BUSTED!!!!
"Federal government" BUSTED for forcing American nuclear industry to become a ticking time bomb. Jim Stone, Updated on July 22, 2013
Americans have been told their nuclear waste must go somewhere.
Americans have been told their spent reactor fuel needs to be stored
inside a mountain in the desert, where it will sit as a threat and
menace to the world for millions of years. Americans have been told
there is nothing they can do about it. But what if they have been told a
lie? What if that "spent fuel" was not spent at all? What if a
technology existed which allowed the same fuel to be used over and over,
twenty times in fact, and expended so fully that fuel rods would be
safe enough to handle directly out of the reactor? Think any "spent
fuel pools" would be full? And even if this technology never existed, what if foreign nations, (France was one) offered to buy this fuel from
America for billions of dollars only to have the American Government
refuse the offer for no reason at all? Certainly allowing France to
have it would solve the problem of getting rid of it. And the final
question, WHY would the American Government want so much nuclear
material sitting around the country - enough to make countless atomic
bombs - only to have it become a threat to America's national security?
Could it be that for many years America has not had a legitimate
government, and instead has had a band of invaders in power who have
intentionally set America up for a fall?
After reading this report, I believe you will be inclined to think so.
This report consists of hard scientific fact and even harder answers.
During my journey of discovery in my investigation into the Fukushima
disaster, I interviewed an 85 year old nuclear engineer who worked in
the nuclear industry during America's glory days, an engineer who earned
GE over 100 patents. He was one of the engineers who designed
Fukushima, so naturally when conducting an investigation into such a
disaster a journalist would want that type of reference. He was
surprised when my prior study of reactor systems was so thorough that he
had no information about Fukushima I did not already dig up, and he was
very surprised when I told him details about the inner workings of his
own reactor design he never expected anyone in the media to know.
When I started to think I was going to walk away with nothing new, he
began to talk about an entirely different subject. He began his new
direction in the discussion with the phrase
"My team succeeded in closing the nuclear loop, and Carter banned our miracle with an executive order
Here is what followed that introductory line, and an enormous
reason why Americans need to seriously question the current government
structure and possibly start over.
"I started in the American nuclear program all the way back at the time
of the Manhattan project, and have been involved in reactor design and
nuclear engineering my whole life. There was one answer we all searched
for, and it was how to close the nuclear loop.
When a reactor such as a boiling water reactor uses fuel, the waste
products, which are highly radioactive isotopes that have a different
fission characteristic than the original fuel, build up in the fuel and
change the nature of the nuclear reaction. A reactor such as a boiling
water reactor can only use the fuel until it gets contaminated by these
isotopes enough to change the nature of the nuclear reactions taking
place. The reaction environment inside a boiling water reactor is only
one such environment which will work to trigger a chain reaction, and if
that spent fuel is put into a reactor made from different materials,
those materials can favor the burning of the isotopes which interfere
with the chain reactions in the boiling water reactor and use these
interfering isotopes as fuel until they are consumed. After this
process, which restores the fuel to it's original state is complete, the
fuel can go back into the boiling water reactor and used as new with no
reprocessing - the exact same rods can be exchanged between reactors.
We perfected the second reactor design which used liquid sodium as a
coolant and the reactor ran much hotter - 1100 farenheit as opposed to
550 in a boiling water reactor. The liquid sodium circulated inside the
reactor instead of water, with the heat of the reaction being removed
from the system by a heat exchanger which produced steam outside the
reactor for use in producing electricity. The temperature difference
and coolant characteristics in the complimentary reactor facilitated the
burning of the isotopes, and you got to use both sides of the reaction -
the boiling water reactor produced electricity while producing unwanted
isotopes, and the sodium cooled reactor produced electricity while
burning the unwanted isotopes out. This process could be repeated 20
times, and when it was finished the fuel was DEAD and no longer
hazardous because all of it's radiological potential was used up. It
was a clean energy dream come true, and Carter banned it by executive
order!"
