Recently European Comr. for Agriculture, Dacion Ciolos, has said, "any business that relies upon subsidies (grants, tax breaks) is NOT A REAL BUSINESS." (Oh dear, that's practically every Third Sector set up!)
"The soona this is a euro, the better. Ah heete bloody Burns too!
Got t' dash hen, must brush up on my German"
Royal Bank of Scotland assett strips, school closed in one week! Ed Balls (Bilderberger) Minister for Children, Schools and Families, plus other NuLabour MPs, TOTALLY IGNORE letters from the public.
Britain2010Common Purpose corruption and communitarianism.1/2
We are living at a particularly momentous time in history. In order to understand what is happening in Britain in 2010, you first need to know about a political philosophy called 'communitarianism'.Communitarianism, aka Tony Blair's 'Third Way', has been implemented by stealth in Britain over the past few years by this New Labour government.
Communitarianism is difficult to pin down. It is...
a. a strange mixture of capitalism and communism. Communitarians want social control in a collectivist and corporatist society;
b. a type of neo-communism that owes some of its ideas to Gramsci and the Fabians;
c. a 'Big Brother knows best' type of philosophy.
Communitarians want...
a. to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society known as the 'New World Order' run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants! In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.
b. group rights dominant over individual rights;
c. highly-taxed capitalism merged with social collectivism, administered through QUANGOs and fake charities. They call this 'civil society'.
The communitarians, through stealth, perseverance, duplicity, and subversion, have snatched individual-rights based democracy right out from under our noses, and replaced it with group rights based communitarianism - a trendy, innovative, and newish form of communism administered by foreign elitists. They are convinced that a communitarian system is 'better' for society - 'improved social cohesion' is the central tenet of their political ideology.
Obama, Blair, Brown and Mandelson et al are Fabian communitarians and Cameron and Clegg show distinct communitarian tendencies, although you will not have heard them use the term. The truth of their hidden agenda is now known and we know their real intentions. These people are front-men for the New World Order communitarians.
Communitarian policy has been seen as fascist corporatism with the primary difference that instead of focussing on nation states, own country and people, it propagates a supranational policy.
A secondary difference is it influences by means of informal social structures, like for example Common Purpose, instead of by institutionalised State violence - at least for the time being.Communitarianism is aimed, just like fascists, socialists and communists, at the collective.
The interests of the collective always prevail above the interests of the individual. Individuals must subjugate themselves to the 'common good'.
Communitarians create imaginary problems such as global warming, terrorism suppression and the bank crisis to force through their ideas.
Britain 2010 – Common Purpose corruption and communitarianism. 2/2
Common Purpose is a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement New Labour's hidden EU communitarian agenda.
In 1973 the UK joined the Common Market and in the 1975 referendum the people of Britain were conned into voting in favour of staying in the Common Market.
Prime Minister Heath, whose government entered into the accession treaty, and Prime Minister Wilson, who arranged the referendum, both knew that the Common Market was simply a stage in the development of the European Union.At some point, those behind the take-over of Britain by the EU realised that they needed people whom they could trust to manage the new bureaucracy.
Enter Common Purpose, which was established to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to run this bureaucracy.
New Labour's Hidden Agenda
Since 1997, the New Labour government has been working totwo agendas.
Firstly, the open agenda as laid out in their manifestos, and
secondly, their hidden agenda.
The objective of the hidden agenda of New Labour is the creation of a communitarian society controlled by the EU collective.
In order to achieve this objective, the New Labour government has been running a parallel administration made up of QUANGOs and fake charities. A fake charity is legally a charity but effectively operates as a government department, receiving a substantial amount of funding directly or indirectly from government and operating as a government department.Common Purpose is a fraudulent 'educational charity' acting as a change agent and recruiter and is part of the management mechanism being used to carry out this hidden agenda of New Labour.
Whilst carrying out the hidden agenda of New Labour, Common Purpose has corruptly abused millions of pounds of taxpayers' money.
Common Purpose is guilty of defrauding YOU of YOUR money.
Some people think that Common Purpose is simply a criminal organisation set up to siphon off public money but there is a lot more than that to the Common Purpose agenda.
What is Common Purpose?
On the surface, Common Purpose is an educational charity, registered in the UK under number 1023384, that does leadership and networking development training.
However, Common Purpose is not what it appears to be on the surface.
