R.I.P. John Barry.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12321610

So much more than the brilliant James Bond Theme:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=srwABRzxbVs

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQFI_VtaOJA

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip1k3hfyiQc

www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn1GArGX8PY

www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJygEq3E5nE

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZh4DDl5wfk

www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWMlqR1VN2o

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4sRKN0LGvI

www.youtube.com/watch?v=82n20GISolo

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGORPUzLxtU

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykLCAfVa410

Thought and Speech Crime

Veteran UK Soccer Broadcasters Fired For "Sexism."

Richard Keys suggested "dark forces" were at work. And indeed they are. He and his colleague are examples in the Illuminati's war on freedom.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Two 20-year soccer commentators for Rupert Murdoch's Sky Sports lost their jobs Wednesday over comments that were made off-air!

Richard Keys and Andy Gray discussed whether a woman referee knew the off-side rules which apparently are very complex. For this, the two men were fired.

This despite abject apologies. And despite the fact that it was a PRIVATE conversation that happened to be recorded. What's next? Are they going to monitor our phone calls and emails for thought crimes?

Frankly I am disgusted. It's OK to criticize heterosexual males or Christians. It's OK to criticize or fire people who wear crucifixes or say they'll pray for you. These are fair game.

But don't dare resist the Illuminati's plan to erase gender or racial distinctions! Don't dare suggest that the genders are different or unequal in various respects, unless of course you're disparaging white men.

It was OK when Keys and Gray criticized male participants, or made off-color jokes. But don't mess with the Illuminati's chosen instruments of social subversion (a.k.a. "change") - homosexuals, feminists and elite Jews.

Richard Keys suggested "dark forces" were at work. And indeed they are. He and his colleague are examples in the Illuminati's war on freedom.

"Sexism" is the recognition that men and women are different. The attempt to banish it - feminism - is an attack on gender. This consists of women usurping the male role. Males have every right to resist this vicious underhanded attack on heterosexuality posing as "gay rights."

Look at this ridiculous women's soccer game. Look at how respectfully Keys and Gray cover it. The truth is that women are no good at certain sports and they should not get the same coverage as their male counterparts.

This is reminiscent of the Don Imus scandal in 2007. He was fired for calling Black women basketball players "nappy headed ho's" by executives who also produce the most obscene misogynist gangster rap. It is also reminiscent of the Shirley Sharrod case last July where a government official was hastily dismissed because her remarks were taken out of context. She was offered her job back.

In the neo-Communist New World Order, you don't work unless you accept the Illuminati's political shibboleths. It's no coincidence that the term "political correctness" originated in the Communist Party in the 1920's.

Communism in the 21st Century means the bankers own or control all the major corporations, and if you resist their pernicious social engineering,( i.e. "change") you don't work. It is a solipsism where the money men redefine truth i.e. men and women are the same, homosexuality is normal, terrorists demolished the World Trade Center etc.

I hope Keys and Gray sue Rupert Murdoch and Sky for all they're worth. I hope British soccer fans show their displeasure to Sky Sports.

Finally, in an era of thought and speech crimes, the only way to resist is to commit as many as possible, as loudly as possible. I'm doing my part.

www.henrymakow.com/veteran_uk_soccer_broadcasters.html

What is the POINT ladies, of entering a man's world, to do a man's job, and then crying into your petticoats when guys talk rough to and about you - as they do to and about each other? You wanted equality, you got it, but then you bleat about it! Grow up and take it girls! Or aren't you man enough, after all?

www.davidicke.com/headlines/43784-david-icke-whats-on-the-telly-luv-change-the-channel

The elite are reframing our minds, they are programing us throught the media. It is a subtle kind of brainwashing and we need to be aware of this. Is this sort of thing healthy?

www.ea.com/uk/dead-space-2/blog/dead-space-2-launch-trailer

Listen and learn:

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/CTTM2010/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_736_Nation-States__Anchors_Away__Flounder_Under_Corporate_Sway_Dec292010.mp3

Read and think!

www.whatwemaybe.org

Gov. Levying Money from Brits. Illegally

..All MPs should be fully aware, and arguing robustly in the House of Commons - instead of complaining 'how did we get here? Most of us are more than "miffed", but extremely angry at the sheer scale of government indifference to the use and misdirection of taxpayer's money.
The key phrase, I suggest, in the comment below is:
"Seeing how Parliament had not approved the deal", is extremely important.

