Halve UK Population!

British Authorities Call for Cutting Population by One Half

Did Jonathon Porritt root for the Daleks when he watched Doctor Who as a child? He seems to have taken their message to heart.

Posted by: James McEnanly at March 22, 2009 6:11 PM

So when will Porritt and Gordon kill themselves and their entire families for "Mother Earth?" They should do the right thing, set the example and kill themselves immediately.

Furthermore, where do they get off talking about overpopulation when they have insane immigration policies and don't give a rat's behind about how many children they give birth to?

Posted by: Roxan at March 27, 2009 12:02 AM

www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/03/british_authori.html

www.prisonplanet.com/lord-christopher-monckton-antics-of-the-global-warming-extremists.html

When human life becomes a commodity.

Daniel Blackman, who researches international affairs for SPUC, has sent the following report about the recent debate in the European Parliament on experimentation on animals, a debate which involved the issue of experimentation of human embryos:

On 8 September 2010, the plenary session of the European Parliament met to debate a draft directive. The directive, proposed by Elizabeth Jeggle MEP, sought to give further legal protection to animals used in scientific experimentation. We at SPUC urged our members to act to oppose this directive, and support prolife amendments.

During the debate, the united Green parties strongly argued for member states to be obliged to use non-animal testing where alternatives exist; for strengthened rules on primate testing; for ensuring that those member states who want to introduce tougher animal welfare standards would be able to do so. The amendments were all defeated, but more legal protection for animals has been put in place. Disappointingly, no prolife amendments were tabled at second reading. Amongst MEPs, Martin Kastler, Miroslav Mikolasik and Anna Zaborska each called for human embryos not to be considered as alternatives. For this, SPUC commends them. Thank you!

The commissioner John Dalli spoke of the consideration given to human embryos. This was a reference to a prolife amendment introduced at first reading. Article 13 of the directive reads:

Without prejudice to national legislation prohibiting certain types of methods, Member States shall ensure that a procedure is not carried out if another method or testing strategy for obtaining the result sought, not entailing the use of a live animal, is recognised under the legislation of the Union

This means that member states are not required to use an alternative if the member state has legislation opposed to certain alternatives. What the alternatives could be is not specified, taking into account the differing legislation of member states. However, this does mean that member states have the right to opt-out of using human embryos as an alternative if they have legislation against it. However, the new directive does not offer any new protection to human embryos or older unborn children.

Member states are encouraged to use alternatives to animals in scientific experimentation. This could mean further calls from politicians and scientists for permission and funding for human embryo research. This research is always destructive as it involves the creation of human embryos, the extraction of their cells, and the destruction of the human embryos. Such flagrant disregard for human life is totally unacceptable.

The new EU directive updates the previous EU directive of 1986. ‘86 seems a particular year when human dignity and protection for animals was particularly confused and inverted.

For example, we have Roger Short, Honorary Professorial Fellow at the University of Melbourne. Prof. Short lists his areas of expertise as human reproduction, contraception, HIV, and AIDS prevention.

On Monday, the 26th of May 1986, Prof. Short was representing the Australian Academy of Science. At that time he was the Chairman of the Working Party on Human Embryo Experimentation, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory. Prof. Short gave evidence to the Senate Select Committee on the Human Embryo Experimentation Bill (1985). During the debate, Prof. Short makes the inaccurate distinction in calling some embryos “human pre-embryos.” Prof. Short then tells the select committee that it is lawful to use “human pre-embryos” because humans are not endangered, unlike gorillas and chimpanzees.

In an article for Cosmos Magazine entitled ‘A plague of people’ Prof. Short wrote:

We have already invented a pill that will prevent global warming - the oral contraceptive pill...if women the world over were given easy access to the contraceptive pill, every birth could become a wanted birth, and human population growth would almost come to a halt.

