruthless exploitation of the
murder of Jo Cox looking certain to secure a manipulated but unquestionable
Remain vote.
Despite the failure of the campaign, a vociferous minority of hardcore
Europhiles, led at present by Tory grandee Lord Heseltine and ‘moderate’ Labour
and LibDem MPs such as David Lammy and Tim Farron, are not going to accept the
verdict of the referendum.
Instead, they are trying desperately to give the liberal elite the nerve
and confidence for their biggest ever display of out-of-touch arrogance –
denying the British people the right to have their Brexit decision implemented.
Will they get away with it? Or will the response of ordinary people as
they realise what is going on be so outraged as to convince the Europhiles
that, being already in a massive hole, it really is time to stop digging? I
don’t know. I simply don’t know. But there is no doubt that this is their game
plan. Don’t expect stability and certainty any time soon.
WHO CARES IF A BUNCH OF GREEDY RICH TOSSERS HAVE LOST MONEY ON THE STOCK MARKET SINCE THE BRITISH PEOPLE VOTED 'OUT'? I DO NOT, I DO NOT CARE. AND WHY SHOULD YOU? WE ARE OUT, NOW. GET ARTICLE 50 OF THE LISBON TREATY INVOKED AND LET'S GET ON WITH IT!
Throughout much of the referendum debate, it has
been assumed that, in order to continue participating in the Single Market, we
would have to accept freedom of movement. Any number of high-ranking Commission
officials have warned us that this is "non-negotiable".
Now, at last, we are beginning to have the debate we should have had before the
referendum, we have the know-all BBC creeping out of the woodwork,
together with others, to remind us of this, as more and more Johnny-come-latelys leap on the EEA bandwagon,
including the revered Chatham House.
However, we should have known that the Commission officials (and the European
politicians who joined them), were not telling the truth about freedom of
movement – or at least the whole truth in respect of the EEA.
Almost too late, we discovered something hidden in plain sight: the fact that
the EU has been quite willing to negotiate with one of the three Efta/EEA
states on freedom of movement. Furthermore, they have come to an amicable
solution, which has allowed it to secure an amendment to the treaty giving it a
permanent opt-out to freedom of movement. The state concerned now operates a
quota system little different in principle to the Australian points system.
That the state is the principality of Liechtenstein need not worry us. It may
be a tiny micro-state with a population of 37,000 spread over an area of 61
square miles – less than half the area of the Isle of Wight – but it is a
fully-fledged Contracting Party to the EEA Agreement. It has assumed exactly
the same rights and responsibilities as any other Efta state.
Furthermore, Iceland has used exactly the same provisions to suspend free
movement of capital following the 2008 financial crisis, demonstrating that
there is a real and effective option within the EEA Agreement which could be
available to the UK, and solve a lot of problems.
I've already told the story in parts, but for the record, I am now bringing it
together under one head in this blogpost. Now the media and politicians can
ignore it properly, instead of pretending they haven't seen it. I've also
written up a version in Flexcit, so that they can ignore it there as
well, leaving the 90,000-plus readers better informed than those who seek to
instruct us.
The story starts – and a fascinating one it is – before Liechtenstein joined
the EEA on 1 May 1995. We can actually take 10 March 1995 as the beginning,
when the EEA Council - part of the formal consultation structure set up under
the agreement – looked at the situation dominating Liechtenstein's entry.
The Council recognised that Liechtenstein had "a very small inhabitable
area of rural character with an unusually high percentage of non-national
residents and employees". And it decided that this microstate could easily be
swamped by immigrants if unrestricted free movement of workers was permitted.
Like the UK, but at the opposite end of the scale, the country was not able to
absorb unlimited numbers.
Moreover, the Council acknowledged "the vital interest of Liechtenstein to
maintain its own national identity". It thus concluded that the situation "might
justify the taking of safeguard measures by Liechtenstein as provided for in Article 112 of the EEA Agreement".