Quite apart from the whole Eurozone bail out project (not) having any connection with British taxpayers, as we were constantly being assured by ministers over the years that no liabilities would fall on the UK, any "deal" negotiated by Darling, or any other government representative is illegal. If Parliament has not been presented with, debated, and passed the proposals then it is not binding upon the taxpayer. Why then did he not invoke the clear terms of our Bill of Rights?
This says unequivocally:

"That levying money for, or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative without consent of Parlament is illegal".

I am amazed that MPs and supposedly eurosceptics appear to be so unaware of the powerful constitutional tool that is available for them to use in such circumstances.
They could have invoked any number of the relevant Statutes of our Constitution, and indeed can still do so. In particular the Bill of Rights which as we know, is still current law - in effect the law of the land, and not subject to implied repeal by EU legislation passing through our parliament by proxy. Perhaps Douglas can enlighten those who admire his anti EU credentials, but are constantly puzzled by his failure to apply constitutional law)
Kind regards,
Graham Wood .

How did we end up in the Euro debt union? Like me, perhaps you were a little miffed to discover that non-Euro member Britain turns out to be liable for Euro zone debts. Despite keeping out of the currency union, we've somehow got ensnared in the Euro debt union.

How did this happen?
The key deal, making the UK liable for the Stabilisation Mechanism, was done in May last year, after the old Parliament was dissolved, but before the new one got going.

Out-going Chancellor, Alistair Darling, negotiated the deal on May 9th, during the General Election.

But there is more to it than that.

Convention means government cannot embark on new policy between Parliaments. And indeed, we know that Mr Darling consulted George Osborne before he went ahead and signed Britain up.

So, what did those Darling consulted have to say about the deal? A firm 'no'?, perhaps, on the basis that we had to deal with the deficit ahead of bailing out the Euro? Or did they nod along with established Treasury policy?

According to the reply I've just got from a Freedom of Information request, 'the parties did cooperate with one another'?. And 'with senior civil servants'? too. Although they won't tell us what approval was actually given.

Seeing how Parliament had not approved the deal, incoming ministers must have known that they could have quashed the whole Darling deal, had they sought to.

Read the reply for yourself . It sounds to me that they won't let us read what incoming Coalition ministers actually said because they fear it might just look a bit embarrassing –“ or in Sir Humphrey-speak 'the context here deserves special consideration'?.

We keep being told that Britain will only face massive Euro bailout liabilities until 2013. But if ministers had been a little savvier on day one, we'd not be liable for the debt crashes about to happen in Spain, Portugal, Greece and Ireland in 2011 and 2012.

If I am wrong, ministers should publish details of the advice that they were given and the instructions that they gave.

How did we end up in the Euro debt union? by Douglas Carswell
Posted on 6 January 2011 http://www.talkcarswell.com/default.aspx?date=201101

Britains Forests Flogged Off!

What's the problem?

Ancient woods are special.

So often described as our equivalent to the rainforest, they are habitats of extraordinary continuity which stretch back hundreds - even thousands - of years. They are highly immobile and sensitive to change; beautiful; delicate - and irreplaceable.

Damaged woods are ancient woods that have been planted over time with conifers - known as planted ancient woodland sites (PAWS). Their conservation potential is incredibly high but there is a limited window of opportunity to restore them to their native glory.

The Forestry Commission owns hundreds of ancient woods.

Defra is proposing a new approach to ownership and management of woodlands and forests, with a reducing role for the state and a growing role for the private sector and civil society - AKA Community/Third Sector!

Our concerns:

Ownership is not the fundamental issue at stake for the Woodland Trust. It is the future of the forests themselves, especially the ancient woods, and how to protect their value for wildlife and for people which is the critical issue for us.

