Spin

The word 'spin' has been used a great deal in Britain over the last 10 years -'New Labour Spin' has become a well used phrase. We have assumed it means to exaggerate or mislead or over-emphasise. Alastair Campbell even became known as New Labour's Spin Master! So I am fascinated to find a different meaning and use for this word which I have been completely unaware of until I read this article. It is not new either, and I now feel very ignorant and foolish in my previous assumptions concerning this word and its relevence to developments taking place around us now.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spin

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2977978.stm

Satan's Network

September 25, 2009

By Fritz Springmeier

(From "Wise as Serpents, Gentle as Doves")

S-P-l-N = Segmented Polycentric Integrated Networks

If one were to diagram a SPIN organizational chart it would not be a conventional box type configuration such as an army company organization chart. Rather, it would resemble a fish-net with interlocking nodes with groups linked to many other groups and cluster around nodes. There is no center to the network. It is like the brain's electrical connections, with an overlap of functions, so that good cells can take over from damaged sections. A network (one of their buzzwords) is many times more greater than the sum of its parts.

The New Age author Marilyn Ferguson does an excellent job in describing how the
Conspiracy's SPIN network functions.

"This is a source of power never before tapped in history: multiple self-sufficient social
movements linked for a whole array of goals whose accomplishment would transform
every aspect of contemporary life.

"Because SPINs are so qualitatively different in organization and impact from
bureaucracies...most people don't see them--or think they are conspiracies. Often
networks take similar action without conferring with each other simply because they share
so many assumptions. It might also be said that the shared assumptions are the
collusion.

"The Aquarian Conspiracy is, in effect, a SPIN of SPINs, a network of many networks
aimed at social transformation. The Aquarian Conspiracy is indeed loose, segmented,
evolutionary, redundant. Its center is everywhere. Although many social movements and
mutual-help groups are represented in its alliances, its life does not hinge on any of them."
<#4. Ferguson, Marilyn. The Aquarian Conspiracy. Los Angeles, CA: J.P.
Tarcher. lnc, 1980, p. 217.>

Organizationally, the SPIN principle has worked wonders for the llluminati, who are the
Illumined Ones who are directed by an angel of light variously called Venus, Lucifer,
Satan, or Sanat (a scrambling of Satan). Different groups have their own preferred name
for this Master. Almost without fail their literature and art provide enough in each case to
positively identify this Being of Light Lucifer as the Ascended Master of every Illuminated
group. Sources that have been near the top of the hierarchies of these various groups
reveal that the "alliances" are not as loose as the public pictures them. The top leaders
are actually in contact and collusion together. Further, the New Age movement is
producing all kinds of organizational charts, Yellow Pages, coordinating councils between
groups such as the Unity in Diversity Council, etc. The movement is not as leaderless as
the New Age Movement likes to pretend.

Further, while their SPIN network is powerful, it is much more man made and artificial
than people can imagine. Groups that supposedly just materialize out of nothing, are
actually funded and promoted from the start by an outside source.

While the New Agers pride themselves on their SPIN strategy, the followers of Christ
have been configured the same way for centuries.

It must be admitted that several interlocking Secret Cults, the Freemasons, the CIA (the Company), and MI6 (the Firm) control much of the world. Through allied groups such as
the B'ai B'rith (the Order), the Skull and Bones Order (the Order), the KGB, the Triads,
the Mafia, the Order of Jesuits (the Company), and the MOUSSAD their control extends
even further. Finally, there are a plethora of religious groups interwoven into the whole
SPIN network. Some like the Universal Aquarian Church, the Metaphysical Church in
America, Light of Christ Community Church, the Institutes for the Enhancement of Life
Energy and Creativity (IELEC) in NY, Children of God's ashram, and the Church
Universal & Triumphant are openly New Age religious bodies. Unity School of Christianity
in Unity Villiage, MO is a training center for the New Age where Luciferian initiations have
been conducted for years. Lucis Trust functions as part of the brain of the New Age
movement, and the Findhorn Foundation in Scotland is comparable to the Vatican City
of the New Age movement. Today the llluminati are also known by the esoteric (inside)
name of Royal Ipsimus (Ipsimus is Latin for "Master of the Household.")

www.henrymakow.com/the_new_world_order_is_organiz.html

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7373201783240489827

A must-see video about so-called "tax-free" charities.