He specifically stated that the burn down was so complete that
the spent fuel was safe to handle directly with bare hands, and needed
no special care or maintenance at all, and after I questioned him about
exactly how safe, said you could safely sleep on it. I questioned him
several times, saying he must be exaggerating, but he said ALL
radiological potential was used, and the fuel was completely inert at
the end of the final cycle.
Many people know about the liquid sodium breeder reactor developed by
General Electric in the late 1970's but few people know the real story
about this reactor, which this engineer developed. To back stab the
public image of this reactor, it was stated that it's rods would stick
and that liquid sodium was too dangerous to use as a coolant. But this
engineer, the man who developed it, stated that this media campaign was a
pure psy op which like many things the media and government says had no
truth to it at all.
He then went on to lament about what a waste of money it was to have the
technology banned because nuclear fuel is expensive and they were only
able to use it to about five percent of its total potential without
implementing this technology. He lamented the fact that his life's
greatest accomplishment got banned for no good reason, and it was a
tremendous waste of money to not use the technology his team developed.
Electricity would have been cheap. So cheap that homes would not have
been heated with oil or natural gas, electricity would have been the
only sensible choice. Furthermore, with a reduction in the price of
electricity by at least 10X, electric cars would have quickly become a
standard.
This would have been America's free energy future, with the only real cost being maintenance of infrastructure.
He was sad that we were now paying too much for electricity. I guess that's how an engineer thinks. He had read my article
about Fukushima
and liked it, so it is an easy guess that his eyes were open to the
global conspiracy. But I think he missed the obvious in what he said.
Here is what I think about this technology being banned, and it
has nothing to do with preservation of resources or free energy.
Nuclear reactors are huge. They have an enormous amount of nuclear
material in them. One boiling water reactor core the size of the ones
at Fukushima, which have a thermal potential of three gigawatts and an
electrical generating capacity of one gigawatt can easily hold enough
fissionable material to make many atomic bombs.
And with the
technology that makes re-using that fuel illegal, it builds up in the
cooling pools at a rate of 25 tons per electrical gigawatt YEAR.
This means that after 40 years of fuel buildup even small 500 megawatt
facilities have approximately a million pounds of highly radioactive
fuel sitting in their pools waiting for the right combination of
problems to cause a disaster.
Because the Japanese were at least allowed by their government to use a
reprocessing technology inferior to what this engineer spoke of,
Fukushima only had approximately 250,000 pounds of "spent" fuel at each
reactor site, which remained intact throughout the disaster. But
because in America no reprocessing is allowed at all in
any form, the fukushima equivalents in America, such as TVA operated Browns Ferry and NSP operated Prairie Island
have no fewer than two million pounds of "spent" fuel at each reactor
site, which means that Browns Ferry alone could, in a worst case
scenario, far exceed the damage done by Fukushima.
Contrary to what the scamming mainstream press has reported, Fukushima
reactor 3 was destroyed entirely while at 3,000 PSI (far beyond
specifications) which resulted in a complete core expulsion. This
threw approximately 100,000 pounds of fuel into the environment, much of
it in the form of brown dust that badly contaminated the entire
surrounding area and was found around the world. Seldom reported in the
press is the fact that the Fukushima site was so badly contaminated that
it could not be approached, and remote control and robots were used in
the months following the disaster to get the radiation down to a
survivable level after the first three people to explore the site died.
At 100,000 pounds of expelled material, reactor 3 could have produced
at most 2 percent of the total contamination possible from a large
American nuclear facility. This puts the possible disaster from Browns
ferry at 50 to 100 times worse than Fukushima. Multiply that by Prairie
Island and the over 100 other similar sized nuclear facilities in
America and it is not hard to calculate that a serious national security
threat exists.
America's nuclear waste problem was intentionally created
When GE and others designed the nuclear facilities both in America and
abroad, they had calculated that they would indeed succeed in closing
the nuclear loop. So they designed the nuclear facilities with an
approximate 20X safety margin in the fuel pools, because they did not
have a clear date on when the technology would be perfected. It was my
impression from this engineer that they got it sooner than expected. So
fortunately the fuel pools were over built, but despite being over
built
they were never designed to withstand the fuel burdens
that would result from a political decision to destroy the closed loop
fuel cycle technology altogether.
