Funeral March for a Marionette

Title : Just WHO is running this country?

With due thanks and acknowledgement of the diligent work of others, this public presentation pulls together some inter-related documents that not only cast doubt on precisely who thinks they are running the country, but also raises important questions as to why otherwise unelected and disparate groups can wield power, not only throughout the country but even inside

No. 10 and Parliament, above and immune from the law.

This document is “public domain” and may be freely used, copied and distributed.

It is the morning of November 14, 2007.

Gordon Brown is getting ready to address the House of Commons on the latest national security measures.

Already, the text of the speech has been released to those who are named.

For the purposes of this presentation, here is the original text of an extract from the speech, as sent to two organisations that were recipients of government money, and published by Common Purpose, the Karimia Institute, Crime Concern and Muslim Hands….

The attachment is A-ORIGINAL-GoBr-141107-NatSec-Parliament.txt

The website is http://nischool.com/karimia/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=289&Itemid=2

The other recipient of funds that quoted from the original text that was issued to them mentions that their organisation is referenced by Gordon Brown in the House of Commons on November 14^th.

Here is what Common Purpose recorded:

“Bursary scheme for Common Purpose

Gordon brown mentioned Common Purpose in a speech, which covered new initiatives around cultural integration. Common Purpose obtained a large bursary scheme from the Department of Local Government and Communities to enable it to target more efficiently leaders from the Muslim communities across Britain. The scheme has now finished and was very successful.”

The attachment is B-ComPur-Jan08-Leeds.txt

The website is
www.commonpurpose.org.uk/home/news/graduatebulletin/jan2008/regional/leeds.aspx

The original document was also picked up by several other organisations.

References are given at the end of this document.

However, something weird happened in those hours between the issue of the text of the speech in the morning, and what Gordon actually said in the Commons.

Here is the relevant paragraph showing what Gordon Brown said:

“We are sponsoring and encouraging a series of national and local mentoring programmes for young people, including a business in the community Muslim mentoring programme, new leadership training and local youth leadership schemes in Blackburn, Waltham Forest, Leeds and in partnership with Tottenham in Haringey. After discussion with Muslim Women, a new advisory group has been set up by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, which will advise on the access of women to mosques and their management committees.”

The attachment is C-DOCTORED-GoBr-141107-NatSec-Parliament.txt

The website is http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page13757.asp

So as to dispel any possibility of doubt, the best thing to do would be to hear it for yourself. You may listen to it attachment: D-brown cp – mp3

Clearly, the differences between the paragraphs is significant.

The references to Common purpose and Karimia have been expunged.

Among the many questions that must be asked is: why?

Why was Common Purpose, for example, edited out of the later version that was read out by Gordon Brown?

It is known that Hansard is a retrospective account.
Therefore, were all those who received the original versions later sent the corrected versions?

The answer to this is a definite “No”… as both Common Purpose and Karimia, among others, reported on their websites in accordance with what they were sent before the speech, not the doctored version that Gordon Brown read.

Even worse, No.10 NEVER sent out a corrected version, as, even by the following January, Common Purpose were still using the original version that they had received the previous November before the speech by Gordon Brown.

Next, we must ask, given that the text of Commons Speeches are made available to the House, which version was actually made available in the lobby of the Commons before the speech by Gordon Brown? Given that Hansard is a retrospective record, there can be but one answer – the original.

Were members of parliament given the doctored version, as recorded by Hansard?

We have what appears to be a case of the Prime Minister deceiving The House, giving members one version but reading out another version.

We have also seen, in the past year, blatant examples of Hansard being deliberately falsified so as to protect nulabour ministers, where what was said was clearly heard and recorded by the cameras but was reported as something else by Hansard.

The integrity of Hansard has been compromised.

(The falsification of records has been a consistency of nulabour)

Now let us see WHY a group such as Common Purpose should have been written out of the speech to the commons.

It turns out that Common Purpose must have been identified as a possible source of embarrassment to the government some time between issuing the original text and the time of the actual speech, necessitating some last-minute alterations.

Why would No10 want Gordon Brown not to mention Common Purpose in the House of Commons?

The answer to this would be because it appears that Common Purpose has been the recipient of large sums of government money, not all of which could be satisfactorily explained, and now Common Purpose was to receive yet more.

On 11^th July 2007, Philip Davies MP had asked this question:

Philip Davies: To ask the prime Minister how much his Office paid to Common Purpose in each of the last five years; for what purpose; and what the outcome of the expenditure was. [147594]

The Prime Minister: For these purposes my Office forms part of the Cabinet Office. I refer my the hon. Member to the answer given to him by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary for the Cabinet Office (Gillian Merron) today.

The website for this is:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070711/text/70711w0006.htm//07071174000366

In fact, Philip Davies MP, asked questions about Government spending on Common Purpose from June to September. Some answers were given, sometimes the answers were fudged, some answers refused to state a figure.

The attachment is: E-ComPur-HoC-Nov07.txt

The website for this is:

http://www.wonkosworld.co.uk/wordpress/2007/11/28/common-purpose

Clearly, Common Purpose was already a potential source of embarrassment to the Government generally, and to No10 in particular.

So, WHY all the secrecy and deceit?

What is it about the workings of Common Purpose that must not be revealed?

Again, the above website gives a brief account of what Common Purpose is about. In summary, Common Purpose is a government agent for the creation and maintenance of unlawful government control mechanisms from No10 to street level, completely outside of the democratic, transparent and accountable institutions seen by the common citizen.

In addition to taxpayers’ money that Common Purpose has received, this organisation has also received ratepayers’ money unbeknown to the ratepayer and not included in Local Authority Accounts – to carry out its separate agenda, with nulabour support. In addition, Common Purpose has received the free use of facilities, premises and services for which taxpayers and ratepayers are blissfully ignorant.

More details of this can be the subject of a separate presentation.

Also, Common Purpose are “running scared”. Their leaders have written to major taxpayer-funded institutions and councils, directing them how to answer Freedom of Information requests should anyone ask awkward questions. They have provided bizarre reasons why councils should break the law and have given specious and fatuous arguments for refusing legitimate requests for information. It is a sad indictment of the insidious penetration of Common Purpose into our institutions that councils and police authorities, for example, do as Common Purpose tell them!