Article 112 is part of the "safeguard measures" – popularly known as
the "emergency brake". Where serious economic, societal or
environmental difficulties of a sectorial or regional nature arise, which are
liable to persist, it allows Efta states (but not EU Member States)
unilaterally to take appropriate measures to resolve them. EU Member States
have to rely on the Commission to take action.
Back in 1995, with a massive immigration problem looming, the EEA Council asked
all members to "endeavour to find a solution which allowed Liechtenstein
to avoid having recourse to safeguard measures". However, no long-term
solution was found so a temporary expedient was arranged by way of transitional
arrangements which allowed the country to impose "quantitative
limitations" on immigration until 1 January 1998. These were incorporated
into Protocol 15, appended to the Agreement.
The next move was towards the end of 1997, just before the end of the
transitional period. There had been no long-term solution found so
Liechtenstein unilaterally invoked the Article 112 safeguard
measures. By this means, it kept the existing immigration restrictions in place
when the transitional period ended.
There were further attempts to resolve the situation in
1998, which were unsuccessful. Then, on 17 December 1999 after a further
review, the EEA Joint Committee decided that the "specific geographical
situation of Liechtenstein" still justified "the maintenance of
certain conditions on the right of taking up residence in that country".
In order to resolve the situation, though, it came up with a proposal for a longer-term solution, allowing
Liechtenstein to introduce a quota system controlling the number of workers
allowed to enter the country. This decision was given formal status by an
amendment to Annex VIII of the EEA Agreement, setting out what
were called "sectoral adaptations", cross-referred to Annex V on the free movement of workers.
As a formal amendment to the EEA Agreement, the decision provided for a new
transitional period until 31 December 2006, and allowed for the new measures to
apply subject to a review "every five years, for the first time before May
2009".
After reviews in 2009 and in 2015, it was concluded
that there was no need to make any change to the current rules. The provisions
on the Sectoral Adaptations could remain unchanged. Under the current
arrangement, Liechtenstein issues 56 residence permits for economically active
and 16 permits to economically non-active persons each year. Half of the
totally available permits are decided by lottery, held twice a year.
The numbers involved are, of course, small beer, but Liechtenstein is a tiny
country. What matters is that a precedent has been set within the framework of
the EEA Agreement for suspending freedom of movement in respect of a single
country, and replacing with a quota system for what amounts to an indefinite
period.
This is where the situation currently stands. Thus, whatever the EU might
declare in terms of freedom of movement being "non-negotiable" for EU
Member States, it is undeniable that it is negotiable within the framework of
the EEA Agreement, as it applies to Efta states.
Therefore, if the UK chooses to follow the Efta/EEA option as an interim
solution to expedite the Article 50 settlement, once the agreement is adopted
it can then follow the procedural steps pioneered by Liechtenstein, imposing
limits on immigration from EEA states.
In terms of the quota system applied, it should be noted that, in the
Australian-style points system, only 23 percent of the migrants admitted come
under the points system. The overall limit set amounts to an arbitrary quota,
set annually – currently at 190,000. This is, by any measure, a quota system.
To that extent, the UK can have some of its cake and eat it. The
"Liechtenstein solution" potentially gives our negotiators far more
flexibility than at first imagined, and should help us reach an amicable
settlement with the EU, while keeping us in the Single Market.
The luvvies who took the stage on Brexit: Over 250 'cultural stars'
including Benedict Cumberbatch and Paloma Faith signed letter saying
leaving EU would make Britain 'less imaginative'
Artists, actors and musicians have signed warning letter in the Guardian
Letter says Britain is stronger, more imaginative and creative in Europe
Among signatories are Paloma Faith, Sam Taylor-Wood and Danny Boyle
Benedict Cumberbatch, Jude Law and Steve Coogan also join campaign
Margaret Thatcher would NOT have voted to stay in Europe
·Thatcher attacked the EU project as 'contrary to
British interests' in letter
·It was revealed by Tory MP Sir Bill Cash, who she
handed note to in 1993
·Told him to make note public if her opinion on
'European project' came up
·Her former secretary said she would back David Cameron's 'In' campaign
·
·Margaret Thatcher would have campaigned for
Britain to quit the EU, a loyal friend revealed last night as he released an
extraordinary letter (pictured) written 23 years ago by the former Prime
Minister
TIP 1: Next time you want to win an election don't accuse British working class people of being wankers, losers and/or stick two fingers up at us.Don't ever call us thick, saddoes and/or a bunch of racists.
