Communi ???

April 24, 2011

Saul Alinsky 1909-1972

"Progressive" Hidden Agenda is Satanic

(Thanks to BK of Dying God List)

From a Communist mentor of Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton:

...from the book, Rules for Radicals - by Saul Alinsky - 1971

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

Opening page - Dedication:

"Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom -- Lucifer."



Dr. Strangelove


...from Part 13 of the Interview with Saul Alinsky (1972) -

archived at: - http://www.progress.org/2003/alinsky14.htm

...

PLAYBOY: Having accepted your own mortality, do you believe in any kind of afterlife?

ALINSKY: - Sometimes it seems to me that the question people should ask is not "Is there life after death?" but "Is there life after birth?" I don't know whether there's anything after this or not. I haven't seen the evidence one way or the other and I don't think anybody else has either. But I do know that man's obsession with the question comes out of his stubborn refusal to face up to his own mortality.

Let's say that if there is an afterlife, and I have anything to say about it, I will unreservedly choose to go to hell.

PLAYBOY: - Why?

ALINSKY: - Hell would be heaven for me. All my life I've been with the have-nots. Over here, if you're a have-not, you're short of dough. If you're a have-not in hell, you're short of virtue. Once I get into hell, I'll start organizing the have-nots over there.

PLAYBOY: - Why them?

ALINSKY: - They're my kind of people.

----------------------

Saul Alinsky died a few months later, on June 12, 1972.


excerpt from the book: - Marx and Satan - by Richard Wurmbrand

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31067286/Marx-and-Satan-Richard-Wurmbrand

...

In 1872, a revolutionary society was formed under the simple name "The Organization," which had a super-secret circle chillingly called "Hell." Though its goals have continued to be pursued for well over a century by groups which continually change their names, its existence has been unknown to the outside world.

Soviet historians have dared to write about the activities of "Hell," a forerunner of the Russian Communist Party, only as recently as 1965, ninety-three years after its formation.

In Revolutionist Underground in Russia, E.S. Vilenskaia wrote:

"Hell" was the name of the center above the secret organization, which not only used terror against the monarchy, but also had punitive functions toward the members of the secret organization.


In Tchernishevsky or Netchaiev we read that one of the members (Fediseev) of "Hell" took it upon himself to poison his own father in order to give the organization his inheritance. Tchernishevsky, who belonged to this movement, wrote,

"I'll participate in revolution; I am not frightened by dirt, by drunkards with sticks, by slaughter. We don't care if we have to shed thrice as much food as the rebels in the French revolution. So what if we had to kill a hundred thousand farmers?"


Here are some of the expressed aims of this Satanic organization:

Mystification is the best, almost the only means to impel men to make a revolution.

It is enough to kill a few million people and the wheels of revolution will be oiled.

Our ideal is awful, complete, universal, and pitiless destruction.

Mankind must be divided into two unequal parts. One tenth receives personal liberty and unlimited rights over the other nine tenths. The latter must lose their personality and become a kind of herd.

...

Churchill says in his Memoirs of World War II that Stalin confessed that ten million people died as a result of the collectivization of agriculture in the Soviet Union.

The important fact to remember is that the Communists have now confessed, after a delay of almost a hundred years, that at the inception of their movement was a circle called "Hell."

Why "Hell"? Why not "The Society for the Betterment of the Poor" or "...of Mankind"? Why the stark emphasis on hell?

Today the Communists are more cautious. But in the beginning their very name revealed that their avowed aim was to recruit men for eternal damnation.

Royal Wedding - Public Sector Cutbacks

But the UK can still afford numerous wars, and this pompous nonsense!



www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ3Dz-n8jbQ

www.youtube.com/user/YouKnowIAmRight#p/u/0/JT3-UAsJp_w

Where can we go to celebrate? Or drown our sorrows?

http://pubcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2010/09/greyhound-put-down.html

http://closedpubs.blogspot.com

www.simplybusiness.co.uk/knowledge/news/2010/09/2010-09-23-Pub-closure-killing-rural-life






If the country (tax-payers) are paying for most of this,
where do the royalties from the tv companies and magazine and news coverage go?
To the country, or the Royals?

BBC Lies about Tibet

Hateful and Manipulative BBC Propaganda and Lies About Tibet

PROOF -

Before: 26/04/11

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13188931

After: 27/04/11

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13205481

In ‘before,’ 26/04/11 we have the sarcastic comments of a nasty pro-Chinese, anti-Tibetan ***t called Adam Brookes. This is what he really thinks of Tibet. And this is the view the BBC clearly holds of Tibet too.

Read it – lots of ‘inverted commas’ representing sarcasm and ‘so-called’, such as here:

“..Following elections in March, Mr Sangay emerged as the surprise front-runner to become Kalon Tripa - a position often referred to as "prime minister" of a "Tibetan government-in-exile" headed by the Dalai Lama…”

“….He will have to lead a global movement that campaigns for Tibetan rights and freedoms under Chinese rule. He'll also manage the ramshackle "government-in-exile" that sits on a dusty hillside in northern India, in the town of Dharamsala.

But his "government" has neither country nor international recognition. And the exiled Tibetans appear to have elected a man who has almost no experience of his homeland, and none of government...”

And so on….and then this

“…The "Central Tibetan Administration" is the object of China's relentless scorn. It has 1,100 officials to its name, and ministries of health, education and security…”

So what?

Tibetans don’t goose-step around with machine guns terrifying everyone, they are too civilised for that! At least the Tibetans are honest and decent, unlike the corrupt and debauched Chinese government. When the scumbag Chinese Government starts reimbursing and compensating the poor of Beijing whose homes were demolished around their ears to make way for the disgusting Olympic ‘Junky’ Games, leaving them homeless, then perhaps this corrupt ‘government’ can get on its high horse. And Tibetans do not eat their pet dogs and cats, or their own babies, unlike their revolting neighbours.

Now read the cushy version, ‘after’ on the 27th! Let’s all pretend to love Tibet, shall we?

NO BBC – BE HONEST FOR ONCE! Actually I prefer the 26^th version, the British Government’s version, hatefully shocking, cruel and deceitful! Lovely!

FAKE CHARITIES

http://fakecharities.org

Welcome to Fake Charities,

the site that tracks just how much of your money the government is giving to “charities”—and at this time of The Big Society, Fake Charities is more relevant than ever.

We define a Fake Charity as any organisation registered as a UK charity that derives more than 10% of its income—and/or more than £1 million—from the government, while also lobbying the government. That lobbying can take the form of calling for new policies, changes to the law or increases in (their own) funding.

Some of these organisations spend a large amount of their time lobbying the state to curtail our freedoms and not all charities are upfront about the amount of money they receive from the state.

When an ‘independent’ charity takes a political stand or attempts to sway public opinion on matters of policy, we think you have a right to know whether they are being funded by the generosity of the public or by the largesse of the state. We think you have the right to know whether you’re listening to a genuine grass-roots charity or are being fed PR from an astro-turfed lobby group. This site exists to help you make up your own mind about who these campaigners are really working for.

We are just assembling some data—we need to start afresh—and then we’ll start posting!

You can use this form to submit a charity for inclusion…

It started in America.

However, in the 80s, New Labour, under the Bliar, reorganised of Common Purpose. The Third Sector took off, and tax-payers in the UK have been mislead ever since. Everything Wormser and Dodd have warned about in the USA is now happening here in the UK and in the EU:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZqZGEBkX1s

www.thehiddenevil.com/foundations.asp

This is what is behind the Public Sector cuts in the UK now!