This issue too can be a subject for a separate presentation.

Gordon Brown must now be asked to explain himself.

This will also be the subject of a separate presentation.

This citizen’s main themes have been the multi-billion Eurofrauds, the fraud and corruption associated with nulabour-sourced regeneration money, and the devastating price paid by those who would expose the corruption. The structures, mechanisms and people involved have been identified.

It can be stated here, unambiguously and unequivocally, that several of these institutions are Common Purpose infected and many of those identified as corrupt or as controlling abusers are Common Purpose members.

In Summary: WHO IS RUNNING THIS COUNTRY?

Clearly not the government we can see.

Regards,

( Name withheld by the angry cheese for obvious reasons.)

Useful links:

http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2007/11/16/3357836.html

www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/leedsbradford/2007/03/365733.html

www.heald.uk.com/security-industry-news.htm?news_id=3

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=3664960863576873594&hl=en

www.tpuc.org/node/107

http://drjn.co.uk/cp.htm

www.scribd.com/doc/862663/cp-downing-street (WOW!)

http://my.telegraph.co.uk/lickyalips/february_2008/common_purpose.htm

www.stopcp.com

Many thanks to the contributors to this article.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJs39z75uew

Tony Gosling Has Been Arrested!

Tony Gosling was arrested near Bristol on Tuesday 24th June at approximately 1400. Tony and his fiancee were stopped in their vehicle on the M32 motorway in Bristol by ten police officers under the authority of the Northumbria Police Major Incident Unit.

Their arrest appears to be concerning a lady named Natalie Bracht who may be heard here on a recent recording describing her very worrying and rather peculiar experiences at the hands of the authorities here in Britain,

www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2008/06//401969.mp3

http://100777.com/node/1831

www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/06/401952.html

Natalie Bracht sounds articulate, lucid and intelligent on the tape and, amazingly, shows no signs at all of the mental illness claimed by the British authorities.
I have said it before - read A. Solzhenitsyn. Accusing dissidents and any kind of objector as mentally ill or insane is a typical and rather obvious nowadays, old Commie Trick that was used all over the Soviet Union, Communist Eastern Europe and the puke-bucket that is China, in order to discredit and lock up "trouble-makers" indefinitely before they could influence others. The British Thought Police are clearly under orders to bring her in before her views and accounts of her recent experiences pollute us all.
Hahahaha - so we all rush to the recording to find out what we're not supposed to know and what the government are trying to hide from us! Brilliant!

The Angry Cheese wishes all concerned well. This mother and her children deserve much better.

Hot Snot and Bogey Pie, All mixed Up With a Dead Dog's Eye.

Many years ago, my charming little sister learned this in the playground and enthusiastically sang it as she stirred her dinner at the table on getting home, and got a right telling off too!
To be honest though, just exactly what muck might we all be eating in a few years time?

Well here is the truth.
Please do not panic.
This is the truth, you need to be aware of it.

Sterling has been devalued. Your pound is literally worth peanuts, only the British Government don't want you to think about it too hard.
You just put your feet up and keep watching tv shows like "Britain has (Questionable) Talent," " I'd Do Anything" (except get a proper job!) " Celebrities Skating (Over the Truth)," and "Big Brother” (Goes Bonkers in High-Heels and a Leotard) ."
While all this jolly fun has been usefully keeping a great many of us enthralled, creepy traitor to the British people - Gordon Brown, along with the rest of Blair's team of vile super-scroats, have been escalating the devaluation our money on the sly, behind our backs, ever since getting into power.

Here is the proof - straight from the telly - so it must be true!

In the current hit tv show on the BBC "the Supersizers go 70s," the annual wage of a successful advertising executive in the 1970s was a handsome £20,000 and is described by the actor taking part in the program as being the equivalent now of a £190,000 salary.
How is your maths?
£190,000 is almost £200,000. Let's call it £200,000 to make it clear. Get it?
You add a nought, and you move the comma to get the equivalent value now.

£20,000 in the seventies = almost £200,000 in 2008!

What does this mean?
Well, the salary comparison is clearly accurate. What about property?
A house might have been valued at £17,000 in the seventies and modest houses are about £160,000 to £170,000 now,
( well over-priced in the south though, but now slowly deflating - which is actually good ) so that is a reasonable comparison.

Let's think about food prices though.
Food prices in Britain have actually been artificially low for many years. This may be seen by using the nought and comma technique on food :-
A loaf of bread that cost 30 pence in the 70s should cost £2.99-3.00 now!
A tin of baked beans costing 9 pence in the 70s should now cost 87-90 pence!
A medium whole chicken at £1.50 should be £14.95-15.00 now,
Pork at 65p per lb should be £6.45-50 per lb ( a pound is just over a half kilo!)
A pound of rice at 25p should be £2.50 now.
But they aren't though, are they?
Not all food is out of kilter like this but a great deal of it continues to be phenomenally cheap in Britain.

Well, while all these lovely low food prices have been gradually adding inches to our national average girth, whole generations of young people have grown up believing this is normal. It isn't!
Now that food seems to be starting ( yes, starting, it still has a long way to go!) to adjust to its correct value, younger people (under 45) and hopeless older people with sawdust for brains (sadly there are millions of these in Britain) can and are, allowing themselves to be duped ( as usual ) into believing the latest cooked-up fairy story:
This one is all about rising food prices being down to terrible, sudden, shocking food shortages all around the world. A sort of Food-Tsunami washing over us all! Oh, and fuel shortages too! Aaaaah, Aaaaah Oooooh!
But is it really? Come off it! Highly unlikely!