Manson Victim Deserves a Break

Roman Polanski has been taken into Swiss custody on a 1978 US arrest warrant.

In a statement the Zurich Film Festival said the Oscar-winning director was held on his arrival in Switzerland. A spokesman for the city's police confirmed Polanski had been detained, but gave no further details. The Swiss Justice Ministry was reported as saying he would be extradited to the US.

Polanski fled America more than 30 years ago after pleading guilty to having sex with a 13-year-old girl. The 76-year-old has been unable to travel to the US since the warrant was issued. Polanski, who is a French citizen, has been trying to have the case thrown out on grounds of misconduct. The director claims the now-deceased judge who arranged a plea bargain later went back on it. In May, a Californian judge dismissed Polanski's bid because he failed to appear in court.

Victim Samantha Geimer, now 45-years-old, has also called for the case to be dismissed and the saga put to an end. She has already sued Polanski, reaching an undisclosed settlement.

The director had been due to receive a lifetime achievement award at the Zurich Film Festival, organisers said. Polanski early films include Rosemary's Baby and Chinatown. More recently, he was awarded the 2002 best director Oscar for The Pianist and released a remake of the Charles Dickens' classic Oliver Twist in 2005.

In 1969 Polanski's pregnant wife, actress Sharon Tate, was brutally murdered along with four other people by followers of Charles Manson.

Cult member Susan Atkins, convicted in 1971 for her part in the killings, died in prison last week

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20090927/twl-director-polanski-arrested-on-1978-w-3fd0ae9.html

Significance of the EU Treaty

Long Live The New Union? *

Wise Up Journal
25.09.2009
By Gabriel O’Hara

"The current EU is legally a group of nations/communities called states. The term EU is just used to describe the join pact. At the moment there is no such thing legally as a European Union state. The EU is actually still the European Community according to the most up-to-date treaty in force. The European Community is not a legal entity like the United States of America that has a seat on the UN Security Council. In the eighteen hundreds independent states such as Texas conferred its powers/competencies to the higher entity we now know as the USA . If you did not know the Lisbon treaty is just as significant as the constitution that established the United States of America now is the time to find out.

Article 1 TEU of the Lisbon treaty shows that a new union will be established. The word community has been removed. The communities are dissolved.

Article 1: “By this Treaty, the HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES establish among themselves a EUROPEAN UNION , hereinafter called ‘ the Union ‘ , on which the Member States confer competences ”

We’ve become familiar with using the term EU but this article shows the ordinary person what lawyers already know, that it’s just a term. This treaty establishes the European Union and it prefers to be hailed as “the Union “. The act of article would be the most significant event since Ireland and other nations became states themselves.

Article 47 TEU of the Lisbon treaty gives the new federal Union/state the authority to make commitments by itself; to have legal personality. It states, ” The Union shall have legal personality .” The European Community called the EU never had legal personality; the new Union would have a seat at the UN for the first time (Art. 27.2).

What happened in the 1800’s to Texas and Montana and the other states would be placed upon the Irish state, the Dutch state, the French state and the other 25 European states. Don’t you think the people in those states deserve to be asked if they want this massive transformation? The same nations that fought in world war two to protect nations from a single German Union. The entity that will benefit from this treaty, the EU, has not allowed the public a vote in all the other states besides Ireland . Democratic? Irish constitutional law on giving up power meant the EU could not stop a referendum in Ireland . However it has not accepted Ireland ’s democratic vote. In fact they put these state changing articles along with over 96% of the Lisbon treaty to the French and Dutch public in 2005 when it was called the EU constitution and they voted no as well. They are not being asked this time around. Since Ireland voted the wrong way it’s been asked twice. If you don’t approve of this behaviour by the EU ask yourself would you give it more power allowing it to become a real state in control of the vast majority of your affairs?

Article 21.h TEU of the Lisbon treaty uses the exact term ” global governance ” and commits the new Union to “promote an international system”. Global governance and empire building are terms used many times in the past. The public accept the fact that politicians lie to them, or should I be politically correct and say spin information to them. But when did a large percentage of the public start believing that by putting liars from Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland and other states together then making them unaccountable would change these individual’s psychology? Even though the public know politicians prefer to do favours for the banks and big business (with tax payers money) people certainly do love giving up authority to them and will go along with almost anything if these career spinners/liars use the warmest and fuzziest expression of them all, “for the greater good”. Oldest rhetoric trick in the book, reused over and over again. People can even be lead to kill in a war for peace and with the right rhetoric accept political and economic colonisation of other nations for democracy and diversity.