TIP 2: Don't believe that the timely death of an MP and the view of their grieving spouse carries much sympathy, if any, with the electorate and influences how they vote - it clearly does not!
We'll have to rebuild Hadrian's Wall to keep the Scottish outfrom
the Southern Daily Echo
IF SCOTLAND ever does get its Independence I hope the people know the
meaning of the word.
For starters they will be left entirely on their own, no help whatsoever
from England as Scotland will be classed as a foreign country and border posts
will have to be put up, guarded by our armed forces.
And who knows, Hadrian’s Wall could even be rebuilt and far higher of
course, also guarded by our armed forces.
And why not? Better be forward thinking and safe than sorry, as we don’t
know who the SNP will join up with in the future.
Scotland’s 59 MP’s at Westminster would be sent packing back to Scotland
where they should be anyway.
Scotland should not be allowed to keep the pound, English voters should not
be forced to pay an
Independent Scotland’s debts and the Bank of England should
not bail out Scottish Banks if they go bust.
This is just the tip of the iceberg as to what the SNP want for Scotland.
Nice work if you can get it but if the SNP think for one second they can leave
the UK but still keep all the benefits of UK membership, they are living in
cloud cuckoo land.
No way. You stand alone. That’s being independent.
The appalling and senseless
murder of Jo Cox MP on Thursday 16th June 2016 shocked us all and resulted in a
very public outpouring of grief from her politician colleagues.
Disgracefully, some of them made
shameless political capital out of it for the #Remain campaign in the European
Referendum. One leaflet, distributed in Kate
Hoey’s constituency, directly blamed the murder on the veteran
#Leave Labour MP. ‘Jo Cox’s tragic murder is possibly only the start’, it
raved.
USING AN OPPORTUNITY
Jo Cox’s husband, Brendan, also a
campaigner for left-wing causes, was quick to blame ‘hate’ rather than
shortcomings in our mental health service for his wife’s death. We should have
sympathy for him in his loss, but to claim ‘Politics’ (rather than lunacy) was
behind her death went beyond normal grieving. It was political point-scoring.
Brendan Cox has now tweeted a link
to a fund-raising page for his late wife on the ‘gofundme’ website. Frankly, he
is using the opportunity to raise funds initially for two causes which might
not ordinarily draw any support or credence from anyone outside his circle, in
addition to the worthy Royal Voluntary Service.
HOPE NOT HATE
The second of his three causes is
‘Hope not Hate’ which ‘seeks to challenge and defeat the politics of hate and
extremism within local communities, building resilience against the politics of
hate and fear’. ‘Hate’ is a buzzword used by those on the godless left to
demonise anyone who disagrees with them.
In practice, ‘Hope not Hate’ are
pro-Islam and pro-sodomy. Anyone who opposes those causes is not someone with
whom they respectfully disagree, but one motivated by ‘hate’. Indeed, that is
how Brendan Cox used ‘hate’, trying to use his wife’s tragic death as a
campaign tool. In his eyes, anyone wanting the leave the EU, especially over concerns
about immigration, is driven by ‘hate’.
WHITE HELMETS
The third of Brendan’s three
causes is the Syrian ‘White Helmets’, also known as ‘Syrian National Defence’.
It was not formed by Syrians, but by the UK Foreign Office. Its operatives pose
as humanitarians in Syria. In practice, they are anti-Assad extremist Sunni
Muslims allied with Al Nusra front, the Al Qaeda offshoot.
Jo and Brendan Cox joined Bob
Geldof’s foul-mouthed tirade against fishermen on the Thames the day before her
tragic murder.
Additionally, she served as a
Patron, Trustee, and Board member for various other campaigns and causes. She
also received the Young Global Leader award in 2009 at the Davos World Economic
Forum, and was a winner of the DEVEX 40 under 40 International Development
Leaders Award in 2012.