SPUC does not have an official line on animal experimentation. However, many of our members belong to the Christian faith, whether Catholic or Evangelical. SPUC also has many members who belong to the Islamic religion. We are in constant dialogue with people from the worlds of science, medicine, politics, philosophy and fellow prolife groups. As such, we would seek to understand animal experimentation in light of our positions on the dignity of human life and our relationship to the created world.

As such, the views expressed by Prof. Short, and those like him in the EU who may want to push for the use of human embryos in experimentation, is always unacceptable. The call for human embryos to be used in scientific research because humans are not endangered is flagrant utilitarianism. Human life is reduced to a commodity at its most vulnerable stage.

What we have been witnessing for several decades is the utter obfuscation in the correct relationship between people and the planet we live in, and the animals under our care. People are not the enemy or the problem. To construe people as the problem, and procreation as the enemy, is a failure to think through and provide real creative solutions to the questions we are facing. Technocratic and utilitarian thinking can only lead to the dehumanising of individuals, communities, and creation itself. In doing so, human life becomes a commodity. We should also remember the utter failure of research on embryonic human stem cells, and the relative success rate using adult human stem cells for treating multiple sclerosis, breast reconstruction after a mastectomy, and spinal injury, to name a few.

We urge prolifers in EU member states to work in shaping public opinion about the dignity of the human embryo. We call on legislators, politicians, scientists and religious leaders to ensure that the inherent rights of human life at the embryonic stage are recognised and protected in their country. We would also like those in the animal welfare movement to understand that in their goal of greater protection for animals, human life must not be seem as an alternative in experimentation. Being pro-animal does not have to mean being pro-human embryonic experimentation. Being prolife does not mean we advocate cruelty to animals.

If we fail to try, there will be no success. We may end up asking ourselves what the lay of the land will look like in another 24 years time.

http://spuc-director.blogspot.com/2010/09/spuc-reports-on-european-parliament.html

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtyC3jFh6eM

www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6ryWiw72pU

www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fiuXORKdbI

Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy

Scientists have begun blurring the line between human and animal by producing chimeras-a hybrid creature that's part human, part animal.

Chinese scientists at the Shanghai Second Medical University in 2003 successfully fused human cells with rabbit eggs. The embryos were reportedly the first human-animal chimeras successfully created. They were allowed to develop for several days in a laboratory dish before the scientists destroyed the embryos to harvest their stem cells.

In Minnesota last year researchers at the Mayo Clinic created pigs with human blood flowing through their bodies. And at Stanford University in California an experiment might be done later this year to create mice with human brains.

Scientists feel that, the more humanlike the animal, the better research model it makes for testing drugs or possibly growing "spare parts," such as livers, to transplant into humans.

Watching how human cells mature and interact in a living creature may also lead to the discoveries of new medical treatments.

But creating human-animal chimeras-named after a monster in Greek mythology that had a lion's head, goat's body, and serpent's tail-has raised troubling questions: What new subhuman combination should be produced and for what purpose? At what point would it be considered human?

Brian Gerrish Coming to Lincs.

ENQUIRING MINDS

LINCOLNSHIRE GROUP

all welcome Cordially Invite bring your friends

Young and old, from all walks of life, to an informal, but informative AND EXCITING ( non party political ) meeting in Louth to explore and to learn about -

.What’s really going on in Britain today…

the EU? Cutbacks? the Euro? Common Purpose?

Guest Speaker: Ex Naval Lt. Commander, owner and editor of the U K Column newspaper, and now the controversial Political Investigator & Internet Celebrity:

THE ONE BRIAN GERRISH AND ONLY

For the first time visiting and speaking in Lincolnshire

As heard on North East Truth and Red Ice Radio, recently interviewed by ALEX JONES on PRISON PLANET Radio.

As seen on BBC 5 tv, YouTube, Google & Yahoo Video, Vimeo, Vodpod and Sky’s Edge TV.