Why? Why might a government engineer this?
Well, the false cheap prices over the last 15-odd years have encouraged the British people to believe that they can live indefinitely within an artificially low budget, and has led many to feel (falsely) confident enough to take out large mortgages in business and in housing. We have also been persuaded by advertising and media programs to take on large loans and have been encouraged by advertising and the false perception of consumer confidence to run up high credit card debt.
But it is a trap! Many of us now, most of us perhaps, are stuck in that trap. It is all explained in this excellent short film which I strongly advise you to watch so you can understand the next part of this essay :-
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279 there is also this:-

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936

The super-wealthy have simply decided that now is about the right time for them to clean up and consolidate their power. They do this every so often. They pace it perfectly. About every seventy to eighty-odd years, so no lucid old-timers are left from the last crash to warn the young about might be about to happen again. It is less messy for them that way! There's less blood to be cleaned up! And, most importantly, they can appear all innocent!

The British Government of NuLabour have ensured that they can easily take our property off us. Foreclosures are escalating, bankruptcies will increase, people are going to lose everything they have worked for - homes, land, farms, businesses, cars, belongings, savings, even their marriage, their family, possibly even their lives!
Spending will be down because people will have much less money to spend, numerous firms are going to have to massively lay off staff, or even close down completely.

The mainstream media have now been programmed to endlessly promote and spin the "food shortages" and "oil shortages" line. This will be repeated over and over and over and over again and again and again until you believe it - which is why they are referred to as programs because you are being programmed - to believe the latest fantasy! It has already started. The papers and tv are full of it already and will continue to be so for a long, long time.
It is in reality, a crafty, very clever confidence trick enabling the Government to shirk responsibility for the devaluation of our currency which, I believe, has been deliberately engineered as part of a bigger plan to demoralise the British people ( and the people of the world ) still further and force through legislation which we would never, normally tolerate.

Meaning what? Well what do you think of this:-

www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrDWkx97Tck and this:-

www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/brown-pushes-eu-to-allow-more-modified-animal-feeds-851020.html

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/gm-crops-needed-in-britain-says-minister-849991.html

www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOMqwPxUx54&feature=rec-fresh

The Communists always target food and farming! ALWAYS! Read some Solzhenitsyn if you don’t understand me. Yes, switch OFF the telly and read. You can get his works from the public library, new from bookshops or online from Amazon, or even sometimes pick them up secondhand at carboot sales. Read Solzhenitsyn! Then research why, although being a Nobel Prize Winner and being one of the most famous, most read and highly respected authors in the entire world, one of his latest books “200 years Together” has not been translated into English so people in the west can read it! You could also investigate the history of Miliband family. And then you might start to wake up!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXXHd8m2j4E

www.youtube.com/watch?v=_60B0xgGvZQ&NR-1

www.youtube.com/watch?v=28U0Wsfyxu0

Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Polh Pot, Mugabe....Their first act on getting into power was to attack farmers and drive them off their land. They also drove off tenant farmers and the smallholders and allotment holders, they even drove the more prosperous people out of their bigger houses because their gardens could grow food and that was not to be allowed either!
And then they proceeded to starve their own people to death in the hundreds, then thousands, and then millions!
It is interesting to note that Adolph Hitler, wicked though he was, did not attack his own peoples' farmers and food in this insane way. Winston Churchill said something like, "Communists are Just Socialists in a Hurry."
Well NuLabour are Socialists aren't they? Isn't it possible, even likely, that they are doing what these murdering Commie degenerates did - only in a slow, subtle and slightly less direct way?

Exaggerating? Well a great many people in the west are going to lose everything through the deceit of manipulating the money system. That is taking our property isn’t it? Not by armed force but sneakily, the result is the same though. Who will be able to purchase these properties? The chosen ones, those who have been permitted to amass enough to take advantage.

There is absolutely no reason why this wonderful world in which we live should not produce plenty of food for every single person who lives in it. Are the food supplies of the world being sabotaged on purpose so we will have to accept GM food?

http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/the-world-according-to-monsanto-a-documentary-that-americans-wont-ever-see-full-video

There is also plenty of fuel in the world too, more oil and gas than we could ever use. The wicked governments of this world are also suppressing new, clean technologies that could provide free heat and power to our homes.

Do you know, for example, that it is possible to heat your home, or any public or commercial premises, simply by drilling a few poles into the ground!!! Free heat provided for us by God. Can you imagine why the greedy governments and big corporations of the world would not want us to know about this? Having us all bent over an oil barrel is so handy for them!
How did Nicola Tesla, in the 1930s, power a car to run around a racetrack at 100 mph by wiring it to the ether? Is Formula One itself just a big advert for the oil business? Do you know that a car can run on water? Do you know that buses in Iceland run on water?

OK. So the governments are suppressing wonderful, clean technology to keep the bucks rolling in to their coffers from all the filthy, dirty, dangerous old-fashioned technologies like oil, gas, coal and nuclear power.
So why then are they so keen on us all accepting gene manipulation? Why are Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and co. so keen to foist genetically modified food on us all? We don’t want it. European people are not keen on the idea of having our food genetically modified, thanks but no thanks!
However, if we are all brought down to grovelling wrecks, desperately hungry, ill, wretched, frightened and demoralised, they know we will gratefully accept it, and pay a fortune for it too.

So what is going on?

You tell me. We shall see. Time will tell. I repeat - Just what muck might we all be eating in a few years time? "Hot snot and bogey pie..

www.texemarrs.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=catalog&Product_Code=pop_2508_cd

www.youtube.com/watch?v=nze8B39OB0k

Traitors, the UK's Government - a nest of vicious snakes!

TRAITORS

Wednesday, 18th june 2008

People of Great Britain, Shame on You All!
What have the Irish got that we haven't? Balls and brains, obviously!

Today, the repulsive nest of vicious snakes that constitute the current government, the snivelling liars and crooked lawyers who are running-sorry I mean, trashing this country, rotten to the core every snivelling last one of them, voted in by an ignorant mass of useful-idiots, after having lied and taken this country into illegal, pointless wars - murdering hundreds of thousands possibly even millions including many of our bravest and best young people and rubbishing our currency, have now decided (in their wisdom?!) to further insult the ordinary people of this country by pushing through the EU treaty.
Well Blair and Brown, you and your idiot followers can smirk now. Enjoy it while you can you worthless sack of snot! You are a bunch of greedy, self-serving traitors to the British People and it is quite likely that sometime in the future you are all going to jail for a very, very long time and the wealth you are greedily amassing now, your Judas silver, your reward for being the dirty little criminals that you are, will all be confiscated! And just like Judas- you might even swing for it - albeit with a little push!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7461918.stm

“….a crazy way to seek influence europe …” eh! Apparently, without europe Britain would be in limbo - that is how much Miliband respects the British People. Does he think that without europe we would be hopeless, we would be lost, we would suck our thumbs and cry, we would wet our pants? Does he actually know anything about the British People? How British is he? Never mind....

www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9FZeNOouMM

Late Post:

I thought Britain had fully ratified the Lisbon Treaty but apparently it hasn’t!