INAPPROPRIATE
In September last year, Brendan
Cox left Save the Children amid complaints about ‘inappropriate behaviour’
towards women. He quit after four years as its director of policy and advocacy.
He denied the claims made against him and the charity declined to comment.
The day before her murder,
Brendan and Jo Cox and their two chilldren joined Sir Bob Geldof’s well-oiled,
foul-mouthed flotilla by manning an inflatable against
Brexit-leaning fishermen on the Thames. The pop millionaire’s obscene gestures
in the direction of the fishermen revealed the contempt of the well-heeled
#Remain camp against ordinary people.
ANTI-ISRAEL
Despite a eulogy from the Chief
Rabbi, Jo Cox was no parliamentary friend of Israel. She included goods from ‘Israeli settlements in the occupied
West Bank‘ among ‘unsavoury activities’ which should be
boycotted.
Two days after her death, the
Palestinian Hamas terrorist group (also Sunni Muslim) were on the bandwagon:
‘The Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas has expressed its sincere
condolences to the family, friends and admirers of slain UK MP Jo Cox.
‘The Palestinian people have lost
a friend and a defender of their rights,’ Hamas said in a press release on
Saturday. ‘Cox was … a passionate advocate for the
Palestinian cause.’
The Hamas Charter states its Islamic determination to ‘eliminate’ the state of
Israel, helpfully explaining, in Article 28, that this is because Israel is
‘Jewish’. In Article seven it urges Muslims to ‘fight the Jews and kill
them’. Hamas is the Palestinian governing authority of the Gaza Strip.
Also in the House of Commons, Jo
Cox voted for Doctor Assisted Dying in September last year and abstained on the
crucial vote in November over whether the Royal Air Force should bomb
Islamic State in Syria.
“‘Remainers’, he said, may try to
say that a vote to stay in the EU is a vote against ‘hatred’ and for ‘hope’ or
the politics of ‘unity’ over those of ‘division’. Such a move would bring about
the triumph of the assassin’s veto in our society – something which could not
only have appalling short-term consequences, but bloody long-term ones as well.
I trust that those campaigning for ‘Remain’ recognise that a victory achieved
on those terms would be the sourest and most divisive victory of all.”
Sadly, Brendan Cox has lacked
that decency at this solemn time.
Find out how to join
Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
The Elite, through their lackeys and controllers, have initiated attempts to infiltrate the various resistance groups around the country. Those whom the media call ‘Conspiracy Theorists,’ have been targets of Government/ EU/ Illuminati tyranny for many years. In order to avoid capture, imprisonment, or death, the following guidelines are STRONGLY recommended:
1) Beware of all strangers. Historically resistance to tyrants has taken the form of small autonomous groups whose members know and trust one another from long experience. These groups are then united by common interest, common goals and common literature. But a strict heirarchy will soon be broken by the tyrants' agents.
2)Beware of the man who is "too perfect." He says all the right things, he needs little persuasion and he supplies money. The wealthy are usually in bed with the tyrant and they are the last to oppose despotism.
3)Be doubly aware of a stranger who proposes illegal activities. You will soon find him testifying against you in court.
4) Beware of those who draw cheques from the enemy. They are very likely to have divided loyalties. It is very difficult for a man to destroy the beast from whose teats he sucks.
5)Avoid drunks, drug users and anyone of unstable character. Always chose quality over quantity.
6)Recognize the media’s tactics and do not react to buzz words. Religious groups, tax resistors, so-called ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ and other groups are called cultists, bigots, Nazis and other words which the masses are conditioned to hate. After the media have demonized a target, as in Waco, 911 or 7/7, Governments are free to murder at will. Ask yourself, "Is it wrong for people to preserve their freedom and individual rights, or to resist oppressive taxation?"
7)Avoid sensitive discussion on the telephone, and use discretion when inviting someone to your home.
8)Beware of someone whose intellect, education and background appear different from those with whom he attempts to associate. Most people inter-relate with others of the same interests or background.
9)Investigate. Do a little investigation. The Elite can create good cover. But they seldom bother because up to now resistance groups have almost never checked their associates’ backgrounds.