The threat created by possible sales of these ancient woods is two fold:

Some ancient woods may slip through the net of protection, while many others may go unrestored.

Government says they will be protected - we have grave doubts about this in practice.

www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/en/campaigning/save-ancient-forests/Pages/fc-disposals-whats-the-problem.aspx

Ireland, Celtic Tiger to Ruined Shell

Gabriel Donohoe – Fools Crow Blog, January 4, 2011

The Irish Government has recently passed the harshest budget in the history of the State with further austerity promised for the next three years and perhaps for decades. Prime Minister Brian Cowen and Finance Minister Brian Lenihan have steered Ireland from the booming prosperity of a Celtic Tiger to a ruined shell of a country where unemployment, poverty, emigration, and despair are proceeding to destroy a once proud, industrious people.

Cowen and Lenihan also bear the ignominy of having brought in the International Monetary Fund who, along with EU banksters, are now dictating Irish fiscal policy. The IMF has long had a vulturish reputation for plundering weaker countries by stripping the flesh of its victims down to the bare bones. This repulsive scavenger is well known for promoting austerity and misery, grabbing national assets for its bankster and corporate friends, and leaving the skeleton of a country’s economy in its wake. The first piece of offal to be plucked from the Irish carcass by this opportunistic carrion eater was the nation’s €20 billion pension fund, the life savings of working people.

As a result of Ireland’s dramatic reversal of fortune the names of Brian Cowen and Brian Lenihan are now being reviled as the villains who inflicted horrendous financial disaster upon the Irish people and forced the enslavement of future generations to a criminal cadre of International Banksters.

The words ‘treason’, ‘traitors’, and ‘treachery’ are being increasingly used not only by ordinary citizens but also by certain politicians, economists, business leaders, and celebrities. ‘Economic treason’ was a term used by the leader of the Labour Party to describe Cowen and Lenihan’s blanket guarantee to the banks. And, incredibly, even the country’s ostensibly non-partisan police association, the GRA, accused the government of ‘treachery’ and denounced it as a ‘government of national sabotage’.

Today, Cowen and Lenihan are being compared to other traitors in history like Vidkun Quisling, a Norwegian politician who assisted the Nazis to conquer his native country; General Benedict Arnold, an American soldier who changed sides during the Revolution and betrayed his country to the British; and even Judas Iscariot, who betrayed his Master for 30 pieces of silver.

In Ireland, the names of Cowen and Lenihan now evoke the same revulsion as that reserved for Dermot MacMurrough, a 12th century King of Leinster who has been loathed for over 8 centuries as the man who brought the first English invaders to Ireland. In 1167, after a dispute with other Irish kings which led to his forced exile, MacMurrough persuaded an English army under the command of the Earl of Pembroke, known as ‘Strongbow’, to invade Ireland and help him take his kingdom back.

MacMurrough died 3 years later and Strongbow declared himself the King of Leinster. Thus began the beginning of a British military occupation that would last for over 800 years and cause countless thousands of Irish deaths and condemn many generations of Irish men and women to utter misery, slavery, famine, and financial and religious tyranny. It is not easy for anyone to incite more odium in the hearts of the Irish people than that of the back-stabber Dermot MacMurrough.

And yet Brian Cowen and Brian Lenihan are reviled with the same detestation as that accorded the traitorous 12th century King of Leinster.

What did Cowen and Lenihan do to earn such public loathing?

On September 29th, 2008, a momentous event occurred. That evening, four of the most senior executives of Ireland’s two largest high street banks, Dermot Gleeson and Eugene Sheehy of Allied Irish Bank (AIB) and Brian Goggin and Richard Burrows of Bank of Ireland (BOI), called to Government Buildings for a hastily convened meeting with the Prime Minister, Brian Cowen, and the Minister for Finance, Brian Lenihan. Also present was the Irish Attorney-General, Paul Gallagher.

The banksters were frantic. As the property bubble was beginning to burst, their main rival, Anglo Irish Bank, was in serious trouble and the huge loss of liquidity could bring down the country’s entire financial system. Like Anglo Irish, AIB and BOI also had massive exposure to the developers and all were in danger of imminent collapse. The banksters implored the Government to do something, immediately, before the money markets opened the following morning.