Prime Minister Brown has been forced, by the High Court, to announce that ratification has been suspended pending the result of Stuart Wheeler’s court case. Thanks to this man’s initiative, some naive people believe there is now a slim chance of dealing the Lisbon Treaty a death blow. The Pantomime continues and I stand by my remarks above, this country is a pathetic sick joke!

www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/06/20/do2008.xml

TOLD YOU SO!

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2192093/Stuart-Wheeler-loses-EU-Lisbon-Treaty-court-case.html

but well-done Stuart Wheeler for for having guts, and trying to do something about this treachery-, other than just sitting around like most pathetic British people who just moan " But what can we do? "

I am proud and thankful for your effort and am adding your name to my Great Britons list.

"Slow Strangulation of Freedom...."

The Right Honourable David Davis MP has resigned.

Quite disgracefully, he was refused permission by the current arrogant, spiteful, scumbag Speaker of the House to make his resignation speech to fellow MPs in Parliament and was forced instead to make his fascinating resignation speech to reporters on the pavement outside. View it here,

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7450627.stm

But politics comes from the street, from the ordinary people and perhaps it was the best and most appropriate place for him to make it because our politicians sitting in their Westminster Palace are now just like the privileged royalty of old that they are supposed to be protecting us from, and risk becoming totally despised by the population of this country. If they carry on much longer down the corrupt road they have chosen they are going to sorely need all the security systems they are now installing. The LibLabCon cannot go on indefinitely, the aroma of cheesed off citizens mixed with the sulphurous stench of Common Purpose is now permeating the air in Britain. In his speech Davis rightly refers to,

“the slow strangulation of freedom…..the intrusive power of the state.. the loss of privacy and freedom..”

Cheesy wonders, could he be hinting at the increasing cross -party power of our Communitarian Common Purpose chums and their dangerous "Third Way" to Hell - aimed directly at our children?

Internet to End by 2012! Start Saving Info.Now

MySpace Is The Trojan Horse Of Internet Censorship
Media elite's last gasp effort to save crumbling empire

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | March 16 2006

MySpace isn't cool, it isn't hip and it isn't trendy. It represents a cyber trojan horse and the media elite's last gasp effort to reclaim control of the Internet and sink it with a stranglehold of regulation, control and censorship.

Since Rupert Murdoch's $580 Million acquisition of MySpace in July 2005, it has come from total obscurity to now being the 8th most visited website in the world, receiving half as many page hits as Google, despite the fact that on first appearance it looks like a 5-year-old's picture scrap and scribble book.

MySpace is the new mobile phone. If you don't have a MySpace account then you belong to some kind of culturally shunned underclass.

What most of the trendy wendy's remain blissfully unaware of is the fact that MySpace is Rupert Murdoch's battle axe for shaping a future Internet environment whereby electronic dissent, whether it be against corporations or government, will not tolerated and freedom of e-speech will cease to exist.

MySpace has been caught shutting down blogs critical of itself and other Murdoch owned companies. They even had the audacity to censor links to completely different websites when clicking through for MySpace. When 600 MySpace users complained, MySpace deleted the blog forum that the complaints were posted on. Taking their inspiration from Communist China, MySpace regularly uses blanket censorship to block out words like 'God'.

Earlier this week Rupert Murdoch sounded the death knell for conventional forms of media in stating that the media elite were losing their monopoly to the rapid and free spread of new communication technologies. Murdoch stressed the need to regain control of these outlets in order to prevent the establishment media empire from crumbling.

MySpace is Rupert Murdoch's trojan horse for destroying free speech on the Internet. It is a foundational keystone of the first wave of the state's backlash to the damage that a free and open Internet has done to their organs of propaganda. By firstly making it cool, trendy and culturally elite for millions to flock to establishment controlled Internet backbones like MySpace, Murdoch is preparing the groundwork for the day when it will stop being voluntary and become mandatory to use government and corporate monopoly controlled Internet hubs.

The end game is a system similar to or worse than China, whereby no websites even mildly critical of the government will be authorized.

The Pentagon admitted that they would engage in psychological warfare and cyber attacks on 'enemy' Internet websites in an attempt to shut them down. The fact that the NSA surveillance program spied on 5,000 Americans tells us that the enemy is the alternative media and that it will be targeted for elimination. Google has been ordered to turn over information about its users by a judge to the US government.

The second wave of destroying freedom of speech online will simply attempt to price people out of using the conventional Internet and force people over to Internet 2, a state regulated hub where permission will need to be obtained directly from an FCC or government bureau to set up a website.

The original Internet will then be turned into a mass surveillance database and marketing tool. The Nation magazine reported, "Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out."

The original Internet will deliberately be subject to crash upon crash until it becomes a useless carcass of overpriced trash and its reputation will be defiled by the TV and media barons cashing in on the perfectly streamlined Internet 2, the free for all network that just requires you to thumbscan in order to log on! Those with a security grading below yellow on their national ID card will unfortunately be refused access. Websites that carry hate speech (ones that talk about government corruption) will be censored for the betterment of society.

For the aspiring dictator, the Internet is a dangerous tool that has been seized by the enemy. We have come a long way since 1969, when the ARPANET was created solely for US government use. The Internet is freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power and subjugate the world under a global surveillance panopticon prison.

Rupert Murdoch's MySpace and its ceaseless promotion by the establishment media as the best thing since sliced bread is part of this movement. In saying all this we do encourage everyone to set up a MySpace account, but only if you're going to use it to bash MySpace, Rupert Murdoch and copy and paste this article right at the top of the page! See how long it is before your account is terminated.