The prime minister who holds the current rotating six month presidency of the council has no extra authority than the other council members expect cheerleading duties. The Lisbon treaty creates a real Union President for a period of up to five years, two and a half years each term. This president would have powers similar to the United States president and would represent the new Union at the UN. A few EU state heads have recommended Tony Blair as our new president, who is despised internationally almost as much as oil and weapons investor George Bush. “I wouldn’t vote for Blair to be my president” I hear most people saying. Hasn’t the penny dropped by now? You won’t be asked. Our president will not be voted on by the people of the new Union . They are not even pretending to be democratic anymore. If it’s not democratic then what is it? In fact it could be easily be argued we are in a post-democratic era now; just ask the citizens from the European community not given a vote on their nation’s future.

Article 48 TEU shows the Lisbon treaty can be altered afterwards by the Union itself. It said; “The Treaties may be amended in accordance with an ordinary revision procedure. They may also be amended in accordance with simplified revision procedures.” The Union can vote to bring areas with vetoes to Qualified Majority Voting thus removing vetoes then bring in laws unacceptable by some. The public in the other 26 states defiantly will not be voting on amendments, they are not even allowed to vote in or out as the case may be the massive treaty itself. If 51% or more Irish people vote yes in the second referendum on the identical treaty they voted no to the EU would accept this vote. The Irish people would be are agreeing to Lisbon ’s self amending clause. The Irish would agree with the referendum question that Ireland ’s constitution will be subordinate to the Lisbon treaty which makes article 48 constitutional in Ireland . The Lisbon treaty is a blank cheque to a proven undemocratic entity............."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBlRS5vrk-c

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u-DAhg-ie4

Meanwhile back in Fool Britania, the cluelessness of most of its dozy inhabitants continues:...

Tories Revealed as Ignorant Fools with Flip-Flop Lisbon Treaty Policy

September 25, 2009.

"The Tories have revealed themselves to be utterly ignorant of the implications of the Lisbon Treaty with their failure to grasp that the only way out of it is a complete withdrawal from the European Union.

In response to mounting criticism of their flip-flop policy towards the Lisbon Treaty, the Conservatives have announced that they will hold a referendum “if the Lisbon Treaty is not yet in force at the time of the next general election.”

They have also said that they will recommend a no vote in such a referendum. From that, observers might think that they are opposed to the Lisbon Treaty — despite pronouncements from leading Conservatives such as Kenneth Clarke to the contrary.

However, that is not all. The Tories have also announced that “if the Treaty is in force we will be in a different situation.

“In our view, then, political integration would have gone too far; the Treaty would lack democratic legitimacy in this country and we would not let matters rest there,” the latest Tory policy now says.

Therein lies the rub. The reality is that the Conservatives do not understand what the Lisbon Treaty really means.

Once it is ratified, it cannot be “torn up” or “renegotiated” and the “worst parts opted out of” as the Conservative Party is implying.

The Lisbon Treaty contains within its clauses a consolidation of power which is the basis of the whole EU structure.

In other words, should the Conservatives want to withdraw from the Lisbon Treaty, they will be obliged to take Britain completely out of the EU. The Lisbon Treaty makes it impossible to disengage from a part of the EU structure one does not like. It is all or nothing.

Given that the Conservative Party’s European elections manifesto called for an “EU that looks out to the world, not in on itself” and that the Tory party “wants to keep the doors of the EU open to new members like the Balkan states and, in due course, Turkey”, it is obvious that that party is in favour of the European Union.

The idiocy of the Tories’ insistence that some parts can be “renegotiated” is apparent when the practical implications of that policy are considered.

To “renegotiate” the EU constitution requires all 27 member states to agree to sit around a table and start the entire process — which has taken years — all over again.

This is, quite simply, impossible.

It is a combination of a foolish delusional fantasy and an outright lie for the Conservative Party to suggest that the other 26 states are ever going to agree to such a harebrained scheme."

“The greatest ignorance is to reject something you know nothing about.”

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/09/tories-revealed-as-ignorant-fools-with-flip-flop-lisbon-treaty-policy

Ms Gisela Stuart MP - Traitor to the British People, guilty and scared.