10)Recognize the ruthlessness of the tyrants and act accordingly. A government which will mass murder women and children is not going to play "fair" with you!
You must recognize the scope and age of the One World Government conspiracy. It is coded in the Great Seal of The United States which is over 200 years old, and is codedin other devices –currency notes for example, and places much older. They intend to have their One World Government with one universal humanist religion, one worldwide economic system, one heavily monitored and designed ‘culture’ and absolute control over every human being. The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women will submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments.
Beneath the bulls**t- the veneer of villas, cocktails, designer clothes and jet skis, half of Europe- Spain, Portugal, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria etc. still live in the Dark Ages - along with their dodgy police, their various bent judiciaries and institutions. Look at my first entry under 'Shock and Awe,' 'The EU's StarvingChildren.' Everything is fine visiting or moving to these countries- as long as they're getting your money, but when things go wrong or problems crop up, that is when you will learn just how "modern" these cesspits really are! And when you'll realise just how much they really like British people! I strongly advise parents not to go to dumpslikePaedugal, and try Skegness, Blackpool or Bognor Regis instead. Our seasides are safer and much more fun! Our weather? Aren't we worshipping & sacrificing to the Sun just a little too much?
BRING ALL OUR TROOPS BACK HOME, NOW. Yes, they are volunteers but they are not tin soldiers in a child's game. They are not disposable, so stop treating them as such! Obama and Cameron are LIARS!
We ordinary British still have not had the full reasons and the real need for these conflicts thousands of miles away fully explained to us.
Am I alone in feeling that this rotten Government and the depraved Elite of this country actually want the brightest, bravest and best of our young people - dead, or disabled? You are taking our forces for granted, abusing their patriotism, honour and loyalty, Mr Cameron, just like your evil predecessors Blair and Brown. Your whole lives' work amounts to a huge rubbish heap scattered with the bones of the innocent. You are all failures and will all be remembered as bad prime ministers. You and your sick colleagues are all cursed, and far beyond redemption. Are you afraid? I would be. God has a special place for wicked scum like you - empty and eternal! By the way, what sacrifices did you and your colleagues make for Britain when you were young? Who in Parliament has actually risked their life serving in the forces? Well? Very brave aren't you all - from your comfy armchairs!
YOUNG PEOPLE OF BRITAIN - I LOVE YOU ALL. DO NOT DIE FOR LIES AND GREED, PLEASE DON'T TAKE THE RISK. War is not glamorous or an exciting adventure, it is death, destruction and hatred. DON'T SIGN UP! JUST SAY "NO," LIVE LONG AND BE HAPPY. BE KIND, FORGIVING AND TOLERANT. YOUR LIVES ARE FAR TOO PRECIOUS TO BE LOST IN POINTLESS, VICIOUS WARS AND CONFLICTS STARTED BY THIS WICKED, MISGUIDED GOVERNMENT. VERY FEW, IF ANY, OF THESE MPs HAVE EVER RISKED THEIR OWN LIVES , OR THOSE OF THEIR OWN FAMILIES, FOR THIS COUNTRY. ARE THEIR SONS IN THESE WARS? NO! NEVER! QUESTION THESE POLITICIANS, THEIR BACKGROUNDS, MOTIVES, AND SCHEMES FOR PERSONAL ENRICHMENT. STOP! AND THINK! WHAT ARE THEY REALLY UP TO? NO DAMN GOOD! THEY HATE US ALL, AND LOVE ONLY MONEY USE YOUR ENERGY TO FIGHT COMMON PURPOSE & E.U. COMMUNITARIANISM INSTEAD!
If you want a real noble cause to fight for then consider volunteering to aid and protect Middle East Christians and fight against the wicked ISIS plague.
Offenders who are particularly pernicious in their smear campaigns are often narcissists at best or sociopaths at worst, if your case meets this criteria it is important that you understand what makes them tick.
Portofino Italian Restaurant, 617 London Road, Sheffield. 0114 255 5655. Opening times 5.30pm to 11pm Tuesday to Sunday. YUMMY!