At

the CONOCO ROOMS,

LOUTH LIBRARY

LN11 OLY

SATURDAY AFTERNOON

2^nd OCTOBER 2010,

12.30 – 5.30

Common Purpose Mind Map

Stop Common Purpose - This mind map gives an overview of Common Purpose.

Common Purpose UK

Common Purpose is a fraudulent 'educational charity' acting as a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement the British government's hidden New World Order communitarian agenda.

Common Purpose hates having people discuss it. Click here to donate and help me spread the message and keep this site going.

www.stopcp.com/cpmindmap.php

Sir Peter Tapsell, liar, deceiver?

http://peacestrike.org/2009/11/04/afghanistan-war-protest

Sir Peter Tapsell.

Watch this -

www.thisisgrimsby.co.uk/news/ELECTION-2010-Tapsell-holds-Louth-seat/article-2128493-detail/article.html

On being recently elected yet again by the local mugs, HE DECLARES the war in Afghanistan to be his TOP PRIORITY!!!!!

At 1 minute 40 seconds into this short film Sir Peter Tapsell mentions the war before any other political issue, giving the definite impression that bringing this war to an end as quickly as possible is dear to his sincere heart.

“….The three great problems facing the country which, ..I .... concern me very much in recent years has been, getting the war ended in Afghanistan, and in getting the economy right, and in renegotiating our relationship with the European Union…..” Sir Peter Tapsell.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tapsell_%28UK_politician%29 Even his Wikipedia entry states, “He is opposed to the war in Afghanistan.”

Now read on:

Six out of the seven Conservative Lincolnshire MP's have recently VOTED IN FAVOUR of the CONTINUED presence of our troops in Afghanistan.

The following have voted with their party:

Boston and Skegness MP, Mark Simmonds

Gainsborough MP, Edward Leigh

Grantham and Stamford MP, Nick Boles

Lincoln MP, Karl McCartney

Sleaford and North Hykeham MP, Stephen Phillips

South Holland and the Deepings MP, John Hayes

However,

Louth and Horncastle MP, Sir Peter Tapsell did not vote ! He abstained rather than vote in defiance of his rotten Conservative Party, ON BEHALF OF HIS CONSTITUENTS, to stop the war which would have been the morally right and brave thing to do.

Sir Peter is 80 years old and in excellent health, he has had a long and privileged life, a life of considerable luxury and good fortune, he has been well-educated and has prospered, and has been blessed with two marriages and a child who is relatively safe and has not been handed back to him in pieces in a body-bag! Nobody has blown Sir Peter's arms and legs off, and he is still as fit as a fiddle. As Sir Peter approaches the end of his life, would it really have hurt him to defy the Tory Whip - for once, and to have done the right thing, and been a man of his word, by voting against this terrible war? Or is he going to be downright selfish right to very end, putting himself first before those he supposedly represents just like most of the other rotten scum in Parliament, up to his dying breath?

The motion, to support the "continued deployment" of British forces in Afghanistan was put before the Commons and was passed by 310 to 14.

(Yes, only 14 MPs voted against the continued, sick “blood sacrifice” of our young people)

As is usual with Britain’s gutless, lying MP's, they say one thing in front of the cameras to con the electorate (we, the mugs) but when given the chance to vote they don't have the courage to follow it through.

www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=uk&v=I0crAPp3k8M

It was the same case with weak-spirited Gillian Merron (Lincoln Labour) regarding Post Office closures that, incidentally, are being privatised! A German firm has been lined-up to take over the Royal Mail courtesy of the EU, and the STUPIDITY AND APATHY of the British public.

Cowardly politicians with no backbone are unfit to be MPs!

MPs are supposed to be LEADERS!

What use is a hopeless scaredeycat, or a quivering jellyfish in a leadership role? What is the point of having a rotten liar making decisions REPRESENTING HIS/HER CONSTITUENTS?

Zion Olympics UFOs, what does the BBC know?

The characters in this 2012 Olympic Games ad. clearly spell out 'Zion.'