Lisbon Treaty Insider Admits It Destroys Democracy

"A leading Labour Party European Union insider and former member of the European Convention’s 13-strong presidium has finally confessed that the treaty breaches fundamental democratic principles and makes EU leaders unaccountable.

Ms Gisela Stuart, current Labour MP for Edgbaston and former health minister, sat on the committee which drew up the original EU Constitution, later repackaged as the Lisbon Treaty. After the draft constitution was published, she stated in public that it had been drawn up by a “self-selected group of the European political elite” but remained part of the process.

Now Ms Stuart has, in an inexplicable moment of honesty, stated clearly what the Lisbon Treaty is all about. Speaking to a daily newspaper, she said the treaty “breaches the fundamental democratic principle that voters can get rid of those in power.

“It allows the EU to launch future power grabs completely unchecked,” she continued, saying that the treaty leaves a “huge democratic deficit” and would make the EU’s leaders accountable to no one.

“There will be no more treaties, no more referendums anywhere on EU integration,” she explained, adding that the treaty contains a “ratchet clause” which allows for the scrapping of national vetoes without the need for summits or referendums.

In addition, voters will also have no power to choose or remove a new all powerful EU president, who will be selected by EU leaders.

Ms Stuart said: “My basic test of democracy is: can I get rid of them? By casting a vote, you can change the people who are in control of you. Lisbon does not give you, as a citizen, the means to control the executive or the politicians who decide on your behalf, and that’s the hurdle it falls on. The nature of democracy is really at stake.”

Her comments are acutely embarrassing for both Tories and her own Labour Party, both of whom have already formally endorsed the Lisbon Treaty.

The Labour Party has already arrogantly broken its promise to hold a referendum on the issue while the Tories have gone back on their promise to hold a referendum as well.

Originally, the Tories said they would hold a vote on the Lisbon Treaty. This position has now been amended to a vote only being held if the treaty is not yet in force by the time they hope to come to power — in other words, if everyone else has accepted it, the Tories will as well.

The Conservative Party’s vacillation over this issue has been described by shadow foreign secretary William Hague as the “ticking time bomb” under David Cameron.

* In related developments, the Czech Prime Minister, Jan Fischer, has warned other EU leaders that a legal challenge in his country, launched by Euro-sceptics, could impose a “long delay” on his country’s ratification which could last till the middle of next year."

Taken from:

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/09/from-the-horse%E2%80%99s-mouth-lisbon-treaty-insider-admits-it-destroys-democracy

And on the wars in the Middle East? Cheesy says:

British politicians no longer deserve to be given the opportunity to accept peace. It is far too late for any of them! They rejected peace years ago!

They cannot just say “sorry” and then that makes it OK. No!
IT MOST DEFINITELY DOES NOT!

NOW it is just about the British People re-gaining power, arresting these traitors, getting them into court and sentencing them – with the death penalty for the main culprits.

They have already chosen the path of war and happily walked down the path of death, killing and maiming millions on both sides in Iraq and Afghanistan. How many British politicians have resigned due to the horrors of these wars? No!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u-DAhg-ie4

And voicing criticism of these wars from the green benches in the Commons while coining it in, and quaffing and and scoffing like greedy pigs is NOT GOOD ENOUGH! No!

They love the money too much to take a stand for human life, so they have forfeited their own to, either a long prison sentence or, the rope!
And yes, there still are people in this country who have to guts, willpower, discipline and expertise to humanely perform this unpleasant fuction on behalf of the British people. It would be an honour to rid our country once and for all of this vile scum. We could celebrate it!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN52vq7xmas

Subversive Elements? Within the Vatican?

http://spuc-director.blogspot.com/2009/09/vatican-newspaper-should-not-have-given.html

"..I pose the question: Are there subversive elements at work within the Vatican who are intent on appeasing Barack Obama and Tony Blair and their anti-life policies? Imagine if Obama and Blair were committed racists rather than being committed to their anti-life and anti-family policies. Would L'Osservatore Romano afford them such a generous platform? I hope not. But surely this same standard should apply to attacks on the sanctity of human life. As Michel Schooyans, one of the Vatican's leading scholars has pointed out in a masterly analysis, Obama and Blair, with their anti-life, anti-family agenda, are seeking to undermine both law and religion respectively..."