---------------------------------------

Visit our MySpace page by clicking here. Will the censors shut it down or keep it up to save face?

www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/061108_kill_internet.htm

www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/120608_a_death.htm

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428&q=outfoxed&total=216&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgrYf7VWASE

Marxism - A Time Line

Marxism - a Time Line

By Chris Brown ⋅ June 11, 2008

The Marxist dream of a one world dictatorship is now closer than ever to achieving it’s goal. They’ve been working to achieve their goal for a long, long time - the following time line will give you an idea of how long, as well as showing just how deeply entrenched within the political establishment the Marxist cancer really is!

KARL MARX.1818-1883

Marx was a German Jew with radical views.

In 1842 he became a member of the Hegelians an anti-religious,radical group with Satanic interests.

In 1843 he left Germany and went to Paris where he met Engels who helped him financially.

In 1845 he was expelled from Paris.

In 1848 went to live in Brussels were he wrote the Communist Manifesto.

In 1849 Marx moved to London and lived there for the rest of his life.

In 1864 following the establishment of the Working Men’s Association. Marx worked for many years on the affairs of First International. “Das Kapital” was published 1867.

MARX died in 1883 in London and is buried in Highgate Cemetery.

THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO INCLUDES:

The Abolition of Private Property
The Abolition of the Family.
The Abolition of Countries and Nationalities.

The Abolition of all Religions, morality and Religious Liberty,
[this shows the Hegelians Idealism.]

The Abolition of Freedom of conscience.
[In a Democracy people believe in the freedom to choose.]

The word Communist covers anyone who aspires to World Government. Marxism works towards achieving World Government and World Dictatorship.

MARX WITH HIS FRIENDS
Marx and his friends Engles and Balunin received their ideas from Moses Hess, the founder of the German Social Democrat Party. Moses Hess taught that to gain a World State it could only be brought about by a revolution using class and racial hatred. He said race struggle is primary, class struggle is secondary.”

Mikhail Balunin said “That whatever the name or label of those who aspire to world government, they must be prepared to awake the devil in people and stir their passions for them to act.”

Passion, as with football hooligans, vandals and various peace groups and the race groups.

THREE REQUIREMENTS TO BECOME A MARXIST
Marx wrote three requirements for those who wished to join the fight for World Government.

1 To read the Communist and Revolutionary teachings of Marx and associates and work accordingly.
2 To work to destabilise nations both morally and financially.
3 To work to gain political control of the MONEY supply and the ASSETS of each Nation and put them BEYOND the REACH and CONTROL of each Government by ensuring that nations become INTER-DEPENDANT on each other for FOOD, MACHINERY and through LOANS.

Marx also said, “Steps should be taken to provide a master race to produce Leaders and Dictators”
(Could the first or second generation now be in place?)

RUSSIA. 1917.
The Bolsheviks needed a good military base to succeed in their bid for world government. In the 19th Century the Bolsheviks tried to taker-over Russia and failed. In 1917 under cover of the First World War they started their second Campaign against RUSSIA, this time from a good military base. They seized control of BANKS and THE MONEY SUPPLY and STOCKS of FOOD. As the food ran out the people became too weak to fight the Bolsheviks terrorists. They are one arm of an organisation which seeks to bring about a one world state.

When Russia fell to the Bolsheviks. LENIN who was the LEADER of the SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY and became the first DICTATOR of the UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS. Many of the countries surrounding Russia also became Communists states.

COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL.1928
In 1928 The Communist International presented a three-stage plan for world government.

1 To level the economies of all nations by introducing a single currency.
2 To bring about REGIONAL UNION between various groups of Socialist Nations.
3 To amalgamate all these REGIONAL groups into the finale–the Worldwide Union of Socialist States.

COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL 1938
In 1938 in the Communist International there appeared an official statement. It said “Dictatorship can only be established by the victory of Socialism in different countries. Then the joining of all the
other republics could complete the UNION OF SOCIALIST SOVIET REPUBLICS.”

1942 STALIN’S COMMUNIST GOAL. A WORLD MADE OF REGIONS.

Stalin defined the Intermediate goals of Communism necessary for the final take-over of the World.

1 TO CONFUSE, DISORGANISE AND DESTROY THE FORCES OF CAPITALISM AROUND THE WORLD.

2 TO BRING ALL NATIONS TOGETHER INTO A SINGLE WORLD SYSTEM. REGIONALISM.

3 Force advanced Countries to pour prolonged finance into under-developed Countries.

4 Divide the world into REGIONAL groups at the transitional stage to total World Government, then populations will more readily abandon their loyalty to their countries and accept loyalty to their REGION instead. Later the REGIONS can all be brought together into WORLD DICTATORSHIP.

5 We will indoctrinate the youth to embrace Marxism (under other labels ) as the correct and political social viewpoint.

6 Neutralise youth against religious influences of home and all other concepts of rigid morality which might interfere with the acceptance of Marxism and communist doctrine.

1942 at the same time, STALIN was co-operating with nations in the West to lay the foundations for the United Nations Organisation.

1943 A PAN NATIONAL ORGANISATION. THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION

1. The formation of the United Nations Organisation was a necessary preliminary for the Russian Soviets.
2. In 1943 it was agreed that the post of Secretary General and Political Affairs should always be held by a nominee of the USSR.
3. The United Nations Buildings in New York contains a Satanic Chapel. This reflects the same theme.
4. In 1947 a Document was published “Design for Europe” promoting a United Nations Army. The army was eventually inaugurated in 1993. The creation of the EEC, The Treaty of Rome and the Treaty to Establish the European Union has been absolutely crucial for the plans for Communism and World Dictatorship.

THE DESTABILISATION OF THE BRITISH POLITICAL SYSTEM

In 1946 THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION gained influence into the Sovereignty of the UNITED KINGDOM by THE STATUTORY INSTRUMENT ACT 1946 and three weeks later the UNITED NATIONS ACT 1946 which was brought before the HOUSE OF COMMONS when most Members had gone home. These two Acts ensured that the COMMUNIST wishes of the UNITED NATIONS SECRETARIAT and UNESCO are implemented in this country without making it obvious.