Having received such stark news from the banksters, Cowen and Lenihan knew they had to move quickly and decisively. They would have to act, and be seen to act, without bias and without favouring any special interest groups. Their first duty was to ensure the welfare of the nation as a whole and to safeguard the financial interests of all the Irish people.

But in this they failed utterly. One special interest group, the banksters, prevailed spectacularly over the interests of the Irish people. How did the banksters manage to wield such inordinate influence over crucial governmental policy?

A key disturbing fact about this meeting was never commented upon in the mainstream media. On the government side of the table sat Paul Gallagher, the Attorney-General, legal adviser to the Irish Government. On the banksters’ side of the table sat Dermot Gleeson, the AIB chairman and himself a former Irish Attorney-General. But, apart from both men holding the senior law office of the land, a more sinister connection between them remained undisclosed. They were both Bilderbergers.

For those who haven’t heard of the Bilderbergers, they are a brotherhood of unelected international banksters, corporatists, politicians, and others who meet secretly every year to formulate and manipulate world policy in finance, economics, trade, and any other area that they can control for their own selfish, globalist interests.

It may well be that the presence of the two Bilderbergers, Gleeson and Gallagher, was just a coincidence but, considering such incredibly high stakes, it can be argued that Gallagher’s attendance as Attorney-General at such a crucial meeting generated a monumental conflict of interest. His Bilderberger connection clearly compromised him as legal adviser to the Irish Government, especially when his Bilderberger pal, Gleeson, was about to be on the receiving end of a whopping government bailout.

After a surprisingly short discussion with some members of the cabinet, the Attorney-General, and top civil servants, Cowen and Lenihan arrived at an ominous decision. They decided that the Government would guarantee all the liabilities of six Irish banks – not just customer and interbank deposits but also the full exposure of all bondholders! This amounted to some 450 billion euro, an astronomical figure which, if ever called upon, would destroy the country.

With the stroke of a pen Cowen and Lenihan shifted hundreds of billions of private debt incurred by greedy, fraudulent banksters and dumped it onto the backs of the Irish people. This was an incredible act of treachery against the Irish nation. What could possess these two politicians to put their people into impossible debt and penury – perhaps for generations – just to save a few mega-rich banksters from taking a loss on their reckless gambling? Was it utter ineptitude or was it something more sinister than that?

As Marcellus said to Horatio in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, ‘Something is rotten in the State of Denmark.’ He said ‘Denmark’, but he might well have been describing present-day Ireland. This bank guarantee deal stinks to high heaven!

Inflicting a risk exposure of €450 billion on the Irish nation was tantamount to state suicide. The willing and needless placement of an entire people into such peril could only be the result of criminal incompetence or criminal collusion. There could be no other explanation, except, of course, criminal insanity. Take your pick. Are Cowen and Lenihan criminally inept, corrupt, or insane?

To put the enormity of the hazard to the nation into perspective let’s compare it to U.S Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s 2008 bank bailout of $700 billion which was then strenuously opposed by the great majority of the American people. The Irish bailout was the equivalent of more than $585 billion dollars, not a far cry from the $700 billion that so appalled and angered most Americans. Consider that the U.S. has a population of 300 million while Ireland only has a population of less than 4.5 million, much the same as the state of Louisiana.

At 3.30am the four bankers left. According to Shane Ross, author of Bankers, they had ‘put the gun to the Government’s head and the ministers had delivered.’

Ireland was aghast. Cowen and Lenihan said the bailout was necessary to preserve Ireland’s creditworthiness with ‘the markets’. This was hogwash and was said so by many people at the time, including leading economists. (The fallacy of the ministers’ thinking is borne out by the approach of the plucky Icelandic people who refused to take on private bankster debt and whose economy is now in a much healthier position than that of Ireland.) But Lenihan persisted with the bailout declaring that it would be ‘the cheapest bailout in history’. Those words, like the ghost in Hamlet, would soon come back to haunt him.