Common Purpose "graduates" breach The Seven Principles of Public Life
All Common Purpose "graduates" have been corrupted and are totally untrustworthy.Some of these "graduates" are "useful idiots" who do not realise just how evil Common Purpose is.Those Common Purpose "graduates" who are public servants breach ALL the Seven Principles of Public Life as set out by the Committee on Standards in Public Life. TheSevenPrinciples of Public Life The Committee has set out 'Seven Principles of Public Life' which it believes should apply to all in the public service. These are:
1) Selflessness Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest. They should not do so in order to gain financial or other benefits for themselves, their family or their friends. However: People become Common Purpose "graduates" for career advancement and to be part of a secret, Masonic-like society for careerists. This is not the action of a selfless person.
2) Integrity Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties. However: Being part of the Common Purpose network brings those in public service under pressure to do favours for other Common Purpose "graduates". The lack of integrity and probity of Common Purpose police officers is particularly disturbing.
3) Objectivity In carrying out public business, including making public appointments, awarding contracts, or recommending individuals for rewards and benefits, holders of public office should make choices on merit. However: Being part of the Common Purpose network will bring them under pressure to do favours for other Common Purpose "graduates" rather than to act impartially and objectively.
4) Accountability Holders of public office are accountable for their decisions and actions to the public and must submit themselves to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their office. However: There is a strong resistance amongst Common Purpose "graduates" towards giving out details of their Common Purpose membership and the activities they engage in. Common Purpose itself operates according to the Chatham House rules which effectively means that meetings are held in secret with no agenda, records or accountability. Fish rots from the head.
5) Openness Holders of public office should be as open as possible about all the decisions and actions that they take. They should give reasons for their decisions and restrict information only when the wider public interest clearly demands. However: There is a strong resistance amongst Common Purpose "graduates" in public office towards giving out details of their Common Purpose membership and the activities they engage in. Common Purpose itself operates according to the Chatham House rules which effectively mean that meetings are held in secret with no agenda, records or accountability. Hardly a recipe for "Open Government".
6) Honesty Holders of public office have a duty to declare any private interests relating to their public duties and to take steps to resolve any conflicts arising in a way that protects the public interest. However: Many Common Purpose "graduates" in public service deliberately hide their membership of Common Purpose. This leaves them open to accusations of dishonesty, corruption, favouritism and under-the-counter dealings.
7) Leadership Holders of public office should promote and support these principles by leadership and example. However: Common Purpose "graduates" are incapable of leading by example because those people who have found out what they are up to do not trust them at all.
Massive sums of public money funnelled through philanthropic charitable foundations and think-tanks to fund huge psy-ops……..sound familiar?
'An unparalleled amount of power is concentrated increasingly in the hands of an interlocking and self-perpetuating group. Unlike the power of corporate management, it is unchecked by stockholders;unlike the power of government, it is unchecked by the people; unlike the power of churches, it is unchecked by any firmly established canons of value.'
(page viii) Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Rene A Wormser 1958.
Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the Last Days some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats. Knowing this also, that there shall come in the Last Days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, saying, Where is the promise of Christ's coming? For since our ancestors fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning. For this they willingly are ignorant.
This know also, that in the Last Days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, highminded, ever learning, yet never able to come to the knowledge of the Truth. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, made to be taken and destroyed, speaking evil of the things that they understand not; Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated by all nations for My name's sake: And they will not repent from their demonic worship, or their idols, neither are they going to repent of their murders, nor of their Sorceries and magic, or their worship of Satan.
TYRANNY. Plato's Republic 344a-c, H.D.P. Lee translation
"...Tyranny is not a matter of minor theft and violence, but of wholesale plunder, sacred and profane, private or public. If you are caught committing such crimes in detail you are punished and disgraced; sacrilege, kidnapping, burglary, fraud, theft are the names we give to such petty forms of wrongdoing. But when a man succeeds in robbing the whole body of citizens and reducing them to slavery, they forget these ugly names and call him happy and fortunate, as do all others who hear of his unmitigated wrongdoing. "