With an overwhelming majority of British MPs having recently voted quite disgracefully and wickedly in favour of the appalling blood sacrifice of our young in the so-called 'war against terror,' the hellish bloodshed looks set to continue up until the 2012 Olympics.
Is there any Christian grace in the Olympics?
No! It is nothing more than a pagan festival from pagan origins, long forgotten until revived into a spectacle by Adolph Hitler in the 1930s purely to showcase perfect specimens.
The Games have now been hi-jacked by international corporations to serve their blood-thirsty, satanic God Of Greed.

What is really going on in the 2012 Olympics?
What does the BBC know?
What is the significance of this weird spacey/surveillance - themed video?

Watch 'Seek Ye The Truth’s' fascinating film, a response to the challenge,

www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E8A-Ukvjf0

The challenge is proposed here by YouKnowIAmRight :

U.F.Os The best undeniable evidence ( The2012 Olympic false flag)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iUyb7SCN9I

More interesting footage:

UFO caught by chance on film over Auschwitz,

www.youtube.com/user/YouKnowIAmRight#p/u/4/I0zwVO5rd_Q

Chris Everard's films:

Secret Space 1

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2571894052908857481

Secret Space 2

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5151406447811659571

SeekYeTheTruth's recommended film:

'BILLION DOLLAR SECRET'

www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=96&Itemid=53

Wicked MPs Vote Overwhelmingly For More Death

Westminster Traitors Vote to Prolong Afghanistan War as Another Hero Dies Amidst Total Failure of Military Mission

Sun, 12/09/2010 - 21:21 | BNP News

The traitor parties in Westminster have voted overwhelmingly in favour of continuing the illegal war in Afghanistan as another British soldier has died and aid agencies have confirmed the total failure of the military mission.

In the very first vote ever on the war, MPs voted 310 to 14 on Friday to keep sending British soldiers into Afghanistan as cannon fodder for the illegal war started by Labour.

That war was backed at the time by the Tories, and the new vote has now dragged the Liberal Democrats into culpability for that conflict as well.

More than 10,000 British troops have been committed to that war and 335 have been killed, with the latest causality identified as Darren Deady, from 2nd Battalion, The Duke of Lancaster's Regiment, who died in hospital from wounds sustained in the field.

The traitor MPs lined up one after another to endorse the conflict which took Darren Deady’s life, with the utterly disgraceful Tory MP James Arbuthnot, chairman of the Commons defence select committee, saying it was a “mistake” to describe the conflict as a “war.”

In comments during the debate which typify the staggering ignorance and arrogance which permeates the Westminster parties, Mr Arbuthnot said he believed “that our presence in Afghanistan should be seen as part of a wider global security mission in the Middle East region as a whole.”

This view was endorsed by Tory Defence Secretary Liam Fox who rambled on about the war being about preventing threats to Britain’s security, repeating the obvious lies first spouted by his Labour Party twins and long since utterly refuted by all intelligence agencies.

The complete failure of the military mission to provide any sort of “security” either for Britain or even for Afghanistan was detailed in a series of reports from aid agencies.

The number of insurgent attacks has increased significantly according to the Afghan NGO Safety Office, an independent organisation financed by Western governments and agencies to monitor safety for aid workers.

In August 2009, insurgents carried out 630 attacks. This August, they initiated at least 1,353. Four years ago, the insurgents were active in only four provinces. Now they are active in 33 of 34, the aid organisations say.

Large parts of the country that were once completely safe, like most of the northern provinces, now have a substantial Taliban presence, even in areas where there are few Pashtuns, who previously were the Taliban's only supporters, the report continued.

Unarmed government employees can no longer travel safely in 30 percent of the country's 368 districts, according to published U.N. estimates, and there are districts deemed too dangerous to visit in all but one of the country's 34 provinces.

The Afghan NGO Safety Office says that by any system of measurement, “Afghanistan is more dangerous now than at any time since 2001.”