Cowen and Lenihan then proceeded to pour taxpayers’ money into the banks, capitalizing the high street lenders to the tune of some €13.5 billion. This figure did not even include the requirements of Anglo Irish Bank, the biggest culprit of fraudulent lending, who Lenihan said could be saved with a €4 billion bailout. As time progressed the Minister of Finance continually revised his figures upwards, going to €12 billion, €18 billion, €24 billion, and now the figure is hovering around €35 billion. The Irish people will never see a single cent of the tens of billions poured into that black hole that is Anglo Irish Bank. This cannot be described as anything other than an act of outrageous criminality.

Another fiasco in the making, the brainchild of Lenihan and Cowen, is NAMA (National Asset Management Agency), set up to restore the banks’ balance sheets by buying their toxic loans to the tune of some €54 billion of taxpayers’ money. This is another huge and needless risk that is likely to go disastrously wrong and which hangs eternally over Irish taxpayers like the Sword of Damocles. The slightest miscalculation and the sword falls – with devastating effect.

This writer, and many others, pointed out at the time that there was a much better short-term solution to the Irish banking problem. The Government could have let the banks fail – that’s what happens in capitalism when businesses are reckless or make mistakes – and set up a state bank. A state bank could have created all the credit the country needed with a much, much smaller outlay. Through fractional reserve lending, a bank can create some twelve and a half times the amount of credit that it holds in assets. For example, if a state bank is capitalised with €10 billion it can lend out €125 billion. With only €20 billion in capital a state bank could create and lend out €250 billion. This would have boosted Irish businesses and given the economy a huge injection and would have obviated the need to go back to the exploitative money markets.

(It is important to point out that this would be a short-term solution only. The real cause of global financial chaos and prohibitive national debt is the permitting of private banking cartels to create a nation’s money, money that is based on debt and bears interest and which makes an immense fortune for the international banksters – to the impoverishment of the people.)

But Cowen and Lenihan seemed not to be focussed on what was good and efficacious for the people of Ireland but on how to save a few criminal banksters from incurring gigantic losses.

Before the bank guarantees, Ireland had a manageable sovereign debt. But after taking on the private debts of reckless, fraudulent banksters Cowen and Lenihan drove Ireland into insolvency. Interest on Irish government bonds rose dramatically and threatened to destabilise the Euro. Uncertainty about Ireland’s ability to handle its deficit caused unrest in Portuguese and Spanish bond markets. There were concerns too about Belgium and Italy. The EU, fearful that panic and contagion would spread and collapse the Euro, bullied the Irish Government into taking a joint EU/IMF bailout. The high placed members of the self-serving Brussels elite were willing to impose hardship and needless austerity upon the people of Ireland in order to save their precious Euro and to preserve their positions of opulence and power.

The Irish economy per se did not need a bailout, but Irish banks did. The IMF does not lend to banks but only to sovereign countries. (That way, they can force a country to bleed its taxpayers to get their money back.) Cowen and Lenihan then proceeded to sell the idea of an EU/IMF loan to the country as a ‘rescue package’ for the Irish nation. This was a complete lie. It was a rescue package mainly for German, British, and French banks who had recklessly and greedily loaned billions to Irish banks during the Celtic Tiger boom.

David McWilliams, Irish economist, broadcaster, and writer, says of the IMF, ‘It is not here to bail us out; it is here to bail [the banks] out. The bailout is a bailout for the banks of Germany and France and the Irish taxpayer foots the bill. It is that simple. And where will the EU and IMF money come from? It will be borrowed from the very investment banks that will be bailed out. So they will get interest payments from us, in order that we pay for their mistakes.’

This view is echoed by Dr. Constantin Gurdgiev, adjunct lecturer in Finance at Trinity College, Dublin, who likens the ECB/IMF bailout to ‘corporate welfare’ (as opposed to social welfare). ‘It’s worse than corporate welfare, it’s corporate welfare with a massive moral hazard loaded on top. This is an undemocratic, corporatist transfer of wealth from ordinary citizens to a tiny group of people: bank bondholders…’

Just who are these precious bondholders that Cowen and Lenihan would bind and bankrupt the country in order to make up their ‘gambling’ losses?

