The Angry Cheese.

angry cheese

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=31122

The BBC, ITV and Channel 4 are LIARS spreading the idea that the Syrian Gov. killed these people. I wonder who the murdering 'militants' really are?

"The UN according to Associated Press, has stated that, “most of the 108 victims of a massacre in [Houla] Syria last week were shot at close range, some of them women, children and entire families gunned down in their own homes.” The UN has also stated that militants, not Syrian soldiers, were responsible for the massacre. The report cites “witness accounts” claiming the militants were “pro-government thugs known as shabiha,” while the Syrian government has claimed the militants were foreign-backed armed terrorists.
This stands in stark contrast to the original narrative the US, UK, France and other NATO members have used to accuse the Syrian government for the atrocities, and even as the basis to expel Syrian diplomats. As stated by UK Foreign Office minister Alistair Burt, (emphasis added) “We are appalled at what appears to be credible reports that the Syrian regime has been responsible for the deaths of 92 civilians in Houla, including 32 children. The UN Head of Mission has been able to confirm the numbers and also that artillery tank shells have been used. If this is the case then it’s an act of pure, naked savagery and we condemn it in the most strongest possible terms.”

Clearly Burt was not reading credible reports, nor has he or his government made any credible attempts to retract their earlier accusations now confirmed to be fabrications. Instead, what the West has done, is distort each new piece of actual evidence that emerges, as the Syrian government and their Russian counterparts struggle to objectively ascertain what happened in Houla, Syria. An example of this comes from the Guardian, who contradicting its own earlier reports, began citing “witness” accounts admittedly provided by Syrian opposition leaders and seemingly custom-tailored to refute the latest evidence presented by Russia before the UN Security Council.
At the moment, only Russia has observed that not enough evidence exists to blame either side, and insists that “the blame must be determined objectively.” Paradoxically, the West, who justifies its global interventions and institutions via “international rule of law,” seems intent on trying, convicting, and executing the Syrian government as quickly as possible, seemingly desperate to do so exactly before “blame can be determined objectively.”

….

To understand why the West is attempting to rush past an objective investigation, and the most likely explanation as to what really happened in Houla, Syria, please read, ”Atrocities Made to Order.” It covers a historical example of another well-documented Western-backed, staged atrocity designed to undermine and topple a targeted government."
Tony Cartalucci is the writer and editor at Land Destroyer Report

But Syria's diplomats are being chucked out anyway!

angry cheese

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/23/rfid-chips-brazil-students_n_1374886.html

Here’s an idea! What if schools were properly run by highly paid, well qualified teachers with strict discipline, and classes were challenging, stimulating and very interesting, the children might not want to skip lessons? What if it was difficult to pass exams and the children had to really work hard to do well?

Why is there all this truancy these days? And the perceived need for ‘chips?’ Modern school education is dumbed down, the education system is designed by Common Purpose – types to deliberately be crap! The kids often leap about like apes, they swear at the teacher – and nothing gets done – and the kids know it.

I had to remove my daughter from a rotten school in Sheffield because an ape of a boy was acting like a lunatic and she was also about to go into a class run by the rottenest, scumbag ‘teacher’ I have ever encountered. I actually believed she was in danger if she stayed there! This was in Junior School.

This boy would have had the ruler across his hand a few times and been stood in the corner in the old days. They can’t do this now. I once shouted at him and told him off myself in the school playground after he barged roughly, and selfishly into a little girl and literally knocked her off her feet! A ‘teacher’ immediately ran over to tell me off and comfort him! He was an absolutely indulged swine of a child!

Bad behaviour can often be linked to poor teaching and a

If I ran the education system of this country it would be very different! No chips would be needed and every classroom would have a plimsoll hanging on the wall with “BUM” written on the sole! What about the bigger children, they are often bigger than the teacher, you may ask? Well, divide and conquer, I would get 4 of his big friends to hold a bad boy down while he got walloped across the arse. And give the 4 lads a fiver ,or even a tenner, each for doing it! You would literally only ever have to do this once!