In reality, Common Purpose is a corrupt, subversive, secretive and deeply sinister organisation with a hidden agenda (communitarian social control, corporate and EU state control) and hidden backers (Tavistock Institute, Fabian Society, Brussels).More about Common Purpose at:
£180 BILLION PER ANNUM;that is a mountain of money.
We get back a mere pittance in return!
The next time you hear a politician use the word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money - on a mad scheme to ruin us all.
A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective inone of it's releases :
A.A billion seconds ago it was 1959.
B.A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.
C.A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age. D.A billion days ago no-one walked on earth on two feet.
E.A billion Pounds ago was only 13 hours and 12 minutes,at the rate our government is spending it!
Income Tax, Employment Tax, Building Permit Tax, Food License Tax, Cigarette Tax,Corporate Income Tax, Fuel Permit Tax,Fishing License Tax,Petrol/Diesel Tax, Real Estate Tax, Hunting License Tax, Inheritance Tax, Luxury Tax, Inventory Tax (tax on top of tax) Alcohol Tax, Road Usage Tax,Marriage License Tax,Property Tax,Service charge taxes, Social Security Tax,Council Tax, Vehicle License Registration Tax,Vehicle Sales Tax,Building Tax, Workers Compensation Tax, Corporate Income Tax, VAT, Tobacco Tax, etc. etc.Why have we allowed this?
Soon we will have to pay new taxes directly to the EU -and then there are the new and controversial:
Carbon Taxes – taxing our right to live!
ENOUGHISENOUGH! Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago.....
Our nation used to be one of the most prosperous in the world… hardly anyone was unemployed...we had a country to be proud of ….Once, we had absolutely no national debt.
What happened?Whathasgone wrong? The answer?Decades of self-serving,naïveandgreedy'politicians!'
The Conservatives, New Labour and the Liberals are allstill 100% committed to the European Union!Why? ?
Now you know why so many massive, shameful and disgusting cuts in Public Spending are planned by all 3 main parties.These 3 traitors’ nests ( The Lib Lab Con ) are committed to giving away your money! They are also flogging off all our national assets to any enriched crook from anywhere who offers to grease their rotten palms!
Find a party, or independent, standing againstBritain’s EU membership in the General Election & vote for them; they might not win, they probably won’t, but our collected protest vote will be noticed.And at least we won’t have voted our young people’s freedom away, and given up on our children’s future safety, security and well-being!
EU Law is Communitarian (Community) Law.Once introduced in the UKand it is, gradually, we lose our traditional Common Law rights, eg. the right to be tried by a jury of 12 of our peers (already happening), to be presumed innocent until proven guilty; we will be assumed guilty unless we can prove innocence - not an easy thing to do! “The Community” will take priority over the individual in any conflict of interest, always!Community Rights will over-ride individual rights. There will be no more elections under Communitarianism – our leaders will be appointed!
Tied landlords lease premises and are obliged to buy beer from the pub company
Pub landlords are being forced out of business by high rents and inflated beer prices demanded by pub companies.
According to the GMB, in a union survey of 3,000 tied landlords, almost a third have debts of nearly £50,000, and pub companies make tied landlords pay twice as much for beer.
The British Beer and Pub Association claim tied landlords may pay more for beer, but do not need much start-up capital to enter the industry.
The association, which represents pub companies, said new guidelines will help tied landlords.
About half of the UK's 52,000 pubs are tied to pub companies, where they lease premises from the companies and are obliged to buy their beer from them at unrealistically high prices from which profit is difficult - and trade is being ruined.
Pub debt
The high price of beer in pubs, compared to the overly-cheap supermarkets, is literally driving thousands of landlords out of business and closing pubs right across the UK.
Cheesy suggests we all find a party comitted to halting this decline.
Ask yourself,
'Why would the Lib Lab Con want us all at home having a cheap beer in front of the telly instead of socialising in our local with our neighbours and friends?'
This is called social engineering, and it is deliberate.
Let's Yahoo search "pubs" with the name of all the political parties - and see if any of them care about the traditional British pub or have even bothered to give this issue any thought.
“Wash-up” process used to rush through draconian legislation as a pitiful handful of MPs attend debate
Steve Watson
Thursday, April 8th, 2010
A draconian Internet censorship bill that has been long looming on the horizon finally passed the house of commons in the UK yesterday, legislating for government powers to restrict and filter any website that is deemed to be undesirable for public consumption.