Senator and presidential hopeful David Norris tried to read out their names under parliamentary privilege in the Irish Senate but was quickly silenced. It seems that Cowen and Lenihan and the Irish Government do not want the people to know that they have been put into debt slavery for the benefit of some of the wealthiest, most fraudulent banksters in the world. The names of these bondholders are now a matter of public record, thanks to investigative journalists like Guido Fawkes (www.order-order.com).

Some of the more familiar names among the four score or so major bondholders are Goldman Sachs, one of the most despised banks on Wall Street whose name is synonymous with greed, sleaze, and fraud. Max Keiser, broadcaster and former broker & options trader, says, ‘Goldman Sachs are scum. I mean that’s the bottom line. They have basically co-opted the U.S. Government, they have co-opted the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve functionality. They’ve co-opted the Obama administration. And Barack Obama dances to Goldman Sach’s tune. They are really crooked and abominable in what they’ve done.’

Keiser continues, with remarkable candour, ‘Just remember, Hank Paulson held Congress hostage, took them in the back room and said give us $700 billion or we’re gonna crash the market. He’s an arsonist; he’s an outlaw. And yet he’s given praise. If you go down the list, they’re all Goldman Sachs scum, whether it’s Hank Paulson, whether it’s Geithner…you know Geithner has very strong ties to Goldman Sachs…and of course all these banking bonuses are paid out to all their cronies who are Goldman Sachs scum.’

Another Anglo Irish Bank bondholder is the Rothschilds Bank, Zurich; the Rothschild family are reputed to have owned half the wealth of Europe a century and a half ago – how much do they own now? And most of the remaining bondholders are worth an accumulation of some twenty trillion euro. An Irish default would involve such an insignificant fraction of their wealth that it would hardly cause them to raise their eyebrows. Yet Cowen and Lenihan forced crippling debt upon the Irish people for many years to come in order to repay the banksters every single cent of their reckless investments.

One great irony amid all this debt and despair is the great wealth recently discovered in the gas fields off the west coast of Ireland. The Corrib gas field alone is reckoned to be worth well over €420 billion, enough to pay off all of Ireland’s debts and make the country vastly rich. According to the Petroleum Affairs Division there is even more gas and oil off the west coast, perhaps as much as 13 trillion euro or beyond, enough to make millionaires of every man, woman, and child in Ireland.

What did the Irish Government do with this €420 billion windfall from the Corrib field? They gave it away to Royal Dutch Shell for nothing. Yes, nothing! In an incredible move, the government cut the State’s share from 50% to zero on all its offshore oil and gas and abolished all royalties.

Why would they do such a crazy thing?

For an answer to that you’ll have to ask the then minister, Ray Burke, who was later convicted and jailed for political corruption on other matters.

Royal Dutch Shell, with its monthly revenues fluctuating between $25 billion and $45 billion, certainly doesn’t need the money as much as the Irish people do. Royal Dutch Shell is a key Bilderberg asset; its principal shareholder is Queen Beatrix of Holland, a long-time member of Bilderberg which was founded by her father, Prince Bernhard, a former officer of Hitler’s SS. Giving these plutocrats billions, and perhaps trillions, in oil and gas for absolutely nothing is criminally obscene and utterly enraging. These energy resources rightfully belong to the Irish people and it’s not for individual politicians, whether corrupt or incompetent, to give them away for nothing.

Looking forward, there will soon be a new government in Ireland. It is now time for the Irish people to take a firm stand. In the coming election campaign they must warn incoming government hopefuls that there HAS to be radical change. The criminal pledges of an outgoing government of traitors MUST be dismantled and consigned to the trash can, along with their authors. The people will not stand for more of the same old bullshit gombeen politics; they are in no mood for mealy-mouthedness or ineffectual tinkering with a failed system. They demand nothing less than clear, decisive, and even ruthless change. They demand leaders of integrity, innovation, and courage. And they demand a decent living for themselves, their children, and future generations yet unborn. There can be no going back!