So now, 40 years after the ban, America has fuel pools around
the country that are so full that they have exceeded even the extremely
generous safety margins they were originally designed to have, and even
modest pools often have over 400 tons of highly active isotope ridden
"spent" fuel in them.
Having functional fuel pool cooling systems was never intended to be
necessary. GE and others wanted only a fractional core of fuel sitting
in a pool at any one time, with at most one or two entire cores, not 15
or 20. If all cooling systems failed with only the intended maximum of
one or two cores sitting in a pool there would be no boiling of the
water in the pool, no pending disaster possible from equipment failure
no matter how severe. But the way it is now, if there is any sort of
attack or disaster which prevents fuel pool maintenance at any of the
facilities in America for a period exceeding three days, the water will
boil off, the fuel will catch fire and a nuclear disaster of
unimaginable magnitude far in excess of Fukushima will take place.
And it never needed to be this way, in fact, the situation is criminal.
Foreign nations offered help, but the American government said NO
Upon recognizing the lunacy of America's Federally mandated nuclear
sabotage, countries like France and Germany offered to buy America's 5%
spent fuel for billions of dollars. They were not held political
hostage by a hostile government, and could certainly use a source of
cheap fuel. But rather than accept this offer,the American government
mandated NO transport of the fuel to foreign nations, no further use
whatsoever. American nuclear facilities were forced by Federal
regulation to use approximately 5 percent of the fuel's radiological
potential, leaving 95 percent of the radiological hazard remaining, and
subsequently forced to keep it in a fuel pool that needs continuous
maintenance. While arguing against this report, shills have said it was
the import/export restrictions which caused such a dangerous situation
in America, but since those laws were written by the same government
that banned the closing of the "nuclear loop", the export restrictions
are only a further indictment of the FED for causing this problem.
Simultaneous with the intentional building of the threat from
having so much nuclear material sitting around came all the government
scandals and lies about needing to put the fuel somewhere.
Inside a mountain in the desert. Inside a dry cask. Maybe in the
ocean, all the while the general American public was kept oblivious to
the obvious answer: If they were not allowed to use it because of a
nonsensical piece of legislation, why not let someone else have it, when
other nations are willing to
even pay for it?
Here is what I believe is the answer. And this answer needs to be spread far and wide.
Whatever you think of Kennedy, on the day of his death he was America's
last hope. No President since has been anything other than a puppet for
an enemy infiltrator,
The enemy is not only inside the gates, it has been taking a paycheck from the American people for over 45 years.
Consider this: America's government intentionally put in place policies
that de-industrialized America. That's an act of war. The American
government put in place policies that intentionally destroyed America's
schools. That's an act of war. And I consider forcing via mandate the
buildup of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of nuclear warheads
worth of perfectly good reactor fuel just waiting for a disaster to be
an act of war as well - Only an enemy would intentionally mandate the
creation of such a threat, who on earth would, other than someone who
hated America? Not only did America lose a marvelous clean virtually
free energy future, that future got converted into a threat that could
very easily destroy the nation and take much of the world with it. All
it would take to kill America, with America's nuclear facilities
drastically overloaded with 5% spent fuel, is 150 smart bombs. One
successful bombing run and it is over. And that's not even taking into
consideration other disaster scenarios, such as earthquakes and computer
virus attacks.
The enemy of America is now in complete control of the nation
Ever since Kennedy's assassination America has not had a true representative government, especially starting with Carter.
When I worked for the NSA, I saw a few computers which were identical
to the early vote counting computers, and they could be set to loop a
single ballot over and over again. With a scammed vote, America got
over-run by outsiders who wanted the country destroyed. Prior to 1973
America was only going upward, and anyone who wanted to see America
destroyed or enslaved would never permit Americans to get virtually free
energy. The enemy would lose oil profits. They would potentially lose
control of energy, leaving the financial system the only means of forced
social compliance outside of a hot war and the enemy wanted control
options. True clean energy had to be stopped.