The “Digital Economy Bill” was rushed through parliament in a late night session last night after a third reading.
In the wake of the announcement of a general election on May 6, the government has taken advantage of what is known as the “wash-up process”, allowing the legislative process to be speeded up between an election being called and Parliament being dissolved.
Only a pitiful handful of MPs (pictured below) were present to debate the bill, which was fully supported by the “opposition” Conservative party, and passed by 189 votes to 47 keeping the majority of its original clauses intact.
The bill will now go back to the House of Lords, where it originated, for a final formal approval.
The government removed a proposal in clause 18 of the bill, which openly stated that it could block any website, however it was replaced with an amendment to clause 8 of the bill which essentially legislates for the same powers.
The new clause allows the unelected secretary of state for business, currently Lord Mandelson, to order the blocking of “a location on the internet which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright”.
Opposing MPs argued that the clause was too broad and open ended, arguing that the phrase “likely to be used” could be used to block websites without them ever having been used for “activity that infringes copyright”. Other MPs argued that under the bill, whistleblower websites, such as Wikileaks, could be targeted......
......Mandelson and his successors will have the power to invent any penalty, including jail time, for any digital transgression he deems Britons to be guilty of.
Despite being named the Digital Economy Bill, the legislation contains nothing that will actually stimulate the economy and is largely based on shifting control over the internet into government hands, allowing unaccountable bureaucrats to arbitrarily hide information from the public should they wish to do so.
Mandelson began the onslaught on the free internet in the UK after spending a luxury two week holiday at Nat Rothschild’s Corfu mansion with billionaire record company executive David Geffen.......
"who walked into the party like he was walking onto a yacht."
"For years there has been debate about which of Carly Simon's ex-boyfriends could have inspired the hit song You're So Vain.
But while former lovers Mick Jagger, Kris Kristofferson, Cat Stevens and Warren Beatty were left wondering whether 'this song is about you', they have been proved wrong
For the Seventies singer has finally revealed the real inspiration behind her hit track wasn't a boyfriend at all - it was openly gay record producer David Geffen...."
FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY, WE HAVE A "GOVERNMENT" DELIBERATELY DESTROYING ITS OWN POPULATION - THE POPULATION THAT HAS ELECTED IT! (applies to the UK - most definitely!) Dr. Paul Craig Roberts interview:
"The revelation that the Government’s Climate Change Act will cost the taxpayer up to £18.3 billion per year between now and 2050, together with its sanitising “enquiry” into the Climate Studies Unit (CSU) scandal, proves that it is working hand-in-glove with the United Nations (UN) towards their “global governance” objectives.
The British National Party recently revealed the UN’s covert plans for their “Green World Order” and “global governance”, terms widely interpreted as euphemisms for global government.
These plans call for the transfer of some $54 trillion in the form of green taxes from the world’s richest nations to the poorest between now and 2050, and the establishment of global governmental political structures.
A huge problem for the UN has been the discrediting of its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the damaging accusations following the publication of controversial emails from Britain’s government-backed CSU.
This is because the science underpinning the UN’s project is almost entirely based on the “findings” of the IPCC and bodies such as the CSU.
As previously reported here, the UN has set up a supposedly “independent” enquiry into its IPCC.
This will be conducted by an organisation largely comprising individuals and organisations known to be “man-made” global warming advocates; suggesting that the exercise is little more than a whitewash.
Similarly, the recent Government enquiry into the CSU — which blatantly avoided the real issues — has largely exonerated it from any criticism; this was as entirely necessary as it was predictable.
Now details of the most expensive piece of legislation ever put through Parliament have been revealed.
According to Labour’s Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) the Climate Change Act (2008) is set to cost the British taxpayer up to £18 billion per annum between now and the UN project’s implementation target date of 2050.
That works out at over £700 per year in unnecessary taxation for every household in the country, to combat non-existent “man-made” global warming.
As part of this Marxist “redistribution of wealth” between rich and poor nations, punitive regulations came into force last week in the form of new road tax rules which will force the owners of larger “CO2 producing” vehicles to pay even more tax.
In addition, the DECC has introduced its Carbon Reduction Scheme (CRS) which requires, by law, Britain’s 30,000 largest energy users to register with the Environment Agency.