HAROLD WILSON signed an agreement with Soviet Union committing the British Government to back plans for a WORLD GOVERNMENT DICTATORSHIP. (Command paper 5924).

2007 THE WORLD GOVERNANCE GROUP IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
An all Parliamentary Group for World Governance met in the House of Commons on 12 June 2007. The Group’s purpose is to promote democratic reform of the United Nations, Global Institutions and International law. Chairman Dr Gavin Strange, Vice Chairmen, Dr Nick Palmer and Joan Wally.

AFTER 1946 SOME TREATIES WERE DIFFERENT - THEY CAME WITHOUT SUBSTANCE
Since 1946 there has been a lack of substance to some of the Treaties made with Great Britain they became thin and ambiguous to be filled out later.

In the 1950’s and 1960’s Ministers made trade visits to Russia and under treaties and agreements they exchanged goods and materials. Many of our industries where closed down or given away, e.g. car and steel making, ships and shipbuilding.

In 1964 the Treaty with the USSR signed by Fred Mulley and Wedgewood Benn did not actually mention the words Nuclear Power, yet under that treaty the whole of Britain’s nuclear know-how was given away to the USSR. In 1968 another treaty signed by Goromy Roberts paved the way for the run-down of Britain’s Merchant Navy and the handing over of ships and our shipping routes to the USSR.

The terms of this Treaty were so outrageous that it was not printed until after the statutory period for prosecutions for TREASON had expired. This Treaty had been implemented right away.

In 1996 John Major complained in a letter to Jaques Santer that after the Maastricht treaty was published he found it was not as he, or the British Government had intended, or signed for.

THE COMMUNIST HIDDEN AGENDA

Infiltration from the top
In Britain in 1940 at a meeting in Oxford the speaker Harold Wilson explained to the understanding audience how they could help make World Government happen. They should not join the Communist party they should join the Conservatives or Labour parties and lean to the Right and Left of those parties, so that when the time was right they must then create a smoke screen and come together as a party of national unity. He said confidently that one day he would be Prime Minister and so he was.

Britain’s application to join the EEC

In 1972 The British Government applied to join the EEC. Prime Minister Edward Heath assured the British people that they would not lose their sovereignty, although his friend Lord Kilmuir had warned him in a letter that it could happen. Under articles 189 and 191 of the Treaty of Rome the EEC Commissioners are empowered to formulate Directives and Decisions that take precedence over Britain’s national laws.

In October 1972 Mr Heath attended a meeting in Paris to negotiate with M. Pompidou (a former employee of Guy Rothschild) the conditions of Britain’s entry. This included that Britain’s fishermen should fish under the EEC quota system and that our maritime limits should be surrendered.

In 1972 Edward Heath invited Victor Rothchild to head-up and choose members for the Central Policy Review staff. Victor Rothschild wrote a white paper on research and development. Since that time, official Treasury policies have included eradication of our aircraft, shipbuilding, Coal-mining, car-making, steel-making, machine-tool industries and others.

Speaking at a meeting at the time, John Davies the then Secretary of State for Industry said that Britain had agreed with the EEC that UK technology should be merged with European Industry:
In 1962. At Dounreay in Scotland, a fast breeder reactor power station was begun. It was the first of its type in the world and after 15 years it was closed in 1977. At the same site a second type of fast breeder reactor was begun in 1974 and closed in 1994.
The Specialist teams of scientists were dispersed and the nuclear know-how given to France. The Rothschilds acquired much of the available Uranium.

Britain agreed to run down Sterling. Mr Heath agreed to renounce national sovereignty and for Britain to become part of a Federal Europe. He agreed to change the local government structure from counties to Regions and also to reorganise Government departments so that the British Parliament could be replaced.

GAINING CONTROL OF THE FOOD SUPPLIES
In 1998 at a meeting of Agriculture Ministers in Brussels the EU’s long term plans for Britain were unfolded They said; Livestock farming in the Britain would be abolished and changed to Arable farming. This would take place without the consent of the British people.

FORWARD PLANNING The abolition of our Abattoirs.
In the 1990s many British abattoirs were closed because they did not reach EU standards. A few larger ones were built instead; this is why animals have to travel long distances for slaughter.

BSE IN CATTLE. This disease is not a contagious disease between animals and man. In Britain BSE in cattle is caused by painting Organo Phosphate nerve poison onto the heads and spines of cattle at four times the normal strength. The poison was laced with oil to help it penetrate the skin to stop warble-fly damage. This EU practice only took place in BRITAIN and Switzerland, but has now been discontinued.

Starting in 1986 this poison was also used in sheep-dip but not in the same strength. Hundreds of farmers have become ill from contamination. 200 have died. This poison was also used in the Gulf War with similar effects.

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE
Early in 2001 the British Press reported the Government Laboratories at Porton Down had lost phials of Foot and Mouth virus. Soon after came the outbreak of Foot and mouth disease in England resulting in 14 million animals being killed and buried or burnt. Only three million animals were diseased. The other 11 million lived within the contamination zones. This is not a killer disease in animals or man. It is a recoverable disease. Vaccination could have been used to save 11 million healthy animals. The Cull was managed from Brussels. Four areas on the map of England had a high concentration of cases–the Solway Firth, Wales, the Midlands and Devon. These areas are shown on a UN map for re-wilding. The Farmer blamed for the outbreak was exonerated in 2007.

In 2007 came a second outbreak of Foot and mouth in England. The Virus was found in the land drains around Government laboratories at Pirbright in Surrey. The outbreak began on a farm 3 miles away to the south west of Pirbright. Local people on TV stated that the water table drains naturally from the Farms towards the laboratories and Not the other way around.

When Foot and mouth has finally run its course there will be fewer farms or farmers left to raise Cattle and sheep, and arable farming is a whole new Industry. Grain can only be grown on the flat land of eastern Britain. Western Britain is hilly sheep country and unsuitable for growing crops.

2003. A GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER

THE ENVIRONMENTAL, TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORTED THAT:

“THE ROLE OF RURAL ENGLAND AS A FOOD PROVIDER FOR THE NATION IS NO LONGER AN ESSENTIAL ONE.”