www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/sep/14/tony-blair-catholicism

www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=OLp9xigjajM

www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=ICc4pxx_mDg

www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=d7BYKAT9Fxs

At Halloween

www.thebcgroup.org.uk/conference

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc9cNHZFTts

OR STAY AT HOME AND WATCH TV WITH THE KIDS:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NDsfUANcws

911

www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWTQl42HPKw

www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoGMfoaaxAA

http://video.yahoo.com/watch/776760/3311136

At 45 minutes in this film, it refers to “our inalienable rights” enshrined in the American Constitution, which is based on our British Constitution – we in the UK have the same inalienable rights! Nobody in government in the UK can ever take these rights away from us. It is actually illegal for we in the UK to enter the European Union. The EU is a branch of the United Nations with the same plans for the UK and European countries, as the UN has for the USA.

www.thebcgroup.org.uk












The Devil Dances On......

www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2NY6NNQJoY

"Human Rights" have a Marxist Base

www.newswithviews.com/Raapana/niki.htm

“..Communitarians promote a thing called human rights, a theory of justice which is totally the opposite of individual rights. Individual rights are what the U.S. Bill of Rights was established to protect. Human Rights covers every aspect of human suffering and death. Unlike clear laws that protect individual liberty, Human Rights can only be enforced by a supreme global communitarian legal system. What Americans (and most British and people in Europe) really don't understand is that ultimately, Human Rights includes the Marxist mandates for confiscation and "equal" distribution of private property and goods. In the logic of the globalists, individual rights to protect yourself, your property, and the freedom to choose ones' own life path, are ancient, outdated barriers to global peace and justice…”

Taken from: www.newswithviews.com/Raapana/niki1.htm

America's Choice - Liberty or Sustainable Development.

1) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8137185398743302029

2) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8137185398743302029#docid=8903112019958738510

3) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8137185398743302029#docid=3160326442882912356

"..The Marxist platform in 1847 was "to abolish private property" and the American Revolution was to protect private property rights.

Marxist societies confiscate wealth and promise to "re-distribute it equally." America promised everyone they could keep and control what was the product of their own labor. Modern Marxist adherants openly claim they will "rebuild the world," and they train activist change agents to openly support overthrowing the legitimate governments of the world.

Since their inception, Marxist agent provacateurs can be linked to every anarchist assasination and student uprising that caused chaos to the established European civilization throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. Modern Americans have succumbed to the conspiracy theory label and will only listen to what the propaganda machines tell them. Now our people don't believe anything but "the Arab world hates our freedom." Most modern Americans will never know what went wrong with their "great experiment in democracy."

While the Marxist-communitarian argument has not provided a shread of evidence to prove their utopian vision, and their synthesis does not match their own projected conclusions of world justice, we are convinced their argument does in fact substantiate our conclusion, that the entire philisophical dialectical argument is nothing but a brilliant ruse.

We used to call it "a cheap parlor trick" until a reader wrote us wondering how we could call it "cheap" when it's been so successful, and he was right.."

from:

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

Van Jones - a watermelon: green on the outside, red on the inside,

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100008708/van-jones-was-just-the-start-now-we-need-a-yekaterinburg-of-all-the-czars

"..Rather than having all his cronies go through the tedious and unedifying process of having to stand for parliamentary election, Tony Blair simply handed them their political jobs on a plate by appointing them Health Czar, or Race Czar, or Climate Change Czar or whatever. In this way, he could stuff his new governing class with politically-sympathetic placemen - with the added advantage that they were completely unaccountable to the democratic process.

Similar rules apply, of course, to the 1,160 Quangos which have flourished under New Labour, such as the Charity Commission currently headed by a woman calling herself “Dame” “Suzi” “Leather”, formerly a freelance consumer consultant, but relentlessly promoted under Tony Blair and later Gordon Brown because of her suitably left-liberal political views. She is currently acting as Britain’s Shrill Bitterness And Class War Czar, responsible for fomenting ever deeper social resentment, grinding her stiletto heels in the faces of the middle classes, and smashing the private school system. And a very splendid job she is making of it too.

President Obama has learned the Blair lesson well, having appointed mostly leftist chums to no fewer than 32 Czardoms (31, now that Van Jones has thankfully gone). Glenn Beck, the US talk show host who was instrumental in forcing Van Jones’s resignation, lists them in full on his website. They include a Domestic Violence Czar, an Energy and Climate Czar (the terrifying Socialist Carol Browner) and even a Guantanamo Closure Czar..."