Actions that should be taken as a matter of urgency:

• Defaulting on private bankster debt which is not a just or proper debt of the Irish people.
• Leave the Euro and return to the Irish Punt. (And consider leaving the EU altogether and take back control of our seas which have been plundered of hundreds of billions of euro of fish stock by other EU nations.)
• End Fractional Reserve Banking and take the power of money creation back from private, criminal banking cartels. The Government would then issue debt-free, interest-free money for the benefit of all the people.
• Spend this debt-free money on hospitals, education, sustainable green energy, ports & harbours, transportation, roads, and infrastructure such as the 100+ year old water and sewage systems that are about to collapse.
• Take full control of all oil, gas, and mineral deposits on land and within our territorial waters.
• Pay a monthly dividend, or basic income, to every adult and child, such as that described in Social Credit or as explained in ‘The Cook Plan’ by Richard C. Cook.
• Promote organic farming so that we are more self-sufficient and need to import less and less foreign foodstuffs.
• Encourage the use of natural medicines and natural health therapies so that the people have real freedom of choice.
• Reduce the number of seats in parliament, abolish the senate and useless quangos, and use the internet more to interface with our politicians and government.
• Make the Mainstream Media truly independent so that they will return to being the proper watchdogs of the people.
• Promote the arts and artists so that we may discover our true spiritual nature and live in peace and harmony and abundance on this wondrous planet of ours.

If a new Irish government implements the actions listed above, the country will quickly achieve unrivalled prosperity and contentment and could well become a guiding light for momentous reform in other nations of the world.

Pecunia, si uti scis, ancilla est; si nescis, domina. (If you know how to use money, money is your slave; if you don’t, money is your master.)

Source

Related articles

• Conor Lenihan’s PA says Cowen will be ousted as Taoiseach by the end of the week (politics.ie)
• The people of Dublin West can help save the country by sacking Brian Lenihan (politics.ie)

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/CTTM2010/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_730_Utopian_Bentham_Creating_Bedlam__Evolutions_Goal--the_Goldfish_Bowl_Dec202010.mp3

Haiti, Republic of Quangos

Where did all the Haiti relief money go?

www.thegrio.com/specials/thegrio-on-the-ground-in-haiti/where-did-all-the-haiti-relief-money-go.php

Haiti's problem is the corrupt and unaccountable, unelected Third/Community Sector. This bloated sector (charities, trusts, ngos, quangos, foundations, etc) now performs roles and has the public money (tax, donations) that the Public Sector (elected) formerly controlled and managed however, the Community Sector, unlike the Public Sector, is NOT covered by Freedom of Information legislation. This mushrooming sector, where stakeholders bid and boards of administators are 'appointed' (Common Purpose?) - not elected, is a crooks' paradise! Now big business and corporations are getting involved in "the community." It is the biggest threat we face, actually!
This article was written before the earthquake! http://www.usip.org/events/haiti-republic-ngos

You might want to watch this NOW as it will only be online for another 26 days!

The Battle for Haiti, on the UK's Channel 4, aired Sunday evening 9th Jan. 2011.

www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/episode-guide/series-78/episode-1

Of interest, at 38.45 mins. in:

There are now 10,000 (yes ten thousand!) NGOs delivering aid in Haiti. Over the past 30 years as the NGOs have grown, the Haitian state has shrunk.

“All us are to be held responsible for the weakness of the Haitian state, over the last 30 years because we didn’t like the ideology of various governments, we have because we felt there was corruption etc. we have been building parallel structures and institutions in Haiti. This the Republic of NGOs.”

Edmond Mulet, Head of UN Mission to Haiti.

There you have it. Straight from the horse's mouth!

www.france24.com/en/20100330-interview-edmond-mulet-head-of-the-UN-mission-in-haiti

Serbs Butchered for Organs

http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2011/01/organ-trafficking-eugenics-and-corruption-meet-our-new-eu-partners.html Organ trafficking, eugenics and corruption:

Meet our new EU 'partners'

www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxcLkbTJSv8 Kosovo: Europe's Mafia State

www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7jNTNsGXZ0 How Kosovo Serbs were Butchered for Organs

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5CXope9ncI Serb WW2 Heroes.