We say that to put the Nation’s food supply into the hands of a Foreign government is TREASON.

As an Island nation we must ensure that we grow and raise our own food supply. Britain’s population is estimated to grow to 70 million by 2050. Already we are vulnerable; our milk supply is an important part of our diet for the young and elderly. YET, for years the EU have only allowed our farmers to produce 60% of our
requirement–the rest must be bought from abroad.

BY STEALTH, BRITAIN HAS BEEN EASED INTO THE CONTINENTAL SHOE
In 1973-1975 John Prescott was a delegate to the Council of Europe and from 1975-1979 he was a member of the European Assembly. In 1999 John Prescot introduced his 30 year old Dream for EU Regions in Britain. Under the EU plan Britain has been divided into 12 Regions. Scotland is a Region, N.I, Wales, London and
England. ENGLAND has been divided into eight EU Regions. THEN ENGLAND’S NAME WAS TAKEN OF THE EUROPEAN MAP IN 1997.

In 1998/99. Deputy Prime Minister John Prescot handpicked 60 people in each of the EIGHT ENGLISH REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES to direct the building of 3 Millon new houses. Sixty-six volunteer local Councillors were invited to become Members of the ASSEMBLY along with 40 Stakeholders or Partners. Together, all three groups are known as the Regional Assembly. There is a support office of Civil Servants.

In 2004 the voters in the Northeast of England voted ‘NO’ to ELECTED. REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES. So the unelected Development agencies combined with one layer of local council will be the new Regional Government. These new Regional Assemblies will work with the “Committee of the Regions” in Brussels, cutting out national Parliaments and giving the EU Commission direct access to all Regional Assemblies in Europe. All things traditional will be abolished; All sovereignty will pass to BRUSSELS bringing a Foreign government nearer to the people.

15 NOVEMBER 2007
On that day David Miliband strode into this story bringing it full circle back to the sleeping giant Russia.

In a Speech he said “THE EUROPEAN UNION SHOULD WORK TOWARDS INCLUDING RUSSIA, THE MIDDLE EAST AND THE NORTH AFRICAN COUNTRIES”. He continued “THAT THE E.U. WOULD NOT BECOME A SUPERPOWER, BUT SHOULD BE A ROLE MODEL FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD. THE EU COULD BE A MODEL OF POWER FOR REGIONAL CO-OPERATION, DEDICATED TO FREE TRADE, THE ENVIRONMENT AND TACKLING EXTREMISM.”

Note: David Miliband’s Marxist Grandfather Samuel Milliband fled to England from Belgium before the war and at first was refused the right to remain. David’s father, Adolphe (Ralph) Miliband was born in Belgium–he came to England and joined the Royal Navy in 1943. Later he became a Professor of Politics at Leeds University and lectured at the London school of Economics. He too was a Marxist.

Beware of David Miliband!

Our Common law is being eradicated as the European Communities Act 1972 Act gives precedence to Community law.

UNLESS BRITAIN RESCINDS
(1) THE 1972 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ACT.
(2)THE 1946 UNITED NATIONS ACT
(3) THE 1946 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS ACT

BRUSSELS WILL GAIN ACCESS TO BRITAIN’S SOVEREIGNTY AND EU LAW WILL BE SUPREME.

For the first time in over a Thousand years, Britain will be ruled by a Foreign Power.

And lest we forget, Blair, Brown, Cameron, and the rest, have been, and are continuing to strive to pave the way for the Marxist end game.

Whether you believe all of these treacherous politicians are acting alone, or whether they are all mere puppets dancing to the tune of unseen puppeteers is in many ways irrelevant.

For the fact remains that they have all but succeeded!

www.bnp.org.uk/index.php/2008/06/marxism-a-time-line

Let's Hope It Is No

www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=173

www.realjewnews.com/?p=219

www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=275

www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFRuLFR91e4

The European Arrest Warrent,

The European Union, A Prison of Nations

by Srdja Trifkovic

Various multiethnic states (imperial Russia, the Habsburg Monarchy, pre-World War II Kingdom of Yugoslavia) have been labeled—often unfairly—as “prisons of nations.” That designation will apply more aptly to the European Union when the Lisbon Treaty, signed by all 27 EU heads of states or governments last December, takes effect next year. Under the “European Arrest Warrant,” which is to be implemented under the terms of the Treaty, every citizen or visitor of a member country the European Union will be liable to arrest and extradition at the behest of a judge in any other EU member-country, under one of 32 vaguely defined categories of “crime.”

This is a momentous development, and not one in a hundred EU citizens, let alone non-EU visitors to Europe, are fully aware of its implications.

Those 32 offenses, according to the drafters of the Treaty, “if they are punishable in the issuing Member State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years and as they are defined by the law of the issuing Member State, shall, under the terms of this Framework Decision and without verification of the double criminality of the act, give rise to surrender pursuant to a European arrest warrant.”

The list of 32 offenses includes criminal conspiracy, terrorism, human trafficking, child pornography, smuggling of drugs, weapons and explosives, fraud and money laundering, murder, kidnapping, forgery, etc. It also includes “racism and xenophobia,” as well as “computer crime” and “crimes under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.” The local police will be obliged to arrest the indicted person and have him transferred to the issuing judge’s court for trial—and they will have to act regardless of their country’s judicial system or penal code.

Once the person is at the local court, he will be at the mercy of the local laws. The involvement of the ICC implies possible further extradition to non-EU countries. The Warrant is already in force in eight EU countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom). An initial hearing takes place before a judge within 48 hours merely to establish the identity of the arrested (habeus corpus) and whether the arrest warrant has been filled in correctly. Additional information from the state that issued the arrest warrant may be requested. The major difference between extradition and EAW procedures is that the “hearing” in the latter process does not consider the allegations against the defendant or examine evidence. Instead, the hearing is merely meant to satisfy the court that no “legal bars to surrender” apply.

The European Arrest Warrant was one of the main topics at the recent Counter-Jihad Summit in Vienna, where the former Austrian Ambassador Edgar K. Selzer gave a detailed talk on the implications of this new weapon against freedom of speech in the EU. Dr. Selzer pointed out that the inclusion of “racism and xenophobia” brings “an emotion, a sentiment” into the category of major crimes, such as murder, arson etc, which is a legal and logical absurdity.