L.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8907496/Ofsted-dull-teaching-is-fuelling-bad-behaviour-in-schools.html

angry cheese

How the Media Manipulates Public Opinion For Regime Change in Syria

Intelligent skeptics should see through the media’s smoke screen in order to work out what is really going on in Syria. Patrick Henningsen
Infowars.com May 28, 2012

http://www.infowars.com/phony-houla-massacre-how-media-manipulates-public-opinion-on-syria

If you are still needing an academic tutorial on exactly how the mainstream media is able to generate a completely phony public consensus to support foreign intervention projects, you need look no further than the dangerous, fictional narrative currently being rolled out regarding Syria.
This past Saturday and Sunday morning, almost every major corporate mainstream newspaper and TV network in North America and in Europe ran with the average headline, “Massacre of the children as Syrian forces hit rebels”, giving hundreds of millions of readers and viewers to artificial impression that it was Syrian government forces – and not western-backed terrorist groups, who carried out a massacre on children and others days ago - even though, the true culprit of these attacks has not yet been determined – a fact which was only briefly mentioned later on in these very same media reports.
One of the UK best-selling weekend papers and most widely read online journals, Guardian media group’s The Observer, ran such a headline – one which shamelessly implied that the Syrian government carried out a massacre in Houla. This was used to shape public opinion in Europe, a reality which is later shaped for the North American market.

Corporate Journalism: The Art of Deception
It shouldn’t take a genius to see through this relentless western effort to takeover Syria, but not having learned their lesson from Libya, so many hard working and well educated westerners are bound to fall for it all over again.
Cui bono? Who benefits… from another civilian massacre? Clearly not the Syrian government. But western-backed terrorist groups who have been working to destabilize the country for over one year now, do clearly benefit.
Who would be the chief suspect for this latest massacre? How about the western-backed terrorists in Syria – the very same terrorist groups admitted to their own bombing campaign that killed many innocent people in Syria only weeks ago.
Important to add here also, that the latest child massacre in Syria has been reported as being “done with knives” – which doesn’t sound like a government attack to any intelligent reader.
Do not underestimate for one second just how pivotal the western corporate media is in advancing an agenda of global destabilization:
As we have seen used before in Syria and Libya, the alleged massacre in question is based entirely on unsubstantiated evidence, in this case its more uploaded ‘Youtube’ footage:

“Videos uploaded to the Internet and purporting to be from Houla show many dead and badly mutilated infants. Residents say some victims were killed with knives, while many more died from 18 hours of relentless shelling that left buildings wrecked and homes destroyed in a large residential area near the centre of town.”

Origins of these ‘Youtube video’ are still unknown, but the media machine and certain UN officials have already cited them as “evidence”. Also note that in the YouTube videos, many of the dead children appear to be shot in the heads with fire arms at close range, but this has not stopped certain ‘UN observers’ from accusing the Syrian government from killing children with tank shelling.
Mainstream Media 101
In order to shape consensus reality, first you need to frame the event. Here the story begins by laying soft blame on the Syrian government…

“Syria‘s fragile peace process is in shreds after what was claimed to be a regime-backed massacre…”

… and then proceeding to carefully cover themselves, so to speak, but retracting the allegations deeper into the article:

“Major General Robert Mood, head of the UN team in Syria, deplored the attack, which began at midday on Friday, as “indiscriminate and unforgivable” but did not say who had been to blame.”

Notice how the article itself states clearly that the persons responsible for the massacre is yet to be known, but The Observer has already framed the conclusion within the headline and in the beginning of the story, in order to fit a pre-determined conclusion. This conclusion happens to be directly in line with Washington and London’s foreign policy objective of regime change in Syria.
Take notes. Because this is how it’s done, time and time again – another clear example how large media outlets can effectively drive reality in the direction of their choosing, and this is why so many millions of public media consumers are left misinformed and dis informed, eventually leading to a marginal public endorsement of Washington, London and Tel Aviv’s interventionist foreign policy objectives.
Hours after this fake story was circulated in the GMT timezone, it made its way to EST, as the New York Times picks up the ball and runs it down the field. Here the story is further refined to streamline it with regime change policy objectives, codifying reality within North American sector, claiming that:

“More than 90 people, including at least 32 children under the age of 10, were killed in a central Syrian village, top United Nations officials said Saturday, accusing the government of perpetrating the “indiscriminate” shelling of civilian neighborhoods.”

No real details are actually given to support this media-generated verdict, only that, “A United Nations statement said the observers confirmed that “artillery and tank shells were fired at a residential neighborhood.”
And finally, the Washington Post weighs in with their attempt to corner Russia and China on the issue, rounding out the artificial verdict today with their headline, “U.N. Security Council blames Syrian government for civilian massacre”, claiming that:
“The U.N. Security Council on Sunday blamed the Syrian government for most of the deaths in a massacre of 116 civilians in the village of Houla, issuing a unanimous statement condemning the killings that was supported by Syria’s staunch allies Russia and China.”
Shortly thereafter, the UN’s Ban Ki Moon and Save the Children charity weigh in with carefully-craft statements, but statements that are obviously framed and directed towards Syria’s Assad government, and not Gulf States, Washington and London-backed terrorist gangs currently operating under an all but official western mandate within Syria and from their NATO-sanctioned base over the border in southern Turkey. Reality is further shaped by the London Guardian’s Observer and others, with an official “international outcry”:

“The international community was united in its condemnation. UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon said the killings were a “flagrant violation of international law” while the White House called the violence acts of “unspeakable and inhuman brutality.” Arab League head Nabil Elaraby said the killings were a “horrific crime” and urged UN action.
Save the Children’s chief executive, Justin Forsyth, echoed calls for intervention. He said: “This indiscriminate killing must stop now. The world cannot sit back and allow this to happen. Children are suffering terribly in this conflict.”