The enemy of America is a sinister enemy. It is a small group of
religiously "elite" people who weaponize everything. They have weaponized
sympathy, victim status, water systems, vaccines, genetically modified
organisms and even terror - anything they have been able to think of,
and have used these things and many more to cause destruction. And the
nuclear industry, now blocked from a dream come true technology, can be
used as a weapon.
The truth in this is undeniable
There is plenty of proof. No shill can stop people from checking out the
history of other nations, such as Germany, France and Russia offering
America BILLIONS for this not so "spent" fuel, which can only sit as a
hazard after a political decision banning technologies which allow for
it's purification at the same time additional political decisions have
banned it's export. This hazard has been unnecessarily and intentionally
accumulating for years. It's the equivalent of keeping a 5,000 gallon
tank of petrol in your bedroom. Better hope all is well with it.
I honestly feel that banning this miracle technology; you should have
heard the sparkle, the awe in the old man's voice when he said they
closed the "nuclear loop", and the sadness, despair and anger expressed
at it's being banned; I feel it was an act of war against America. There
were never any accidents associated with this technology, according to
this engineer everything negative said about it was a bold faced lie
spoken by people of ill intent.
America's nuclear waste problem is not
scientific, it is political.
I believe this nuclear engineer opened up and told me about this because
I was the first journalist he ever encountered that actually understood
nuclear technology. He knew I would understand what he said and
subsequently bring this story to the public. But outside of making the
public aware by telling his story in an article such as this, what more
can I do?
People asked me to clarify Carter's executive order
The executive order was number 12058, and it put in place the Nuclear non-proliferation act of 1978.
There was NEVER a safety related issue with the technology, and
never a meltdown of any sort associated with it. This fits the context
in which the engineer spoke. This confirms that a "wag the
dog" scenario really was put forth to the public to avoid dissent toward
the banning of this miracle technology, a wag the dog the shills repeat
OVER AND OVER. It's a lie folks, and I will prove it right here!
The excuse given in the "act" associated with the executive order was
that the process was perfect for producing plutonium, and the FED wanted
to avoid the possibility of plutonium spreading around the world for
use in nuclear weapons. No mention as to its safety is made at all in
the bill, which would be expected if it was a legitimate excuse to shoot
the technology down.
There is a major flaw in the concept of non proliferation. First of
all, the technology had already been developed, and was the sole
property of an American corporation. So using this technology in
America, which already had LOTS AND LOTS of plutonium, would not have
been any more of a threat than what was already here. So the excuse for
banning the technology was a LIE.
Reagan later over turned this executive order, but then an excuse was
made that we really could not do it after all, it was EXPENSIVE!. I am
going to flatly state that the technology got buried or destroyed in
the 10 year interim where it was out in limbo, and the ban was lifted
only after EVERY LAST TRACE of how it should be done was physically
destroyed, and every last document associated with it was shredded.
After that, the only thing needed to keep it quiet would be the
usurpation of GE, and transfer of the engineers involved so they never
get to re-develop it.
Other nations have developed versions of the technology and are using it
right now, but what they have cannot approach the elegance and
perfection of what this engineer described. I believe America had the
holy grail of nuclear technology, and it really was taken from us. What
others have cannot be described as the closing of the "nuclear loop".
A link to an abbreviated version of that treaty is
here
and it is a tough one to dig up. Nothing ANYWHERE specifically states
the technology was banned, but the implementation of the treaty amounts
to a de-facto ban. This is what killed it.
It is interesting then that the reactor engineer specifically stated
that Carter made the case that the process was not safe and THAT is what
led to the ban. So I would be willing to bet that there was something
else going on which remains classified to this day; but as the
"official" culprit, this act is what did it. And please note where I
had to go to get even an abbreviated version. $! CHINA. They are THAT
worried about having screwed us!
Here is Carter's
speech
about his enactment of this abomination, where as usual, safety and
security are used as an excuse to destroy. I am sure if you found my
site you know that game!
Here is a
supporting book,
I could not dredge up the full text of the actual bill, only an
abbreviated version. There is somthing fishy here. If you find the
actual bill with the full text, send me the link and I will put it here.