Stolen Kosovo (banned film) over-run by barabarians!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rDr85g0upc

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ-IARbhVhE

www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MuchMcYcvA

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ijcm09AEnaw

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xfih1WYDgYA

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_o4v7XOL2g

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUR7B29AFH8

www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGNNoDD6RXk

www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP-wfk8xoVQ

www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N1bFU0Jvic

Beautiful Serbian religious music:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwMBe6-A6dM

www.youtube.com/watch?v=bewCMAjypqk

Fritz Springmeier, and his works.

How Fritz Springmeier Was Framed (Updated)

January 1, 2011

by Henry Makow Ph.D.


In 2003, Illuminati researcher Fritz Springmeier was sentenced to 111 months in prison on the basis of no evidence. His experience suggests that at any time the Illuminati can put away anyone who irritates them.

Springmeier was convicted because a bank robber, Forrest E. Bateman Jr. testified that Springmeier visited his house on the same day as Bateman discussed the robbery with two accomplices.

Bateman received a reduced sentence for this testimony. He did not say he had discussed the robbery with Springmeier.

Bateman was turned in by his friend and accomplice Tony Huntington. Huntington also implicated Springmeier and received no sentence for the bank robbery. Over 120 years of prison time for drugs and guns were also forgiven. Pretty good incentive to lie?

At Springmeier's trial and appeal, James A. Redden, the sentencing judge, kept repeating -- "circumstantial evidence can be used to prove anything."

Indeed, Springmeier's case is in the law books as an example of the low standard of evidence needed to convict someone. Ann J Brown, the first Federal Judge to hear the case, had said, "There is no evidence against this man."

Springmeier received an extra five years because a firearm was used in the robbery.

Forrest Bateman fired a rifle into the ceiling to get everyone's attention when he and two accomplices robbed $6000 from the Key Bank in the Portland suburb of Damascus Oct 6, 1997.

Ten minutes prior to the robbery, a "bomb" exploded at the Fantasy Adult Video Store, located six miles west of the bank. No one was injured in the explosion but police investigators believe that the bomb was set off as a diversionary tactic.

The "bomb" was a propane tank. Springmeier was nowhere near either event and had no prior knowledge of either. At the time he was working at a print shop in Eagle Creek, 10 miles SE. However the proprietor refused to provide an alibi because Fritz had offended him by criticizing Billy Graham.

The point is that Fritz served seven years in prison for a crime he did not commit. He was sold out by his lawyer, Pat Birmingham, who, when given a copy of "Bloodlines of the Illuminati" exclaimed, "Am I in this?"

There was no evidence connecting Fritz to this crime. Yes, he knew Bateman (from a Bible Studies class, of all things) but there was no evidence he knew about the crime. Bateman and his accomplices got reduced sentences for implicating Springmeier.

These days, if you're an Illuminati researcher in the US, you are guilty until proven innocent.

Last October, Fritz was released to a halfway house in Portland.

In order to regain his freedom, he needs to find approved employment and accommodation.

Until then, this gifted opponent of the New World Order is in a guided cage, unable to leave the premises except on job expeditions. He needs to find a job within a 100 miles radius of Portland. If you can help, write to him at springmeiermessages@hotmail.com

www.henrymakow.com/springmeier.html

http://magickmasonryandmindcontrol.wikispaces.com/Fritz+Springmeier

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2694841576971107107

http://fritz-springmeier.dbs2000ad.com

www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/armageddon_plot.htm

www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/feast_of_the_beast.htm

www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/illuminati_formula_mind_control.htm

www.whale.to/b/sp/springmeier.html

http://oneheartbooks.com/resources/ebooks/bloodlines_of_illuminati.pdf

www.whale.to/b/sp/springmeier_h.html

http://www.scribd.com/doc/14733902/Fritz-Springmeier-The-Watchtower-the-Masons-A-Preliminary-Investigation-1990

www.scribd.com/doc/4069648/Springmeier-eBook-Be-Wise-as-Serpents

www.davidicke.com/articles/political-manipulation-mainmenu-72/42734-they-dare-not-speak-its-name-rothschild-zionism