Even the BBC have gone so far as to run 9 year old photographs from Iraq, and sell them as from this latest massacre of children in Syria. Any other foreign media outlet in the UK would have its broadcasting license pulled for such a propaganda stunt. In the face of such damning manipulation, why then would so many people still believe the mainstream media’s version of reality in countries like Syria?
But what is a more closer version of reality is this:
Western-backed terrorists, many of whom are al-Qaida, mostly hailing from outside of Syria, are fomenting civil war and carrying out a series of attacks on UN observers and civilians, in order to create the preferred western narrative that “Assad must go.”
Western readers should be under no illusion – your government operators are sanctioning civilian killing in places like Syria, and your corporate media are being used to place the blame on the west’s political enemy in the region – and therefore influence western public support for regime change.
After over one year of intervening through their own favored terrorist guerrilla proxy fighters and running arms into Syria – arms that are admittedly for going into the hands of western-backed al-Qaida groups there, the west has not yet succeeded in toppling the Assad government and installing a new puppet regime, as they did by using NATO military force in Libya last autumn. But western project managers like Hillary Clinton and William Hague have not given up, and if their corporate media outlets are allowed to determine their version reality in Syria, they will eventually get their “humanitarian intervention”, and the country will slowly be destroyed from within. Then regime change will happen.
It’s as simple as that.
The Syrian people are the ones who will eventually lose if Washington, London, Tel Aviv and the Gulf States succeed in destroying that country, as they have done in Libya and Iraq.
When this is done, then they will move on to destabilize Lebanon in order to unseat and neutralize Hezbollah.
After that, the door to attack Iran will be wide open.
There’s your World War Three in earnest.

BBC use Iraq photo from 2003 and pretend it is in present day Syria, what else has the BBC lied about?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9293620/BBC-News-uses-Iraq-photo-to-illustrate-Syrian-massacre.html

angry cheese

Banks regard the money you deposit as their property and use it accordingly...

NOW HEAR THIS and understand the name of the cruel game...

A SIMPLIFIED EXAMPLE:

Yesterday there was a sign outside the bank saying

WE HAVE NO MONEY TO LEND TODAY.

At 9 am next day YOU go in the bank and deposit £1000 (£ONE K)

The clerk rushes out and puts up a new sign saying...

WE HAVE MONEY TO LEND TODAY.

I see the sign and as I want a loan for a new car I go in and ask the bank for a loan of £9,000 which the manager approves....

Now, the only money the bank has in its safe to lend is the £1000
YOU deposited yesterday. BUT HERE'S THE MAGICAL SCAM.

HAPPENS IN EVERY BANK EVERY DAY...

The manager enters the figure £9,000 in MY account. He has leveraged YOUR deposit of £1000 to £9,000.
Of course your local bank is not privy to this high-end knowledge.
To continue... you write a cheque on your account and take it down the road to the car dealer and he sells you the car...
He takes your cheque for £9,000 and goes to his bank to deposit the £9000 in HIS account - now his bank can put up a sign outside saying...
WE HAVE MONEY TO LEND TODAY.
Joe Bloggs sees the sign and goes in to ask for a loan of £81,000 which the bank agrees and enters the figure of £81,000 in his account which he, Joe, can pay away wherever he wishes.
The bank, in both cases charge 10% interest to each borrower and signatures on two Promissory Notes promising to pay the interest and repay the loan over a period of 24 months.
FROM YOUR DEPOSIT OF £1000 (ONE THOUSAND) the bank has made for itself a total of £90,000.
NINETY THOUSAND £POUNDS from ONE THOUSAND.
It gives you say, TODAY, £30 for each of the 2 years.
AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO PAY BANK CHARGES.

GET IT?

The 1844 BANK ACT needs repealing and re-writing.
It was written in such a way that the banks could FOREVER steal the wages out of our purses and grow very, very fat.

I strongly suggest getting involved with this new approach to money and banking: http://lawfulbank.com/