The European Arrest Warrant does not define “racism and xenophobia” as such, but its drafters have relied on the European Commission’s “Framework Decision on combating racism and xenophobia” which criminalizes “belief in race colour, descent, religion or belief, national or ethnic origin as a factor determining aversion to individuals.” The Decision mandates that “racist and xenophobic behaviour must constitute an offence in all Member States and be punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties.” This framework decision will apply to all “offences” committed within the territory of the European Union, or “for the benefit of a legal person established in a Member State.”

The implications of all this are significant, for the future of civil liberties in the Western world no less than for me personally.

On May 11, I gave a speech at the Counter-Jihad Summit in Vienna. As our readers are well aware, “racism and xenophobia” in the EU-speak have long included the nebulous thought-crime of “Islamophobia”—and my speech could be construed as paradigmatically “Islamophobic” by the drafters of the EU Framework Decision, and accordingly acted upon by the future users of the European Arrest Warrant.

I am not an EU citizen, but that is immaterial if the “offence” was committed in an EU member-country. Once the European Arrest Warrant is in force, a Muslim-friendly judge in, say, Leicester or Birmingham could issue a warrant for my arrest in Greece—where I often go during the summer— for the “offence” committed by giving that speech in Austria last May, and the authorities in Thessaloniki or Athens would have to comply, no questions asked.

Furthermore, the speech was given at a gathering of 60 like-minded persons, most of them EU citizens. This constitutes a criminal conspiracy, a separate offense among those 32 crimes covered by the Warrant, since the Framework Decision defines a “racist or xenophobic group” as “a structured organisation consisting of at least two persons established for a specific period.” The speech was given to the Karl Martell Society, i.e. “for the benefit of a legal person established in a Member State.”

Last but not least, the said speech is widely available on the Internet, in both German and English, which potentially falls under the separate and as yet undefined offence of “computer crime.” Such EAWs have been issued already by British judges to Dutch authorities demanding the surrender of a Danish citizen in a case involving pornography.

Interestingly, under the Framework Decision, anything that is said at a John Randolph Club conference here in the United States may be deemed illegal and actionable under the European Arrest Warrant, if the offending speech or statement is posted on a website (such as www.chroniclesmagazine.org) that is downloadable within the EU, or if some supposedly “racist and xenophobic” material written by one of our editors or contributors is distributed by mailing Chronicles to a subscriber or an institution in the EU. This would be actionable under the Framework Decision as “public dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material containing expressions of racism and xenophobia,” potentially subjecting the author to arrest in any EU country on a warrant issued by a judge in any other EU country.

Orwell was prescient but his date was wrong, a quarter-century premature.

The Bilderberg Group 2008

This year's Bilderberg Meeting is currently taking place in Chantilly, Virginia, USA. The internet is now full of it, and there is much speculation.

( Just Google or Yahoo search - 'Bilderberg 2008.' )

Tony Gosling is the UK's foremost expert on exposing these mysterious annual meetings held by the secretive super-elite of our planet where they plot schemes and strategies for the management and exploitation our world and everything in it, its people and its resources.

www.bilderberg.org/tonyhom.htm

http://documentally.blogspot.com/2007/05/bilderberg-introduction.html

www.bebo.com/FlashBox.jsp?FlashBoxId=4802058783&

Jim Tucker, veteran American Journalist, is his colleague and has been working to expose these meetings for many years as well.

Alex Jones is also an expert in this curious field of study,
www.prisonplanet.com

The Bilderberg Group or Bilderberg Conference is an unofficial annual invitation-only conference. Usually about 130 guests attend, most of them are persons of considerable influence in their fields of business, politics and media. Owing to the discussions by public officials and powerful business leaders (and others) being off the record, the Bilderberg meetings are the subject of much criticism (for circumventing the democratic process of discussing issues openly and publicly) and great suspicion from ordinary people who would actually like to be party to decisions made about them and their future.
This is not just a polite tea party for rich people. They own the media, they influence you directly, their decisions are in your life every single day, they mould your thinking and beliefs, they decide how you will live - or die, and more often than not - when and how! It is serious. Which is why it is never reported or commented on in any depth by Britain's main-stream-media. Good job someone bothers to do the work! Daniel Estulin for example,

www.bilderberg.org/2005.htm

It is possible to work out future events like who is likely to become British Prime Minister or President of the USA simply by scrutiny of the attendees lists (always leaked to Jim Tucker by a mystery member)
In recent years Ed. so-what Balls has attended, also William Hague, David Cameron, Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, Sarkozy, Obama, the Clintons etc.
What can we do? Understandably, we could get really angry on finding out and give vent to our feelings like this,

www.youtube.com/watch?v=88cSvK2Wm_M

or just stay in our rooms and philosophise over it, and wait for it to happen,

www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRjs5z9Wamw

but it is better to be informed than clueless. Joining a pressure group of other like-minded people is a good idea and could make a difference. Or you could consider supporting these investigators in their detective work. Look on this blog for some suggestions.

By the way, what do you make of this?

www.bilderberg.org/2008.htm#reid

Current British attendees include: Kenneth Clarke, Peter Mandelson and George Osborne. Notice though that Mandelson is classed as Int. (international I presume) as he is there representing the EU not the UK. There are a great many of these European Int.s attending.

www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/060608_b_list.htm

A New Ice Age

With the debate focused on a warming Earth, the icy consequences of a cooler future have not been considered

The Deniers, By Lawrence Solomon,

"Several renowned scientists have been predicting for some time that the world could enter a period of cooling right around now, with consequences that could be dire. “The next little ice age would be much worse than the previous one and much more harmful than anything warming may do,” believes Dr. Chapman. “There are many more people now and we have become dependent on a few temperate agricultural areas, especially in the U.S. and Canada. Global warming would increase agricultural output, but global cooling will decrease it.'”

www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/020608_b_spotless.htm

www.youtube.com/watch?v=baVbbX4HLe4&amp