The collapse in security has caused all aid agencies to stop using the country's principal highway, the Grand Trunk Road connecting Kabul, the capital, to Peshawar in Pakistan.

The threat to government workers is just as severe. Last month, Afghan police and army officials asked the Independent Election Commission to cancel 938 of its proposed 6,835 polling centres, almost 14 percent, because it could not guarantee security for those areas. Polling places in 25 provinces were affected.

Last week, the election commission said it would cancel 81 other polling sites, nearly a fifth of the polling places in eastern Nangarhar province, which was relatively safe during last year's presidential election.

The decreased security has shown up the Westminster parties’ claims of “securing Afghanistan” to be yet another lie in the long litany of deceit which has been the hallmark of this criminal adventure.

www.bnp.org.uk/news/westminster-traitors-vote-prolong-afghanistan-war-another-hero-dies-amidst-total-failure-milita

The truth is beautiful, whover says it! The Angry Cheese.

The Uncomfortable Definition of an Infidel....

Allah or Jesus Christ? Islam is the fastest growing religion in the UK. This incident happened in London.

Last month I attended my annual training session for maintaining my security clearance in the prison service. There was a presentation by three speakers from the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who explained their beliefs. I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say about the basics of Islam, complete with video.

After the presentations; question time. I directed my question to the Imam and asked: 'Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a Holy War against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'

There was no disagreement with my statement and, without hesitation, he replied, 'Non-believers!'

I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not a follower of Allah, so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'

The expression on his face changed from one of authority to that of 'a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the biscuit tin.'

He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'

I then stated, 'Well, I have a real problem trying to imagine Pope Benedict commanding all Catholics to kill Muslims, or the Archbishop of Canterbury ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!'

The Imam was speechless!

I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your 'friend' when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!

Let me ask you a question. Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because He will take me to heaven and He wants you to be
there with me?'

You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam remained speechless. Needless to say, the organizers of the Diversification' seminar were not happy with this way of exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.

Within twenty years, ie. 2029, there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.K. to elect a government of their choice, complete with Sharia law. Everyone in the U.K. should be required to read this, but with the current political paralysis, tolerant justice system, liberal media and p.c. madness, there is no way this will be widely publicized.

Please pass this on to all your e-mail contacts.

John Harrison MBE. MIDSc

This little essay is currently doing the rounds of the internet, with people agreeing with it and others in complete denial by using the fact that they cannot "find" the real John Harrison who has written it, as evidence of everything in it being completely untrue.

I wonder if the issue of who wrote it matters?

The poet John Keats said, "Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. ..."

Surprise! Some 'distinguished' academics who do not understand this statement! Or have been paid not to by some commie literary charitable foundation! -

THE BEAUTY IS TRUTH DEBATE,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ode_on_a_Grecian_Urn

Well I agree with John Keats - For me, the truth is beautiful.
Lies and deception are very ugly, and a religion of deceit is the ugliest thing imaginable!
This is true, whoever says it.

Tibet, we love you - NOT!

WORDS ARE CHEAP, IT IS ACTION THAT COUNTS!

www.freetibet.org/campaigns/full-list-sympathetic-mps

Full List of Sympathetic MPs? Oh really!

What absolute hypocrites most of these people are! The biggest problem the Tibetans have faced since Chinese occupation in the 1950s is being lumped together with the Chinese and being subjected to their cruel and bloody one-child policy. With a population equal in size to the Welsh but spread out over an area the size of Western Europe, anyone with a fuctioning brain could work out that this is a population that needs encouraging, not culling!

But China - the USA's most favoured nation, have enforced for decades, a cruel and vicious policy of population control on the Tibetans consisting of sexual abuse and infanticide - forced abortions, and forced sterilisations. What has the British Government and Parliament said or done about this? - Virtually nothing!