Not only does the act of registration involve the payment of an “administration” fee to the Government from every user but it also requires the applicant to conduct an expensive evaluation to quantify its “carbon-footprint”.
All this so that they can be taxed at £12 per year for every ton of CO2 they produce.
It is also envisaged that, in time, not only will the Government increase the tax payable per tonne, but also the number of registered users through a lowering of the “qualifying threshold” requirement, as measured in tonnes of CO2 created per year.
Furthermore, in order to administer this totally unnecessary scheme, the Government intends to hire thousands of officials to check up on registered users to ensure they have not underestimated their CO2 output and hence their tax liability.
Heavy fines will be imposed on “cheats.”
As many of these licensed users will be energy producers, manufactures, farmers and supermarkets, there can be little doubt that these costs will be passed to the consumer.
To add insult to injury, this development comes hard on the news that the Government has contributed to green carbon-credits, said to be worth hundreds of millions of pounds, being paid by Western nations to India’s giant TATA Corporation — so that it can build that country’s largest coal-burning power station at Mundra, in Gujarat province.
It is claimed that the plant will generate 26 million tonnes of carbon dioxide every year — far more than any British plant.
Like everything else associated with Labour, the Climate Change Act is just another excuse to de-industrialise Britain and rip-off the British taxpayer in the furtherance of its and the UN’s gobalist projects."
'Published Date: 29 March 2010
By Mike Russell
Education reporter
A PRIVATE school in Sheffield is up for sale at a recommended asking price of £1 million - after the bank which forced its closure insisted it was worth no more than £600,000. BrantwoodSchool for Girls in Nether Edge was controversially forced to close with only a week's notice in February after the Royal Bank of Scotland pulled the plug on its funding.
The school was struggling due to the recession and had loans with RBS secured against the school and its grounds - which governors had independently valued at £1 million.
But RBS withdrew support on the basis of an informal new valuation of around £600,000 - thought to have been based on a belief the buildings would be less valuable if they had to be converted for alternative use.
As a result 130 pupils and their families were given just a fortnight to find alternative schools - including girls sitting GCSEs in June.
Receivers Grant Thornton have now asked estate agents Eadon Lockwood and Riddle to put the school on the market for £1 million. The move has angered parents and staff at the former school, one of whom described it as 'scandalous'. They say if had they known the school would raise £1million it could have been kept open for longer - giving interested parties the time to put a rescue plan together and possibly save Brantwood.
It also calls into question RBS's decision to value the property at just £600,000.
RBS says the decision has been made by the receivers who are in control ofthe sale of the property, which includes the school building, a coach house and almost an acre of land.
ELR director Nick Riddle said he had received three inquiries within the first 24 hours.
"We valued the property at between £850,000 and £900,000 but even at the higher price there is a lot of interest," he said.
"We had nothing to do with the bank's £600,000 valuation - and if the new estimate is correct then the school had up to £400,000 in assets more than the bank said."
Brantwood's former chair of governors John Boyington said the school had never had any convincing response from RBS as to where the £600,000 valuation came from.
"It seemed to be an informal estate agent's opinion which came out of the blue, whereas ours was legally guaranteed," he said.
"It seemed to us as if RBS's actions were designed to essentially avoid even a single pound of risk. Their actions were unconscionable - and they have fundamentally undermined confidence in independent schools."
Mum Maxine Boot, whose daughter Eleanor is now preparing for GCSEs at SheffieldHigh School, said if RBS had agreed with the £1 million valuation Brantwood could have at least have been kept open until the summer.
"The pressure my daughter is facing from her imminent exams has been compounded by the added stress of having to move schools. The whole situation could have been avoided," she added.
Former Brantwood teacher Ian McNeilly said the bank's valuation had been absolutely scandalous.
"Anyone with even half an idea about property values in Sheffield knows £1 million is an absolutely bare minimum, even in these harsh economic times.
"There was no risk attached at all - and the depth of feeling shown by the parents proved that given time they could have come up with a rescue plan." '
I DEDICATE THIS MUSIC TO BRANTWOODSCHOOL'S GOVERNORS, GREEDY GRANT THORNTON, AND THE VILE MANAGERS OF THE RUTHLESS BANK OF SCOTLAND AND IT'S NEW OWNERS - THE BRUTISH GOVERNMENT (THE E.U.)