Most annoying of all is the deafening silence from the pro-abortion, women's rights lobby. They love abortion so much they cannot bear criticism of any form of abortion at all. There is no way they will stand up for a woman's right to have a child! Even when it is a full-term pregnancy and Tibetan mother is opposed to it and has gone into hiding to try and save her unborn child - the Chinese also frequently kill newborns, and they starve children (mostly female) in the millions too! Since the 1950s, the so-called women's movement in the West have never lifted a finger for Tibetan women and girls! Or for Chinese women and children! In fact they have positively hindered the Tibetan's in their search for support and assistance from western countries by their intimidating behaviour towards any group who criticise any form of abortion. Womens' Libbers have the damaging effect of making well-meaning people back-off from supporting the Tibetan cause for fear of the shrill women's lobby attacking them! It is shameful!

I can remember organising Martin Moss, co-author with Jeffrey Bowe of 'Children of Despair' a comprehensive account of China's evil, so-called Family Planning policies, to give a talk at Sheffield University in the 1990s. It was well advertised but less than a dozen people turned up, mostly from a Tibetan supporters group and a few from climbing club (Everest, Himalayas?!) No scumbag students bothered themselves, and the uni. Amnesty International club or Women Lib. Group were not interested either!

www.fantompowa.net/Flame/tibet_info_network.htm

www.pakistan.tv/videos-chinas-one-child-policy-[NZj_Cp-bKL4].cfm

www.pop.org/00000000406/chinas-persecution-of-women-and-children-more-of-the-same

www.wnd.com/?pageId=36782

www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58435

www.republicdefiance.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=717:bill-gates-is-a-major-dick-by-wally-paul&catid=63:wally-paul&Itemid=93

To see ugly hypocrite Diane Abbott's name at the top of this list of creeps is nothing short of infuriating.

Will she be the next Labour leader? It doesn't matter really, all the candidates are self-serving abortion promoters, it is part of the selection criteria.

The Face of Selfishness!

SPOT THE DIFFERENCE!

LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR AS THYSELF

I strongly suggest you read this article and have a long, hard think,

www.starnewsonline.com/article/20100904/ARTICLES/100909828/1177

Because this is what can happen when a COMMUNITY organisation gets its meat hooks into your life. They persecute you. They behave like Hitler’s Gestapo and then have the audacity to accuse you of being mentally ill for defying them and being a little annoying. And then they kill you!

CONGRADULATIONS PLANTER’S WALK!

This man’s neighbours did not like his little white picket fence, his ornamental windmill, his planters, steps and his tool shed. Because of this, they have now driven him to his death – let’s hope they are happy at last, and proud of themselves!

Are they aware of the 2^nd Commandment? I seem to remember someone rather important, on whose teaching our law is based, saying, “LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR.” Romans 13:9 (King James Version)

http://atschool.eduweb.co.uk/sbs777/laws/loveall.html

Let’s hope the courts are proud of themselves over this too! In a world full of horror and terror, this man was a REAL BADDIE and he deserved all he got!

There was no Christian forgiveness in this court system, no kindness, no justice tempered by reasonableness and tolerance, only hateful, jobsworth* COMMUNITARIAN spitefulness!

This is what the Soviet Union was like, and is what China is like! China - America's most-favoured nation, and the blueprint for the rest of the world, with its armies of paid local cadres spying on their friends, family and neighbours, getting paid for reporting them for being pregnant without permission, for example! Or hanging their hat over the Chairman’s (Big Brother’s) photo in the hallway.

Dear ignorant muppets, this is the COMMUNITY in action. Once the COMMUNITY is in complete control (and it will be because this is what the EU is introducing) when you step out of line, your neighbours will be able to take everything you have and then they can kill you!

Coming soon to you and your family and home, right here in little old England – and Wales and Scotland and Ireland, no, not just Northern Ireland either, the whole of Ireland and the whole of Europe.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

* www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jobsworth

http://stopcp.com/Britain_2010_Common_Purpose_corruption_and_communitarianism.php

R.I.P. Peter Darius.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PzTrC9fREY